Factors associated with door-in-door-out times in large vessel occlusion stroke patients undergoing endovascular therapy.

INTRODUCTION: In the management of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS), patients are frequently evaluated first at a non-endovascular stroke center and later transferred to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) for endovascular treatment (EVT). The door-in-door-out time (DIDO) is frequently used as a benchmark for transferring hospitals though there is no universally accepted nor evidenced-based DIDO time. The goal of this study was to identify factors affecting DIDO times in LVOS patients who ultimately underwent EVT. METHODS: The Optimizing Prehospital Use of Stroke Systems of Care-Reacting to Changing Paradigms (OPUS-REACH) registry is comprised of all LVOS patients who underwent EVT at one of nine endovascular centers in the Northeast United States between 2015 and 2020. We queried the registry for all patients who were transferred from a non-ESC to one of the nine ESCs for EVT. Univariate analysis was performed using t-tests to obtain a p value. A priori, we defined a p value of <0.05 as significant. Multiple logistic regression was conducted to determine the association of variables to estimate an odds ratio. RESULTS: 511 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean DIDO times for all patients was 137.8 min. Vascular imaging and treatment at a non-certified stroke center were associated with longer DIDO times by 23 and 14 min, respectively. On multivariate analyses, the acquisition of vascular imaging was associated with 16 additional minutes spent at the non-ESC while presentation to a non-stroke certified hospital was associated with 20 additional minutes spent at the transferring hospital. The administration of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) was associated with 15 min less spent at the non-ESC. DISCUSSION: Vascular imaging and non-stroke certified stroke centers were associated with longer DIDO times. Non-ESCs should integrate vascular imaging into their workflow as feasible to reduce DIDO times. Further work examining other details regarding the transfer process such as transfer via ground or air, could help further identify opportunities to improve DIDO times.

First-Time Seizure Patients have High Rate of Abnormalities on Emergency Department Performed Brain Computed Tomography: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: First-time seizures comprise 15% to 35% of all seizure-related complaints in the emergency department (ED). Emergent neuroimaging of first-time seizure patients is recommended by both the American Academy of Neurology and American College of Emergency Physicians. However, most of these studies are over 10 years old and included both adults and children. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this investigation is to determine the rate of abnormal neuroimaging in adults with first-time seizures presenting to the ED during the current era. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients presenting to three urban EDs with a chief complaint of seizure over 18 months. Abnormal neuroimaging findings were defined a priori and were dichotomized into acute and subacute/chronic categories. RESULTS: Of the 2505 patients who presented with a seizure, 242 patients (9.7%) presented with a first-time seizure. The most common etiologies for first-time seizures were drug intoxication and drug withdrawal. Of those 242 patients, 29 (11.9%) patients had abnormal findings on brain computed tomography (CT). Brain CT demonstrated an acute finding in 13 (45%) patients and a subacute/chronic finding in 16 (55%) patients. The most common abnormality overall and the most common chronic finding was ischemic changes. The most common acute findings were traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and intracranial metastases. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 11.9% of first-time seizure patients presenting to the ED had abnormal findings on neuroimaging. Our findings support current recommendations to obtain emergent neuroimaging for adult patients with first-time seizures.

Timing and Outcomes After Coronary Angiography Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Without Signs of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

BACKGROUND: There is broad consensus that resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should receive immediate coronary angiography (CAG); however, factors that guide patient selection and optimal timing of CAG for post-arrest patients without evidence of STEMI remain incompletely described. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the timing of post-arrest CAG in actual practice, patient characteristics associated with decision to perform immediate vs. delayed CAG, and patient outcomes after CAG. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at seven U.S. academic hospitals. Resuscitated adult patients with OHCA were included if they presented between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019 and received CAG during hospitalization. Emergency medical services run sheets and hospital records were analyzed. Patients without evidence of STEMI were grouped and compared based on time from arrival to CAG performance into "early" (≤ 6 h) and "delayed" (> 6 h). RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-one patients were included. Median time to CAG was 18.6 h (interquartile range [IQR] 1.5-94.6 h). Early catheterization was performed on 94 patients (42.5%) and delayed catheterization was performed on 127 patients (57.5%). Patients in the early group were older (61 years [IQR 55-70 years] vs. 57 years [IQR 47-65] years) and more likely to be male (79.8% vs. 59.8%). Those in the early group were more likely to have clinically significant lesions (58.5% vs. 39.4%) and receive revascularization (41.5% vs. 19.7%). Patients were more likely to die in the early group (47.9% vs. 33.1%). Among survivors, there was no significant difference in neurologic recovery at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: OHCA patients without evidence of STEMI who received early CAG were older and more likely to be male. This group was more likely to have intervenable lesions and receive revascularization.

Evolution of endovascular stroke centers and disparities in access to stroke care in four Northeastern states: 2015-2019.

OBJECTIVES: Disparities exist throughout our healthcare system, especially related to access to care. Advanced stroke care for strokes is only available at selected endovascular centers (ESCs) in the United States. Although the number of ESCs increase each year, this does not necessarily reflect increased access to care. Here, we look at the evolution of ESC in four states and disparities in access to advanced stroke care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study of access to ESCs in four Northeastern states between 2015-2019. Using data from the United States Census Bureau and spatial analysis, we examined the proportion of the population with drive times of less than 60 minutes stratified by income, race/ethnicity, population density, and insurance. We also calculated the mean drive time for each of these socioeconomic groups from their census tracts to the nearest ESC. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, the number of ESCs increased from 15 to 48. The proportion of patients within a 60-minute drive of an ESC increased from 77% to 88%. However, only 66% of the least densely populated quartile lived within 60 min of an ESC. By income, access to ESCs in the wealthiest quartile was 96.6% compared to 83.7% in the lowest quartile. Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks had the largest proportions of populations within 60 minutes of an ESC while Non-Hispanic Whites had the smallest. CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the need to evaluate the placement of new ESCs to assure that these hospitals decrease disparities and increase access to advanced stroke care.

Optimizing Prehospital Stroke Systems of Care-Reacting to Changing Paradigms (OPUS-REACH): a pragmatic registry of large vessel occlusion stroke patients to create evidence-based stroke systems of care and eliminate disparities in access to stroke care.

BACKGROUND: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are best treated with rapid endovascular therapy (EVT). There are two routes that LVO stroke patients can take to EVT therapy when transported by EMS: primary transport (ambulance transports directly to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) or secondary transport (EMS transports to a non-ESC then transfers for EVT). There is no clear evidence which path to care results in better functional outcomes for LVO stroke patients. To find this answer, an analysis of a large, real-world population of LVO stroke patients must be performed. METHODS: A pragmatic registry of LVO stroke patients from nine health systems across the United States. The nine health systems span urban and rural populations as well as the spectrum of socioeconomic statuses. We will use univariate and multivariate analysis to explore the relationships between type of EMS transport, socioeconomic factors, and LVO stroke outcomes. We will use geographic information systems and spatial analysis to examine the complex movements of patients in time and space. To detect an 8% difference between groups, with a 3:1 patient ratio of primary to secondary transports, 95% confidence and 80% power, we will need approximately 1600 patients. The primary outcome is the patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 at 90 days. Subgroup analyses include patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis and duration of stroke systems. Secondary analyses include socioeconomic factors associated with poor outcomes after LVO stroke. DISCUSSION: Using the data obtained from the OPUS-REACH registry, we will develop evidence based algorithms for prehospital transport of LVO stroke patients. Unlike prior research, the OPUS-REACH registry contains patient-level data spanning from EMS dispatch to ninety day functional outcomes. We expect that we will find modifiable factors and socioeconomic disparities associated with poor outcomes in LVO stroke. OPUS-REACH with its breadth of locations, detailed patient records, and multidisciplinary researchers will design the optimal prehospital stroke system of care for LVO stroke patients.

The LIMIT-NI clinical decision instrument reduces neuroimaging compared to unstructured clinician judgement in recurrent seizure patients.

OBJECTIVE: The LIMIT clinical decision instrument (CDI) was published in 2021 to safely reduce neuroimaging in patients with recurrent seizures. The LIMIT CDI had a sensitivity of 90%, negative predictive value of >99.9%, and reduced neuroimaging by 13.3%. However, the design of the original LIMIT CDI made it cumbersome to use. The goal of this study was to validate the streamlined LIMIT-NeuroImaging (LIMIT-NI) CDI and compare its performance to the original LIMIT CDI. METHODS: This was an observational study of patients presenting to three emergency departments with recurrent seizures. The LIMIT-NI CDI was applied to all patients. We calculated the test characteristics of the LIMIT-NI CDI and compared it to unstructured clinical judgement. RESULTS: 3401 patients were screened, and 2125 patients were included in the final analysis. 16 patients (0.75%) had positive CTs; Both the LIMIT-NI CDI and clinician judgement identified all 16 patients with a sensitivity of 100.0% and a negative predictive value of 100.0%. Using unstructured clinical judgement, emergency providers ordered 835 brain CTs, while only 499 brain CTs would have been ordered using the CDI, a reduction of 15.8% (relative reduction 40.2%). CONCLUSION: The LIMIT-NI CDI demonstrated greater ease of application and improved test characteristics compared to the original LIMIT CDI. Compared to unstructured clinician judgement, the LIMIT-NI CDI reduced neuroimaging by 15.8% (relative reduction 40.2%) in recurrent seizure patients. The LIMIT-NI CDI can be used by physicians along with clinical judgement to reduce neuroimaging in the recurrent seizure patient.

The LIMIT clinical decision instrument reduces neuroimaging compared to unstructured clinician judgement in recurrent seizures.

INTRODUCTION: Given the many causes of seizures, emergency physicians often utilize brain computed tomography (CT) to evaluate for intracranial pathology. Previously, we have validated the LIMIT (Let's Image Malignancy, Intracranial Hemorrhage, and Trauma) clinical decision instrument (CDI) study to determine which patients with recurrent seizures require emergent neuroimaging. The LIMIT CDI had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.9%. Here, we seek to compare the LIMIT CDI to unstructured physician judgement. METHODS: This was an observational study of patients who presented with a complaint of seizure. A research assistant reviewed the electronic medical record (EMR) for each patient and applied the LIMIT CDI. Brain CT was used as a proxy for physician judgement. If no brain CT was ordered and the patient was discharged from the emergency department (ED), the EMR was searched to determine whether patient had any medical visits within one year of the index visit. If the patient had no new neurological findings on follow up or abnormalities on follow up neuroimaging, this was considered a patient who did not require a brain CT in the ED. Patients who did not have a CT on their ED visit and had no follow up visits were excluded. RESULTS: 1739 patients were screened and 1108 patients were in the final analysis. 24 patients who did not have a brain CT and no follow up visits were excluded. 10 patients (0.9%) had positive CTs. 9/10 of the patients were identified by the CDI resulting in a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 81.1% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 99.9%, and a negative likelihood ratio (LR) of 0.12. Clinician judgement identified all 10 patients with a positive brain CT for a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 67.8%, and a NPV and negative LR of 100% and 0, respectively. Using unstructured clinical judgement, EPs ordered 364 brain CTs while only 217 brain CTs would have been ordered using the CDI, a reduction of 13.3%. DISCUSSION: When compared to unstructured physician judgement, the LIMIT CDI would have reduced brain CT usage by more than 13%. Although the LIMIT CDI needs to be validated in a larger set of patients, it performed better than unstructured physician judgement for evaluating need for emergent neuroimaging after recurrent seizures.

Upgrades to intensive care: The effects of COVID-19 on decision-making in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: The initial surge of critically ill patients in the COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted processes at acute care hospitals. This study examines the frequency and causes for patients upgraded to intensive care unit (ICU) level care following admission from the emergency department (ED) to non-critical care units. METHODS: The number of ICU upgrades per month was determined, including the percentage of upgrades noted to have non-concordant diagnoses. Charts with non-concordant diagnoses were examined in detail as to the ED medical decision-making, clinical circumstances surrounding the upgrade, and presence of a diagnosis of COVID-19. For each case, a cognitive bias was assigned. RESULTS: The percentage of upgraded cases with non-concordant diagnoses increased from a baseline range of 14-20% to 41.3%. The majority of upgrades were due to premature closure (72.2%), anchoring (61.1%), and confirmation bias (55.6%). CONCLUSION: Consistent with the behavioral literature, this suggests that stressful ambient conditions affect cognitive reasoning processes.

Impact of a shelter-in-place order during the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of opioid overdoses.

INTRODUCTION: Since the beginning of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States, there have been concerns about the potential impact of the pandemic on persons with opioid use disorder. Shelter-in-place (SIP) orders, which aimed to reduce the spread and scope of the virus, likely also impacted this patient population. This study aims to assess the role of the COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of opioid overdose before and after a SIP order. METHODS: A retrospective review of the incidence of opioid overdoses in an urban three-hospital system was conducted. Comparisons were made between the first 100 days of a city-wide SIP order during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 100 days during the COVID-19 pandemic preceding the SIP order (Pre-SIP). Differences in observed incidence and expected incidence during the SIP period were evaluated using a Fisher's Exact test. RESULTS: Total patient visits decreased 22% from 46,078 during the Pre-SIP period to 35,971 during the SIP period. A total of 1551 opioid overdoses were evaluated during the SIP period, compared to 1665 opioid overdoses during the Pre-SIP period, consistent with a 6.8% decline. A Fisher's Exact Test demonstrated a p < 0.0001, with a corresponding Odds Ratio of 1.20 with a 95% confidence interval (1.12;1.29). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated SIP order were associated with a statistically and clinically significant increase in the proportion of opioid overdoses in relation to the overall change in total ED visits.

Evaluating the utility of Rapid Response EEG in emergency care.

BACKGROUND: Timely management of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is critical to improving patient outcomes. However, NCSE can only be confirmed using electroencephalography (EEG), which is either significantly delayed or entirely unavailable in emergency departments (EDs). We piloted the use of a new bedside EEG device, Rapid Response EEG (Rapid-EEG, Ceribell), in the ED and evaluated its impact on seizure management when used by emergency physicians. METHODS: Patients who underwent Rapid-EEG to rule out NCSE were prospectively enrolled in a pilot project conducted at two ED sites (an academic hospital and a community hospital). Physicians were surveyed on the perceived impact of the device on seizure treatment and patient disposition, and we calculated physicians' sensitivity and specificity (with 95% CI) for diagnosing NCSE using Rapid-EEG's Brain Stethoscope function. RESULTS: Of the 38 patients enrolled, the one patient with NCSE was successfully diagnosed and treated within minutes of evaluation. Physicians reported that Rapid-EEG changed clinical management for 20 patients (53%, 95% CI 37% to 68%), primarily by ruling out seizures and avoiding antiseizure treatment escalation, and expedited disposition for 8 patients (21%, 95% CI 11% to 36%). At the community site, physicians diagnosed seizures by their sound using Brain Stethoscope with 100% sensitivity (95% CI 5% to 100%) and 92% specificity (95% CI 62% to 100%). CONCLUSION: Rapid-EEG was successfully deployed by emergency physicians at academic and community hospitals, and the device changed management in a majority of cases. Widespread adoption of Rapid-EEG may lead to earlier diagnosis of NCSE, reduced unnecessary treatment and expedited disposition of seizure mimics.

Derivation of a clinical decision instrument to identify patients with status epilepticus who require emergent brain CT.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the value of CT brain imaging in adults with first-time seizures, but there are no recommendations regarding emergent brain CTs in persons with an established seizure disorders. Our study aimed to derive a clinical decision instrument (CDI) to determine which patients with status epilepticus (SE) require emergent brain imaging. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who presented to our emergency department with SE between 2010 and 2018. Patients with first-time seizures were excluded. A priori, we defined high risk criteria for emergent imaging as well as positive findings on brain CT. High risk criteria included known malignancy, trauma, and immunosuppression. Positive CT scans included findings such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and mass. RESULTS: We identified 214 patients who met inclusion criteria Of the 181 patients without high risk criteria, 3% had positive CT scans. Of the 33 patients with high risk criteria, 10% had positive CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for our initial CDI were 38%, 85%, 9%, and 97%. Adding the criterion of prior ICH would have lowered our miss rate to 0.6%. Modifying our CDI to 1) History of ICH, 2) Malignancy, 3) Immunosuppression, and 4) Trauma would result in a CDI with sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 87.5%, 87.4%, 21.2%, and 99.5%. CONCLUSIONS: By using four criteria to identify high risk patients, we can defer CT scanning in the vast majority of patients with SE and known seizure disorders. This CDI should be prospectively validated before adoption.

A Case of Acute Traumatic Lumbar Paraspinal Compartment Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Compartment syndrome is a life-threatening complication of traumatic injury, most commonly, direct trauma. Back pain is a common cause of visits to the emergency department (ED) and often is treated without imaging or diagnostic testing. Lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome is a rare cause of acute back pain. CASE REPORT: A 43-year-old woman presented to the ED after direct trauma to the lower back. Laboratory studies revealed rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury, with examination findings and imaging consistent with lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome. She was taken to the operating room for emergent fasciotomy. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: It is the job of the emergency physician to identify the red flags in history and physical examination that warrant further diagnostic testing. Early diagnosis and surgical consultation is the key in avoiding morbidity and achieving good outcomes in all forms of compartment syndrome.

A Shorter Door-In-Door-Out Time Is Associated with Improved Outcome in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke.

Introduction: Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) significantly improves outcomes in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). When a patient with a LVOS arrives at a hospital that does not perform EVT, emergent transfer to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) is required. Our objective was to determine the association between door-in-door-out time (DIDO) and 90-day outcomes in patients undergoing EVT. Methods: We conducted an analysis of the Optimizing Prehospital Stroke Systems of Care-Reacting to Changing Paradigms (OPUS-REACH) registry of 2,400 LVOS patients treated at nine ESCs in the United States. We examined the association between DIDO times and 90-day outcomes as measured by the modified Rankin scale. Results: A total of 435 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean DIDO time for patients with good outcomes was 17 minute shorter than patients with poor outcomes (122 minutes [min] vs 139 min, P = 0.04). Absolute DIDO cutoff times of ≤60 min, ≤90 min, or ≤120 min were not associated with improved functional outcomes (46.4 vs 32.3%, P = 0.12; 38.6 vs 30.6%, P = 0.10; and 36.4 vs 28.9%, P = 0.10, respectively). This held true for patients with hyperacute strokes of less than four-hour onset. Lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (11.9 vs 18.2, P = <.001) and younger age (62.5 vs 74.9 years (P < .001) were associated with improved outcomes. On multiple regression analysis, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-2.02) and baseline NIHSS score (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.42-1.98) were associated with improved outcomes while DIDO time was not associated with better outcome (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.30). Conclusion: Although the DIDO time was shorter for patients with a good outcome, this was non-significant in multiple regression analysis. Receipt of intravenous thrombolysis and time to EVT were not associated with better outcomes, while male gender, lower age, arrival by private vehicle, and lower NIHSS score portended better outcomes. No absolute DIDO-time cutoff or modifiable factor was associated with improved outcomes for LVOS. This study underscores the need to streamline DIDO times but not to set an artificial DIDO time benchmark to meet.

Delay in hospital presentation is the main reason large vessel occlusion stroke patients do not receive intravenous thrombolysi.

Objectives: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT) are the mainstays of treatment for large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). Prior studies have examined why patients have not received IVT, the most cited reasons being last-known-well (LKW) to hospital arrival of >4.5 hours and minor/resolving stroke symptoms. Given that LVOS patients typically present moderate-to-severe neurologic deficits, these patients should be easier to identify and treat than patients with minor strokes. This investigation explores why IVT was not administered to a cohort of LVOS patients who underwent EVT. Methods: This is an analysis of the Optimizing the Use of Prehospital Stroke Systems of Care (OPUS-REACH) registry, which contains patients from 9 endovascular centers who underwent EVT between 2015 and 2020. The exposure of interest was the receipt of intravenous thrombolysis. Descriptive summary statistics are presented as means and SDs for continuous variables and as frequencies with percentages for categorical variables. Two-sample t tests were used to compare continuous variables and the chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between those who received IVT and those who did not receive EVT. Results: Two thousand forty-three patients were included and 60% did not receive IVT. The most common reason for withholding IVT was LKW to arrival of >4.5 (57.2%). The second most common contraindication was oral anticoagulation (15.5%). On multivariable analysis, 2 factors were associated with not receiving IVT: increasing age (odds ratio [OR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.93) and increasing time from LKW-to hospital arrival (OR 0.45 95% CI 0.46-0.49). Conclusion: Like prior studies, the most frequent reason for exclusion from IVT was a LKW to hospital presentation of >4.5 hours; the second reason was anticoagulation. Efforts must be made to increase awareness of the time-sensitive nature of IVT and evaluate the safety of IVT in patients on oral anticoagulants.

A simple method of maintaining chilled saline in the prehospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: Mild therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to improve neurologic outcomes after sudden cardiac arrest. Therapeutic hypothermia should be started as soon as return of spontaneous circulation occurs. However, saline is difficult to keep chilled in the prehospital environment. We sought to determine whether a cooler and ice packs could keep saline cold under prehospital conditions. METHODS: In phase 1 of the experiment, two 1000-mL bags of prechilled 0.9% normal saline were placed in a cooler with 3 ice packs. An additional bag of 1000-mL 0.9% normal saline remained outside the cooler as a control. Over 9 consecutive days, we measured the ambient air temperature and the temperature of each bag of saline every 4 hours. In phase 2 of the experiment, the cooler was kept sealed, and the temperature of the saline was measured after 24 hours. RESULTS: The mean temperatures over 24 hours ranged as follows: ambient temperature, 24°C to 27.2°C; bottom bag, 0.6°C to 3.5°C; top bag, 1.4°C to 5.7°C; and control bag, 9.8°C to 26.8°C. A t test was used to compare the chilled saline against the control bag. Statistical significance (P < .05) was achieved at all times. In phase 2 of the experiment, after 24 hours, 100% of the bottom bags and 93% of the top bags were less than 6°C. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that saline can be kept chilled in ambulances for 24 hours using ice packs and coolers. The estimated cost is less than $50.00 per ambulance. Using coolers and ice packs is an inexpensive way for emergency medical service agencies to initiate prehospital hypothermia.

A simple three-step dispatch rule may reduce lights and sirens responses to motor vehicle crashes.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients involved in motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are not seriously injured. However, dispatch protocols require an ambulance be sent with lights and sirens (L&S) to the vast majority of MVCs. L&S have been shown to reduce response times minimally. The rate of injuries among prehospital workers is nearly 15 times higher among ambulances operating with L&S than those without. OBJECTIVE: To derive a dispatch rule to reduce the need for L&S response by using MVC characteristics that could easily be described by a 9-1-1 caller. The US Centers for Disease Control Field Triage Guidelines were used as the standard for requiring L&S response; it was assumed that if a patient did not require transport to a trauma centre, he/she did not need an L&S response. METHODS: Data were extracted from prehospital patient care reports (PCRs) of patients transported by ambulance to a level I trauma centre between July 2007 and June 2008 with injuries sustained in MVCs. Patients with completed prehospital PCRs and hospital charts were included in the study. Five MVC characteristics were extracted that could easily be identified by a 9-1-1 caller. Using various permutations of these MVC characteristics, a dispatch rule was developed to determine when an ambulance should respond to an MVC without L&S. The sensitivity and specificity of this dispatch rule were calculated for both patients who met trauma centre triage criteria, and those who used trauma centre resources. RESULTS: 509 patients were included in the analysis. The following dispatch rule was developed for an ambulance response without L&S to a MVC: (1) the MVC does not occur on an interstate/highway, (2) and the MVC involves more than one car. AND (3) all patients are ambulatory. This dispatch rule was 95.9% sensitive and 33.5% specific for patients who met trauma centre criteria, and 97.7% sensitive and 32.5% specific for patients who required trauma centre resources. The study was limited by the large number of patients for whom prehospital PCRs were not available. CONCLUSIONS: A simple three-step dispatch rule for MVCs can safely reduce L&S responses by one-third, as judged by need for transport to a trauma centre or use of trauma centre resources. Prospective validation is needed.

Clinical factors associated with significant coronary lesions following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

OBJECTIVES: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) afflicts >350,000 people annually in the United States. While postarrest coronary angiography (CAG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with improved survival in observational cohorts, substantial uncertainty exists regarding patient selection for postarrest CAG. We tested the hypothesis that symptoms consistent with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including chest discomfort, prior to OHCAs are associated with significant coronary lesions identified on postarrest CAG. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study among eight regional hospitals. Adult patients who experienced atraumatic OHCA with successful initial resuscitation and subsequent CAG between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. We collected data on prehospital documentation of potential ACS symptoms prior to OHCA as well as clinical factors readily available during postarrest care. The primary outcome in multivariable regression modeling was the presence of significant coronary lesions (defined as >50% stenosis of left main or >75% stenosis of other coronary arteries). RESULTS: Four-hundred patients were included. Median (interquartile range) age was 59 (51-69) years; 31% were female. At least one significant stenosis was found in 62%, of whom 71% received PCI. Clinical factors independently associated with a significant lesion included a history of myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 6.5, [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.3 to 32.4], p = 0.02), prearrest chest discomfort (aOR = 4.8 [95% CI = 2.1 to 11.8], p ≤ 0.001), ST-segment elevations (aOR = 3.2 [95% CI = 1.7 to 6.3], p < 0.001), and an initial shockable rhythm (aOR = 1.9 [95% CI = 1.0 to 3.4], p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among survivors of OHCA receiving CAG, history of prearrest chest discomfort was significantly and independently associated with significant coronary artery lesions on postarrest CAG. This suggests that we may be able to use prearrest symptoms to better risk stratify patients following OHCA to decide who will benefit from invasive angiography.

Motor vehicle intrusion alone does not predict trauma center admission or use of trauma center resources.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published its Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients in 2009. These CDC guidelines define criteria for the triage of trauma patients to trauma centers, and include physiologic, anatomic, and high-risk mechanism-of-injury criteria. One of the mechanism criteria used for motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) is intrusion >12 inches at the occupant site or >18 inches at any site. Objective. We hypothesized that motor vehicle intrusion, as the sole criterion for transport to a trauma center, is neither sensitive nor specific for predicting which patients will utilize trauma center resources. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of a cohort of MVC victims transported to a single trauma center. The authors extracted MVC characteristics, patient demographics, and final diagnoses from emergency medical services (EMS) and emergency department (ED) charts. Two outcomes were examined: admission to the trauma center for a traumatic injury and use of trauma center resources, defined as in-hospital death, admission to an intensive care unit, operative intervention of any type, spinal injury, or intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, 608 patients met the inclusion criteria in our study; 36 patients met the trauma center triage criteria based solely on intrusion. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of intrusion were 38.9%, 92.8%, and 25.5%, respectively, for trauma center admission, and 58.3%, 91.9%, and 12.7%, respectively, for trauma center resource utilization. We conducted one post hoc adjustment to modify intrusion to entrapment. This change greatly increased the PPV of the CDC guidelines for both trauma center admissions and trauma center utilization, without any reduction in sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Motor vehicle intrusion alone is a poor predictor of the need for trauma center admission or trauma center resource utilization. A modest change to the CDC guidelines from intrusion to entrapment may reduce overtriage while maintaining a high sensitivity for serious injury.