Assessing trauma and related distress in refugee youth and their caregivers: should we be concerned about iatrogenic effects?

Assessment of potentially traumatic events and related psychological symptoms in refugee youth is common in epidemiological and intervention research. The objective of this study is to characterize reactions to assessments of trauma exposure and psychological symptoms, including traumatic stress, in refugee youth and their caregivers. Eighty-eight Somali youth and their caregivers participated in a screening and baseline interview for a psychological intervention in three refugee camps in Ethiopia. Participants were asked about their levels of distress prior to, immediately after, and approximately two weeks after completing the interview. Other quantitative and qualitative questions inquired about specific reactions to interview questions and procedures. Children and caregivers became increasingly relaxed over the course of the interview, on average. Few children (5.3%) or caregivers (6.5%) who reported being relaxed at the beginning of the interview became upset by the end of the interview. Some children and caregivers reported that certain assessment questions were upsetting and that feeling upset interfered with their activities. Despite some participants reporting persistent negative reactions, most reported liking and benefitting from the interview. While the majority of refugee youth and their caregivers reported positive experiences associated with completing trauma-related assessments, some reported negative reactions. Researchers and practitioners must consider the necessity, risks, and benefits of including questions about potentially traumatic events and related symptoms that are particularly upsetting in screening, survey research, and clinical assessment. When included, it is important that researchers and practitioners monitor negative reactions to these assessments and connect participants who become distressed with appropriate services.

The importance of establishing reliability and validity of assessment instruments for mental health problems: An example from Somali children and adolescents living in three refugee camps in Ethiopia.

Assessing mental health problems cross-culturally for children exposed to war and violence presents a number of unique challenges. One of the most important issues is the lack of validated symptom measures to assess these problems. The present study sought to evaluate the psychometric properties of two measures to assess mental health problems: the Achenbach Youth Self-Report and the Child Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale. We conducted a validity study in three refugee camps in Eastern Ethiopia in the outskirts of Jijiga, the capital of the Somali region. A total of 147 child and caregiver pairs were assessed, and scores obtained were submitted to rigorous psychometric evaluation. Excellent internal consistency reliability was obtained for symptom measures for children and their caregivers. Validation of study instruments based on local case definitions was obtained for the caregivers but not consistently for the children. Sensitivity and specificity of study measures were generally low, indicating that these scales would not perform adequately as screening instruments. Combined test-retest and inter-rater reliability was low for all scales. This study illustrates the need for validation and testing of existing measures cross-culturally. Methodological implications for future cross-cultural research studies in low- and middle-income countries are discussed.