Nutrition and food literacy among young Canadian adults living with type 1 diabetes.

AIM: Nutrition and food literacy encompasses knowledge, skills and confidence to prepare healthy meals. This project aimed to assess and compare the proportion of young Canadian adults (18-29 years old) living with type 1 diabetes and without diabetes (controls) who demonstrated adequate nutritional health literacy. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved participants completing an online survey that included questions on socio-economic status, nutrition knowledge, confidence and skills in meal preparation and the Short Food Literacy Questionnaire (SFLQ). Proportion of participants with adequate SFLQ score (i.e. ≥34/52) was compared between the groups (two-sample t-test). RESULTS: Among the 236 people living with type 1 diabetes and 191 controls (81.5% women), mean age was 24 ± 3 years for people living with type 1 diabetes and 22 ± 3 years for controls (p < 0.001). More people living with type 1 diabetes reported adequate SFLQ score (people living with type 1 diabetes 88.0% vs. Controls 68.0%; p < 0.001). Similarly, majority of people living with type 1 diabetes prepared their own meals compared to the controls (74.5% vs. 47.6%; p < 0.001). Enhanced SFLQ score was associated with higher cooking skills (p = 0.02) and confidence (p < 0.01) in preparing healthy meals. CONCLUSIONS: Living with type 1 diabetes was associated with greater SFLQ scores among young Canadian adults. Having the independence, the confidence and skills in meal preparation were contributing factors.

Understanding Self-Guided Web-Based Educational Interventions for Patients With Chronic Health Conditions: Systematic Review of Intervention Features and Adherence.

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases contribute to 71% of deaths worldwide every year, and an estimated 15 million people between the ages of 30 and 69 years die mainly because of cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, or diabetes. Web-based educational interventions may facilitate disease management. These are also considered to be a flexible and low-cost method to deliver tailored information to patients. Previous studies concluded that the implementation of different features and the degree of adherence to the intervention are key factors in determining the success of the intervention. However, limited research has been conducted to understand the acceptability of specific features and user adherence to self-guided web interventions. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to understand how web-based intervention features are evaluated, to investigate their acceptability, and to describe how adherence to web-based self-guided interventions is defined and measured. METHODS: Studies published on self-guided web-based educational interventions for people (≥14 years old) with chronic health conditions published between January 2005 and June 2020 were reviewed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) Statement protocol. The search was performed using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE (Excerpta Medica dataBASE) databases; the reference lists of the selected articles were also reviewed. The comparison of the interventions and analysis of the features were based on the published content from the selected articles. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included. Seven principal features were identified, with goal setting, self-monitoring, and feedback being the most frequently used. The acceptability of the features was measured based on the comments collected from users, their association with clinical outcomes, or device adherence. The use of quizzes was positively reported by participants. Self-monitoring, goal setting, feedback, and discussion forums yielded mixed results. The negative acceptability was related to the choice of the discussion topic, lack of face-to-face contact, and technical issues. This review shows that the evaluation of adherence to educational interventions was inconsistent among the studies, limiting comparisons. A clear definition of adherence to an intervention is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited information was available, it appears that features related to interaction and personalization are important for improving clinical outcomes and users' experience. When designing web-based interventions, the selection of features should be based on the targeted population's needs, the balance between positive and negative impacts of having human involvement in the intervention, and the reduction of technical barriers. There is a lack of consensus on the method of evaluating adherence to an intervention. Both investigations of the acceptability features and adherence should be considered when designing and evaluating web-based interventions. A proof-of-concept or pilot study would be useful for establishing the required level of engagement needed to define adherence.