Automatic opportunistic osteoporosis screening in routine CT: improved prediction of patients with prevalent vertebral fractures compared to DXA.

OBJECTIVES: To compare spinal bone measures derived from automatic and manual assessment in routine CT with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their association with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures using our fully automated framework ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ) to assess various bone measures in clinical CT. METHODS: We included 192 patients (141 women, 51 men; age 70.2 ± 9.7 years) who had lumbar DXA and CT available (within 1 year). Automatic assessment of spinal bone measures in CT included segmentation of vertebrae using a convolutional neural network (CNN), reduction to the vertebral body, and extraction of bone mineral content (BMC), trabecular and integral volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and CT-based areal BMD (aBMD) using asynchronous calibration. Moreover, trabecular bone was manually sampled (manual vBMD). RESULTS: A total of 148 patients (77%) had vertebral fractures and significantly lower values in all bone measures compared to patients without fractures (p ≤ 0.001). Except for BMC, all CT-based measures performed significantly better as predictors for vertebral fractures compared to DXA (e.g., AUC = 0.885 for trabecular vBMD and AUC = 0.86 for integral vBMD vs. AUC = 0.668 for DXA aBMD, respectively; both p < 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted associations with fracture status were strongest for manual vBMD (OR = 7.3, [95%] CI 3.8-14.3) followed by automatically assessed trabecular vBMD (OR = 6.9, CI 3.5-13.4) and integral vBMD (OR = 4.3, CI 2.5-7.6). Diagnostic cutoffs of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm3) or low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm3) had sensitivity (84%/41%) and specificity (78%/95%) similar to trabecular vBMD. CONCLUSIONS: Fully automatic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of the spine is feasible. CT-based measures can better identify individuals with reduced bone mass who suffered from vertebral fractures than DXA. KEY POINTS: • Opportunistic osteoporosis screening of spinal bone measures derived from clinical routine CT is feasible in a fully automatic fashion using a deep learning-driven framework ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ). • Manually sampled volumetric BMD (vBMD) and automatically assessed trabecular and integral vBMD were the best predictors for prevalent vertebral fractures. • Except for bone mineral content, all CT-based bone measures performed significantly better than DXA-based measures. • We introduce diagnostic thresholds of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm3) and low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm3) with almost equal sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional thresholds of quantitative CT as proposed by the American College of Radiology (osteoporosis < 80 mg/cm3).

Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA.

OBJECTIVES: To compare opportunistic quantitative CT (QCT) with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their ability to predict incident vertebral fractures. METHODS: We included 84 patients aged 50 years and older, who had routine CT including the lumbar spine and DXA within a 12-month period (baseline) as well as follow-up imaging after at least 12 months or who sustained an incident vertebral fracture documented earlier. Patients with bone disorders aside from osteoporosis were excluded. Fracture status and trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively evaluated in baseline CT and fracture status was reassessed at follow-up. BMDQCT was assessed by opportunistic QCT with asynchronous calibration of multiple MDCT scanners. RESULTS: Sixteen patients had incident vertebral fractures showing lower mean BMDQCT than patients without fracture (p = 0.001). For the risk of incident vertebral fractures, the hazard ratio increased per SD in BMDQCT (4.07; 95% CI, 1.98-8.38), as well as after adjusting for age, sex, and prevalent fractures (2.54; 95% CI, 1.09-5.90). For DXA, a statistically significant increase in relative hazard per SD decrease in T-score was only observed after age and sex adjustment (1.57; 95% CI, 1.04-2.38). The predictability of incident vertebral fractures was good by BMDQCT (AUC = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89) and non-significant by T-scores. Asynchronously calibrated CT scanners showed good long-term stability (linear drift ranging from - 0.55 to - 2.29 HU per year). CONCLUSIONS: Opportunistic screening of mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients in CT performed for indications other than densitometry allows for better risk assessment of imminent vertebral fractures than dedicated DXA. KEY POINTS: • Opportunistic QCT predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures better than DXA reference standard in mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients. • More than every second patient (56%) with an incident vertebral fracture was misdiagnosed not having osteoporosis according to DXA. • Standard ACR QCT-cutoff values for osteoporosis (< 80 mg/cm 3 ) and osteopenia (≤ 120 mg/cm 3 ) can also be applied scanner independently in calibrated opportunistic QCT.

Far Lateral Lumbar Decompression Using the Far-Lateral Approach: Patient Reported Outcome is Associated with the Involved Vertebral Level and Coronal Segmental Angle.

STUDY DESIGN: Single centre retrospective study of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: Analyse factors associated with patient reported outcome after far lateral decompression surgery (FLDS) for lumbar nerve root compression using the far-lateral approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To date, no studies have investigated the influence of vertebral level, coronal segmental Cobb angle, and the nature of the compressive tissue (hard/soft) on patient reported outcome following FLDS. METHODS: Patients who had undergone FLDS between 2005 and 2020 were included. Coronal segmental angle (CSCA) was measured on preoperative, posteroanterior radiographs. Primary outcome measure was the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) score at 2 years' follow-up (2Y-FU). Patients who had undergone microsurgical decompression using a midline approach (MID) served as a comparator group. RESULTS: There were 148 FLDS and 463 MID patients. In both groups there was a significant improvement in COMI score from preoperative to 2Y-FU (P<0.0001), with greater improvement in patients treated at higher vertebral levels than in those treated at L5/S1 (P=0.014). Baseline COMI, ASA grade, BMI, and low back pain as the "chief complaint" all had a significant association with the 2-year COMI score. The nature of compressive tissue showed no association with COMI score at 2Y-FU. In the FLDS group, there was a statistically significant correlation between the preoperative CSCA and change in COMI score preoperatively to 2Y-FU (P<0.001). The association was retained in multiple regression analysis controlling for confounders. A one-degree increase in CSCA was associated with a 0.35-point worse COMI score at 2Y-FU (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Treatment of far lateral nerve root compression showed overall good patient reported outcome, but with less improvement with advanced coronal segmental angulation. Modified approaches and techniques might be preferable for the level L5/S1.

A Vertebral Segmentation Dataset with Fracture Grading.

Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.