Opioid Prescribing Practices After Isolated Pilon Fractures.

The purpose of our study was to identify the opioid-prescribing practices after operative treatment of isolated pilon fractures at a level 1 trauma center. Patients ≥ 18 years of age with an operatively treated isolated pilon fracture between 2005 and 2015 were identified. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were then calculated. Mean and standard deviations were calculated for patients without a history of opiate use and for patients with a history of opiate use within 1 year prior to injury. Data were obtained from the State Controlled Substance Monitoring Database. Seventy-two patients met our inclusion criteria; of these, 54% (39/72) were opiate exposed at the time of injury. Median MMEs prescribed were 2738 (range 375 to 12,360). Orthopedic providers prescribed 61% of all the MMEs (median 2010; range 113 to 6825), while nonorthopedic providers prescribed a median of 338 MMEs (range 0 to 10,080) (p < .05). Combined, patients with exposure 1 year before the injury received more MMEs (median 3600; range 840 to 12,360) than opiate-naive patients (median 2520; range 375 to 10,610) (p < .05). Twenty-eight (38.9%) patients continued using opiates for more than 6 months after their injury; 25% (7/28) were not previously exposed. There is great variability regarding the quantity of opiates being prescribed after isolated pilon fractures, and 39% of opiate prescriptions are coming from nonorthopedic prescribers. Opiate-exposed patients are more likely to be prescribed more opiates by orthopedists and outside physicians and for a longer duration. We believe that adequate pain control can be obtained by prescribing 40 pills of oxycodone 10 mg with a maximum of 1 additional refill. In cases in which a staged procedure is planned, an additional refill is expected (total of 3 refills).

Impact of type of surgery on deep venous thrombi and pulmonary emboli: a look at twenty seven thousand hip fracture patients.

PURPOSE: Deep venous thrombi (DVT) and pulmonary emboli (PE) are common complications in hip fracture patients. It is imperative that orthopaedists know the patient risk factors for DVT and PE, including if type of surgery plays a role. To this end, we used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database to identify significant risk factors. METHODS: From the 2006-2011 ACS NSQIP database, 27,441 patients with hip fractures were identified using a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code search. DVT and PE complications, type of surgery based on CPT code, patient demographics, medical comorbidities and operative factors were identified for each patient. Fisher's exact tests were used to (1) determine if rates of DVT and PE significantly differed based on type of surgery and (2) identify significant associations between patient factors and development of DVT/PE. These significant factors were then used as covariates in multivariable analysis to determine which risk factors predicted postoperative DVT/PE. RESULTS: Of the 27,441 hip fracture patients, 449 (1.6 %) developed DVT/PE. There was a significant difference in rates of DVT/PE based on surgery (p = 0.015): patients undergoing intramedullary nailing of inter-/peri-/subtrochanteric femoral fractures had the highest rates of DVT/PE (2.06 %). After multivariate analysis, renal failure and recent surgery were significant risk factors for DVT/PE. CONCLUSIONS: This study was the first to show through large, multicentre, prospective data that type of hip fracture surgery impacts rates of DVT/PE. We further identified two additional risk factors orthopaedists should be aware of. Knowing these risk factors will help in peri-operative planning to reduce complications.

What factors influence follow-up in orthopedic trauma surgery?

BACKGROUND: Among surgical patients, follow-up visits are essential for monitoring post-operative recovery and determining ongoing treatment plans. Non-adherence to clinic follow-up appointments has been associated with poorer outcomes in many different patient populations. We sought to identify factors associated with non-attendance at follow-up appointments for orthopedic trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review at a level I trauma center identified 2,165 patients who underwent orthopedic trauma surgery from 2008 to 2009. Demographic data including age, sex, race, tobacco use, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score, insurance status, distance from the hospital, and follow-up time were collected. Injury characteristics including fracture type, anatomic location of the operation, length of hospital stay, living situation and employment status were recorded. Attendance at the first scheduled follow-up visit was recorded. Multivariable log-binomial regression analyses were used with statistical significance maintained at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Of the 2,165 patients included in the analysis, 1,449 (66.9 %) attended their first scheduled post-operative clinic visit. 33.1 % (717) were not compliant with keeping their first clinic appointment after surgery. Patients who used tobacco, lived more than 100 miles from the clinic site, did not have private insurance, had an ASA score >2, or had a fracture of the hip or pelvis were significantly less likely to follow-up. Age, sex, and race were not significantly associated with failure to follow-up. DISCUSSION: Follow-up appointments are essential for preventing complications among orthopedic trauma patients. By identifying patients at risk of failure to follow-up, orthopedic surgeons can appropriately design and implement long-term treatment plans specifically targeted for high-risk patients.

Opiate Prescribing Practices After Common Isolated Lower Extremity Injuries.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed at identifying opiate prescribing practices, the number of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed by orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic providers in patients with operatively treated isolated lower extremity fractures, and provide opiate prescribing recommendations. METHODS: Patients older than 18 years with isolated lower extremity (unicondylar, bicondylar, tibial shaft, pilon, and ankle) fractures between 2005 and 2016 were identified. Prescribing information was obtained from the State Controlled Substance Monitoring Database. Descriptive statistics were calculated for each injury and plotted for MME use. Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for data analysis. To aid in clinical relevance, MMEs were converted to number of pills of oxycodone 10 mg (OC 10 mg). RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 45 years; 56% (192/341) were men. Forty-seven percent (159/341) were prescribed opiates before their injury. Orthopaedic providers prescribed more opiates to patients with pilon fractures compared with unicondylar (P = 0.010), tibial shaft (P < 0.001), and ankle (P < 0.001) fractures. Bicondylar plateau fracture patients also received more opiates when compared with unicondylar (P = 0.001), tibial shaft (P < 0.001), and ankle (P < 0.001) fractures. Nonorthopaedic providers prescribed more opiates to patients with pilon fractures when compared with unicondylar (P = 0.006), bicondylar (P < 0.001), tibial shaft (P < 0.001), and ankle fractures (P = 0.006). Differences between orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic MMEs prescribed are significantly different for each injury type (<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pilon or bicondylar tibial plateau fractures are currently being prescribed more opiates when compared with other isolated fractures. We have developed an opiate prescription guideline based on what is being prescribed by orthopaedic providers.

The risk of deep vein thrombosis in total joint patients compared to orthopaedic trauma patients: Need for new prevention guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The development of Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is a major concern following orthopaedic surgery. No study has yet to compare the rate and risk factors for DVT between total joint and orthopaedic trauma patients. To evaluate if DVT prophylaxis for trauma should differ from total joints, we explored the rate and risk factors for DVT between both cohorts. METHODS: Using a CPT code search from 2005 to 2013 in the ACS-NSQIP database, 150,657 orthopaedic total joint patients and 44,594 orthopaedic trauma patients were identified. DVT complications, patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and surgical characteristics were collected for each patient. A chi-squared test was used to compare the risk factors for DVT between orthopaedic trauma and total joint patients. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to adjust for comorbidities for each cohort. RESULTS: The rate of DVT diagnosis in the total joint population was 0.8% (N = 1186) and 0.98% (N = 432) in the orthopaedic trauma population (p = 0.57). After controlling for individual comorbidities, dyspnea, peripheral vascular disease, and renal failure were significant risk factors for DVT in total joint patients (p < 0.05), whereas age, ascites and steroid use were significant risk factors for DVT in orthopaedic trauma patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Historically, the risks for DVT in total joints have been emphasized, yet based on our results, the incidence of DVT is the same for orthopaedic trauma. However, the risk factors varied. It is therefore important to consider specialty-specific DVT prophylaxis for orthopaedic trauma patients in order to improve care and reduce postoperative complications.

Length-Preserving Intramedullary Femoral Fixation for Traumatic Leg Amputation.

CASE: We present the case of a twenty-one-year-old woman with a traumatic left leg amputation, substantial proximal skin degloving, and an ipsilateral femoral fracture treated with revision amputation distal to the fracture site and retrograde femoral nailing through the amputation site. CONCLUSION: A short retrograde femoral nail is a surgical option to fix a femoral shaft fracture proximal to a traumatic amputation in order to preserve limb length for effective prosthetic fit and ambulation.

Preoperative skeletal versus cutaneous traction for femoral shaft fractures treated within 24 hours.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of preoperative cutaneous traction versus skeletal traction in adults with diaphyseal femur fractures amenable to fixation within 24 hours. DESIGN: Randomized prospective trial. SETTING: Level I trauma center in a major metropolitan area. PATIENTS: Sixty-five patients with 66 femur fractures were prospectively enrolled and randomized to a traction group from July 2009 to July 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time of application for on call physicians/practitioners, pain relief after application of traction; time of reduction in the operating room theater, and evaluation of pain medication consumption before stabilization. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received cutaneous femoral traction, whereas 29 patients received skeletal traction. There was a significant reduction in time of application for the cutaneous traction (24.30 ± 24.74 minutes) compared with skeletal traction (57.10 ± 33.60 minutes) (P ≤ 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in visual analog scale (VAS) scores when compared with pretraction application pain assessment and posttraction pain assessment between the cutaneous and skeletal traction groups with a decrease in the VAS of (0.56 ± 3.73 and 0.54 ± 2.76), respectively (P = 0.99). There was no difference in pain medication requirements between groups (0.12 ± 0.17 mg/kg for cutaneous versus 0.09 ± 0.14 mg/kg for skeletal, P = 0.39). There was no significant difference in reduction time of the fracture (skin incision or opening reamer to guide wire passage) in the operating room between cutaneous traction versus skeletal traction (P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Use of cutaneous traction for diaphyseal femur fractures when compared with skeletal traction results in a statistically significant reduction in time of application to the on call practitioner with no complications or detrimental change in operative time and no difference in VAS pain scores or narcotic usage.