Disparities in Utilization of Ambulatory Cholecystectomy: Results From Three States.

BACKGROUND: Inpatient cholecystectomy is associated with higher cost and morbidity relative to ambulatory cholecystectomy, yet the latter may be underutilized by minority and underinsured patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of race, income, and insurance status on receipt of and outcomes following ambulatory cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of patients 18-89 undergoing cholecystectomy for benign indications in Florida, Iowa, and New York, 2011-2014 using administrative databases. The primary outcome of interest was odds of having ambulatory cholecystectomy; secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative complications, and 30-day unplanned admissions following ambulatory cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Among 321,335 cholecystectomies, 190,734 (59.4%) were ambulatory and 130,601 (40.6%) were inpatient. Adjusting for age, sex, insurance, income, residential location, and comorbidities, the odds of undergoing ambulatory versus inpatient cholecystectomy were significantly lower in black (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.73], P< 0.001) and Hispanic (aOR = 0.71, 95% CI [0.69, 0.72], P< 0.001) patients compared to white patients, and significantly lower in Medicare (aOR = 0.77, 95% CI [0.75, 0.80] P < 0.001), Medicaid (aOR = 0.56, 95% CI [0.54, 0.57], P< 0.001) and uninsured/self-pay (aOR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.27, 0.28], P< 0.001) patients relative to privately insured patients. Patients with Medicaid and those classified as self-pay/uninsured had higher odds of postoperative complications and unplanned admission as did patients with Medicare compared to privately insured individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic minorities and the underinsured have a higher likelihood of receiving inpatient as compared to ambulatory cholecystectomy. The higher incidence of postoperative complications in these patients may be associated with unequal access to ambulatory surgery.

Outcomes of emergency general surgery admissions in patients experiencing homelessness: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Housing status impacts outcomes after elective and emergent operations but has not been well studied in the emergency general surgery population. This study investigates the impact of housing status on complications and 30-day follow-up, emergency department visits, and readmissions after emergency general surgery admission. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study of adult patients admitted with an emergency general surgery diagnosis at an urban, safety net hospital from 2014 to 2021. Patients were matched 1 to 2 on the basis of age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, diagnosis, and operative status. The primary exposure was unhoused status. The primary outcome was in-hospital complications. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admission, extended length of stay, follow-up attendance, and emergency department visit or unplanned readmission within 30 days. Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to determine the association between housing status and the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: The study included 531 patients (177 unhoused, 354 housed). There were no significant differences in complications, intensive care unit admissions, or extended length of stay. Unhoused patients had lower odds of outpatient follow-up (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.85, P = .008) and higher odds of emergency department utilization (odds ratio, 2.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-4.14, P < .001) and readmission (odds ratio, 1.87; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.19, P = .02). CONCLUSION: Compared with housed patients, unhoused patients with emergency general surgery conditions have lower rates of outpatient follow-up and greater odds of using the emergency department and being readmitted within 30 days of discharge. This points to a need for dedicated posthospitalization care and creative methods of engaging with this population.

Exploring Rural-Urban Differences in the Receipt of Nonelective Cancer-specific Gastrointestinal Surgery Using a Multilevel Mixed-Effects Approach.

BACKGROUND: Rural communities constitute a populace marked by various social challenges influencing health outcomes. As such, nonelective surgeries for cancer may have a disproportionate impact on rural populations. We explored patient and county-level factors contributing to differences in the receipt of nonelective cancer-specific surgery between rural and urban residents. METHODS: This retrospective study included adult patients captured in the SEER-Medicare data between January 2008 and December 2015 with an incident stage I-IV cancer of the stomach, liver/intrahepatic bile duct, pancreas, gallbladder/other biliary origin, or small intestine who underwent a cancer-specific surgery. The primary outcome was nonelective cancer-directed surgery among rural versus urban residents. We conducted a multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression model to adjust for confounders while accounting for county-level clustering. RESULTS: The sample included 10,136 patients who underwent a surgical intervention; 2,941 (29%) were nonelective. The incidence of nonelective surgery was lower among rural compared tourban patients [351 (27%) and 2590(29%); p= 0.05]. There was no statistically significant difference in the unadjusted and adjusted odds of nonelective surgery between rural and urban residents [OR 0.88, 95% CI (0.76-1.03); p= 0.11] and [aOR 0.86, 95% CI (0.72-1.02); p= 0.080]. Additionally, high social vulnerability index counties or Black race was significantly associated with increase odds of nonelective surgery [aOR 1.33, 95% CI (1.07-1.65); p=0.009] and [aOR 1.49, 95% CI (1.26-1.77); p<0.0001], respectively. CONCLUSION: This study found no difference in the odds of receiving nonelective surgery for GI foregut cancers between rural and urban populations. However, Black race and high SVI were associated with higher odds of the receipt of nonelective surgery. Further research is warranted to explore if disparities in clinical outcomes exist despite the comparable likelihood of receiving nonelective surgery between rural and urban communities.

History repeats itself: Impact of mental illness on violent reinjury and hospital reencounters among female victims of interpersonal violence.

BACKGROUND: Violence-related reinjury impacts both patients and health care systems. Mental illness (MI) is prevalent among violently injured individuals. The relationship between preexisting MI and violent reinjury among women has not been fully characterized. Our objective was to determine if risk of hospital reencounter-violent reinjury and all-cause-was associated with preexisting MI at time of index injury among female victims of violence. METHODS: All females (15-100 + years) presenting to a level I trauma center with violent injury (2002-2019) surviving to discharge were included (N = 1,056). Exposure was presence of preexisting MI. The primary outcome was hospital reencounters for violent reinjury and all-cause within one year (through 2020). The secondary outcome was the development of a new MI within one year of index injury. Odds of reencounter and development of new MI for those with and without preexisting MI were compared with multivariable logistic regression, stratified for interaction when appropriate. RESULTS: There were 404 women (38%) with preexisting MI at time of index injury. Approximately 11% of patients with preexisting MI experienced violent reinjury compared to 5% of those without within 1 year ( p < 0.001). Specifically, those with MI in the absence of concomitant substance use had more than three times the odds of violent reinjury (adjusted Odds Ratio, 3.52 (1.57, 7.93); p = 0.002). Of those with preexisting MI, 64% had at least one reencounter for any reason compared to 46% of those without ( p < 0.001 ) . Odds of all-cause reencounter for those with preexisting MI were nearly twice of those without (adjusted Odds Ratio, 1.81 [1.36, 2.42]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Among female victims of violence, preexisting MI is associated with a significantly increased risk of hospital reencounter and violent reinjury within the first year after index injury. Recognition of this vulnerable population and improved efforts at addressing MI in trauma patients is critical to ongoing prevention efforts to reduce violent reinjury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Citizenship and Social Responsibility in Surgery: A Review.

Importance: Social determinants of health have been shown to be key drivers of disparities in access to surgical care and surgical outcomes. Though the concept of social responsibility has received growing attention in the medical field, little has been published contextualizing social responsibility in surgery. In this narrative review, we define social responsibility as it relates to surgery, explore the duty of surgeons to society, and provide examples of social factors associated with adverse surgical outcomes and how they can be mitigated. Observations: The concept of social responsibility in surgery has deep roots in medical codes of ethics and evolved alongside changing views on human rights and the role of social factors in disease. The ethical duty of surgeons to society is based on the ethical principles of benevolence and justice and is grounded within the framework of the social contract. Surgeons have a responsibility to understand how factors such as patient demographics, the social environment, clinician awareness, and the health care system are associated with inequitable patient outcomes. Through education, we can empower surgeons to advocate for their patients, address the causes and consequences of surgical disparities, and incorporate social responsibility into their daily practice. Conclusions and Relevance: One of the greatest challenges in the field of surgery is ensuring that surgical care is provided in an equitable and sustainable way. Surgeons have a duty to understand the factors that lead to health care disparities and use their knowledge, skills, and privileged position to address these issues at the individual and societal level.

Clinical diagnostic phenotypes in hospitalizations due to self-inflicted firearm injury.

BACKGROUND: . Hospitalized self-inflicted firearm injuries have not been extensively studied, particularly regarding clinical diagnoses at the index admission. The objective of this study was to discover the diagnostic phenotypes (DPs) or clusters of hospitalized self-inflicted firearm injuries. METHODS: . Using Nationwide Inpatient Sample data in the US from 1993 to 2014, we used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes to identify self-inflicted firearm injuries among those ≥18 years of age. The 25 most frequent diagnostic codes were used to compute a dissimilarity matrix and the optimal number of clusters. We used hierarchical clustering to identify the main DPs. RESULTS: . The overall cohort included 14072 hospitalizations, with self-inflicted firearm injuries occurring mainly in those between 16 to 45 years of age, black, with co-occurring tobacco and alcohol use, and mental illness. Out of the three identified DPs, DP1 was the largest (n=10,110), and included most common diagnoses similar to overall cohort, including major depressive disorders (27.7%), hypertension (16.8%), acute post hemorrhagic anemia (16.7%), tobacco (15.7%) and alcohol use (12.6%). DP2 (n=3,725) was not characterized by any of the top 25 ICD-9 diagnoses codes, and included children and peripartum women. DP3, the smallest phenotype (n=237), had high prevalence of depression similar to DP1, and defined by fewer fatal injuries of chest and abdomen. LIMITATIONS: . Claims data. CONCLUSIONS: . There were three distinct diagnostic phenotypes in hospitalizations due to self-inflicted firearm injuries. Further research is needed to determine how DPs can be used to tailor clinical care and prevention efforts.

Utilization of mental health services in pediatric patients surviving penetrating trauma resulting from interpersonal violence.

BACKGROUND: Violent trauma has lasting psychological impacts. Our institution's Community Violence Response Team (CVRT) offers mental health services to trauma victims. We characterized implementation and determined factors associated with utilization by pediatric survivors of interpersonal violence-related penetrating trauma. METHODS: Analysis included survivors (0-21 years) of violent penetrating injury at our institution (2011-2017). Injury and demographic data were collected. Nonparametric regression models determined factors associated with utilization. RESULTS: There was initial rapid uptake of CVRT (2011-2013) after which it plateaued, serving >80% of eligible patients (2017). White race and higher injury severity were associated with receipt and duration of services. In post-hoc analysis, race was found to be associated with continued treatment but not with initial consultation. CONCLUSION: Successful implementation required three years, aiding >80% of patients. CVRT is a blueprint to strengthen existing violence intervention programs. Efforts should be made to ensure that barriers to providing care, including those related to race, are overcome.

Association of Race, Health Insurance Status, and Household Income With Location and Outcomes of Ambulatory Surgery Among Adult Patients in 2 US States.

Importance: The receipt of surgery in freestanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) is often less costly compared with surgery in hospital-based outpatient departments. Although increasing numbers of surgical procedures are now being performed in freestanding ASCs, questions remain regarding the existence of disparities among patients receiving care at ASCs. Objective: To examine the association of patient race, health insurance status, and household income with the location (ASC vs hospital-based outpatient department) of ambulatory surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to perform a secondary analysis of patients who received ambulatory surgery in New York and Florida between 2011 and 2013. Patients aged 18 to 89 years who underwent 12 different types of ambulatory surgical procedures were included. Data were analyzed from December 2018 to June 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Receipt of surgery at a freestanding ASC and 30-day unplanned hospital visits after ambulatory surgery. Results: A total of 5.6 million patients in New York (57.4% female; 68.9% aged ≥50 years; and 62.5% White) and 7.5 million patients in Florida (57.3% female; 77.4% aged ≥50 years; 74.3% White) who received ambulatory surgery were included in the analysis. After adjusting for age, comorbidities, health insurance status, household income, location of surgery, and type of surgical procedure, the likelihood of receiving ambulatory surgery at a freestanding ASC was significantly lower among Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.81-0.83; P < .001) and Hispanic patients (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.77-0.79; P < .001) compared with White patients in New York. This likelihood was also lower among Black patients (aOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.65-0.66; P < .001) compared with White patients in Florida. Public health insurance coverage was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of receiving ambulatory surgery at freestanding ASCs in both New York and Florida, particularly among patients with Medicaid (in New York, aOR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.22-0.22; P < .001; in Florida, aOR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.40-0.41; P < .001) and Medicare (in New York, aOR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.46-0.46; P < .001; in Florida, aOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66-0.67; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Differences in the use of freestanding ASCs were found among Black patients and patients with public health insurance. Further exploration of the factors underlying these differences will be important to ensure that all populations have access to the increasing number of freestanding ASCs.

Evaluation of incidental adrenal masses at a tertiary referral and trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Incidental adrenal masses are those that are found on imaging performed for any nonadrenal evaluation. Published guidelines define accepted follow-up criteria for incidental adrenal masses; however, adherence to these guidelines and barriers to appropriate follow-up are not well understood. We aimed to describe practice patterns for the discovery, evaluation, and follow-up of incidental adrenal masses. METHODS: Medical records of patients with an incidental adrenal mass underwent retrospective review at a tertiary referral and level-1 trauma center, as well as regional ambulatory care locations. Individuals ≥18 years of age with an incidental adrenal mass identified during 2016 were included. Patterns of evaluation, follow-up, and associated adrenal diagnoses were determined. RESULTS: From a total of 19,171 cross-sectional imaging procedures (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), 244 patients with new incidental adrenal masses were identified. A majority (52%) were discovered as part of an evaluation in the emergency department. Of 153 patients with an identifiable primary care provider, approximately 75% had an in-network primary care provider, and 12 (7.8%) had both follow-up imaging and biochemical evaluation. Twenty-three percent of patients with an in-network primary care provider underwent an appropriate cross-sectional imaging procedure in follow-up compared to 29% for a non-network primary care provider (P = .54). Patients with a mass described with benign terminology were less likely to undergo follow-up imaging compared to those with indeterminate terminology (5% vs 37%, P < .001). Patients with imaging ordered as an outpatient were more likely to receive follow-up with imaging (22.8% outpatient vs 11.5% inpatient, P = .042). There was no difference between any groups regarding biochemical evaluation, which inappropriately was performed in only 15% of patients with an incidental adrenal mass. CONCLUSION: To optimize follow-up of incidental adrenal masses, efforts should be made to assure and prioritize inpatient/emergency department incidental findings and to communicate to the appropriate primary care provider the necessary next steps for evaluation. Further, efforts to increase biochemical testing should be pursued.

Surgery service learning in preclinical years improves medical student attitudes toward surgery, clinical confidence, and social determinants of health screening.

INTRODUCTION: Patient health literacy is paramount for optimal outcomes. The Service Learning Project (SLP) aims to merge the need for patient education with the desire of medical students for early clinical experience. METHODS: This pretest-posttest study examined the effect of the SLP on medical students. First-year students spent 8 h each month educating inpatients and screening for social determinants of health (SDH). Students completed a 30-question survey pre- and post-SLP, and longitudinally throughout medical school. We used t-tests to assess changes in attitudes towards surgery, clinical confidence, and SDH screening. RESULTS: Student self-perceived value on surgical teams increased significantly (2.49 vs 3.63 post-SLP, p < 0.001), as did their confidence interacting with patients (3.66-4.14, p = 0.002) and confidence assessing for SDH (3.13-4.75, p = 0.002). 100% of students continued to assess for SDH on clerkships. CONCLUSIONS: The SLP model improves medical students' skills and confidence working with patients and addressing SDH.

Implementation of a Novel Structured Social and Wellness Committee in a Surgical Residency Program: A Case Study.

This article provides a theoretical and practical rational for the implementation of an innovative and comprehensive social wellness program in a surgical residency program at a large safety net hospital on the East Coast of the United States. Using basic needs theory, we describe why it is particularly important for surgical residency programs to consider the residents sense of competence, autonomy, and belonging during residence. We describe how we have developed a comprehensive program to address our residents' (and residents' families) psychological needs for competence, autonomy, and belongingness.

Socially Responsible Surgery: Building Recognition and Coalition.

IMPORTANCE: Socially responsible surgery (SRS) integrates surgery and public health, providing a framework for research, advocacy, education, and clinical practice to address the social barriers of health that decrease surgical access and worsen surgical outcomes in underserved patient populations. These patients face disparities in both health and in health care, which can be effectively addressed by surgeons in collaboration with allied health professionals. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed the current state of surgical access and outcomes of underserved populations in American rural communities, American urban communities, and in low- and middle-income countries. EVIDENCE REVIEW: We searched PubMed using standardized search terms and reviewed the reference lists of highly relevant articles. We reviewed the reports of two recent global surgery commissions. CONCLUSION: There is an opportunity for scholarship in rural surgery, urban surgery, and global surgery to be unified under the concept of SRS. The burden of surgical disease and the challenges to management demonstrate that achieving optimal health outcomes requires more than excellent perioperative care. Surgeons can and should regularly address the social determinants of health experienced by their patients. Formalized research and training opportunities are needed to meet the growing enthusiasm among surgeons and trainees to develop their practice as socially responsible surgeons.