RESUMO
We report a rare case of paraneoplastic neurological syndrome with dual seropositivity of anti-aquaporin-4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in a 40 year-old woman with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. She received multiple lines of anti-neoplastic treatment, including immunotherapy with pembrolizumab, as well as cytotoxic chemotherapy. Paraneoplastic meningoencephalomyelitis developed 2 years after diagnosis of breast cancer and 1 year after discontinuation of immunotherapy with pembrolizumab. She first developed longitudinally extending transverse myelitis followed by left optic neuritis and meningoencephalitis with new enhancing lesions in the brain and spinal leptomeninges. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis during both episodes showed normal glucose and protein, and elevated white blood cell count. Cytology was negative for malignancy. Cerebrospinal fluid was positive for neuromyelitis optica immunoglobulin G antibody anti-aquaporin-4, and autoimmune myelopathy panel was positive for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody. The patient had significant clinical and radiographic improvement after completion of five cycles of plasmapheresis followed by intravenous immunoglobulin. She did not have recurrence of paraneoplastic syndrome with maintenance rituximab every 6 months and daily low-dose prednisone. She succumbed to progressive systemic metastatic disease 4.5 years after her breast cancer diagnosis. This case shows that these antibodies can occur concurrently and cause clinical features, such as both neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease, in a patient with a singular type of cancer. We highlight the importance of testing for paraneoplastic etiology in cancer patients with radiographic menigoencephalomyelitis or meningitis with atypical symptoms of meningeal carcinomatosis and/or cerebrospinal fluid profile negative for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis.
RESUMO
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in unprecedented restrictions on the general public and disturbances to the routines of hospitals worldwide. These restrictions are now being relaxed as the number of vaccinated individuals increases and as the rates of incidence and prevalence decrease; however, they left a lasting impact on healthcare systems that is still being felt today. This retrospective study evaluated the total number of canceled or missed outpatient clinic appointments in a Neurological Surgery department before and after peak COVID-19 restrictions and attempted to assess the impact of these disruptions on neurosurgical clinical attendance. We also attempted to compare our data with the data from another surgical subspecialty department. We evaluated 32,558 scheduled appointments at the Loyola University Medical Center Department of Neurological Surgery, as well as 139,435 scheduled appointments with the Department of Otolaryngology. Appointments before April 2020 were defined as pre-COVID, while appointments during or after April 2020 were defined as post-COVID. Here, we compare no-show and non-attendance rates (no-shows plus late-canceled appointments) within the respective time range. Overall, we observed that before COVID-19 restrictions were put into place, there was an 8.9% no-show rate and a 17.4% non-attendance rate for the Department of Neurological Surgery. After COVID restrictions were implemented, these increased to 10.9% and 18.3%, respectively. Greater no-show and cancellation rates (9.8% in the post-COVID era vs 8.0% in the pre-COVID era) were associated with varying socioeconomic and racial demographics. African-American patients (2.56 times higher), new-visit patients (1.67 times higher), and those with Medicaid/Medicare insurance policies (1.48 times higher) were at the highest risk of no-show in the post-COVID era compared to the pre-COVID era.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Cerebral arterial vasospasm is a rare complication after supratentorial meningioma resection. The pathophysiology of this condition may be similar to vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and treatment options may be similar. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present two cases of cerebral vasospasm after supratentorial meningioma resection and perform a systematic literature review of similar cases. LESSONS: Cerebral arterial vasospasm after supratentorial meningioma resection may be associated with significant morbidity due to cerebral ischemia if not addressed in a timely manner. Treatment paradigms may be adopted from the management of arterial vasospasm associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage.