Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Infect ; 151: e95, 2023 05 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37222136

RESUMO

Toxoplasmosis caused by the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii occurs worldwide. Infections range from asymptomatic to life-threatening. T. gondii infection is acquired either via bradyzoites in meat or via oocysts in the environment, but the relative importance of these path ways and the different sources remains unclear. In this study, possible risk factors for toxoplasmosis in the Netherlands were investigated. A case-control study was conducted including persons with recent infection and individuals with a negative test result for IgM and IgG for T. gondii between July 2016 and April 2021. A total of 48 cases and 50 controls completed the questionnaire. Food history and environmental exposure were compared using logistic regression. Consumption of different meats was found to be associated with recent infection. In the multivariable model, adjusted for age, gender, and pregnancy, consumption of large game meat (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 8.2, 95% confidence interval 1.6-41.9) and sometimes (aOR 4.1, 1.1-15.3) or never (aOR 15.9, 2.2-115.5) washing hands before food preparation remained. These results emphasize the value of the advice to be careful with the consumption of raw and undercooked meat. Good hand hygiene could also be promoted in the prevention of T. gondii infection.


Assuntos
Toxoplasma , Toxoplasmose , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Toxoplasmose/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
2.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(10): 2464-9, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27413193

RESUMO

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are an important cause of health care-acquired infections (HAIs). Studies have shown that active surveillance of high-risk patients for VRE colonization can aid in reducing HAIs; however, these screens generate a significant cost to the laboratory and health care system. Digital imaging capable of differentiating negative and "nonnegative" chromogenic agar can reduce the labor cost of these screens and potentially improve patient care. In this study, we evaluated the performance of the WASPLab Chromogenic Detection Module (CDM) (Copan, Brescia, Italy) software to analyze VRE chromogenic agar and compared the results to technologist plate reading. Specimens collected at 3 laboratories were cultured using the WASPLab CDM and plated to each site's standard-of-care chromogenic media, which included Colorex VRE (BioMed Diagnostics, White City, OR) or Oxoid VRE (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom). Digital images were scored using the CDM software after 24 or 40 h of growth, and all manual reading was performed using digital images on a high-definition (HD) monitor. In total, 104,730 specimens were enrolled and automation agreed with manual analysis for 90.1% of all specimens tested, with sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 89.5%, respectively. Automation results were discordant for 10,348 specimens, and all discordant images were reviewed by a laboratory supervisor or director. After a second review, 499 specimens were identified as representing missed positive cultures falsely called negative by the technologist, 1,616 were identified as containing borderline color results (negative result but with no package insert color visible), and 8,234 specimens were identified as containing colorimetric pigmentation due to residual matrix from the specimen or yeast (Candida). Overall, the CDM was accurate at identifying negative VRE plates, which comprised 84% (87,973) of the specimens in this study.


Assuntos
Automação Laboratorial/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Compostos Cromogênicos/metabolismo , Meios de Cultura/química , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/isolamento & purificação , Erros de Diagnóstico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Positivas/microbiologia , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Imagem Óptica/métodos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(3): 620-4, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26719443

RESUMO

Recently, systems have been developed to create total laboratory automation for clinical microbiology. These systems allow for the automation of specimen processing, specimen incubation, and imaging of bacterial growth. In this study, we used the WASPLab to validate software that discriminates and segregates positive and negative chromogenic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) plates by recognition of pigmented colonies. A total of 57,690 swabs submitted for MRSA screening were enrolled in the study. Four sites enrolled specimens following their standard of care. Chromogenic agar used at these sites included MRSASelect (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA), chromID MRSA (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France), and CHROMagar MRSA (BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD). Specimens were plated and incubated using the WASPLab. The digital camera took images at 0 and 16 to 24 h and the WASPLab software determined the presence of positive colonies based on a hue, saturation, and value (HSV) score. If the HSV score fell within a defined threshold, the plate was called positive. The performance of the digital analysis was compared to manual reading. Overall, the digital software had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 90.7% with the specificity ranging between 90.0 and 96.0 across all sites. The results were similar using the three different agars with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity ranging between 90.7 and 92.4%. These data demonstrate that automated digital analysis can be used to accurately sort positive from negative chromogenic agar cultures regardless of the pigmentation produced.


Assuntos
Automação Laboratorial/métodos , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Compostos Cromogênicos/metabolismo , Meios de Cultura/química , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Software
4.
JAMA ; 312(14): 1429-1437, 2014 10 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25271544

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are prophylactic antibiotic regimens used in intensive care units (ICUs) and associated with improved patient outcome. Controversy exists regarding the relative effects of both measures on patient outcome and antibiotic resistance. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of SDD and SOD, applied as unit-wide interventions, on antibiotic resistance and patient outcome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pragmatic, cluster randomized crossover trial comparing 12 months of SOD with 12 months of SDD in 16 Dutch ICUs between August 1, 2009, and February 1, 2013. Patients with an expected length of ICU stay longer than 48 hours were eligible to receive the regimens, and 5881 and 6116 patients were included in the clinical outcome analysis for SOD and SDD, respectively. INTERVENTIONS: Intensive care units were randomized to administer either SDD or SOD. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Unit-wide prevalence of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Secondary outcomes were day-28 mortality, ICU-acquired bacteremia, and length of ICU stay. RESULTS: In point-prevalence surveys, prevalences of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria in perianal swabs were significantly lower during SDD compared with SOD; for aminoglycoside resistance, average prevalence was 5.6% (95% CI, 4.6%-6.7%) during SDD and 11.8% (95% CI, 10.3%-13.2%) during SOD (P < .001). During both interventions the prevalence of rectal carriage of aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria increased 7% per month (95% CI, 1%-13%) during SDD (P = .02) and 4% per month (95% CI, 0%-8%) during SOD (P = .046; P = .40 for difference). Day 28-mortality was 25.4% and 24.1% during SOD and SDD, respectively (adjusted odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88-1.06]; P = .42), and there were no statistically significant differences in other outcome parameters or between surgical and nonsurgical patients. Intensive care unit-acquired bacteremia occurred in 5.9% and 4.6% of the patients during SOD and SDD, respectively (odds ratio, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.65-0.91]; P = .002; number needed to treat, 77). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Unit-wide application of SDD and SOD was associated with low levels of antibiotic resistance and no differences in day-28 mortality. Compared with SOD, SDD was associated with lower rectal carriage of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria and ICU-acquired bacteremia but a more pronounced gradual increase in aminoglycoside-resistant gram-negative bacteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: trialregister.nlIdentifier: NTR1780.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bacteriemia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Estudos Cross-Over , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reto/microbiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(4): 1437-9, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22238435

RESUMO

Five methods were compared to determine the most accurate method for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (n = 142 strains). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) showed the best results for rapid and accurate CoNS differentiation (99.3% of strains correctly identified). An alternative to this approach could be Vitek2 combined with partial tuf gene sequencing (100% of strains correctly identified when both methods are performed simultaneously).


Assuntos
Coagulase/genética , Tipagem Molecular , Staphylococcus/classificação , Genótipo , Fenótipo , Proteômica , RNA Bacteriano/genética , RNA Ribossômico 16S/genética , Padrões de Referência , Análise de Sequência de DNA/normas , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização e Dessorção a Laser Assistida por Matriz/normas , Staphylococcus/enzimologia , Staphylococcus/genética
7.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 9(4): ofac077, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35308482

RESUMO

Background: Mycobacterium marinum is a nontuberculous mycobacterium that causes skin and soft tissue infections. Treatment consists of multiple antibiotics, sometimes combined with surgical debridement. There is little evidence for the choice of antibiotics, the duration of treatment, and the role of susceptibility testing. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of culture-confirmed M. marinum infections in the Netherlands in the 2011-2018 period. Clinical characteristics, in vitro susceptibility, extent of disease, treatment regimens, and outcomes were analyzed. Incidence was assessed from laboratory databases. Results: Forty cases of M. marinum infection could be studied. Antibiotic treatment cured 36/40 patients (90%) after a mean treatment duration of 25 weeks. Failure/relapse occurred in 3 patients, and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. Antibiotic treatment consisted of monotherapy in 35% and 2-drug therapy in 63%. Final treatment contained mostly ethambutol-macrolide combinations (35%). Eleven patients (28%) received additional surgery. We recorded high rates of in vitro resistance to tetracyclines (36% of isolates). Tetracycline resistance seemed correlated with poor response to tetracycline monotherapy. The annual incidence rate was 0.15/100 000/year during the study period. Conclusions: Prolonged and susceptibility-guided treatment results in a 90% cure rate in M. marinum disease. Two-drug regimens of ethambutol and a macrolide are effective for moderately severe infections. Tetracycline monotherapy in limited disease should be used vigilantly, preferably with proven in vitro susceptibility.

8.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 181(5): 452-7, 2010 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19965807

RESUMO

RATIONALE: Selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) eradicate gram-negative bacteria (GNB) from the intestinal and respiratory tract in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, but their effect on antibiotic resistance remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: We quantified the effects of SDD and SOD on bacterial ecology in 13 ICUs that participated in a study, in which SDD, SOD, or standard care was used during consecutive periods of 6 months (de Smet AM, Kluytmans JA, Cooper BS, Mascini EM, Benus RF, van der Werf TS, van der Hoeven JG, Pickkers P, Bogaers-Hofman D, van der Meer NJ, et al. N Engl J Med 2009;360:20-31). METHODS: Point prevalence surveys of rectal and respiratory samples were performed once monthly in all ICU patients (receiving or not receiving SOD/SDD). Effects of SDD on rectal, and of SDD/SOD on respiratory tract, carriage of GNB were determined by comparing results from consecutive point prevalence surveys during intervention (6 mo for SDD and 12 mo for SDD/SOD) with consecutive point prevalence data in the pre- and postintervention periods. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During SDD, average proportions of patients with intestinal colonization with GNB resistant to either ceftazidime, tobramycin, or ciprofloxacin were 5, 7, and 7%, and increased to 15, 13, and 13% postintervention (P < 0.05). During SDD/SOD resistance levels in the respiratory tract were not more than 6% for all three antibiotics but increased gradually (for ceftazidime; P < 0.05 for trend) during intervention and to levels of 10% or more for all three antibiotics postintervention (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SOD and SDD have marked effects on the bacterial ecology in an ICU, with rising ceftazidime resistance prevalence rates in the respiratory tract during intervention and a considerable rebound effect of ceftazidime resistance in the intestinal tract after discontinuation of SDD.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/prevenção & controle , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Infecções Respiratórias/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Ceftazidima/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Reto/microbiologia , Sistema Respiratório/microbiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Tobramicina/uso terapêutico
9.
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd ; 1622018 08 30.
Artigo em Holandês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30212003

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: On returning from a period in a country where tuberculosis is endemic, e.g. a medical internship abroad, screening for tuberculosis takes place. The tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test) and the interferon-γ release assay test are available for this purpose. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe a 23-year-old female medical intern who was treated preventively with a tuberculostatic drug due to a latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) following an internship in India. This treatment was prematurely discontinued due to increased transaminases (ALT, AST) and physical side effects that impacted negatively on her general wellbeing and on her ability to function during her later internships. CONCLUSION: Long-term preventive treatment for a health care professional with an LTBI is often indicated. However, this treatment can have negative side effects.


Assuntos
Antituberculosos/efeitos adversos , Internato e Residência , Tuberculose Latente/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Tuberculose Latente/diagnóstico , Adulto Jovem
10.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 11(5): 372-80, 2011 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21420908

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previously, we assessed selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) on survival and prevention of bacteraemia in patients in intensive-care units. In this analysis, we aimed to assess effectiveness of these interventions for prevention of respiratory tract colonisation and bacteraemia with highly resistant microorganisms acquired in intensive-care units. METHODS: We did an open-label, clustered group-randomised, crossover study in 13 intensive-care units in the Netherlands between May, 2004, and July, 2006. Participants admitted to intensive-care units with an expected duration of mechanical ventilation of more than 48 h or an expected stay of more than 72 h received SOD (topical tobramycin, colistin, and amphotericin B in the oropharynx), SDD (SOD antibiotics in the oropharynx and stomach plus 4 days' intravenous cefotaxime), or standard care. The computer-randomised order of study regimens was applied by an independent clinical pharmacist who was masked to intensive-care-unit identity. We calculated crude odds ratios (95% CI) for rates of bacteraemia or respiratory tract colonisation with highly resistant microorganisms in patients who stayed in intensive-care units for more than 3 days (ie, acquired infection). This trial is registered at http://isrctn.org, number ISRCTN35176830. FINDINGS: Data were available for 5927 (>99%) of 5939 patients, of whom 5463 (92%) were in intensive-care units for more than 3 days. 239 (13%) of 1837 patients in standard care acquired bacteraemia after 3 days, compared with 158 (9%) of 1758 in SOD (odds ratio 0·66, 95% CI 0·53-0·82), and 124 (7%) of 1868 in SDD (0·48, 0·38-0·60). Eight patients acquired bacteraemia with highly resistant microorganisms during SDD, compared with 18 patients (with 19 episodes) during standard care (0·41, 0·18-0·94; rate reduction [RR] 59%, absolute risk reduction [ARR] 0·6%) and 20 during SOD (0·37, 0·16-0·85; RR 63%, ARR 0·7%). Of the patients staying in intensive-care units for more than 3 days, we obtained endotracheal aspirate cultures for 881 (49%) patients receiving standard care, 886 (50%) receiving SOD, and 828 (44%) receiving SDD. 128 (15%) patients acquired respiratory tract colonisation with highly resistant microorganisms during standard care, compared with 74 (8%) during SDD (0·58, 0·43-0·78; RR 38%, ARR 5·5%) and 88 (10%) during SOD (0·65, 0·49-0·87; RR 32%, ARR 4·6%). Acquired respiratory tract colonisation with Gram-negative bacteria or cefotaxime-resistant and colistin-resistant pathogens was lowest during SDD. INTERPRETATION: Widespread use of SDD and SOD in intensive-care units with low levels of antibiotic resistance is justified. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Descontaminação/métodos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Trato Gastrointestinal/microbiologia , Orofaringe/microbiologia , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos Cross-Over , Farmacorresistência Fúngica , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA