The Effects of Injury Type on Health-Related Quality of Life in Youth Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The relationship between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and injury type has not been analyzed for young athletes. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in HRQoL between injured athletes, injured nonathletes, and normative data for healthy youth (NDHY) or among athletes with acute, overuse, or concussion injuries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical cohort. SETTING: Primary care sports medicine clinics at 3 academic institutions. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 8 to 18 years presenting with injury. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Injury type and athletic participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health-related quality of life measured 1 month after injury through the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric-25 v2.0 assessed pain interference, peer relationships, depression, fatigue, anxiety, and mobility. One-way analysis of variance was performed with P values of <0.05 considered significant. Concussion Learning Assessment and School Survey (CLASS) evaluated academic performance. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-seven patients (36% male), with average age of 14.2 years, completed HRQoL and CLASS surveys following injury. There were 196 overuse injuries (55%), 119 acute injuries (33%), and 42 concussions (12%). Ninety-four percent were athletes. Six percent were nonathletes; 90.5% of concussed patients reported grades worsening. Concussed athletes reported more fatigue (P = 0.008) compared with other injury types but no worse than NDHY. Athletes with overuse injuries had lower mobility (P = 0.005) than other injury types and NDHY. Patients with lower HRQoL were female, older age, or required surgery. No other domains had significant differences by injury type nor did HRQoL differ between the athletes, nonathletes, and NDHY. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of injuries requiring surgery, HRQoL of injured young athletes was similar to NDHY in most domains.

Feasibility of the pitch efficiency rating: A novel tool for systematic assessment of pitching mechanics in developing throwing athletes.

BACKGROUND: Injuries in younger baseball athletes continue to increase despite work characterizing risk factors. Three-dimensional (3D) motion capture may identify suboptimal pitching mechanics that predispose an athlete to injury, but 3D-motion analysis is often inaccessible. Thus, there is a gap between the current biomechanics literature and its practical application in young athletes. The current study aims to assess the reliability of the pitch efficiency rating (PER) as a systematic tool to evaluate throwing mechanics in developing baseball pitchers. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of application and reliability of a novel, scientifically informed tool (PER) for the assessment of pitching mechanics. DESIGN: Reliability study using Bland-Altman methods for assessing agreement between two raters. SETTING: Academic medical center through community outreach. PARTICIPANTS: Pitching mechanics were assessed and rated with the PER for 40 athletes (26 high school, 14 Division III), average age 19.0 years old (range 15.3-23.7 years old). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interrater and intrarater reliability as calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS: For initial readings comparing interrater reliability between Rater 1 and Rater 2, the ICC was calculated at 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.89) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.60-0.86) for the second set of ratings. Regarding intrarater reliability across reads, ICC was found to be 0.63 (95% CI 0.43-0.79) for Rater 1, and 0.91 for Rater 2 (95% CI 0.85-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The present study introduces the PER as a potential tool for evaluating pitching mechanics. However, the intrarater reliability of the PER did not meet preestablished criteria in one of the two pilot raters. Further study is needed to continue to assess the reliability of the tool across diverse demographics.