Association between prior peripherally inserted central catheters and lack of functioning arteriovenous fistulas: a case-control study in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Although an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the hemodialysis access of choice, its prevalence continues to be lower than recommended in the United States. We assessed the association between past peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and lack of functioning AVFs. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. PARTICIPANTS & SETTING: Prevalent hemodialysis population in 7 Mayo Clinic outpatient hemodialysis units. Cases were without functioning AVFs and controls were with functioning AVFs on January 31, 2011. PREDICTORS: History of PICCs. OUTCOMES: Lack of functioning AVFs. RESULTS: On January 31, 2011, a total of 425 patients were receiving maintenance hemodialysis, of whom 282 were included in this study. Of these, 120 (42.5%; cases) were dialyzing through a tunneled dialysis catheter or synthetic arteriovenous graft and 162 (57.5%; controls) had a functioning AVF. PICC use was evaluated in both groups and identified in 30% of hemodialysis patients, with 54% of these placed after dialysis therapy initiation. Cases were more likely to be women (52.5% vs 33.3% in the control group; P = 0.001), with smaller mean vein (4.9 vs 5.8 mm; P < 0.001) and artery diameters (4.6 vs 4.9 mm; P = 0.01) than controls. A PICC was identified in 53 (44.2%) cases, but only 32 (19.7%) controls (P < 0.001). We found a strong and independent association between PICC use and lack of a functioning AVF (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.9-5.5; P < 0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for confounders, including upper-extremity vein and artery diameters, sex, and history of central venous catheter (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.5-5.5; P = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, participants mostly white. CONCLUSION: PICCs are commonly placed in patients with end-stage renal disease and are a strong independent risk factor for lack of functioning AVFs.

Prospective, randomized evaluation of a cuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft for hemodialysis vascular access.

BACKGROUND: A cuffed expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) hemodialysis graft was developed to address the problem of recurrent stenosis at the graft-vein anastomosis. The purpose of this study was to compare graft patency and blood flow rates of cuffed and noncuffed (standard) ePTFE grafts placed for hemodialysis access. METHODS: Forty-eight patients were prospectively randomized and followed for up to 24 months after placement of a cuffed or standard ePTFE graft for hemodialysis access. Study end points included time to graft failure and blood flow rates on hemodialysis. RESULTS: Risk factors for graft failure were similar in both groups. However, the overall incidence of graft failure was significantly lower in the cuffed ePTFE graft group (P =.039). Graft patency rates in the cuffed versus standard groups were 64% versus 32% at 12 months (P =.037) and 58% versus 21% at 24 months (P =.0213). No cuffed ePTFE graft failed as a result of venous outflow stenosis. Average graft flow rates were similar when first measured 3 months postoperatively (845 mL/min, cuffed vs 715 mL/min, standard; P =.51) but declined more rapidly in the standard group (12 months, 623 vs 253 mL/min [P =.037]; 24 months, 531 vs 121 mL/min [P =.012]). CONCLUSIONS: The cuffed ePTFE graft was associated with increased blood flow rates during hemodialysis and improved graft patency compared with a standard ePTFE graft. Our results suggest a beneficial effect of the cuffed venous geometry for hemodialysis vascular access.

Outcomes of arteriovenous fistula creation after the Fistula First Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred hemodialysis access, but AVF-failure rate is high, and complications from AVF placement are rarely reported. There is no clear consensus on predictors of AVF patency. This study determined AVF outcomes and patency predictors at Mayo Clinic Rochester following the Fistula First Initiative. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A retrospective cohort study of AVFs placed at Mayo Clinic from January 2006 through December 2008 was performed. The AVF placement-associated primary and secondary failure rates, complications, interventions, and hospitalizations were examined. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine primary and secondary patency and associated predictors. RESULTS: During this time frame, 317 AVFs were placed in 293 individual patients. The primary failure rate was 37.1% after excluding patients not initiated on hemodialysis during follow-up (n = 38) or those with indeterminate outcome (37 lost to follow-up; six died; two transplanted). Of usable AVFs, 11.4% later failed. AVF creation incurred complications and hospitalization in 21.2% and 12.3% of patients, respectively. The risk for reduced primary patency was increased by diabetes (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.07); the risk for reduced primary and secondary patency was decreased with larger arteries (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.94; and HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Primary failure remains a major issue in the post-Fistula First era. Complications from AVF placement must be considered when planning AVF placement. Our data demonstrate that artery size is the main predictor of AVF patency.