MicroRNA profile of circulating CD4+ T cells in aged patients with atherosclerosis obliterans.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the specificity of the expression patterns of microRNAs (miRNAs) in circulating CD4+ T cells in aged patients with atherosclerosis obliterans (ASO). METHODS: A comprehensive miRNA expression study was conducted using a miRNA microarray of CD4+ T cells isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of 33 patients with ASO and 24 healthy donors. A t test was used for statistical analysis, and the average linkage method was used for hierarchical clustering. The results were validated by qRT-PCR. Putative targeted pathways associated with validated miRNAs were predicted with the online software DIANA miRPath. RESULTS: We identified 44 miRNAs based on a cutoff value of a 1.3-fold change in expression between the two groups, with 18 miRNAs showing a false discovery rate (FDR) p value < 0.05. The qRT-PCR analysis validated differences in 12 miRNAs, and 6 miRNAs were proven to be differentially expressed among three age groups (age: 35-55 years; 56-75 years; 76-95 years): the miRNAs miR-21 (p: 0.0008; 0.0009; 0.0022), miR-29b (p: 0.453; < 0.0001; < 0.0001), and miR-374b (p: < 0.0001; < 0.0001; 0.2493) showed upregulated expression in patients with ASO, while miR-142-3p (p: < 0.0001; < 0.0001; < 0.0001), miR-142-5p (p: < 0.0001; < 0.0001; < 0.0001), and miR-150 (p: < 0.0001; < 0.0001; 0.0001) showed downregulated expression in patients with ASO. The validated miRNAs participated in CD4+ T cell activation, proliferation, and migration pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating CD4+ T cells in aged patients with ASO may show a distinct molecular signature. This is the first time that a distinctive, validated miRNA profile from circulating CD4+ T cells in atherosclerosis has been presented. This miRNA signature may be used to help elucidate the underlying mechanism of atherosclerosis. Further clinical studies and in-depth reports will contribute to identifying predictive and therapeutic targets in these patients with atherosclerosis.

Comparison of the Bifurcated Graft Reconstruction and Aortic Stump Closure in Open Surgical Conversion After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of the aortic stump in open surgical conversion (OSC) after Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is debated. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacies and safety between the bifurcated prosthetic vascular graft in situ stump reconstruction (p-graft ISSR) and aortic stump closure (ASC) in OSC. METHODS: We analyzed 973 elective AAA patients admitted from January 01, 2001 to December 31, 2020, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University. We conducted a statistical analysis of the clinical characteristics, procedural data, as well as outcomes and technique considerations of aortic stump management in OSC patients. RESULTS: A total of 24 male patients had OSC after EVAR. The rate of stent graft infection was 54.17% before OSC. Eleven patients underwent ASC, and 13 patients were treated with p-graft ISSR. The major complication after OSC was aortic stump bleeding (total incidence was 37.50%) (1 patient with a periaortic hematoma and 8 patients with a stump blowout). The total incidences of stump blowout between the patients with ASC and those with p-graft ISSR were significantly different (45.45% vs. 23.08%, P < 0.05). The total perioperative mortality was 25.00% (6 patients with stump blowouts). The perioperative survival rates between these 2 aortic stump management approaches were 72.72% and 76.92% (ASC vs. p-graft ISSR, P < 0.05). In total, 18 patients were followed up (3-180 months). There were 3 aorta-related deaths during the late follow-up period (including both of the 2 stump-blowout-related deaths just treated with ASC). CONCLUSIONS: If the condition of the aorta and peri-aortic tissue are suitable for a prosthetic graft bypass, the p-graft ISSR is highly recommended for OSC patients after EVAR.

Stent patency rates and prognostic factors of endovascular intervention for iliofemoral vein occlusion in post-thrombotic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), an important complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), adversely affects patients' quality of life. Endovascular intervention in PTS can relieve symptoms rapidly with high therapeutic value. This study mainly focuses on how to improve postoperative stent patency rates and aims to find prognostic factors impacting patency. METHODS: According to the specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, PTS patients who underwent endovascular intervention at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from December 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, were included in this single-center prospective study. Follow-up data were collected and analyzed regularly over 2 years. RESULTS: Overall, 31 PTS patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of these patients was 55.39 ± 11.81, including 19 male patients. Stent implantation was successful in 22 PTS patients, with a technical success rate of 70.97%. The average Villalta scores of the stent-implanted group and the non-stent-implanted group were 5.95 ± 2.57 and 5.78 ± 2.95, respectively, with no significant difference observed. In the stent-implanted group, the perioperative patency rate was 81.81% (18/22), and the follow-up patency rates were 68.18% (15/22) within 3 months, 59.09% (13/22) within 6 months, 45.45% (10/22) within 1 year, and 36.36% (8/22) within 2 years. Based on the stent placement segments, the 22 PTS patients were divided into two subgroups: the iliofemoral vein balloon dilation + iliofemoral vein stent implantation (FV-S) subgroup and the iliofemoral vein balloon dilation + iliac vein stent implantation (FV-B) subgroup. In the FV-S subgroup, the perioperative patency rate was 100.00% (14/14), and the follow-up patency rates were 85.71% (12/14), 71.43% (10/14), 57.14% (8/14) and 50.00% (7/14), which were higher than those for overall stent patency of all patients. The postoperative patency rates in the FV-B subgroup were 50.00% (4/8), 37.50% (3/8), 37.50% (3/8), 25.00% (2/8), and 12.50% (1/8). The secondary postoperative patency rates in the FV-B subgroup were 100.00% (8/8), 87.50% (7/8), 75.00% (6/8), 62.50% (5/8) and 50.00% (4/8). CONCLUSIONS: For PTS patients with iliofemoral vein occlusion but patent inflow, iliofemoral vein stent implantation is a more efficient therapeutic option than iliofemoral vein balloon dilation with iliac vein stent implantation for PTS patients.