Pharmacist provider status: Geoprocessing analysis of pharmacy locations, medically underserved areas, populations, and health professional shortage areas.

BACKGROUND: Payment reform for pharmacists is both an important and urgent issue that needs to be addressed. OBJECTIVE(S): The purpose of this paper is to assess the use of medically underserved areas, medically underserved populations, and primary care health professional shortage areas in The Pharmacy and Medically Underserved Areas Enhancement Act; and provide policy recommendations for national pharmacy associations to achieve provider status. METHODS: Pharmacy location addresses were determined using public domain data from the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System (NPPES) National Provider Identifier (NPI) Registry. Medically Underserved Areas/Populations (MUAs/MUPs) and Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) were gathered through public data provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration as Keyhole Markup Language (KML) files. Addresses and KML files were analyzed and mapped using the geographic information software, QGIS. A series of maps depicting the location of all MUAs/MUPs, HPSAs, HPSA facility locations, and community pharmacy locations in the U.S. were then created. These maps were overlayed, and geoprocessing tools were used to create the analysis. RESULTS: After analyzing all community pharmacy locations in the United States, we found that only 56% are located within a current MUA/MUP or HPSA. The percentage of pharmacies in healthcare underserved areas differs widely between states from the lowest in New Jersey of 18.26% of pharmacies to the highest of Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands and the Virgin Islands with 100% of pharmacies. CONCLUSIONS: Aligning the pharmacist business model to be comparable to other health care professionals will ensure patients receive access to pharmacist-provided cognitive patient care services, which have higher value than product-centered services. Future attempts to recognize pharmacists as providers and allow for their reimbursement under Medicare Part B should consider strategies to increase the number of pharmacists that are eligible to participate in order to exemplify value to the public and elected leaders.

Community-based pharmacy use of the Pharmacist eCare Plan: A retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists in community-based settings document patient care using the Pharmacist eCare Plan (PeCP). OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot evaluation of the PeCP use and documentation of Systemized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) codes within select community-based pharmacies. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Moose Pharmacy operates 7 locations in rural North Carolina that are part of the Community Pharmacy Enhanced Services Network (CPESN). The Moose Pharmacy Medication Adherence Program (MooseMAP) targets patients with a chronic condition who would benefit from medication synchronization, adherence packaging, and monthly calls. PRACTICE INNOVATION: CPESN pharmacies use the PeCP to track a patient's concerns, goals, interventions, and medication-related information. The PeCP standard requires pharmacies to detail a patient's current medication regimen and health concerns as well as the pharmacy's interventions and patient's health over time. EVALUATION METHODS: Data were included if the patient was enrolled in MooseMAP and had a free-text note in the eCare Plan. Data were excluded if the medication-related problem (MRP) or intervention was a general health problem without a valid SNOMED CT code. Data were categorized into MRPs, medication interventions, education, and referrals. The International SNOMED CT browser and pharmacy health information technology (PHIT) value sets were searched; data sets without existing codes were submitted to the appropriate oversight authorities for future inclusion. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Emerging codes were identified that resulted in 91 recommendations to PHIT for development of new SNOMED CT codes and 113 recommendations to PHIT for inclusion in the PHIT value sets. In total, 66% of MRPs did not have a valid SNOMED CT code, and 78% of MRPs were not included in a PHIT value set. The most prevalent gap in MRP or intervention documentation related to medication use issues. CONCLUSION: Incorporating emerging codes into documentation systems should enable the profession to better communicate value to health care stakeholders.