Timing of antenatal steroid administration for imminent preterm birth: results of a prospective observational study in Germany.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the timing of antenatal steroid administration and associated medical interventions in women with imminent preterm birth. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study at a single tertiary center in Germany from September 2018 to August 2019. We included pregnant women who received antenatal steroids for imminent preterm birth and evaluated the interval from administration to birth. 120 women with antenatal steroid application were included into our analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed to analyze factors influencing the timing of antenatal steroids and to evaluate additional medical interventions which women with imminent preterm birth experience. RESULTS: Of the 120 women included into our study, 35.8% gave birth before 34/0 weeks and 64.2% before 37/0 weeks of gestation. Only 25/120 women (20.8%) delivered within the optimal time window of 1-7 days after antenatal steroid application. 5/120 women (4.2%) only received one dose of antenatal steroids before birth and 3/120 (2.5%) gave birth within 8 to 14 days after antenatal steroids. Most women gave birth more than 14 days after steroid application (72.5%, 87/120). Women with preeclampsia (60%), PPROM (31%), and FGR (30%) had the highest rates of delivery within the optimal time window. Women of all timing groups received additional interventions and medications like antibiotics, tocolytics, or anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Our observational data indicate that most pregnant women do not give birth within 7 days after the administration of antenatal steroids. The timing was best for preterm birth due to preeclampsia, PPROM, and FGR. Especially for women with symptoms of preterm labor and bleeding placenta previa, antenatal steroids should be indicated more restrictively to improve neonatal outcome and reduce untimely and unnecessary interventions.

A Question of Timing: 10-year Retrospective Analysis on the Use of Antenatal Steroids for Imminent Preterm Birth.

OBJECTIVE: Antenatal steroids improve the neonatal outcome if they are administered within a therapeutic window of seven days before preterm birth. The aim of this study was to evaluate the timing of antenatal steroids for imminent preterm birth at a single center in Germany. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective analysis of 843 preterm births between 24/0 and 33/6 weeks was performed from January 2008 to December 2017 at a German university hospital. We evaluated the timing of antenatal steroids according to the indication for their application. Descriptive statistics and binomial regression were performed to analyze factors influencing the timing of antenatal steroid administration. RESULTS: Of 843 preterm births below 34 weeks included in our study, 752 pregnant women received antenatal steroids (89.2%). Only 301/843 women (35.7%) gave birth within the optimal window of 7 days after antenatal steroids. 91/843 women (10.8%) did not receive steroids. 130/843 women (15.4%) only received one dose, 76/843 (9.0%) gave birth within 8 to 14 days, and 245/843 (29.1%) more than 14 days later. In a binomial regression model, preterm premature rupture of membranes (OR 3.40, 95% CI 1.81 to 6.39, p<0.001), fetal growth restriction (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.63 to 6.58, p=0.001), and preeclampsia (OR 2.83, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.83, p=0.005) were positively associated with optimal timing. CONCLUSION: Two thirds of women with preterm birth before 34 weeks received antenatal steroids outside the optimal therapeutic window. Further research is needed to achieve an optimal effect of antenatal steroids on neonatal outcome and to reduce untimely as well as unnecessary interventions.

Timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean section is critical for gut microbiome development in term born infants.

Animal models imply that the perinatal exposure to antibiotics has a substantial impact on microbiome establishment of the offspring. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean section before versus after cord clamping on gut microbiome composition of term born infants. We performed an exploratory, single center randomized controlled clinical trial. We included forty pregnant women with elective cesarean section at term. The intervention group received single dose intravenous cefuroxime after cord clamping (n = 19), the control group single dose intravenous cefuroxime 30 minutes before skin incision (n = 21). The primary endpoint was microbiome signature of infants and metabolic prediction in the first days of life as determined in meconium samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Secondary endpoints were microbiome composition at one month and 1 year of life. In meconium samples of the intervention group, the genus Staphylococcus pre-dominated. In the control group, the placental cross-over of cefuroxime was confirmed in cord blood. A higher amino acid and nitrogen metabolism as well as increased abundance of the genera Cutibacterium, Corynebacterium and Streptophyta were noted (indicator families: Cytophagaceae, Lactobacilaceae, Oxalobacteraceae). Predictive models of metabolic function revealed higher 2'fucosyllactose utilization in control group samples. In the follow-up visits, a higher abundance of the genus Clostridium was evident in the intervention group. Our exploratory randomized controlled trial suggests that timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis is critical for early microbiome engraftment but not antimicrobial resistance emergence in term born infants.

Gastrointestinal cancer web sites: how do they address patients' concerns?

BACKGROUND: We studied the quality of web sites containing information on gastrointestinal cancer, focusing on the way these web sites dealt with the special concerns of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Searching the Internet for German-language gastroenterological cancer web sites, we collected 9,947 web pages from 14 search engines. Evaluation was done with a 36-item questionnaire. Information quality, availability of the web sites, and web site attributes considering patients' concerns and potential embarrassment were analyzed using a scoring system. RESULTS: Belonging to 165 web sites, 1,763 of 9,947 (17.7%) web pages found by search engines provided relevant information. Five hundred forty-seven (5.5%) hits were partly relevant, and 7,637 (76.8%) were irrelevant or not available. Most web sites reported about surgery (92.1%), chemotherapy (88.5%), and radiotherapy (73.9%). Of the web sites, 46.7% (n=77), 34.6% (n=57), and 21.8% (n=36) gave information about the author(s) itself, their qualifications, and references of their information, respectively. Search engines ranked web sites giving no information on evidence-based medicine higher than other web sites, whereas web sites providing this information accurately showed higher link popularities. Patients' concerns and potential embarrassment were best addressed by gastrointestinal web sites initiated by private individuals or web sites directed to both a patient and physician audience. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to gastrointestinal cancer web sites, many search engines may be ineffective, and patient emotional needs and concerns are often disregarded. Also, physicians should guide their patients through the Internet to find high-quality information and use link-popularity-based search strategies.