Evaluating Readmission Rates for a Statewide In-Home Ecosystemic Family-Based Treatment Program for Youth with Serious Emotional Disturbance.

Family Based Mental Health Services (FBMHS) with an embedded clinical model, Ecosystemic Structural Family Therapy, is an intervention designed for youth with a serious emotional disturbance (SED) who are at risk of out-of-home placement. The current evaluation examines the association between receipt of FBMHS and rates of out-of-home and community-based care during and after an episode of FBMHS. We identified 25,016 Medicaid-enrolled youth ages 3 to 17 years with receipt of a new FBMHS episode from 1/1/2015 to 6/30/2021. 14% of youth received out-of-home services. Rates of out-of-home service decreased during receipt of FBMHS (14.25-6.98%, p < .0001) and remained lower 6 months following discharge (to 6.95%, p < .0001). Short and longer doses of service were both associated with decreased rates of out-of-home services. FBMHS has been scaled across a large geographic area and is associated with lower rates of out-of-home placement for youth with SED.

Prevalence of and Relationship Between Caregiver Adversity Scores and Child Client Eco-systemic Structural Family Therapy (ESFT) Outcome: Implications for Family Based Mental Health Services (FBMHS).

Adverse childhood experiences, especially with primary caregivers, impacts the mental, physical, and relational health of individuals (Felitti et al. in Am J Prev Med, 14(4):245-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(98)00017-8 , 1998). Therefore, caregiver adversity is important to consider when delivering therapeutic interventions to children (Gardner et al. in Clin Soc Work J 42(1):81-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-012-0428-8 , 2014; Eslinger et al. in J Child Fam Stud 24(9):2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0079-1 , 2015; Hagan et al. in J Trauma Stress 30(6):690-697, 2017). This study analyzed archival data to understand the role of caregiver adversity in Eco-Systemic Structural Family Therapy (ESFT) outcomes, within Family Based Mental Health Services. Results indicate caregiver lifetime adversity score did not predict treatment outcome. However, caregiver current adversity and family length of stay were negatively correlated as were length of stay and client discharge level of care. These findings suggest that ESFT benefits families regardless of caregiver childhood adversity level and that clinician attention to caregiver current adversity is important to ensure families receive the full benefits of ESFT. Implications for optimizing ESFT and future directions for ESFT clinical research are discussed.