Arterial aneurysm and dissection with systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: A review of cases reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and published in the literature.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved multiple systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors since 2004 to treat various malignancies. Inhibition of the VEGF signaling pathway can result in impairment of vascular wall integrity through medial degeneration and endothelial dysfunction, potentially resulting in arterial (including aortic) aneurysm/dissection. We performed a postmarketing review to evaluate arterial aneurysm/dissection as a potential safety risk for patients with cancer treated with VEGF inhibitors. We searched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and literature for reports of arterial (including aortic) aneurysm/dissection with VEGF inhibitors currently approved by the FDA for a cancer indication. We identified 240 cases of arterial aneurysm/dissection associated with VEGF inhibitors. The median time to onset of an arterial aneurysm/dissection event from the initiation of a VEGF inhibitor was 94 days (range 1-1955 days). Notably, 22% (53/240) of cases reported fatal outcomes related to arterial aneurysm/dissection. We determined the drug-event association as probable in 15 cases that lacked relevant confounding factors for arterial aneurysm/dissection, which is supported by unremarkable computed tomography (CT) findings prior to starting VEGF inhibitor therapy, despite nondrug-associated background arterial aneurysm/dissection generally demonstrating preexisting arterial abnormalities. FAERS and literature case-level evidence suggests that VEGF inhibitors may have contributed to arterial aneurysm/dissection, as a class effect, based on short onset relative to natural history of disease and biologic plausibility. Cardiovascular and oncology healthcare professionals should be aware of this rare, but life-threatening safety risk associated with VEGF inhibitors.

Pentosan associated retinal pigmentary changes: FDA's perspective on an emerging postmarketing safety finding.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Recent publications describe pigmentary changes in the retina associated with the use of pentosan polysulfate sodium, the only FDA-approved oral agent for relief of bladder pain or discomfort associated with interstitial cystitis. METHODS: To evaluate this association, we reviewed data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and published case reports and observational studies. RESULTS: The totality of clinical and epidemiology evidence does not resolve the question of causation between pentosan use and retinal pigmentary changes; however, several elements support a potential association. CONCLUSION: Here, we provide our perspective on the available evidence the agency weighed when retinal pigmentary changes were added to pentosan labeling. It is important for urogynecologists prescribing pentosan to be aware of this potential association and be vigilant about assessing eye health in pentosan users.

Disseminated Gonococcal Infections in Patients Receiving Eculizumab: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Gonorrhea is the second most commonly reported notifiable condition in the United States. Infrequently, Neisseria gonorrhoeae can cause disseminated gonococcal infection (DGI). Eculizumab, a monoclonal antibody, inhibits terminal complement activation, which impairs the ability of the immune system to respond effectively to Neisseria infections. This series describes cases of N. gonorrhoeae infection among patients receiving eculizumab. METHODS: Pre- and postmarketing safety reports of N. gonorrhoeae infection in patients receiving eculizumab worldwide were obtained from US Food and Drug Administration safety databases and the medical literature, including reports from the start of pivotal clinical trials in 2004 through 31 December 2017. Included patients had at least 1 eculizumab dose within the 3 months prior to N. gonorrhoeae infection. RESULTS: Nine cases of N. gonorrhoeae infection were identified; 8 were classified as disseminated (89%). Of the disseminated cases, 8 patients required hospitalization, 7 had positive blood cultures, and 2 required vasopressor support. One patient required mechanical ventilation. Neisseria gonorrhoeae may have contributed to complications prior to death in 1 patient; however, the fatality was attributed to underlying disease per the reporter. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving eculizumab may be at higher risk for DGI than the general population. Prescribers are encouraged to educate patients receiving eculizumab on their risk for serious gonococcal infections and perform screening for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) per the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention STD treatment guidelines or in suspected cases. If antimicrobial prophylaxis is used during eculizumab therapy, prescribers should consider trends in gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility due to emerging resistance concerns.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation Associated With Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: A Review of Cases Reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) are used increasingly to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Reports were published recently on hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBV-R) in patients with HBV-HCV co-infection. Hepatitis B virus reactivation, defined as an abrupt increase in HBV replication in patients with inactive or resolved HBV infection, may result in clinically significant hepatitis. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether HBV-R is a safety concern in patients receiving HCV DAAs. DESIGN: Descriptive case series. SETTING: U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). PATIENTS: 29 patients with HBV-R receiving HCV DAAs. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and laboratory data. RESULTS: The FDA identified 29 unique reports of HBV-R in patients receiving DAAs from 22 November 2013 to 15 October 2016. Two cases resulted in death and 1 case in liver transplantation. Patients in whom HBV-R developed were heterogeneous regarding HCV genotype, DAAs received, and baseline HBV characteristics. At baseline, 9 patients had a detectable HBV viral load, 7 had positive results on hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) testing and had an undetectable HBV viral load, and 3 had negative results on HBsAg testing and had an undetectable HBV viral load. For the remaining 10 patients, data points were not reported or the data were uninterpretable. Despite provider knowledge of baseline HBV, HBV-R diagnosis and treatment were delayed in 7 cases and possibly 7 others. LIMITATIONS: The quality of information varied among reports. Because reporting is voluntary, HBV-R associated with DAAs likely is underreported. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis B virus reactivation is a newly identified safety concern in patients with HBV-HCV co-infection treated with DAAs. Patients with a history of HBV require clinical monitoring while receiving DAA therapy. Studies would help determine the risk factors for HBV-R, define monitoring frequency, and identify patients who may benefit from HBV prophylaxis and treatment. DAAs remain a safe and highly effective treatment for the management of HCV infection. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Use of an active surveillance system by the FDA to observe patterns of quinine sulfate use and adverse hematologic outcomes in CMS Medicare data.

PURPOSE: In 2005, the Food and Drug Administration approved Qualaquin (quinine) for treatment of malaria and later ordered unapproved quinine formulations off the market. In 2009, labeling for Qualaquin added a warning for use for leg cramps, as serious hematologic reactions could occur. We examined quinine use trends among Medicare beneficiaries focusing on indications for use and associations with adverse hematologic outcomes. METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries, aged 65 years and older, in 2006-2012, were included in incident quinine or comparator, diltiazem, cohorts if 183 days prior to dispensing, they were enrolled in Medicare, had no dispensing of quinine, diltiazem, ticlodipine, clopidogrel, and sulfonamide drugs, and had no diagnoses of thrombocytopenia, immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), or hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS). Diagnoses of malaria or leg cramps were observed during 183 days prior to index dispensing. Outcomes of ITP, TMA, or HUS in inpatient or emergency room settings were then observed during drug use. RESULTS: Prevalent use of quinine decreased by 99%, from 419 675 to 6036 users during 2006-2012. Of 88 066 quinine users, 9 had diagnoses of malaria and 36 218 had leg cramps. Incidence rates (per 1000 person-years) for ITP were quinine 1.67 and diltiazem 0.40 [incidence rate ratio 4.2 (95% confidence interval 2.5, 6.5)], for TMA were quinine 0.23 and diltiazem 0.03 [incidence rate ratio 6.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3, 24.0)], and for HUS were quinine 0 and diltiazem 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Use of quinine decreased substantially, although diagnoses of leg cramps persist. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an association for quinine and ITP and TMA in claims data.

Varicella zoster virus reactivation reported with isatuximab use.

Isatuximab is a CD38-directed antibody indicated for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. The Division of Pharmacovigilance at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed case reports from postmarketing sources, including the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), PubMed, and Embase, to investigate a potential association between isatuximab and the risk of varicella zoster virus (VZV) reactivation. We identified 20 reports of which 15 met our case definition and causality criteria. All 15 patients (80% male, median age = 60 years) received isatuximab for a hematologic neoplasm; eight (53%) for previously untreated multiple myeloma. All cases described additional risk factors for VZV reactivation, including concomitant proteasome inhibitor and/or immunomodulatory drug (n = 10, 67%) use. Based on this postmarket analysis, the U.S. Prescribing Information for isatuximab was updated to include this new safety information, including recommendations for antiviral prophylaxis.

US-based emergency department visits for fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions.

PURPOSE: To estimate the rate of hypersensitivity reactions per 100,000 prescription dispensings of fluoroquinolones based on care rendered in a nationally representative sample of US hospital emergency departments (ED). METHODS: We analyzed the frequency of fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions using the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-Cooperative Adverse Drug Event Surveillance system (2004-2010) in conjunction with US retail outpatient prescription data from IMS Health (2004-2010). We further categorized reaction severity into three subgroups (mild, moderate, and severe). RESULTS: Based on 1422 cases of fluoroquinolone-associated hypersensitivity reactions and national drug utilization projections, we estimated risk of hypersensitivity reactions for moxifloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and levofloxacin. The absolute risk of a fluoroquinolone-related hypersensitivity reaction of any severity was low (44.0 (95% CI 34.8-53.3) ED visits/100,000 prescriptions); however, we identified a statistically significant difference in the relative risk (rate ratios) of seeking care in an ED attributed to moxifloxacin hypersensitivity compared to either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. For all reaction severities, the estimated ED visits/100,000 prescriptions were 141.3 (95% CI 99.9-182.7) for moxifloxacin, 40.8 (95% CI 31.5-50.0) for levofloxacin, and 26.3 (95% CI 20.8-31.9) for ciprofloxacin. When the rates were stratified by reaction severity category (mild or moderate-severe), moxifloxacin continued to be implicated in more ED visits per 100,000 prescriptions dispensed than either levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSION: Fluoroquinolones may cause hypersensitivity reactions requiring care in an ED, and relative to use, the rate of moxifloxacin-related hypersensitivity reactions is higher compared to levofloxacin or ciprofloxacin.

Using natural language processing to characterize and predict homeopathic product-associated adverse events in consumer reviews: comparison to reports to FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

OBJECTIVE: Apply natural language processing (NLP) to Amazon consumer reviews to identify adverse events (AEs) associated with unapproved over the counter (OTC) homeopathic drugs and compare findings with reports to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were extracted from publicly available Amazon reviews and analyzed using JMP 16 Pro Text Explorer. Topic modeling identified themes. Sentiment analysis (SA) explored consumer perceptions. A machine learning model optimized prediction of AEs in reviews. Reports for the same time interval and product class were obtained from the FAERS public dashboard and analyzed. RESULTS: Homeopathic cough/cold products were the largest category common to both data sources (Amazon = 616, FAERS = 445) and were analyzed further. Oral symptoms and unpleasant taste were described in both datasets. Amazon reviews describing an AE had lower Amazon ratings (X2 = 224.28, P < .0001). The optimal model for predicting AEs was Neural Boosted 5-fold combining topic modeling and Amazon ratings as predictors (mean AUC = 0.927). DISCUSSION: Topic modeling and SA of Amazon reviews provided information about consumers' perceptions and opinions of homeopathic OTC cough and cold products. Amazon ratings appear to be a good indicator of the presence or absence of AEs, and identified events were similar to FAERS. CONCLUSION: Amazon reviews may complement traditional data sources to identify AEs associated with unapproved OTC homeopathic products. This study is the first to use NLP in this context and lays the groundwork for future larger scale efforts.

Emergency use authorization for intravenous peramivir: evaluation of safety in the treatment of hospitalized patients infected with 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus.

BACKGROUND: On 23 October 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for intravenous peramivir, an unapproved antiviral, to treat suspected or confirmed 2009 H1N1 influenza A virus infection. Eligible hospitalized patients were unresponsive to or unable to tolerate available antivirals or lacked dependable oral or inhaled drug delivery routes. The EUA required healthcare providers to report medication errors, selected adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and deaths to the FDA. METHODS: An FDA safety team analyzed reports submitted to the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) and sought follow-up in selected cases. RESULTS: The FDA received AERS reports for 344 patients (including 28 children and 3 pregnant women). Many patients were critically ill on mechanical ventilation (41%) and renal replacement therapies (19%); 38% had received oseltamivir. The most frequently reported serious AEs by MedDRA preferred term were death (15%), H1N1 influenza (8%), respiratory failure (8%), acute renal failure (7%), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (7%). Six medication errors were reported. Most deaths occurred among patients who were obese, immunosuppressed, aged >65 years, or received oseltamivir. Rash was the only treatment-emergent AE attributable to peramivir. Influenza severity, comorbidities, and concomitant medications confounded additional peramivir AE assessments. Missing clinical and laboratory data precluded evaluation of some reports. CONCLUSIONS: Many peramivir recipients under the EUA were critically ill and at risk for influenza-related complications. The safety data were insufficient to assess whether peramivir affected outcome or caused adverse reactions other than rash. Clinical trials in hospitalized patients with serious influenza infections should provide additional information.

Repeated or Continuous Medically Supervised Ketamine Administration Associated with Hepatobiliary Adverse Events: A Retrospective Case Series.

INTRODUCTION: Emerging off-label medical uses of ketamine for the treatment of persistent conditions such as depression and chronic pain often require repeated administration. Cases reported by other countries suggest that long-term and repeated exposure to ketamine may be associated with several risks, including but not limited to hepatobiliary damage. OBJECTIVE: We aimed (1) to characterize the association between repeated administration of ketamine for off-label medical use and hepatobiliary events and (2) to describe recent trends in the use of ketamine across different clinical settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case series analysis, utilizing reports identified from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database as well as the medical literature. We included all cases reported through July 2018 describing both repeated exposure to ketamine in a hospital or ambulatory setting and a hepatobiliary adverse event. We excluded cases describing ketamine abuse. We identified adverse hepatobiliary events using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) and summarized various case characteristics including: patient demographics, route of ketamine administration, dose, time to onset of event, type of event, and pre-existing risk factors for hepatobiliary disease. To assess trends in the demand for ketamine, we used IQVIA, National Sales Perspectives™ to provide the nationally estimated number of vials sold for ketamine from the manufacturer to all US channels of distribution from 2013 through 2017. RESULTS: We identified 14 unique cases that met selection criteria with 21 hepatobiliary adverse events including liver enzyme elevation in all cases, biliary dilation with liver cirrhosis (n = 1), biliary dilation with cholangitis (n = 1), and pericholeductal fibrosis (n = 1). Most cases received ketamine for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome or chronic pain. In cases with a reported time to onset, the majority of events occurred within 4 days. The nationally estimated number of ketamine vials sold in the USA from manufacturers to various channels of distribution increased from 1.2 million in 2013 to 2.1 million in 2017. CONCLUSIONS: We report an association between repeated or continuous administration of ketamine and hepatobiliary adverse events. Increased awareness among clinicians may mitigate these adverse outcomes, especially in the context of growing ketamine sales.

An Evaluation of Postmarketing Reports of Serious Idiosyncratic Liver Injury Associated with Ulipristal Acetate for the Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.

INTRODUCTION: Ulipristal acetate (ulipristal) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator that has been marketed for daily use in Europe and Canada to reduce symptoms caused by uterine fibroids. Long-term use of some other members of this class of 19-norprogesterone-derived agents has been associated with idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed postmarketing reports of suspected drug-induced liver injury associated with the daily use of 5 mg of ulipristal to treat symptoms of uterine fibroids. METHODS: We searched for reports of serious liver injury associated with ulipristal, submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration through 31 January, 2020. Cases of liver injury temporally associated with long-term ulipristal exposure that reported combined increases of serum aminotransferases and bilirubin were individually assessed using a five-tier categorical scale of likelihood for a causal association with the drug by individuals with expertise in drug-induced liver injury evaluation. Individual cases that did not culminate in liver failure, death, or liver transplantation were also assessed for their causal association with ulipristal by the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method. RESULTS: We identified nine non-US cases that met the criteria for inclusion in our search for cases of serious liver injury associated with ulipristal. Five cases reported clinical outcomes of liver transplantation and/or death and all were assessed to have a probable causal association with ulipristal acetate. Evaluation of the other four cases reporting resolution of liver injury after treatment discontinuation revealed a possible or probable causal relationship with ulipristal. CONCLUSIONS: We identified postmarketing cases of serious acute drug-induced liver injury causally associated with ulipristal used to treat uterine fibroids, some with outcomes of liver transplant and/or death. The presence of common structural features identified with certain selective progesterone receptor modulators in the treatment of chronic conditions may indicate a liability for idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury.

An Evaluation of Postmarketing Reports with an Outcome of Death in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse reactions with an outcome of death are inherently important for pharmacovigilance organizations to evaluate. Prior efforts to systematically evaluate individual case safety reports (ICSRs) with an outcome of death have been limited to high-level summaries. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize ICSRs with an outcome of death contained in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. METHODS: All ICSRs received through 31 December 2017 reporting an outcome of death were characterized by patient demographics, suspect product(s), adverse events, and reporter type. Using the ICSR's narrative and reporter information, we classified ICSRs by source to include those from industry-sponsored programs, poison control centers, specialty pharmacies, and litigation. Additionally, a random sample of ICSRs was evaluated for completeness of structured data fields and manually reviewed for the availability of key information in the narrative (i.e. cause of death, medical history, and causality assessment). RESULTS: Overall, 1,053,716 ICSRs with a death outcome were received in the study period. Ten medications treating conditions for malignancies, pain, and kidney disease accounted for nearly 20% of all fatal ICSRs. ICSRs originating from industry-sponsored programs, poison control centers, litigation, and specialty pharmacies accounted for 14%, 6.5%, 5.0%, and 3.3% of all fatal ICSRs, respectively. ICSRs in which the only adverse event coded was 'death' were more likely to be missing structured data and less likely to include key information in the narrative. CONCLUSION: Understanding the origins and characteristics of ICSRs with an outcome of death supports meaningful evaluations and interpretations of FAERS data. A wide variability in ICSR quality exists, even in those reports with the most serious outcome.

Unusual Neisseria species as a cause of infection in patients taking eculizumab.

BACKGROUND: Non-meningococcal, non-gonococcal Neisseria spp. are typically commensal and rarely cause invasive disease. Eculizumab is a terminal complement inhibitor that increases susceptibility to meningococcal disease, but data on disease caused by typically-commensal Neisseria spp. are lacking. This series describes postmarketing reports of typically-commensal Neisseria spp. disease in patients receiving eculizumab. METHODS: We searched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and medical literature for reports of commensal Neisseria spp. disease in patients receiving eculizumab, from eculizumab U.S. approval (2007) through January 31, 2018. RESULTS: We identified seven FAERS reports (including one case also reported in the literature) of non-meningococcal, non-gonococcal Neisseria disease, including N. sicca (mucosa)/subflava (n = 2), N. cinerea (n = 2), N. sicca (mucosa) (n = 1), N. mucosa (n = 1, with concurrent alpha-hemolytic Streptococcus bacteremia), and N. flavescens (subflava) (n = 1). Four cases had sources of patient immunosuppression in addition to eculizumab. Three patients had sepsis (n = 2) or septic shock (n = 1). Five patients were bacteremic. All patients were hospitalized; the infections resolved with antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our search identified seven cases of disease from typically commensal Neisseria spp. in eculizumab recipients. These findings suggest that any Neisseria spp. identified from a normally sterile site in an eculizumab recipient could represent true infection warranting prompt treatment.

Etonogestrel implant migration to the vasculature, chest wall, and distant body sites: cases from a pharmacovigilance database.

OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical outcomes of etonogestrel implant patients with migration to the vasculature, chest wall and other distant body sites spontaneously reported to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) query in the FAERS database (through November 15, 2015), with reports coded with one or more MedDRA preferred terms that indicate complications with device placement or migration of the device from the original site of insertion to the vasculature, chest wall and other distant body sites. We excluded any cases previously described in the medical literature. RESULTS: We identified 38 cases of pronounced etonogestrel implant migration. Migration locations included the lung/pulmonary artery (n=9), chest wall (n=1), vasculature at locations other than the lung/pulmonary artery (n=14) and extravascular migrations (n=14) to other body sites (e.g., the axilla and clavicle/neck line/shoulder). The majority of cases were asymptomatic and detected when the patient desired implant removal; however, seven cases reported symptoms such as pain, discomfort and dyspnea in association with implant migration. Three cases also describe pulmonary fibrosis and skin reactions as a result of implant migration to the vasculature, chest wall and other distant body sites. Sixteen cases reported surgical removal in an operating room setting. CONCLUSIONS: Our FAERS case series demonstrates etonogestrel implant migration to the vasculature, chest wall and other body sites distant from the site of original insertion. IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT: As noted by the sponsor in current prescribing information, a key determinant in the risk for etonogestrel contraceptive implant migration appears to be improper insertion technique. Although migration of etonogestrel implants to the vasculature is rare, awareness of migration and education on proper insertion technique may reduce the risk.