Iterative assessment of a sports rehydration beverage containing a novel amino acid formula on water uptake kinetics.

PURPOSE: Rapid gastric emptying and intestinal absorption of beverages is essential for rapid rehydration, and certain amino acids (AA) may augment fluid delivery. Three sugar-free beverages, containing differing AA concentrations (AA + PZ), were assessed for fluid absorption kinetics against commercial sugar-free (PZ, GZ) and carbohydrate-containing (GTQ) beverages. METHODS: Healthy individuals (n = 15-17 per study) completed three randomised trials. Three beverages (550-600 mL) were ingested in each study (Study 1: AA + PZ [17.51 g/L AA], PZ, GZ; Study 2: AA + PZ [6.96 g/L AA], PZ, GZ; Study 3: AA + PZ [3.48 g/L AA], PZ, GTQ), containing 3.000 g deuterium oxide (D2O). Blood samples were collected pre-, 2-min, 5-min, and every 5-min until 60-min post-ingestion to quantify maximal D2O enrichment (Cmax), time Cmax occurred (Tmax) and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Study 1: AUC (AA + PZ: 15,184 ± 3532 δ‰ vs. VSMOW; PZ: 17,328 ± 3153 δ‰ vs. VSMOW; GZ: 17,749 ± 4204 δ‰ vs. VSMOW; P ≤ 0.006) and Tmax (P ≤ 0.005) were lower for AA + PZ vs. PZ/GZ. Study 2: D2O enrichment characteristics were not different amongst beverages (P ≥ 0.338). Study 3: Cmax (AA + PZ: 440 ± 94 δ‰ vs. VSMOW; PZ: 429 ± 83 δ‰ vs. VSMOW; GTQ: 398 ± 81 δ‰ vs. VSMOW) was greater (P = 0.046) for AA + PZ than GTQ, with no other differences (P ≥ 0.106). CONCLUSION: The addition of small amounts of AA (3.48 g/L) to a sugar-free beverage increased fluid delivery to the circulation compared to a carbohydrate-based beverage, but greater amounts (17.51 g/L) delayed delivery.

Hypohydration induced by prolonged cycling in the heat increases biomarkers of renal injury in males.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have shown that hypohydration can increase renal injury. However, the contribution of hypohydration to the extent of renal injury is often confounded by exercise induced muscle damage. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of manipulating hydration status during moderate-intensity cycling in the heat on biomarkers of renal injury. METHODS: Following familiarisation, fourteen active males (age: 21 [20-22] y; BMI: 22.1 ± 1.9 kg/m2; V ˙ O2peak: 55 ± 9 mL/kg/min) completed two experimental trials, in a randomised cross-over design. Experimental trials consisted of up to 120 min of intermittent cycling (~ 50% Wpeak) in the heat (~ 35 °C, ~ 50% relative humidity). During exercise, subjects consumed either a water volume equal to 100% body mass losses (EU) or minimal water (HYP; 75-100 mL) to induce ~ 3% body mass loss. Blood and urine samples were collected at baseline, 30 min post-exercise and 24 h post-baseline, with an additional urine sample collected immediately post-exercise. RESULTS: Thirty minutes post-exercise, body mass and plasma volume were lower in HYP than EU (P < 0.001), whereas serum and urine osmolality (P < 0.001), osmolality-corrected urinary kidney injury molecule-1 concentrations (HYP: 2.74 [1.87-5.44] ng/mOsm, EU: 1.15 [0.84-2.37] ng/mOsm; P = 0.024), and percentage change in osmolality-corrected urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations (HYP: 61 [17-141] %, EU: 7.1 [- 4 to 24] %; P = 0.033) were greater in HYP than EU. CONCLUSION: Hypohydration produced by cycling in the heat increased renal tubular injury, compared to maintaining euhydration with water ingestion.

Exercise-induced hypohydration impairs 3 km treadmill-running performance in temperate conditions.

Research assessing exercise-induced hypohydration on running performance in a temperate environment is scarce. Given the weight-bearing nature of running, the negative effects of hypohydration might be offset by the weight-loss associated with a negative fluid balance. Therefore, this study investigated the effect of exercise-induced hypohydration on running performance in temperate conditions. Seventeen intermittent games players (age 22 ± 1 y; VO2peak 52.5 ± 4.1 mL∙kg-1∙min-1) completed preliminary and familiarisation trials, and two experimental trials consisting of 12 blocks of 6 min of running (65% VO2peak; preload) with 1 min passive rest in-between, followed by a 3 km time trial (TT). During the preload, subjects consumed minimal fluid (60 mL) to induce hypohydration (HYP) or water to replace 95% sweat losses (1622 ± 343 mL; EUH). Body mass loss (EUH -0.5 ± 0.3%; HYP -2.2 ± 0.4%; P < 0.001), and other changes indicative of hypohydration, including increased serum osmolality, heart rate, thirst sensation, and decreased plasma volume (P ≤ 0.022), were apparent in HYP by the end of the preload. TT performance was ~6% slower in HYP (EUH 900 ± 87 s; HYP 955 ± 110 s; P < 0.001). Exercise-induced hypohydration of ~2% body mass impaired 3 km running TT performance in a temperate environment.

Hypohydration produced by high-intensity intermittent running increases biomarkers of renal injury in males.

PURPOSE: Whilst there is evidence to suggest that hypohydration caused by physical work in the heat increases renal injury, whether this is the case during exercise in temperate conditions remains unknown. This study investigated the effect of manipulating hydration status during high-intensity intermittent running on biomarkers of renal injury. METHODS: After familiarisation, 14 males (age: 33 ± 7 years; V̇O2peak: 57.1 ± 8.6 ml/kg/min; mean ± SD) completed 2 trials in a randomised cross-over design, each involving 6, 15 min blocks of shuttle running (modified Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test protocol) in temperate conditions (22.3 ± 1.0 °C; 47.9 ± 12.9% relative humidity). During exercise, subjects consumed either a volume of water equal to 90% of sweat losses (EU) or 75 mL water (HYP). Body mass, blood and urine samples were taken pre-exercise (baseline/pre), 30 min post-exercise (post) and 24 h post-baseline (24 h). RESULTS: Post-exercise, body mass loss, serum osmolality and urine osmolality were greater in HYP than EU (P ≤ 0.024). Osmolality-corrected urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (uKIM-1) concentrations were increased post-exercise (P ≤ 0.048), with greater concentrations in HYP than EU (HYP: 2.76 [1.72-4.65] ng/mOsm; EU: 1.94 [1.1-2.54] ng/mOsm; P = 0.003; median [interquartile range]). Osmolality-corrected urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) concentrations were increased post-exercise (P < 0.001), but there was no trial by time interaction effect (P = 0.073). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that hypohydration produced by high-intensity intermittent running increases renal injury, compared to when euhydration is maintained, and that the site of this increased renal injury is at the proximal tubules.

Ad-libitum fluid intake was insufficient to achieve euhydration 20 h after intermittent running in male team sports athletes.

This study documented 20 h rehydration from intermittent running while concealing the primary outcome of rehydration from subjects. Twenty-eight male team sports athletes (age 25 ± 3 y; predicted V̇O2max 54 ± 3 mL kg-1 min-1) were pair-matched to exercise (EX) or rest (REST) groups. To determine hydration status, body mass, urine and blood samples were collected at 08:00, pre-intervention (09:30), post-intervention (12:00), 3 h post-intervention and 08:00 the following morning (20 h). The intervention was 110 min intermittent running (EX) or seated rest (REST), with ad-libitum fluid provided in both. Subjects completed a weighed diet record and collected all urine for the 24 h. Changes typical of hypohydration were apparent in EX following the intervention period (body mass: EX -2.0 ± 0.5%; REST -0.2 ± 0.3%; serum osmolality: EX 293 ± 4 mOsm∙kgH2O-1; REST 287 ± 6 mOsm∙kgH2O-1; P ≤ 0.022). Fluid intake during the intervention period (EX 704 ± 286 mL, REST 343 ± 230 mL) and fluid intake within the first 3 h post-intervention (EX 1081 ± 460 mL, REST 662 ± 230 mL) were greater (P ≤ 0.004), and 24 h urine volume lower (EX 1697 ± 824 mL, REST 2370 ± 842 mL; P = 0.039) in EX. Compared to baseline, body mass remained lower (-0.6 ± 0.5%; P = 0.030) and urine osmolality elevated (20 h: 844 ± 197 mOsm∙kgH2O-1, 08:00: 698 ± 200 mOsm∙kgH2O-1; P = 0.004) at 20 h in EX. When games players drank fluid ad-libitum during exercise and post-exercise in free-living conditions, a small degree of hypohydration remained 20 h post-exercise.

Apple puree as a natural fructose source provides an effective alternative carbohydrate source for fuelling half-marathon running performance.

Carbohydrate supplementation during endurance exercise is known to improve performance, but the effects of food-based approaches in running exercise are understudied. Therefore, this study investigated the performance and gastrointestinal (GI) effects of a carbohydrate supplement containing a natural fructose source compared with a highly processed fructose source in a combined glucose-fructose supplement, during a half-marathon. Eleven trained runners (9 males, 2 females; age 32 ± 8 y, 89:53 ± 13:28 min half-marathon personal record) completed a familiarisation (8 miles) and two experimental trials (13.1 miles) on an outdoor running course, with blood and urine samples collected before and after the run. Subjective GI measures were made throughout the run. Carbohydrate was provided as a natural fructose source in the form of apple puree (AP) or highly processed crystalline fructose (GF) in a 2:1 glucose-to-fructose ratio (additional required glucose was provided through maltodextrin). Half-marathon performance was not different between carbohydrate sources (AP 89:52 ± 09:33 min, GF 88:44 ± 10:09 min; P = 0.684). There were no interaction effects for GI comfort (P = 0.305) or other GI symptoms (P ≥ 0.211). There were no differences between carbohydrate sources in ad libitum fluid intake (AP 409 ± 206 mL; GF 294 ± 149 mL; P = 0.094) or any other urinary (P ≥ 0.724), blood-based (P ≥ 0.215) or subjective (P ≥ 0.421) measures. Apple puree as a natural fructose source was equivalent to crystalline fructose in supporting half-marathon running performance without increasing GI symptoms.HighlightsResearch examining food-first and food-based approaches to carbohydrate supplementation and endurance running performance are limited. Therefore, this study aimed to compare carbohydrate supplements either containing a natural or highly processed fructose source as part of a glucose-fructose supplement on half-marathon running performance and gastrointestinal comfort in trained runners.Running performance (apple puree 89:52 ± 09:33 min vs. crystalline fructose 88:44 ± 10:09 min), gastrointestinal comfort and symptoms were not different between the two fructose sources.Apple puree can be effectively used as a carbohydrate source to fuel half-marathon running performance.