To Stage or Not to Stage? Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, and Discharge Disposition After Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have bilateral hip arthritis can be treated with bilateral total hip arthroplasty (bTHA) in either a staged or simultaneous fashion. The goal of this study was to determine whether staged and simultaneous posterior bTHA patients differ in regard to (1) patient-reported outcome measures, (2) 90-day complication rates, and (3) discharge dispositions and cumulative lengths of stay. METHODS: Patients who (1) underwent simultaneous bTHA or staged bTHA (within 12 months) using the posterior approach, and (2) completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement surveys were included in the study. A total of 266 patients (87 simultaneous bTHA and 179 staged bTHA) were included. Chart review was performed to collect patient-level variables, postoperative complications, discharge dispositions, and lengths of stay. RESULTS: Staged bTHA patients had higher Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical component scores compared to simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery (P = .019, .006, and .008, respectively), but these differences did not meet the minimal clinically important difference threshold for any questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA was associated with higher rate of periprosthetic fractures (P = .034) and discharge to a location other than home (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There were statistically significant, but likely not clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes for staged and simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the higher periprosthetic fracture risk and greater likelihood of discharge to a rehabilitation facility associated with simultaneous bTHA. Further research should aim to understand which patients may benefit most from simultaneous bTHA.

Differences in Time to Return to Work Between Patients Undergoing Staged Versus Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) oftentimes have severe osteoarthritis (OA) in both hips and may consider staged or simultaneous bilateral THA (bTHA). The goal of this study was to compare the total workdays missed following staged and simultaneous bTHA performed via either postero-lateral or direct anterior approach. METHODS: Patients who were (1) employed, (2) underwent a staged (within 12 months) or simultaneous bTHA at our institution between February 1, 2016 and December 31, 2021, (3) completed a return to work questionnaire, and (4) had the same surgical approach for both THAs were included. The primary outcome of interest was the total days of work missed. RESULTS: We identified 78 employed patients who had undergone staged bTHA (62 postero-lateral approach [PA], 16 direct anterior approach [DAA]) and 76 patients (44 PA, 32 DAA) who underwent simultaneous bTHA, and had completed the return to work questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA patients missed an average of 25.6 days of work (standard deviation [SD]: 14.3 days) compared to staged bTHA patients, who missed an average of 36.9 days of work (SD: 23.4) when combining days missed from both operations (P < 0.001). In multivariate mixed regression analysis adjusted for sex, age, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, type of work, and surgical approach, the staged bTHA group missed a mean of 8.2 more days of work (SD: 3.3) compared to the simultaneous bTHA group (95% confidence interval: 1.8-14.7, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Employed patients who underwent simultaneous bTHA missed an average of 8.2 fewer days of work compared to those who were treated with staged bTHA. These findings may help surgeons counsel their employed patients who have bilateral hip OA and are considering surgical treatment.

Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of Mid-Level Constrained and Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Inserts in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of 12,674 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Mid-level constraint polyethylene designs provide additional stability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purposes of this study were to (1) compare the survivorship and reason for revision between mid-level inserts and posterior-stabilized (PS) used in primary TKA and (2) evaluate the biomechanical constraint characteristics of mid-level inserts. METHODS: We reviewed all cases of primary TKA performed at our institution from 2016 to 2019 using either PS or mid-level constrained inserts from 1 of 6 manufacturers. Data elements included patient demographics, implants, reasons for revision, and whether a manipulation under anesthesia was performed. We performed finite element analyses to quantify the varus/valgus and axial-rotation constraint of each mid-level constrained insert. A one-to-one propensity score matching was conducted between the patients with mid-level and PS inserts to match for variables, which yielded 2 cohorts of 3,479 patients. RESULTS: For 9,163 PS and 3,511 mid-level TKAs, survivorship free from all-cause revision was estimated up to 5 years and was lower for mid-level than PS inserts (92.7 versus 94.1%, respectively, P = .004). When comparing each company's mid-level insert to the same manufacturer's PS insert, we found no differences in all-cause revision rates (P ≥ .91) or revisions for mechanical problems (P ≥ .97). Using propensity score matching between mid-level and PS groups, no significant differences were found in rates of manipulation under anesthesia (P = .72), all-cause revision (P = .12), revision for aseptic loosening (P = .07), and revision for instability (P = .45). Finite element modeling demonstrated a range in varus/valgus constraint from ±1.1 to >5°, and a range in axial-rotation constraint from ±1.5 to ±11.5° among mid-level inserts. CONCLUSIONS: Despite wide biomechanical variations in varus/valgus and axial-rotation constraint, we found minimal differences in early survivorship rates between PS and mid-level constrained knees.

Is Tibial Bone Mineral Density Related to Sex, Age, Preoperative Alignment, or Fixation Method in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has regained interest for its potential for long-term biologic fixation. The density of the bone is related to its ability to resist static and cyclic loading and can affect long-term implant fixation; however, little is known about the density distribution of periarticular bone in TKA patients. Thus, we sought to characterize the bone mineral density (BMD) of the proximal tibia in TKA patients. METHODS: We included 42 women and 50 men (mean age 63 years, range: 50 to 87; mean body mass index 31.6, range: 20.5 to 49.1) who underwent robotic-assisted TKA and had preoperative computed tomography scans with a BMD calibration phantom. Using the robotic surgical plan, we computed the BMD distribution at 1 mm-spaced cross-sections parallel to the tibial cut from 2 mm above the cut to 10 mm below. The BMD was analyzed with respect to patient sex, age, preoperative alignment, and type of fixation. RESULTS: The BMD decreased from proximal to distal. The greatest changes occurred within ± 2 mm of the tibial cut. Age did not affect BMD for men; however, women between 60 and 70 years had higher BMD than women ≥ 70 years for the total cut (P = .03) and the medial half of the cut (P = .03). Cemented implants were used in 1 86-year-old man and 18 women (seven < 60 years, seven 60 to 70 years, and four ≥ 70 year old). We found only BMD differences between cemented or cementless fixation for women < 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize the preoperative BMD distribution in TKA patients relative to the intraoperative tibial cut. Our results indicate that while sex and age may be useful surrogates of BMD, the clinically relevant thresholds for cementless knees remain unclear, offering an area for future studies.

Impact of Selective Posterior Cruciate Ligament Fiber Release on Femoral Rollback in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Computational Study.

BACKGROUND: Partial or total release of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is often performed intraoperatively in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) to alleviate excessive femoral rollback. However, the effect of the release of selected fibers of the PCL on femoral rollback in CR-TKA is not well understood. Therefore, we used a computational model to quantify the effect of selective PCL fiber releases on femoral rollback in CR-TKA. METHODS: Computational models of 9 cadaveric knees (age: 63 years, range 47 to 79) were virtually implanted with a CR-TKA. Passive flexion was simulated with the PCL retained and after serially releasing each individual fiber of the PCL, starting with the one located most anteriorly and laterally on the femoral notch and finishing with the one located most posteriorly on the medial femoral condyle. The experiment was repeated after releasing only the central PCL fiber. The femoral rollback of each condyle was defined as the anterior-posterior distance between tibiofemoral contact points at 0° and 90° of flexion. RESULTS: Release of the central PCL fiber in combination with the anterolateral (AL) fibers, reduced femoral rollback a median of 1.5 [0.8, 2.1] mm (P = .01) medially and by 2.0 [1.2, 2.5] mm (P = .04) laterally. Releasing the central fiber alone reduced the rollback by 0.7 [0.4, 1.1] mm (P < .01) medially and by 1.0 [0.5, 1.1] mm (P < .01) laterally, accounting for 47 and 50% of the reduction when released in combination with the AL fibers. CONCLUSIONS: Releasing the central fibers of the PCL had the largest impact on reducing femoral rollback, either alone or in combination with the release of the entire AL bundle. Thus, our findings provide clinical guidance regarding the regions of the PCL that surgeons should target to reduce femoral rollback in CR-TKA.

Clinical and Biomechanical Characteristics of Posterior-Stabilized Polyethylene Post Fractures in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrieval Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the polyethylene post are a rare but known complication after posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluated the polyethylene and patient characteristics for 33 primary PS polyethylene components that were revised with fractured posts. METHODS: We identified 33 PS inserts revised between 2015 and 2022. Patient characteristics collected included age at index TKA, sex, body mass index, length of implantation (LOI), and patient-reported details on events surrounding the post fracture. Implant characteristics recorded were manufacturer, cross-linking properties (highly cross-linked polyethylene [XLPE] versus ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene [UHMWPE]), wear characteristics based on subjective scoring of the articular surfaces and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of fracture surfaces. Mean age at index surgery was 55 years (range, 35 to 69), mean body mass index was 29.5 (range, 18.5 to 37.2), and mean LOI was 10.0 (range, 4 to 26). RESULTS: Total surface damage scores were significantly higher in the UHMWPE group versus the XLPE group (57.3 versus 44.2, P = .003). SEM demonstrated fracture initiation at the posterior edge of the post in 10 of 13 cases. UHMWPE fracture surfaces posts had more tufted, irregularly clamshell features, while XLPE posts had more precise clamshell marking and a diamond pattern in the region of acute, final fracture. CONCLUSION: Characteristics of PS post fracture differed between XLPE and UHMWPE implants, with fractures occurring in the XLPE with less generalized surface damage, after a shorter LOI, and with SEM evaluation indicative of a more brittle fracture pattern.

Undersizing the Tibial Baseplate in Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty has Only a Small Impact on Bone-Implant Interaction: A Finite Element Biomechanical Study.

BACKGROUND: The tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often chosen to maximize coverage of the tibial cut, which can result in excessive internal rotation of the component. Optimal rotational alignment may require a smaller baseplate with suboptimal coverage that could threaten fixation. We asked: "does undersizing the tibial component of a cementless TKA to gain external rotation increase the risk of bone failure?" METHODS: We developed computational finite element (FE) analysis models from the computed tomography (CT) scans of 12 patients scheduled for primary TKA. The models were implanted with a cementless tibial baseplate that maximized coverage and one or two sizes smaller and externally rotated by 5°. We calculated the risk of bone collapse under loads representative of stair ascent. RESULTS: Undersizing the implant increased the area at risk of collapse for eight patients. However, the area at risk of collapse for the undersized implant (range, 5.2%-16.4%) was no different (P = .24) to the optimally sized implant (range, 4.5%-17.9%). The bone at risk of collapse was concentrated along the posterior edge of the implant. The area at risk of collapse was not proportional to implant size, and for four subjects undersizing the implant actually decreased the area at risk of collapse. CONCLUSION: While implants should maximize coverage of the tibial cut and seek support on dense bone, undersizing the tibial component to gain external rotation had minimal impact on the load transfer to the underlying bone. This FE analysis model of a cementless tibial baseplate may require further validation and additional studies to investigate the long-term biomechanical effects of undersizing the tibial baseplate. In conclusion, while surgeons should strive to use the appropriate tibial baseplate for each patient, our model identified only minor biomechanical consequences of undersizing the implant for the immediate postoperative bone-implant interaction and implant subsidence.

Tumors Constitute a Majority of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients <21 Years Old: A United States Nationwide Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is rarely performed in patients under 21 years old, but the frequency of utilization of TKA in this population in the United States is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate trends in the use of TKA in patients <21 in the United States. Additionally, we aimed to determine the characteristics of these patients and the hospitals in which this procedure is performed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Kids' Inpatient Database, a national weighted sample of all inpatient hospital admissions in the United States in patients <21 years of age. We used International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes to identify patients undergoing TKA from 2000 to 2019 and determine a primary diagnosis. Descriptive statistics were calculated using the appropriate sample weights. RESULTS: The total weighted number of TKAs performed in patients <21 years from 2000 to 2019 was 1,535. There were 70.9% of TKAs performed for a primary diagnosis of tumor, and the use of TKA for malignant tumors has increased. In contrast, the use of TKA for inflammatory arthritis/juvenile idiopathic arthritis decreased significantly over the study period. The majority of TKAs were performed in urban teaching hospitals with a large bed size. CONCLUSION: Approximately 1,535 TKAs have been performed in patients <21 years from 2000 to 2019 in the United States. The majority of these procedures were performed for reconstruction after resection of a malignant tumor. The rate of TKA for inflammatory arthritis/juvenile idiopathic arthritis has decreased over the past two decades.

Arthroplasty Surgeons Differ in Their Intraoperative Soft Tissue Assessments: A Study in Human Cadavers to Quantify Surgical Decision-making in TKA.

BACKGROUND: In TKA, soft tissue balancing is assessed through manual intraoperative trialing. This assessment is a physical examination via manually applied forces at the ankle, generating varus and valgus moments at the knee while the surgeon visualizes the lateral and medial gaps at the joint line. Based on this examination, important surgical decisions are made that influence knee stability, such as choosing the polyethylene insert thickness. Yet, the applied forces and the assessed gaps in this examination represent a qualitative art that relies on each surgeon's intuition, experience, and training. Therefore, the extent of variation among surgeons in conducting this exam, in terms of applied loads and assessed gaps, is unknown. Moreover, whether variability in the applied loads yields different surgical decisions, such as choice of insert thickness, is also unclear. Thus, surgeons and developers have no basis for deciding to what extent the applied loads need to be standardized and controlled during a knee balance exam in TKA. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do the applied moments in soft tissue assessment differ among surgeons? (2) Do the assessed gaps in soft tissue assessment differ among surgeons? (3) Is the choice of insert thickness associated with the applied moments? METHODS: Seven independent human cadaveric nonarthritic lower extremities from pelvis to toe were acquired (including five females and two males with a mean age of 73 ± 7 years and a mean BMI of 25.8 ± 3.8 kg/m 2 ). Posterior cruciate ligament substituting (posterior stabilized) TKA was performed only on the right knees. Five fellowship-trained knee surgeons (with 24, 15, 15, 7, and 6 years of clinical experience) and one chief orthopaedic resident independently examined soft tissue balance in each knee in extension (0° of flexion), midflexion (30° of flexion), and flexion (90° of flexion) and selected a polyethylene insert based on their assessment. Pliable force sensors were wrapped around the leg to measure the loads applied by each surgeon. A three-dimensional (3D) motion capture system was used to measure knee kinematics and a dynamic analysis software was used to estimate the medial and lateral gaps. We assessed (1) whether surgeons applied different moments by comparing the mean applied moment by surgeons in extension, midflexion, and flexion using repeated measures (RM)-ANOVA (p < 0.05 was assumed significantly different); (2) whether surgeons assessed different gaps by comparing the mean medial and lateral gaps in extension, midflexion, and flexion using RM-ANOVA (p < 0.05 was assumed significantly different); and (3) whether the applied moments in extension, midflexion, and flexion were associated with the insert thickness choice using a generalized estimating equation (p < 0.05 was assumed a significant association). RESULTS: The applied moments differed among surgeons, with the largest mean differences occurring in varus in midflexion (16.5 Nm; p = 0.02) and flexion (7.9 Nm; p < 0.001). The measured gaps differed among surgeons at all flexion angles, with the largest mean difference occurring in flexion (1.1 ± 0.4 mm; p < 0.001). In all knees except one, the choice of insert thickness varied by l mm among surgeons. The choice of insert thickness was weakly associated with the applied moments in varus (ß = -0.06 ± 0.02 [95% confidence interval -0.11 to -0.01]; p = 0.03) and valgus (ß = -0.09 ± 0.03 [95% CI -0.18 to -0.01]; p= 0.03) in extension and in varus in flexion (ß = -0.11 ± 0.04 [95% CI -0.22 to 0.00]; p = 0.04). To put our findings in context, the greatest regression coefficient (ß = -0.11) indicates that for every 9-Nm increase in the applied varus moment (that is, 22 N of force applied to the foot assuming a shank length of 0.4 m), the choice of insert thickness decreased by 1 mm. CONCLUSION: In TKA soft tissue assessment in a human cadaver model, five surgeons and one chief resident applied different moments in midflexion and flexion and targeted different gaps in extension, midflexion, and flexion. A weak association between the applied moments in extension and flexion and the insert choice was observed. Our results indicate that in the manual assessment of soft tissue, changes in the applied moments of 9 and 11 Nm (22 to 27 N on the surgeons' hands) in flexion and extension, respectively, yielded at least a 1-mm change in choice of insert thickness. The choice of insert thickness may be more sensitive to the applied moments in in vivo surgery because the surgeon is allowed a greater array of choices beyond insert thickness. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Among five arthroplasty surgeons with different levels of experience and a chief resident, subjective soft tissue assessment yielded 1 to 2 mm of variation in their choice of insert thickness. Therefore, developers of tools to standardize soft tissue assessment in TKA should consider controlling the force applied by the surgeon to better control for variations in insert selection.

Satisfaction With the Process vs Outcome of Care in Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction, with both process of care and outcome of care, is critical for measuring the quality and value of elective procedures such as arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between early postoperative satisfaction with the process of care and 2-year satisfaction with the outcome of care after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from institutional arthroplasty registries. Satisfaction with the outcome of care was measured on a scale of 0-100 by a previously validated questionnaire administered 2 years postoperatively. Patient satisfaction with the process of care was measured by the Press Ganey (PG) inpatient survey, also scored 0-100. We examined the correlation between these 2 measures of satisfaction in patients who underwent primary THA or TKA. RESULTS: In total, 721 TKA patients and 760 THA patients underwent surgery and completed both the PG survey and 2-year satisfaction questionnaire. The mean age was 65.1 years with a mean body mass index of 28.8 and 56% were female. The mean PG survey score for the entire cohort was 95.6. The mean 2-year satisfaction score was 90.3. The Spearman correlation coefficient between the PG survey and the 2-year satisfaction survey was 0.23 for TKA patients (P < .001) and 0.13 for THA patients (P < .001). CONCLUSION: We found a weak correlation between the measurement of satisfaction with the process of care surrounding hip and knee arthroplasty using the PG survey and measurement of satisfaction with the outcome of care after arthroplasty using a validated 2-year satisfaction instrument.

A Mid-Level Constrained Insert Reduces Coupled Axial Rotation but Not Coronal Mid-Flexion Laxity Induced by Joint Line Elevation in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Computational Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons may resect additional distal femur during primary posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to correct a flexion contracture. However, the resultant joint line elevation (JLE) increases mid-flexion laxity. We determined whether a mid-level constraint (MLC) insert reduced mid-flexion laxity after JLE. METHODS: Six computational knee models were developed using computed tomography scans and average soft tissue properties yielding balanced extension gaps but with a 10° flexion contracture. Distal femoral resections of +2 and +4 mm were simulated with PS and MLC inserts. Varus-valgus ±10 Nm moments were applied at 30°, 45°, and 60° of flexion. Coronal laxity (the sum of varus-valgus angulation) and coupled axial rotation (the sum of internal/external rotation) were measured and compared between insert models. RESULTS: At 30° of flexion, coronal laxities with the PS insert at the +2 and +4 mm resections averaged 7.9° ± 0.6° and 11.3° ± 0.6°, respectively, and decreased by 0.8° (P = .06) and 1.0° (P = .07), respectively, with the MLC insert. PS rotational laxities at the +2 and +4 mm resections averaged 11.1° ± 3.9° and 12.5° ± 4.6°, respectively, and decreased by 5.6° (P = .01) and 7.1° (P = .02), respectively, with the MLC insert. Similar patterns were observed at 45° and 60° of flexion. CONCLUSION: With additional distal femoral resections to alleviate a flexion contracture, utilizing an MLC insert substantially reduced coupled axial rotation but had a minimal impact on coronal laxity compared to a PS insert. Efforts should be taken to avoid JLE in primary total knee arthroplasty as even MLC inserts may not mitigate coronal laxity.

Arthroscopic treatment of type II superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions in a younger population: minimum 2-year outcomes are similar between SLAP repair and biceps tenodesis.

PURPOSE: Compared to a relatively older population over 30-40 years of age, the efficacy of biceps tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions in a younger population is not well studied. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between biceps tenodesis and labral repair for type II SLAP lesions in a young active population. METHODS: Patients aged 15-40 who underwent primary arthroscopic biceps tenodesis or SLAP repair for type II SLAP tears between 2009 and 2016 were included. Shoulders with intraarticular chondral damage, full thickness rotator cuff tear, rotator cuff repair, labral repair outside of the superior labrum, bony subacromial decompression, and acromioclavicular joint resection were excluded. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Sports/Performing Arts Module (DASH-sport), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction. Return to sport rates were also recorded. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (20 tenodesis, 33 repair) were available for minimum 2-year follow-up. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in mean ASES, DASH-sport, VAS, and satisfaction between groups [ASES: tenodesis 86.3 vs. repair 86.4 (n.s.); DASH-sport: 11.0 vs. 22.5 (n.s.); VAS: 1.85 vs. 1.64 (n.s.); satisfaction: 8.50 vs. 8.00 (n.s.)]. Rate of return to pre-injury level of performance/competition in sport/physical activity was also similar between groups [tenodesis 63% vs. repair 50% (n.s.)]. CONCLUSIONS: In a young active population, primary arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is a viable surgical alternative to labral repair for type II SLAP lesions. The results of this study suggest that indications for arthroscopic tenodesis can safely be expanded to a younger patient group than has previously been demonstrated in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

High Satisfaction and Activity Levels After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under Age 21.

BACKGROUND: With improved materials and bearing surfaces, the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in young patients is increasing. Functional outcomes and activity level are particularly relevant in this higher-demand patient population. There is a paucity of data on patient-reported outcomes and activity levels after THA in extremely young (<21 years old) patients. METHODS: We identified 196 patients (222 hips) who underwent THA at age <21 years at our institution from 1982 to 2018. After applying exclusion criteria, 113 of 160 (70.6%) patients (129 hips) were available for follow-up. Patient activity levels and functional outcomes were evaluated using the UCLA activity score, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, and a validated 5-question satisfaction survey. Survivorship and reasons for revision were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 17.0 ± 2.8 years, and the mean follow-up was 13.2 years (range 2-38 years). The most common indications for THA were osteonecrosis (34%) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (30%). The mean UCLA activity score was 5.9 ± 2.0, and 64% of patients reported a score ≥6. The mean FJS was 57.9 ± 31.0. The mean Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement score was 84.6 ± 16.6. Ninety percent of patients reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with their surgery. At final follow-up, 27 of 129 (20.9%) hips had undergone revision surgery. CONCLUSION: THA performed in patients under 21 years of age with end-stage hip disease allows for high levels of activity and satisfaction postoperatively, with most patients being able to participate in moderate recreational activities. These data may be useful for surgeons in planning for and counseling extremely young patients indicated for THA.

Retrieval Analysis of Polyethylene Components in Rotating Hinge Knee Arthroplasty Implants.

BACKGROUND: This study examined a cohort of retrieved rotating hinge (RH) total knee arthroplasty implants of four different designs with emphasis on the surface damage observed on the polyethylene components. Our purpose was to determine if differences in polyethylene damage existed among the designs, and if those differences could be explained by differences in design characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-two RH implants from four manufacturers (DePuy LPS/SROM, Zimmer NexGen, Stryker Howmedica MRH, and Biomet Finn-OSS) removed at the time of revision performed between 2002 and 2017 were identified in our institutional retrieval registry. Damage to the surfaces of the polyethylene was assessed using a subjective grading system and evaluated in multiple zones. Design characteristics that were evaluated included the following: location of the dwell point on the polyethylene component, posterior position of the axle, and amount of hyperextension and rotation allowed by the implant. RESULTS: There were no differences in total damage scores between the four implant groups (P = .45). The Stryker Howmedica MRH group showed the least backside wear of all implants but significantly more articular-sided wear compared with two of the other three groups. All implants except NexGen showed increased total damage scores in implants revised for mechanical (vs nonmechanical) reasons and in implants with a longer duration of implantation. CONCLUSION: No single implant design emerged as superior in terms of minimizing polyethylene wear damage. Polyethylene damage existed in various locations but was not different in severity across designs, suggesting that there is no clear superior RH design that minimizes overall articular surface wear compared with other designs.

Use of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Under 21 Years Old: A US Population Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate trends in the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the United States in patients under 21 years of age. Specifically, we examined the frequency of THA in this patient population over the past 2 decades, the epidemiologic characteristics of patients under 21 who underwent THA, and the characteristics of the hospitals where these procedures were performed. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the Kids' Inpatient Database, an inpatient US national weighted sample of hospital admissions in patients under 21 from approximately 4200 hospitals in 46 states. We queried the database using Current Procedural Terminology codes for elective and non-elective primary THA for the years 2000-2016. We utilized the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes to determine primary diagnoses. RESULTS: The weighted total number of THAs performed in patients under 21 in the Kids' Inpatient Database increased from 347 in 2000 to 551 in 2016. The most common diagnoses were osteonecrosis, osteoarthritis, and inflammatory arthritis. The frequency of THA for osteonecrosis increased from 24% in 2000 to 38% in 2016, while the frequency of THA for inflammatory arthritis decreased from 27% in 2000 to 4% in 2016. CONCLUSION: The number of THAs in patients under 21 in the United States has increased over the past 2 decades and these procedures are increasingly performed in urban teaching hospitals. The decrease in THA for inflammatory arthritis in this population likely reflects improvements in medical management during the study period.

Development and Validation of the Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Postoperative Satisfaction Survey.

PURPOSE: To develop and validate a standardized patient satisfaction measurement tool for adult patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). METHODS: A 4-phase iterative process that included item generation and pilot survey development, item reduction, survey readability, and survey validation was used. To develop and validate the Hospital for Special Surgery ACL Satisfaction Survey (HSS ACL-SS), 70 patients were included in the survey development phase and 77 patients were included in the validation phase. The HSS ACL-SS was compared with other currently used ACLR outcome measures including the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner-Lysholm score, Short Form 12 (SF-12) Mental Component Score, and SF-12 Physical Component Score. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and floor and ceiling effects were assessed. RESULTS: The HSS ACL-SS consists of 10 items identified by patients as being important for satisfaction after ACLR. In the validation phase, the mean score on the HSS ACL-SS (of 50) among all patients was 37.9 ± 9.9 (range, 10-50). Statistically significant positive correlations were seen between the HSS ACL-SS score and the International Knee Documentation Committee score (r = 0.351, P = .002) and Tegner-Lysholm score (r = 0.333, P = .003). No statistically significant correlation was found between the satisfaction score and the SF-12 Mental or Physical Component Score. The lowest possible score (10 of 50 points) was achieved in 1 patient (1.3%) and the highest possible score (50 of 50 points) was achieved in 7 patients (9.1%), indicating no significant floor or ceiling effects of the instrument. Internal consistency for all 10 items was strong (Cronbach α, 0.995). The mean intraclass correlation coefficient between test and retest responses was 0.701, indicating moderate agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The HSS ACL-SS is a validated and reliable patient-derived satisfaction measure with excellent psychometric properties for active adults undergoing ACLR. The results of this study show that the HSS ACL-SS may be a useful tool to measure postoperative patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, development of diagnostic or monitoring criteria in consecutive patients.

Determining the Validity, Reliability, and Utility of the Forgotten Joint Score: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: With improving patient outcome after total hip and total knee arthroplasty, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have seen a parallel rise in average scores and ceiling effects. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a PROM that has been previously proposed to reduce this observed ceiling effect. However, the validity and reliability of the FJS has not been well analyzed. METHODS: The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried using keywords pertinent to FJS, validity, reliability, measurement properties, and PROM. The methodological quality of measurement properties was evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. RESULTS: In total, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Internal consistency was consistently high (Cronbach alpha >0.9). Test-retest reliability was good or excellent (interclass correlation coefficient ≥0.8) in all studies. As for construct validity, all the articles reported a positive rating. Floor and ceiling effects overall were low (<15%). Conflicting results were found for responsiveness and measurement error. CONCLUSION: There is a strong evidence of good construct validity and test-retest reliability regarding the FJS, with moderate evidence of good internal consistency. Ceiling and floor effects were very low, showing a very promising discriminatory power between patients with a good outcome and patients with an excellent outcome. Therefore, especially in patients expected to achieve high levels of function after total joint replacement, we highly recommend the use of FJS for the long-term assessment of their treatment.

Thirty-Day Readmissions After Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Rates, Predictors, and Reasons Vary by Surgical Indication.

BACKGROUND: Revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is performed for different surgical indications. With increasing attention being focused to minimize readmission risk, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was used to assess 30-day readmissions after rTHA for 3 aseptic indications. METHODS: Patients undergoing rTHA were identified in the 2013-2017 NSQIP and classified as being performed for osteolysis/aseptic loosening, recurrent dislocation, or periprosthetic fracture. Rates and predictors of 30-day readmission were determined by indication. Reasons for readmission were also assessed as being either related or unrelated to the surgical site. RESULTS: Of 6104 patients meeting inclusion criteria, osteolysis/aseptic loosening represented 46% of the revisions (readmission rate: 6.2%), recurrent dislocation represented 33.2% (readmission rate: 10.9%), and periprosthetic fractures represented 20.9% (readmission rate: 9.3%). These readmission rates represented statistically significant variation across the 3 indications (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, demographic, procedural, and postoperative predictors of readmission varied by indication. The osteolysis/aseptic loosening and periprosthetic fracture cohorts had surgical site-related readmissions in 43.9% and 42.4% of readmitted cases, respectively. On the contrary, readmissions after rTHA performed for recurrent dislocation were mostly surgical site-related (63.3%) and driven primarily by a postoperative dislocation. Further multivariate analysis showed that the rTHA indication of recurrent dislocation itself was the strongest predictor (odds ratio, 3.34; P < .0001) of a postoperative dislocation leading to a 30-day readmission. CONCLUSION: Thirty-day readmissions varied from 6.2% to 10.9% based on surgical indication for aseptic rTHA. Reasons for readmission also differed across the 3 cohorts. These findings may aid postoperative care pathways and protocol optimization.

Assessment of a Satisfaction Measure for Use After Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction after total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a core outcome selected by the Outcomes Measurement in Rheumatology. Up to 20% of THA/TKA patients are dissatisfied. Improving patient satisfaction is hindered by the lack of a validated measurement tool that can accurately measure change. METHODS: The psychometric properties of a proposed satisfaction instrument, consisting of 4 questions rated on a Likert scale, scored 1-100, were tested for validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change using data collected between 2007 and 2011 in an arthroplasty registry. RESULTS: We demonstrated construct validity by confirming our hypothesis; satisfaction correlated with similar constructs. Satisfaction correlated moderately with pain relief (TKA ρ = 0.61, THA ρ = 0.47) and function (TKA ρ = 0.65, THA ρ = 0.51) at 2 years; there was no correlation with baseline/preoperative pain/function values, as expected. Overall Cronbach's alpha >0.88 confirmed internal consistency. Test-retest reliability with weighted kappa ranged 0.60-0.75 for TKA and 0.36-0.56 for THA. Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score/Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores quality of life improvement (>30 points) corresponds to a mean satisfaction score of 93.2 (standard deviation, 11.5) after THA and 90.4 (standard deviation, 13.8) after TKA, and increasing relief of pain and functional improvement increased the strength of their association with satisfaction. The satisfaction measure has no copyright and is available free of cost and represents minimal responder burden. CONCLUSION: Patient satisfaction with THA/TKA can be measured with a validated 4-item questionnaire. This satisfaction measure can be included in a total joint arthroplasty core measurement set for total joint arthroplasty trials.

Single- Versus Double-Row Repair of Hip Abductor Tears: A Biomechanical Matched Cadaver Study.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the percentage of gluteus medius and minimus tendon footprint restoration that can be achieved with fixation using single-row repair versus double-row repair and (2) to evaluate the yield load of a repair of the gluteus medius and minimus tendon using single-row versus double-row repair techniques. METHODS: Twelve human fresh-frozen cadaveric hip specimens (6 matched pairs, 4 female, mean age 47.5 ± 14.5 years) were tested. Specimens were excluded if they had any prior hip surgery or injury, if any abnormality of the tendon was noted on dissection, or if they had a body mass index <20 or >35 or a T-score <2.0 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning. Matched pairs were randomized to receive either double-row repair with 2 standard suture anchors and 2 knotless anchor devices or a single-row repair with suture anchors only. The percentage of the footprint area covered after repair was determined using a computer-assisted digitization algorithm. With a mechanical testing system, each repaired specimen was tested for mechanical strength first with cyclic loading and then load to failure testing. RESULTS: Footprint coverage of the lateral facet was significantly greater for double-row repair (mean 76.6%) compared with single-row repair (mean 50.3%) (P = .03). There was no significant difference between single- and double-row repair for posterior-superior or anterior facet coverage. Mechanical testing showed a higher mean yield load for double-row anchor repair (197.6 ± 61.7 N vs 163.5 ± 35.4 N for single-row repair), but this did not reach statistical significance (P = .15). The predominant mode of failure was suture pullout through the musculotendinous unit (9/12 specimens: 5 double-row and 4 single-row). CONCLUSIONS: For hip abductor tears, double-row suture repair yields improved footprint coverage compared with single-row repair. Although it did not reach statistical significance, there was a higher mean yield load in the double-row group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Double-row suture fixation technique for hip abductor tears maximizes strength and footprint coverage of the repair.