Performance evaluation of Alfred60AST rapid susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures in the routine laboratory workflow.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the new automated system Alfred60AST which is based on light scattering technology for rapid susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures as well as its applicability in the routine laboratory workflow. We evaluated 176 significant episodes of bacteremia due to 92 Gram-negative and 84 Gram-positive bacteria. The antimicrobial agents tested were ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and colistin for Gram negatives and cefoxitin, vancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin for Gram positives. Concordance assessment was performed in comparison with our routine method, Vitek2 (bioMérieux). Discrepancies were resolved with MICRONAUT-S (Merlin) or E-test (bioMérieux). Out of 690 susceptibility determinations, 94.05% showed categorical agreement (CA) with the routine method and this percentage increased to 94.49 after discrepancy analysis. There were 1.45% very major errors, 3.33% major errors, and 1.16% minor errors (decreased to 1.45, 3.04, and 1.01 after discrepancy analysis). The CA for most of the antibiotics was above 90% except for daptomycin for Gram positives (87.30%) and ceftriaxone for Gram negatives (88.23%). The concordance was slightly better for Gram negative than for Gram-positive bacteria (94.30 versus 93.70%, respectively). The total turnaround time for a complete Alfred60AST result was 6-6.5h. The evaluated method gave rapid and reliable results in a few hours, versus 48h for the conventional one. Implementing this technology in routine workflow allows clinicians to optimize the treatment on the same day of blood culture positivity with potential positive clinical benefits and impact on antibiotic stewardship.

Clostridioides difficile infection epidemiology during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece.

Aim: The aim was to highlight the incidence and epidemiology of C. difficile infections (CDI) in a tertiary Greek hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A single-center prospective observational cohort study was conducted (October 2021 until April 2022). 125 C. difficile isolates were cultured from hospitalized patients stool samples and screened by PCR for toxin A (tcdA), toxin B (tcdB), binary toxin (cdtA and cdtB) genes and the regulating gene of tcdC. Results: The incidence of CDI increased to 13.1 infections per 10,000 bed days. The most common PCR ribotypes identified included hypervirulent RT027-related RT181 (73.6%), presumably hypervirulent RT126 (8.0%) and toxin A negative RT017 (7.2%). Conclusion: Although the incidence of CDI increased significantly, the CDI epidemiology remained stable.

[Box: see text].

Implication of COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection in a Greek tertiary hospital.

Introduction. C. difficile infection (CDI) represents an important global threat. In the COVID-19 era, the multifactorial nature of CDI has emerged.Hypothesis - Aim. The aim was to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the incidence of CDI in a Greek hospital.Methodology. A retrospective study was performed throughout a 51 month period (January 2018 to March 2022), divided into two periods: pre-pandemic (January 2018 to February 2020) and COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 to March 2022). The effects of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period on the incidence of CDI [expressed as infections per 10 000 bed days (IBD)] were studied using interrupted time-series analysis.Results. Throughout the study, there was an increase in the monthly CDI incidence from 0.00 to 11.77 IBD (P<0.001). Interrupted time-series disclosed an increase in CDI incidence during the pre-pandemic period from 0.00 to 3.36 IBD (P<0.001). During the COVID-19 pandemic period the linear trend for monthly CDI rose from 2.65 to 13.93 IBD (P<0.001). The increase rate was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic period (r2 = +0.47) compared to the pre-pandemic period (r1 = +0.16).Conclusion. A significant increase of CDI incidence was observed, with the rate of the rise being more intense during the COVID-19 pandemic.