Reoperation rate after internal fixation of intertrochanteric femur fractures with the percutaneous compression plate: what are the risk factors?

OBJECTIVE: The aim was this study was to analyze the risk factors for reoperation after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur using the percutaneous compression plate (PCCP). DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The study was conducted at the University Hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures who underwent internal fixation with a PCCP were included in this study. We investigated potential risk factors such as age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities of the patients (American Society of Anesthetist classification), type of fracture (AO/OTA classification), experience of the surgeons (in terms of the number of surgical procedures with the PCCP device), tip-apex distance (TAD), and operation time. The procedures were performed by 10 surgeons. Logistic regression was used to assess potential predictors for the need of reoperation. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients with 96 intertrochanteric fractures, 8 underwent reoperation due to local complications (8.3%). The most frequent complication was complete or imminent cutting out of the upper cervical screw (N = 5; 5.2%). Five of the 8 risk factors that were associated with reoperation in the initial univariable analyses with a P value of <0.20 were retained in a multivariable logistic regression model, including, age, body mass index, TAD, experience of the surgeons, and operation time. Of these, only the factor TAD proved to be a significant predictor for reoperation (P = 0.027, odds ratio = 1.089, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.175). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that the surgeon-related risk factors (number of operations, operation time, TAD) seem to be more relevant for the reoperation rate after internal fixation with the PCCP device when compared with the patient-related risk factors. This finding indicates a substantial learning curve for this technically demanding procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Socio-economic outcome after blunt orthopaedic trauma: Implications on injury prevention.

BACKGROUND: Several large studies have identified factors associated with long-term outcome after orthopaedic injuries. However, long-term social and economic implications have not been published so far. The aim of this investigation is to study the long-term socio-economic consequences of patients sustaining severe trauma. METHODS: Patients treated at a level one trauma center were invited for a follow-up (at least 10 years) examination. There were 637 patients who responded and were examined. Inclusion criteria included injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 16 points, presence of lower and upper extremity fractures, and age between 3 and 60 years. Exclusion criteria included the presence of amputations and paraplegia. The socio-economic outcome was evaluated in three age groups: group I (< 18 years), group II (19 - 50 years), and group III (> 50 years). The following parameters were analyzed using a standardized questionnaire: financial losses, net income losses, pension precaution losses, need for a bank loan, and the decrease in number of friends. RESULTS: 510 patients matched all study criteria, and breakdown of groups were as follows: 140 patients in group I, 341 patients in group II, and 29 patients in group III. Financial losses were reported in all age groups (20%-44%). Younger patients (group I) were associated with less income losses when compared with other groups (p < 0.05). Financial deterioration was more frequently reported in age group II (p < 0.05). Social consequences (number of friends decreased) were predominantly stated in patients younger than 18 years old (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Economic consequences are reported by polytraumatized patients even ten or more years after injury. Financial losses appear to be common in patients between 19 and 50 years. In contrast, social deprivation appears to be most pronounced in the younger age groups. Early socio-economic support and measures of injury prevention should focus on these specific age groups.