What Changed? Variables Associated With the General Surgery Match.

INTRODUCTION: Between 1994 and 2014, despite an increase in applicants, successful matches into general surgery (GS) decreased by 13%. We aim to (1) understand the trends in competitiveness for a GS residency, and ascertain the associations between (2) geographical distribution and (3) research experiences on matching. METHODS: National Resident Matching Program data (2013-2022) were analyzed for (1) annual positions and matches, (2) United States Medical Licensing Examination scores, and (3) research experiences. Geographical locations of general surgery residency programs (GSRPs) for matched US seniors were obtained from medical school websites and through contacting institutions. Distances between medical schools and respective matches were assessed for the proportion of students matching within 100 miles, in the same state or same region, or in a different geographical region than their medical school. RESULTS: Of 28,690 applicants, 15,242 (53.12%) matched into a GS residency. Matched GS applicants had higher United States Medical Licensing Examination scores compared to applicants who matched in Emergency Medicine and Family Medicine (P < 0.001). US Medical Doctor (MD) match rates into GS were lower compared to Neurosurgery (P < 0.01), possibly due to competition from non-US MD applicants within GS. More applicants matched into GSRPs in the same region as their medical school, with 14% matching into home programs or within the same state as their medical school. CONCLUSIONS: Higher board examination scores and research participation are associated with successful matches. GS competition from non-US MDs may be driving the match rates for US MDs lower. More than half of students matched into GSRPs in the same region as their medical school.

The Effectiveness of Patient Education on Laparoscopic Surgery Postoperative Outcomes to Determine Whether Direct Coaching Is the Best Approach: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: As of 2022, patient adherence to postoperative guidelines can reduce the risk of complications by up to 52.4% following laparoscopic abdominal surgery. With the availability of various preoperative education interventions (POEIs), understanding which POEI results in improvement in patient outcomes across the procedures is imperative. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine which POEI could be the most effective on patient outcomes by systematically reviewing all the POEIs reported in the literature. METHODS: In total, 4753 articles investigating various POEIs (eg, videos, presentations, mobile apps, and one-on-one education or coaching) were collected from the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing abdominal laparoscopic surgery, randomized controlled trials, and studies that provided postoperative outcomes. Exclusion criteria included studies not published in English and with no outcomes reported. Title and abstract and full-text articles with POEI randomized controlled studies were screened based on the above criteria through a blinded, dual review using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation). Study quality was assessed through the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The included articles were analyzed for educational content, intervention timing, intervention type, and postoperative outcomes appropriate for a particular surgery. RESULTS: Only 17 studies matched our criteria, with 1831 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bariatric surgery (gastric bypass and gastric sleeve), and colectomy. In total, 15 studies reported a statistically significant improvement in at least 1 patient postoperative outcome. None of these studies were found to have an overall high risk of bias according to Cochrane standards. In total, 41% (7/17) of the included studies using direct individual education improved outcomes in almost all surgery types, while educational videos had the greatest statistically significant impact for anxiety, nausea, and pain postoperatively (P<.01). Direct group education demonstrated significant improvement in weight, BMI, exercise, and depressive symptoms in 33% (2/6) of the laparoscopic gastric bypass studies. CONCLUSIONS: Direct education (individual or group based) positively impacts postoperative laparoscopic surgery outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42023438698; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=438698.

The Role of Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) in Neurodegeneration.

Sirtuins (SIRT) are a class of histone deacetylases that regulate important metabolic pathways and play a role in several disease processes. Of the seven mammalian homologs currently identified, sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) is the best understood and most studied. It has been associated with several neurodegenerative diseases and cancers. As such, it has been further investigated as a therapeutic target in the treatment of disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and Alzheimer's disease (AD). SIRT1 deacetylates histones such as H1 lysine 26, H3 lysine 9, H3 lysine 56, and H4 lysine 16 to regulate chromatin remodeling and gene transcription. The homolog has also been observed to express contradictory responses to tumor suppression and tumor promotion. Studies have shown that SIRT1 may have anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting the effects of NF-κB, as well as stimulating upregulation of autophagy. The SIRT1 activators resveratrol and cilostazol have been shown to improve Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores in AD patients. In this review, we aim to explore the various roles of SIRT1 with regard to neuroprotection and neurodegeneration.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Factors Impacting Success of the Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Hip dysplasia is a condition affecting both infants and adults, characterized by a shallow acetabulum that does not sufficiently cover the head of the femur. This leads to instability of the hip and elevated levels of mechanical stress around the acetabular rim. A popular procedure for the correction of hip dysplasia is the periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), in which fluoroscopically guided osteotomies around the pelvis are made to allow for repositioning of the acetabulum to fit properly on the femoral head. This systematic review aims to analyze patient factors that impact outcomes, as well as patient-reported outcomes such as the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC). The patients in this review did not undergo any prior intervention for acetabular hip dysplasia, allowing for an unbiased reporting of outcomes from all included studies. Of studies reporting HHS, the mean preoperative HHS was 68.92 and the mean postoperative HHS was 89.1. Of the study that reported mHHS, the mean preoperative mHHS was 70, and the mean postoperative mHHS was 91. Of the studies reporting WOMAC, the mean preoperative WOMAC was 66, and the mean postoperative WOMAC was 63. Key findings of this review are that of the seven included studies, six achieved a minimally important clinical difference (MCID) based on patient-reported outcomes, and factors impacting outcome are preoperative Tönnis osteoarthritis (OA) grade, pre and postoperative lateral-center edge angle (LCEA), preoperative hip joint congruency, postoperative Tönnis angle, and age. In patients with no prior intervention for hip dysplasia, the PAO is a successful procedure with significant improvement in postoperative patient-reported outcomes. Despite the reported success of the PAO, proper patient selection is vital to avoid early conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and prolonged pain. However, further investigation is prompted regarding the long-term survivorship of the PAO in patients with no prior intervention for hip dysplasia.