Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease with Biologics in Japan: A Single-Center, Retrospective Pharmacoeconomic Study.

Biologics are essential for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, only a few studies have validated cost-effective treatment options and patient factors for biologic use using real-world data from Japanese patients with IBD. Here, we aimed to provide pharmacoeconomic evidence to support clinical decisions for IBD treatment using biologics. We assessed 183 cases (127 patients) of IBD treated with biologics between November 2004 and September 2021. Data on patient background, treatment other than biologics, treatment-related medical costs, and effectiveness index (ratio of the C-reactive protein-negative period to drug survival time) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Drug survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis. The outcomes were to validate a novel assessment index and elucidate the following aspects using this index: the effectiveness-cost relationship of long-term biologic use in IBD and cost-effectiveness-associated patient factors. Body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and duration of hypoalbuminemia during drug survival correlated significantly with the therapeutic effectiveness of biologics. There were no significant differences in surgical, granulocyte apheresis, or adverse-event costs per drug survival time. Biologic costs were significantly higher in the group showing lower effectiveness than in the group showing higher effectiveness. These findings hold major pharmacoeconomic implications for not only improving therapeutic outcomes through the amelioration of low albumin levels and obesity but also potentially reducing healthcare expenditure related to the use of biotherapeutics. To our knowledge, this is the first pharmacoeconomic study based on real-world data from Japanese patients with IBD receiving long-term biologic therapy.

Pharmacoeconomic study of biologics for psoriasis treatment based on real-world drug survival.

The efficacy of biologics in psoriasis treatment is clinically proven; however, biologics are expensive. In this study, we assessed the real-world cost-effectiveness of biologics for psoriasis treatment by evaluating the relationship between biologic drug survival (DS) and total medical-treatment costs from a pharmacoeconomic viewpoint. Furthermore, the effects of patient factors on cost-effectiveness were investigated. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 135 cases who received either a tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) monoclonal antibody (TNF-mab), interleukin (IL)-17 mab, or IL23p19-mab for psoriasis from January 2010 to June 2020 at Yamaguchi University Hospital. We compared the monthly medical-treatment costs according to biologic classification and found that costs of medical services, tests, and external preparations required for the treatment process were significantly higher in the TNF-mab group than in the other groups, and the total medical costs associated with TNF-mab treatment were significantly higher than those of IL17-mab treatment. The total monthly cost of medical care was lower in the long-term DS group than in the short-term group. The number of prescriptions for external preparations, comprising Vitamin D3 and corticosteroid, was significantly higher in the long-term DS group than in the short-term group; in the TNF-mab group, the proportion of patients without smoking habits was significantly higher in the long-term group as well. Our study indicated that when costly biologics are used for psoriasis treatment, the maintenance of long-term DS and appropriate patient guidance might improve the quality of medical care, thus allowing cost-effective medical care.