Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 43(3): 579-594, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318878

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulators (SNSs) are a widely accepted, efficacious surgical option to treat patients who have failed conservative management for overactive bladder, nonobstructive urinary retention, fecal incontinence, or pelvic pain. As with all implanted devices, there are associated risks for surgical site and implant infections. There are currently no clear published data or guidelines regarding treating such infections. AIMS: We present a scoping review aiming to examine the existing literature on the treatment approaches of infected SNSs. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The search strategy focused on "sacral modulation," and "infection," and "explantation," and conservative management methods such as "antibiotics." A search was conducted on medical databases, and a grey literature search was performed. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included for data extraction. Articles were published between 2006 and 2022. Outcomes were reported for 7446 patients. Two hundred and seventy-four infection events were reported, giving an overall 3.7% infection rate. Most infection events were treated with explantation, although there is some discussion on the role of conservative management using oral and intravenous antibiotics in the literature. Articles also discussed considerations for future reimplantation after explantation of SNS. CONCLUSIONS: There are currently no treatment protocols in the literature to help guide whether a patient is suited to conservative or surgical management. There is future scope for developing treatment algorithms to guide clinicians for optimal treatment of infected sacral neuromodulation devices.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Plexo Lombossacral , Humanos , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/instrumentação , Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/terapia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/diagnóstico , Remoção de Dispositivo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 43(3): 553-564, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38225733

RESUMO

AIMS: The negative impact on quality of life and the economic-related burden to the patient and the health care system associated with idiopathic overactive bladder (iOAB) is well-documented. Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTN/A) injections are a well-used treatment modality for the management of overactive detrusor refractory to medical management, with well-documented efficacy and safety profiles. There is currently no best practice guideline for the administration of BTN/A for this procedure and historically the trigone of the bladder has been excluded from the injection paradigm given the risk of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). METHODS: A scoping review methodology was employed to assess available literature to evaluate current techniques used. There is emerging literature that the inclusion of the trigone may increase the efficacy of the procedure, while maintaining a similar adverse effect profile. Similar results could also be obtained by decreasing the number of injection sites. A scoping review was completed with systematic methodology using the Preferred Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses extension for Scoping Review checklist. The search strategy looked to evaluate BTN/A and number of injection sites and the inclusion of the trigone in female patients with iOAB. Studies with male or neurogenic bladder only were excluded. Mixed studies were included. A specialist research librarian was engaged, with supervision from a functional urologist using a combination of MeSH and natural language terms. Two investigators independently reviewed the titles and abstracts. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included and were published between 2005 and 2021. There was no evidence of VUR in any of the results. All but one study reported similar if not improved efficacy of trigone-inclusion. Lower number of injection sites had similar efficacy profiles to higher numbers of intradetrusor injections. CONCLUSIONS: Further high-quality randomized control trials of trigone inclusion and reduction of injection sites are required. It is hoped that with further exploration of intraoperative methods for BTN/A injections, the development of universally accepted guidelines may optimize management and experiences for patients with iOAB.


Assuntos
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa , Refluxo Vesicoureteral , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/uso terapêutico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/tratamento farmacológico , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/induzido quimicamente , Qualidade de Vida , Bexiga Urinária , Administração Intravesical , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA