Screening Criteria Improve Access to Palliative Care in the PICU.

OBJECTIVES: To test the ability of palliative care screening criteria to improve access to palliative care services in the PICU and examine the association between palliative care team involvement and ICU and hospital length of stay. DESIGN: Prospective interventional quality improvement study. SETTING: PICU at a quaternary academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the PICU who met criteria for palliative care referral over a 9-month period. INTERVENTION: Consensus palliative care consultation criteria were created by pediatric critical care medicine and palliative care providers, and palliative care referral was encouraged for all PICU patients meeting criteria. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Palliative care referral rates increased significantly after screening criteria implementation. We identified 100 patients who were eligible for palliative care services, and referrals were made for 70 patients (70%). Patients were divided into three groups based on palliative care status: patients new to the palliative care team, patients with an existing palliative care relationship, and patients who did not have a palliative care referral. By the end of study, patients who had an existing relationship with the palliative care team were more likely to still be alive and to have limitations of medical interventions in place, whereas patients who did not have a palliative care referral were more likely to be deceased and to have died in the PICU. After correcting for other factors, including severity of illness, patients who were new to the palliative care team experienced greater delay in palliative care referral and had significantly longer PICU and hospital length of stay than those who were already known to the palliative care team. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative care screening criteria are effective tools for improving access to palliative care services in the PICU; however, widespread adoption may produce a significant increase in palliative care demand. The association between an existing palliative care relationship and reduction in resource utilization deserves further investigation as does the perceived benefit of palliative care involvement in the patient, family, and staff experience.

Use of a dose-dependent follow-up protocol and mechanisms to reduce patients and staff radiation exposure in congenital and structural interventions.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly complex structural/congenital cardiac interventions require efforts at reducing patient/staff radiation exposure. Standard follow-up protocols are often inadequate in detecting all patients that may have sustained radiation burns. METHODS: Single-center retrospective chart review divided into four intervals. Phase 1 (07/07-06/08, 413 procedures (proc)): follow-up based on fluoroscopy time only; frame rate for digital acquisition (DA) 30 fps, and fluoroscopy (FL) 30 fps. Dose-based follow-up was used for phase 2-4. Phase 2 (07/08-08/09, 458 proc): DA: 30 fps, FL: 15 fps. Phase 3 (09/09-06/10, 350 proc): DA: 15-30 fps, FL: 15 fps, use of added radiation protection drape. Phase 4 (07/10-10/10, 89 proc): DA: 15-30 fps, FL: 15 fps, superior noise reduction filter (SNRF) with high-quality fluoro-record capabilities. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the median cumulative air kerma between the four study periods (710 mGy vs. 566 mGy vs. 498 mGy vs. 241 mGy, P < 0.001), even though the overall fluoroscopy times remained very similar (25 min vs. 26 min vs. 26 min vs. 23 min, P = 0.957). There was a trend towards lower physician radiation exposure over the four study periods (137 mrem vs. 126 mrem vs. 108 mrem vs. 59 mrem, P = 0.15). Fifteen patients with radiation burns were identified during the study period. When changing to a dose-based follow-up protocol (phase 1 vs. phase 2), there was a significant increase in the incidence of detected radiation burns (0.5% vs. 2%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-based follow-up protocols are superior in detecting radiation burns when compared to fluoroscopy time-based protocols. Frame rate reduction of fluoroscopy and cine acquisition and use of modified imaging equipment can achieve a significant reduction to patient/staff exposure.