Textbook outcome among voluntary donors undergoing major living donor hepatectomy.

PURPOSE: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure of outcome and provides superior assessment of quality of care after surgery. TO after major living donor hepatectomy (MLDH) has not been assessed. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of TO and its associated factors, after MLDH. METHODS: This was a single center retrospective review of living liver donors who underwent MLDH between 2012 and 2021 (n = 1022). The rate of TO and its associated factors was determined. RESULTS: Among 1022 living donors (of whom 693 [67.8%] were males, median age 26 [range, 18-54] years), TO was achieved in 714 (69.9%) with no donor mortality. Majority of donors met the cutoffs for individual outcome measures: 908 (88.8%) for no major complications, 904 (88.5%) for ICU stay ≤ 2 days, 900 (88.1%) for hospital stay ≤ 10 days, 990 (96.9%) for no perioperative blood transfusion, 1004 (98.2%) for no 30-day re-admission, and 1014 (99.2%) for no post-hepatectomy liver failure. Early donation era (before streamlining of donor operative pathways) was associated with failure to achieve TO [OR 1.4, CI 1.1-1.9, P = 0.006]. TO was achieved in 506/755 (67%) donors in the early donation era versus 208/267 (77.9%) in the later period (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite zero mortality and low complication rate, TO was achieved in approximately 70% donors. TO was modifiable and improved with changes in donor operative pathway.

Saphenous vein conduits for hepatic arterial reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation.

PURPOSE: Occasionally, a recipient's native hepatic arteries are not suitable for reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The use of the great saphenous vein (GSV) conduits in such patients is seldom practiced since arterial conduits from deceased donors are available. Here, we share our experience with a significantly large group of LDLT recipients who underwent arterial reconstruction with GSV conduits. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent LDLT between 2012 and 2017. Patients who had arterial reconstruction using native hepatic arteries (group 1)(n = 452) were compared with those who had GSV interposition conduits for reconstruction (group 2)(n = 21). We compared hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) rate, allograft dysfunction, morbidity, mortality, and actuarial 5-year survival in the two groups. RESULTS: HAT was seen in 0/452 (0%) versus 1/21(4.7%) patients (P = 0.04). Allograft dysfunction was seen in 89/423 (21%) versus 6/19(31.5%) (P = 0.2) patients. Overall mortality was 81/452 (17.9%) versus 8/21(38%) (P = 0.02). Death after a biliary complication was seen in 24/452 (5.3%) versus 4/21 (19%) patients (P = 0.02). Actuarial 1- and 5-year overall survival was 85% versus 67% and 79% versus 58% (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: GSV conduits are a suboptimal alternative for establishing hepatic arterial inflow in LDLT, but remain valuable in ominous situations.

The travails of setting up a living donor liver transplant program: Experience from Pakistan and lessons learned.

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is the only treatment option for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) where cadaveric donors are not available. In developing countries, the inception of LDLT programs remains a challenge. The first successful liver transplantation program in Pakistan started transplantation in 2012. The objective of this study was to report outcomes of 100 LDLT recipients in a developing country and to highlight the challenges encountered by a new LDLT program in a resource-limited setting. We retrospectively reviewed recipients who underwent LDLT between April 2012 and August 2014. Demographics, etiology, graft characteristics, and operative variables were assessed. Outcome was assessed on the basis of morbidity and mortality. All complications of ≥ 3 on the Clavien-Dindo grading system were included as morbidity. Estimated 1-year survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and a Log-rank test was used to determine the significance. Outcomes between the first 50 LDLTs (group 1) and latter 50 LDLTs (group 2) were also compared. Median age was 46.5 (0.5-72) years, whereas the median MELD score was 15.5 (7-37). The male to female ratio was 4:1. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus was the most common indication (73% patients). There were 52 (52%) significant (≥ grade 3) complications. The most common morbidities were bile leaks in 9 (9%) and biliary strictures in 14 (14%) patients. Overall mortality in patients who underwent LDLT for ESLD was 10.6%. Estimated 1-year survival was 87%. Patients who underwent transplantation in the latter period had a significantly lower overall complication rate (36% versus 68%; P = 0.01). Comparable outcomes can be achieved in a new LDLT program in a developing country. Outcomes improve as experience increases.

Long-term medical and quality of life outcomes among voluntary liver donors.

BACKGROUND: Long-term medical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in voluntary liver donors remain under investigated. The objective of the current study was to report long-term medical outcomes and re-evaluate QOL in living liver donors. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective cohort study of donors who underwent donor hepatectomy between 2012 and 2018. We investigated long-term outcomes in 7 domains. These include medical problems, surgical procedures, work-related issues, pregnancy outcomes, psychiatric interventions, willingness to donate again, and long-term mortality. QOL was evaluated using short-form 36. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 61.4 months (53.3-83.7). Among 698 donors, 80 (11.5%) experienced medical problems, 4 (0.6%) had work-related issues, and 20 (2.9%) needed psychiatric assistance. Surgery was performed in 49 donors (7%), and females were more likely to have undergone incisional hernia repair (5.8% vs 1.9%, P = .006). There were 79 postdonation pregnancies including 41 normal vaginal deliveries (51.9%), 35 cesarean sections (44.3%), and 3 miscarriages (3.8%). Willingness to donate again was reported by 658 donors (94.3%). Donors whose recipients were alive were more likely to donate again (95.5% vs 90.5%, P = .01). There were 3 deaths (0.4%) in the long-term. The mean physical composite score at initial and follow-up evaluation was 86.7 ± 13.9 and 76.5 ± 20.9 (P = .001), and the mean mental composite score at initial and follow-up evaluation was 92.1 ± 13.5 and 80.7 ± 16 (P = .001). CONCLUSION: The overall long-term outlook in living liver donors is promising. QOL parameters might deteriorate over time and frequent re-evaluation might be considered.

Survival after extended resections for gallbladder cancer.

Backgrounds/Aims: Locally advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) is associated with survival limited to a few months. Extended resections (ER) are occasionally performed in this group and outcomes remain inconclusive. This study assessed outcomes after ER for locally advanced GBC. Methods: Patients who underwent ER for GBC between 2011 and 2020 were reviewed. ER was defined as a major hepatectomy alone (n = 9), a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with or without minor hepatectomy (n = 3), a major hepatectomy with PD (HPD) (n = 3) or vascular resection and reconstruction (n = 4). We assessed 30-day morbidity, mortality, and 2-year overall survival (OS). Results: Among 19 patients, negative margins were achieved in 14 (73.6%). The 30-day mortality was 1/9 (11.1%) for a major hepatectomy, 0/3 (0%) for a minor HPD, 2/3 (66.7%) for a major HPD, and 1/4 (25.0%) for vascular resection. All short term survivors (< 6 months) (n=8) had preoperative jaundice and 6/8 (75.0%) underwent a major HPD or vascular resection. There were five (26.3%) long term survivors. The median OS in patients with and without preoperative jaundice was 4.1 months (0.7-11.1 months) and 13.7 months (12-30.4 months), respectively (p = 0.009) (2-year OS = 7% vs. 75%; p = 0.008). The median OS in patients who underwent a major hepatectomy alone or a minor HPD was 11.3 months (6.8-17.3 months) versus 1.4 months (0.3-4.1 months) (p = 0.02) in patients who underwent major HPD or vascular resection (2 year OS = 33% vs. not reached) (p = 0.010) respectively. Conclusions: In selected patients with GBC, when ER is limited to a major hepatectomy alone, or a minor HPD, acceptable survival can be achieved.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: an Evolving Challenge.

BACKGROUND: Maintaining standards of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can be a challenge during the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Center-specific protocols have been developed and transplant societies propose limiting elective LDLT. We have looked at outcomes of LDLT during the pandemic in an exclusively LDLT center. METHODS: Patients were grouped into pre-COVID (January 2019-February 2020) (n = 162) and COVID (March 2020-January 2021) (n = 53) cohorts. We looked at patient characteristics, 30-day morbidity, and mortality. Outcomes were also assessed in donors and recipients who underwent surgery after recovery from COVID-19. RESULTS: The average number of transplants reduced from 11.5/month to 4.8/month. Fewer patients with MELD > 20 underwent LDLT in the COVID cohort (41.3% versus 24.5%, P = 0.03). Out of nine patients with a positive pretransplant COVID-19 PCR, there were 2 (22.3%) deaths on the waiting list. Seven patients underwent LT after recovery from COVID-19 with one 30-day mortality due to biliary sepsis. Three donors with positive COVID-19 PCR underwent uneventful donation after testing negative for COVID-19. No significant difference in 30-day survival was observed in the pre-COVID and COVID cohorts (93.2% versus 90.6%) (P = 0.3). Out of two recipients who developed COVID-19 pneumonia within 30 days after LT, there was one mortality. The 1-year survival for the entire cohort with a MELD cutoff of 20 was 90% and 84% (P = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Despite comparable outcomes, fewer sick patients might undergo LDLT during the pandemic. Individuals recovered from COVID-19 might be safely considered for donation or transplantation.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Appraisal of the United Network for Organ Sharing Modified TNM Staging.

Background: In deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), transplant eligibility for T3-T4 HCC requires successful downstaging (DS). Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) can be considered selectively in these patients without DS, but its role is not defined. The objective of the current study was to assess outcomes of LDLT for HCC based on UNOS staging with no prior DS. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent LDLT for HCC (n = 262) were staged based on modified UNOS TNM staging. High-risk factors were identified and 5-year recurrence free survival was compared in patients with T2-T4 HCC. Results: Median follow-up was 30.2 (16.4-46.3) months. Recurrence rate in T1, T2, T3, T4a, and T4b HCC was 0, 10.1, 16.1, 5.9, and 37.5% (P = 0.02), respectively. On multivariate analysis, AFP > 600 ng/mL [HR:11.7, P < 0.001] and T4b HCC (macrovascular invasion) [HR = 5.6, P = 0.03] were predictors of recurrence. After exclusion of AFP > 600 ng/mL, 5-year RFS for T2, T3, and T4a HCC was 94, 86, and 92% (P = 0.3). Rate of microvascular invasion between T2 and T3 HCC was 24.3 vs. 53.6% (P = 0.005), and between T2 and T4a HCC was 24.3 vs. 36.7% (P = 0.2). Overall, 26 (19.4%) patients were overstaged and 23 (17.1%) were understaged on preoperative imaging. The 5-year RFS in patients with identical preoperative and histopathological staging was 94, 87, and 94% (P = 0.6). Conclusion: LDLT without prior DS leads to comparable survival for UNOS T2, T3, and T4a HCC as long as AFP is < 600 ng/mL.

Failure to rescue in living donor liver transplantation: Patterns and predictors.

BACKGROUND: As a quality assessment tool, failure to rescue (FTR) has been employed in various surgical specialties. However, its role in liver transplantation has only recently been explored. To the best of our knowledge, role of FTR in living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has not been assessed previously. The objective of the current study was to determine failure to rescue (FTR) rate and it's predictors in an LDLT center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent LDLT at our center between 2012 and 2016. Patients who experienced grade 3B or above complications on Clavien-Dindo grading were included in this study. Primary outcome of interest was FTR rate in these patients. FTR was defined as a preventable major complication followed by death within one year after transplantation. We also looked at independent predictors of FTR in our patients and a multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Median age was 48.4(18-73) years. Male to female ratio was 3.3:1. Median MELD score was 17(6-42). The FTR rate in the current study was 52/131 (39.6%). Infectious complications were more common in the FTR group i.e. 22/32(68.8%) versus 10/32 (31.2%) (P < 0.0001). Biliary complications were more common in the non-FTR group i.e. 49/62 (79.1%) versus 13/62 (20.9%) (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, there was a 60% increase in mortality following a major complication in the presence of early allograft dysfunction (Hazard ratio: 1.6, Confidence interval; 1.2-2.2, P = 0.002). A 40% reduction in FTR was seen in patients with a biliary complication versus other complications (Hazard ratio: 0.6, Confidence interval = 0.4-0.8, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Early allograft dysfunction and biliary complications are independent predictors of FTR in LDLT.

Short Term Donor Outcomes After Hepatectomy in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of living-donor liver transplant (LDLT) donors from the first liver transplant program in Pakistan. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, from April 2012 to August 2014. METHODOLOGY: A total of 100 live donors who underwent hepatectomy were included. Demographics, etiologies, graft characteristics and operative variables were retrospectively assessed. Outcome was assessed based on morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Median donor age was 28 (17 - 45) years and median body mass index (BMI) was 24 kg/m2 (15 - 36). Male to female ratio was 1.5:1. Hepatitis B and C were the most common underlying etiologies and accounted for 79/100 (79%) of LDLT&#039;s. Overall, 93/100 (93%) donors donated a right lobe graft. Median estimated graft weight to recipient body weight (GW/BW) ratio was 1.03 (0.78 - 2). Standard arterial anatomy was present in 56% donors. The 90-day morbidity was 13/100 (13%) and overall morbidity was 17/100 (17%). Bile leak was encountered in 3 (3%) patients. There was no donor mortality. CONCLUSION: Acceptable short-term donor outcomes were achieved in an LDLT program in Pakistan with careful donor selection and planning.

Is pancreaticodoudenectomy with vascular resection a safe procedure in developing country? Early outcomes and review of national literature.

INTRODUCTION: Safety of extended lymphadenectomy (EL) ± vascular resection in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in resource limited settings is not well established. The objective of this study was to report outcomes of PD resection with EL ± vascular resection from Pakistan and review national literature. METHODS: Data of patients who underwent PD between 2011 and 2014 was reviewed. A total of 66 patients were included in the study. Primary outcome was 90 day morbidity and mortality. Secondary objective was 2 year overall survival. RESULTS: Median age was 57 (32-82) years. Majority patients had locally advanced (pT3/T4) tumors and nodal involvement i.e. 44 (71%) and 42 (67.8%). Mean number of excised lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes was 28.2 ± 12.8 (range 3-62) and 4.8 ± 6.9 (range 0-27) respectively. There were 13 vascular resections including 3 arterial resections. Overall 90 day morbidity was 31.8% and mortality was 3%. No difference in complication rate was observed in patients who did and did not undergo vascular resection i.e. 18% versus 34.5% (P = 0.1). Similarly, median survival was 11 (3-24) months and 11 (1-36) months and not significantly different (P = 0.5). CONCLUSION: In developing countries, extended lymphadenectomy with vascular resection can be safely performed with pancreaticoduodenectomy in specialized hepatobiliary units.