Nevirapine versus efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy regimens in antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV and tuberculosis infections in India: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Administration of rifampicin along with nevirapine reduces the plasma concentration of nevirapine in human immunodeficiency virus positive individuals with concomitant tuberculosis (HIV-TB patients). Nevirapine is a much cheaper drug than its alternative efavirenz, and might be beneficial in resource constrained settings. METHODS: A randomised open label trial was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. During the regimen of an antiretroviral therapy (ART), naive HIV-TB patients were randomly assigned to receive either nevirapine or efavirenz based ART with concomitant rifampicin based anti-tubercular therapy (ATT). Participants were followed for 24 months after starting ART. The end points were virological, immunological and clinical responses, and progression of HIV disease marked by failure of ART. RESULTS: Of the 135 HIV-TB patients, who were receiving rifampicin based ATT, 68 were selected randomly to receive efavirenz based ART and 67 to receive nevirapine based ART. The virological failure rates in the overall population, and the nevirapine and efavirenz groups were 14.1% (19/135); 14.9% (10/67) and 13.2% (9/68), respectively (p =0.94). No significant difference was found between the groups in the rate of clinical, immunological or virological failures. The overall mortality was 17% with no significant difference between the two groups. Except for the lead in period on day 14, the mean nevirapine concentration remained above 3 mg/L. No association was found between plasma levels of nevirapine and incidence of unfavourable outcomes in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Outcome of ART in HIV-TB patients on rifampicin based ATT showed no significant difference, irrespective of whether efavirenz or nevirapine was used. Therefore, nevirapine based ART could be an alternative in the resource limited settings in patients with HIV and tuberculosis co-infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT No. 01805258.

Role of metabolizing MTHFR gene polymorphism (rs1801133) and its mRNA expression among Type 2 Diabetes.

Objective: Type 2 Diabetes is a glucose metabolic disorder occurred by insulin insensitivity in which folate metabolism plays an important role. it is believed that polymorphism of Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T linked with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, results are conflicted. therefore, in this study we re-examine the relationship between MTHFR C677T in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Methods: Present research work included 100 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) cases and 100 healthy individuals. After the blood sample collection all the biochemical parameters were evaluated among the T2DM cases and healthy individuals. DNA and RNA extraction from whole blood was done to study the MTHFR gene polymorphism by allele specific polymerase chain reaction method and its expression analysis was done by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction method. Results: The significant difference was observed in genotype distribution among case and control group (p=0.0002). Compared with wildtype CC genotype, CT heterozygous (OR=2.95, 95% Cl=1.62-5.38) and TT homozygous (OR=3.20, CI=1.79-5.73) suggest to have effect of MTHFR polymorphism on type 2 mellitus risk. Moreover, relative MTHFR mRNA expression was found for wild type CC genotype 3.02-fold, CT heterozygous genotype 2.57 fold and mutant TT homozygous genotype 0.50-fold which is down regulated (p<0.0001). Conclusion: Our results indicates that the polymorphism in MTHFR C677T plays significant role in type II diabetes risk. MTHFR CT heterozygous and mutant TT genotype showed reduced mRNA expression among the T2DM patients. However, large scale case-control studies are needed to strengthen such conclusion in the future.

HIV Drug Resistance Mutations in Patients with HIV and HIV-TB Coinfection After Failure of First-Line Therapy: A Prevalence Study in a Resource-Limited Setting.

INTRODUCTION: The present study aimed to report the prevalent HIV-1 drug-resistant mutations in patients with HIV-1 alone and tuberculosis (TB) coinfection alone to improve our understanding of the mutation patterns and aid treatment decisions. METHODS: Patients with HIV-1 and HIV-TB on treatment for more than 1 year with suspected failure were recruited. Sequencing of protease and two-thirds of the region of reverse transcriptase gene was done for drug-resistant mutations. RESULTS: In the HIV-TB group (n = 25), 88%, 92%, and 12% had mutations to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), and protease inhibitors (PIs), respectively. In the HIV-alone group (n = 25), 84%, 100%, and 4% had mutations to NRTIs, NNRTIs, and PIs, respectively. M184V, M41L, D67N, G190A, A98G, and K103N were the most common mutations seen. CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of drug-resistant mutations in HIV and HIV-TB coinfected patients.

Higher Frequency of HIV-1 Drug Resistance and Increased Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Mutations among the HIV-1 Positive Antiretroviral Therapy-Naïve patients Coinfected With Mycobacterium tuberculosis Compared With Only HIV Infection in India.

BACKGROUND: Emergence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drug resistance mutations prior to highly active antiretroviral therapy is a serious problem in clinical management of HIV/AIDS. Risk factors for appearance of drug resistance mutations are not known. We hypothesize that Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection may contribute to rapid emergence of such mutations in antiretroviral therapy-naïve patients. METHODS: A total of 115 patients were recruited in this study of which 75 were HIV+TB+ coinfected (group 1) and 40 were HIV+TB- (group 2). Blood samples from all the patients were collected and CD4+ cell counts; HIV-1 plasma viral load and sequencing of protease and two-third region of reverse transcriptase of HIV-1 was performed and analyzed for drug resistance pattern. RESULTS: For patients with HIV+TB+, 10.6% (8/75) had mutations to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), 4% (3/75) to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and only 2.6% (2/75) patients had mutations to protease inhibitors. Interestingly, for group 2 (HIV+TB-), there were only NNRTI mutations found among these patients, and only 3 patients (7.5%) had these drug-resistant mutations. Clade typing and phylogenetic tree analysis showed HIV-1 subtype C predominance in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that higher percentage of HIV drug resistance mutations was found among HIV+TB+ individuals compared with tuberculosis-uninfected patients. Tuberculosis coinfection may be a risk factor for emergence of high frequency of drug resistance mutations. Studies with a larger sample size will help to confirm these findings from the Indian population.