RESUMO
BACKGROUND: While previous studies have demonstrated neuronal apoptosis and associated cognitive impairment after isoflurane or propofol exposure in neonatal rodents, the effects of these two anesthetics have not been directly compared. Here, we compare and contrast the effectiveness of isoflurane and propofol to cause neurodegeneration in the developing brain and associated cognitive dysfunction. METHODS: Seven-day-old mice were used. Mice in the isoflurane treatment group received 6 h of 1.5% isoflurane, while mice in propofol treatment group received one peritoneal injection (150 mg/kg), which produced persistent anesthesia with loss of righting for at least 6 h. Mice in control groups received carrying gas or a peritoneal injection of vehicle (intralipid). At 6 h after anesthetic treatment, a subset of each group was sacrificed and examined for evidence of neurodegeneration, using plasma levels of S100ß, and apoptosis using caspase-3 immunohistochemistry in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus and Western blot assays of the cortex. In addition, biomarkers for inflammation (interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha) were examined with Western blot analyses of the cortex. In another subset of mice, learning and memory were assessed 32 days after the anesthetic exposures using the Morris water maze. RESULTS: Isoflurane significantly increased plasma S100ß levels compared to controls and propofol. Both isoflurane and propofol significantly increased caspase-3 levels in the cortex and hippocampus, though isoflurane was significantly more potent than propofol. However, there were no significant differences in the inflammatory biomarkers in the cortex or in subsequent learning and memory between the experimental groups. CONCLUSION: Both isoflurane and propofol caused significant apoptosis in the mouse developing brain, with isoflurane being more potent. Isoflurane significantly increased levels of the plasma neurodegenerative biomarker, S100ß. However, these neurodegenerative effects of isoflurane and propofol in the developing brain were not associated with effects on inflammation or with cognitive dysfunction in later life.
Assuntos
Anestésicos/toxicidade , Transtornos Cognitivos/induzido quimicamente , Isoflurano/toxicidade , Degeneração Neural/induzido quimicamente , Propofol/toxicidade , Administração por Inalação , Anestésicos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Dano Encefálico Crônico/induzido quimicamente , Caspase 3/análise , Córtex Cerebral/efeitos dos fármacos , Córtex Cerebral/enzimologia , Feminino , Hipocampo/efeitos dos fármacos , Hipocampo/enzimologia , Inflamação , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Isoflurano/administração & dosagem , Deficiências da Aprendizagem/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Aprendizagem em Labirinto/efeitos dos fármacos , Transtornos da Memória/induzido quimicamente , Camundongos , Propofol/administração & dosagem , Subunidade beta da Proteína Ligante de Cálcio S100/sangueRESUMO
Optimal Ag targeting and activation of APCs, especially dendritic cells (DCs), are important in vaccine development. In this study, we report the effects of different Toll-like receptor (TLR)-binding compounds to enhance immune responses induced by human APCs, including CD123(+) plasmacytoid DCs (PDCs), CD11c(+) myeloid DCs (MDCs), monocytes, and B cells. PDCs, which express TLR7 and TLR9, responded to imidazoquinolines (imiquimod and R-848) and to CpG oligodeoxynucleotides stimulation, resulting in enhancement in expression of costimulatory molecules and induction of IFN-alpha and IL-12p70. In contrast, MDCs, which express TLR3, TLR4, and TLR7, responded to poly(I:C), LPS, and imidazoquinolines with phenotypic maturation and high production of IL-12 p70 without producing detectable IFN-alpha. Optimally TLR ligand-stimulated PDCs or MDCs exposed to CMV or HIV-1 Ags enhanced autologous CMV- and HIV-1-specific memory T cell responses as measured by effector cytokine production compared with TLR ligand-activated monocytes and B cells or unstimulated PDCs and MDCs. Together, these data show that targeting specific DC subsets using TLR ligands can enhance their ability to activate virus-specific T cells, providing information for the rational design of TLR ligands as adjuvants for vaccines or immune modulating therapy.