Exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with prior trastuzumab use in the ATTRACTION-2 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer.

BACKGROUND: Data on immune checkpoint inhibitor efficacy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer are lacking. Because HER2 status was not captured in the ATTRACTION-2 trial, we used patients with prior trastuzumab use (Tmab+) as surrogate for HER2 expression status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab as third- or later-line therapy in these patients. METHODS: In ATTRACTION-2, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial, patients were randomized (2:1) to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks until disease progression or toxicity requiring study discontinuation. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Of 493 enrolled patients, 81 (nivolumab, n = 59; placebo, n = 22) were Tmab+ and 412 (nivolumab, n = 271; placebo, n = 141) were Tmab-. In both groups, patients receiving nivolumab showed a longer median OS vs placebo (Tmab+, 8.3 [95% confidence interval, 5.3-12.9] vs 3.1 [1.9-5.3] months, hazard ratio, 0.38 [0.22-0.66]; P = 0.0006; Tmab-, 4.8 [4.1-6.0] vs 4.2 [3.6-4.9] months, 0.71 [0.57-0.88]; P = 0.0022). PFS was longer in both groups receiving nivolumab vs placebo (Tmab+, 1.6 [1.5-4.0] vs 1.5 [1.3-2.9] months, 0.49 [0.29-0.85]; P = 0.0111; Tmab-, 1.6 [1.5-2.4] vs 1.5 [1.5-1.5] months, 0.64 [0.51-0.80]; P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nivolumab was efficacious and safe as third- or later-line therapy regardless of prior trastuzumab use in patients with advanced G/GEJ cancer.

Host inflammatory response predicts survival of patients with Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) is a rare subtype of gastric carcinoma (GC) with a better survival rate than other GCs; most cases of LELC are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. We investigated whether the survival advantage of LELC is related to the EBV infection itself or to associated inflammatory immune responses. METHODS: From 1994 to 2008, 123 EBV-associated GCs were identified and compared with 405 EBV-negative GCs. EBV-associated GCs were subclassified, based on the pattern of host inflammatory immune responses, into 3 histologic subtypes: typical LELC (n = 53, 43.1%), Crohn's disease-like lymphocytic reaction (CLR) (n = 52, 42.3%), and conventional adenocarcinoma (n = 18, 14.6%). Patients with curatively resected EBV-negative GC were controls. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used, with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Patients with EBV-associated GC had tumors of proximal location, lower N stage (P < .0001), and lower T stage (P = .02) and were older than controls (P = .0003). Upon univariate analysis, patients with EBV-associated GC had longer survival times than controls (P < .004); this difference was not significant in a multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazards. Stratification of EBV-associated GCs by host cellular immune responses showed that patients with LELC and LELC+CLR have significantly longer overall survival time (hazard ratio, 0.09 and 0.42, respectively) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.05 and 0.46, respectively; P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of EBV-associated GCs depends on the patient's inflammatory response. The definition of LELC should be expanded to include EBV-associated GCs with CLR because these have a prognosis similar to LELC.

Arsenic trioxide inhibits the growth of A498 renal cell carcinoma cells via cell cycle arrest or apoptosis.

Previously, we showed that arsenic trioxide potently inhibited the growth of myeloma cells and head and neck cancer cells. Here, we demonstrate that arsenic trioxide inhibited the proliferation of all the renal cell carcinoma cell lines (ACHN, A498, Caki-2, Cos-7, and Renca) except only one cell line (Caki-1) with IC(50) of about 2.5-10 microM. Arsenic trioxide induced a G(1) or a G(2)-M phase arrest in these cells. When we examined the effects of this drug on A498 cells, arsenic trioxide (2.5 microM) decreased the levels of CDK2, CDK6, cyclin D1, cyclin E, and cyclin A proteins. Although p21 protein was not increased by arsenic trioxide, this drug markedly enhanced the binding of p21 with CDK2. In addition, the activities of CDK2- and CDK6-associated kinase were reduced in association with hypophosphorylation of Rb protein. Arsenic trioxide (10 microM) also induced apoptosis in A498 cells. Apoptotic process of A498 cells was associated with the changes of Bcl-(XL), caspase-9, caspase-3, and caspase-7 proteins as well as mitochondria transmembrane potential (Deltapsi(m)) loss. Taken together, these results demonstrate that arsenic trioxide inhibits the growth of renal cell carcinoma cells via cell cycle arrest or apoptosis.