[Dosimetric Characteristics of a Real Time Shapeable Tungsten Containing Rubber with Electron Beams].

PURPOSE: This study investigated the dosimetric characteristics of electron beams shaped with a real-time shapeable tungsten-containing rubber (STR) collimator. METHODS: Circular irradiation fields of 40 mm diameter were shaped using STR or low melting-point alloy (LMA) placed on the electron applicator. The STR heated with approximately 70-degree warm water was molded into the template bottom of the applicator. Percent depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles of 6 and 12 MeV electron beams were measured and compared between STR and LMA. For the PDDs, the depths of maximum dose (dmax), 90% dose (d90), and 80% dose (d80) were evaluated. For the lateral dose profiles, penumbra as the width of the off-axis distance from 80% to 20% doses and treatment diameter covering over 90% dose were evaluated at the surface, dmax, d90, and d80. The transmission of the STR was also investigated at thicknesses fit to electron applicator for 6 and 12 MeV electron beams. RESULTS: The STR was softened with 70-degree warm water. Therefore, it was easy to mold it and attach the applicator. The PDDs and penumbras at the surface, dmax, d90, and d80 for the STR were almost equal to those for the LMA with 6 and 12 MeV electron beams. The treatment diameters covering over 90% dose for the irradiation fields with 40 mm diameter at dmax (LMA vs. STR) were 20.9 vs. 21.1 mm and 19.2 vs. 18.4 mm for 6 and 12 MeV electron beams, respectively. The transmission of the STR was almost same as that of LMA. CONCLUSIONS: The dosimetric characteristics of the STR on the electron applicator were almost same as those of the LMA. The heated STR was shaped easily, flexibly, and immediately. The STR can be used as a substitute for LMA in electron radiotherapy.

Irradiation Methods for Accurate Dose Delivery to Postoperative Keloid Scars With Minimal Normal Tissue Exposure Using TomoTherapy: A Phantom Study.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We aimed to clarify the TomoTherapy irradiation method for accurate dose delivery to the postoperative ear keloid with minimal exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electron beam of Elekta synergy and static and helical photon beams of TomoTherapy were delivered to the auricle and lobe of an anthropomorphic phantom compensated using a soft rubber bolus. The doses to the ear surface and the eyeballs and thyroid were measured using radiochromic film and glass dosimeters, respectively. RESULTS: Using static, helical, and electron beams, the respective doses to the ear surface were 97.9%, 103.0%, and 91.7% of the prescribed dose; the respective doses to the thyroid were 0.6, 0.8, and 2.4 cGy; the respective doses to the left eyeball were 3.3, 6.9, and 2.7 cGy. CONCLUSION: The static beam of the TomoTherapy can be safely used for treating ear keloids, while ensuring target dose. The helical photon beam spreads out the low-dose exposure.

Reduction of Occupational Exposure Using a Novel Tungsten-Containing Rubber Shield in Interventional Radiology.

This study investigates whether a novel tungsten-containing rubber shield could be used as substitute shielding material in interventional radiology to reduce the occupational exposure of operators to scattered radiation from a patient. The tungsten-containing rubber is a lead-free radiation-shielding material that contains as much as 90% tungsten powder by weight. Air kerma rates of scattered radiation from solid-plate phantoms, simulating a patient, were measured with a semiconductor dosimeter at the height of the operator's eye (1,600 mm from the floor), chest (1,300 mm), waist (1,000 mm), and knee (600 mm) with and without tungsten-containing rubber shielding (1-5 mm thickness). The tungsten-containing rubber and a commercial shielding material (RADPAD) were affixed onto the phantom on the operator's side, and reductions in air kerma rates were compared. Reduction rates for tungsten-containing rubber shielding with thicknesses of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 mm at each height level were as follows: 70.37 ± 0.40%, 72.17 ± 0.29%, 72.95 ± 0.31%, 72.58 ± 0.35%, and 73.63 ± 0.63% at eye level; 76.36 ± 0.19%, 77.13 ± 0.10%, 77.36 ± 0.14%, 77.62 ± 0.25%, and 77.66 ± 0.14% at chest level; 67.78 ± 0.31%, 68.12 ± 0.19%, 68.88 ± 0.28%, 68.97 ± 0.14%, and 68.85 ± 0.45% at waist level; and 0.14 ± 0.94%, 0.72 ± 0.56%, 1.08 ± 0.74%, 1.77 ± 0.80%, and 1.79 ± 1.82% at knee level, respectively. Reduction rates with RADPAD were 61.80 ± 0.67%, 60.33 ± 0.61%, 64.70 ± 0.25%, and 0.14 ± 0.66% at eye, chest, waist, and knee levels, respectively. The shielding ability of the 1 mm tungsten-containing rubber was superior to that of RADPAD. The tungsten-containing rubber could be employed to minimize an operator's radiation exposure instead of the commercial shielding material in interventional radiology.

Feasibility of a Tungsten Rubber Grid Collimator for Electron Grid Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (grid therapy) can control some bulky tumors which is challenging for conventional radiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether a novel tungsten contained rubber (TCR) grid collimator can be employed in electron grid therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The TCR grid collimator placed on a solid water phantom, and percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles were measured for 9 MeV electron beam with Gafchromic EBT3 films. At the lateral dose profile, the ratios of the dose in the areas with and without shielding (valley-to-peak ratios) were evaluated. RESULTS: The dmax values with the 1, 2 and 3 mm TCR grid collimators were 1.2, 1.1 and 0.7 cm, respectively, while the valley-to-peak ratios at each dmax were 0.566, 0.412 and 0.293, respectively. CONCLUSION: Only the 2 mm TCR grid collimator had adequate dosimetric features compared to the conventional grid collimator and could be substituted.

Estimation of radiation shielding ability in electron therapy and brachytherapy with real time variable shape tungsten rubber.

PURPOSE: To clarify the physical characteristics of a newly developed real time variable shape rubber containing tungsten (STR) with changes in heat and estimate its shielding abilities against electron beams and γ-rays from 192Ir. METHODS: Dynamic mechanical analysis for the STR (density = 7.3 g/cm3) was conducted at a frequency of 1.0 Hz in the temperature range of -60 °C to 60 °C. We evaluated tanδ, defined as the ratio (E″/E') between the storage modulus (E') and loss modulus (E″). The transmission rates were measured against 6- and 12-MeV electron beams and the percentage depth dose and lateral dose profile were compared with low-melting alloy (LMA). For the shielding rate of 192Ir against γ-rays, measurement data and Monte Carlo simulation data were obtained with STR thickness ranging from 1.0 mm to 16.0 mm. RESULTS: At 36 °C, the tanδ value was 0.520, while at 60 °C, this value was 1.016. For 6- and 12-MeV electron beams, the transmission rates decreased with increasing STR thickness and reached plateaus at approximately 1.0% and 4.0% with STR thickness of >7.0 and >12.0 mm, respectively. The dose distributions were almost equal to those for LMA. Against γ-rays, the thickness of STR that obtained a 50% attenuation rate for 192Ir was 5.804 mm. The Monte Carlo calculation results were 2.6% higher on average than the measurement results. CONCLUSION: The STR can be changed shape in real time at 60 °C and maintains its shape at body temperatures. It has adequate shielding abilities against megavoltage electron beams and γ-rays from 192Ir.

The Shielding Ability of Novel Tungsten Rubber Against the Electron Beam for Clinical Use in Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A newly-introduced tungsten containing rubber (TCR) is a potentially useful shielding material in electron radiotherapy because it is lead-free, containing as much as 90% fine tungsten powder by weight. This study aimed to investigate the shielding ability of TCR against electron beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transmission of TCR was measured for energies of 4, 6, 9 and 12 MeV. Dose profiles were measured to compare the TCR and lead. The electron backscatter factor (EBF) was also compared. RESULTS: The transmission of equivalent thickness for 4, 6, 9 and 12 MeV with TCR (0.78%, 1.34%, 2.16% and 3.08%, respectively) were lower than that with lead (0.81%, 1.44%, 2.19% and 3.16%, respectively) (p<0.05). The dose profiles were not significantly different for TCR and lead. The EBF with TCR was up to 17% lower than that with lead. CONCLUSION: TCR has adequate radiation shielding ability for electron beams and could be employed instead of lead.