Pelvic Binder Radiography Is Safe and Feasible for Quantifying Fracture Instability in LC1 Pelvis Fractures: A Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate fracture displacement, patient tolerance, and in-hospital safety quantifying lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvis fracture stability with awake stress radiography using a pelvic binder (PBR). DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial of PBR diagnostic intervention. SETTING: Two centers, Level I trauma center and academic hospital. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Alert adults with LC1 (OTA/AO B1.1/2.1) pelvic fractures from blunt mechanism presenting within 3 weeks of injury between February and December 2023 without hypotension or injury precluding pelvic binder application. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: The primary outcome was fracture displacement on PBR. Secondary outcomes included feasibility (≥85% patient tolerance) and safety (no major adverse events). Exploratory outcomes included pain during examination, opioid medication consumption within 96 hours, length of hospital stay, discharge destination, and correlation between fracture displacement on PBR and examination under anesthetic. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine patients with pelvis fractures were screened, 58 were eligible, and 31 were enrolled. The mean age of enrolled patients was 58.7 ± 23 years, 54.8% were female, 22.6% were White, and 67.7% Hispanic. Fracture displacement was 4.3 ± 4.7 mm on PBR at 5 kg and 8.4 ± 9.0 mm at 10 kg. All patients tolerated PBR. Sixteen patients (52%) reported pain during PBR but completed the test. No patient experienced an adverse event. Patients received 40.4 ± 56.4 mg oral morphine equivalents within 96 hours of PBR. Ten patients (32.2%) received internal fixation. The median hospital stay was 6 days (interquartile range 5.5 days) with no inpatient mortality. Fourteen patients (45.2%) discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: PBR is feasible and safe as a point-of-care test for LC1 pelvis fracture instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II Diagnostic.

Patient Preferences for Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of LC1 Pelvis Fracture: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify how patients with lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvis fracture value attributes of operative versus nonoperative treatment. DESIGN: Discrete choice experiment. SETTING: Three US Level 1 trauma centers. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Adult survivors of an LC1 pelvis treated between June 2016 and March 2023 were identified from institutional registries. The choice experiment was administered as a survey from March through August 2023. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Participants chose between 12 hypothetical comparisons of treatment attributes including operative or nonoperative care, risk of death, severity of pain, risk of secondary surgery, shorter hospital stay, discharge destination, and independence in ambulation within 1 month of injury. The marginal utility of each treatment attribute, for example, the strength of participants' aggregate preference for an attribute as indicated by their survey choices, was estimated by multinomial logit modeling with and without stratification by treatment received. RESULTS: Four hundred forty-nine eligible patients were identified. The survey was distributed to 182 patients and collected from 72 patients (39%) at a median 2.3 years after injury. Respondents were 66% female with a median age of 59 years (IQR, 34-69 years). Before injury, 94% ambulated independently and 75% were working; 41% received operative treatment. Independence with ambulation provided the highest relative marginal utility (21%, P < 0.001), followed by discharge to home versus skilled nursing (20%, P < 0.001), moderate versus severe postdischarge pain (17%, P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (16%, P < 0.001), secondary surgery (15%, P < 0.001), and mortality (10%, P = 0.02). Overall, no relative utility for operative versus nonoperative treatment was observed (2%, P = 0.54). However, respondents strongly preferred the treatment they received: operative patients valued operative treatment (utility, 0.37 vs. -0.37, P < 0.001); nonoperative patients valued nonoperative treatment (utility, 0.19 vs. -0.19, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LC1 pelvis fracture patients valued independence with ambulation, shorter hospital stay, and avoiding secondary surgery and mortality in the month after their injury. Patients preferred the treatment they received rather than operative versus nonoperative care.