Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37556019

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Few studies of risk factors for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been prospective in design or investigated the role of psychosocial factors measured during pregnancy. We aimed to investigate associations between prenatal psychosocial factors and risk of ASD in offspring, as part of a multicenter prospective cohort study of more than 2000 mother-child pairs. METHODS: Nulliparous women aged 18-35 years, living in Pennsylvania, USA, were interviewed during pregnancy and multiple times postpartum over the course of a 3-year period. There were 2388 mothers who completed the Screen for Social Interaction Toddler Version (SSI-T), a measure of risk of ASD, when their child was 3-years old. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the associations between prenatal psychosocial factors-including total scores on three scales (social-support, stress and depression), trouble paying for basic needs, mental illness diagnosis and use of antidepressants-and risk of ASD in offspring at the age of 3-years, controlling for relevant confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 102 children (4.3%) who were scored as at-risk of ASD at 3-years. Prenatal psychosocial factors that were significantly associated with risk of ASD in the adjusted models were lower social-support (p < 0.001); stress (p = 0.003): depression (< 0.001), trouble paying for basic needs (p = 0.012), mental illness diagnosis (p = 0.016), and use of antidepressants (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that maternal experience of adverse psychosocial factors during pregnancy may be important intrauterine exposures related to the pathogenesis of ASD.

2.
Birth ; 49(4): 833-842, 2022 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35608986

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The goals of this study were (a) to determine how experiences in the first perinatal period shape birth mode preference among individuals with a first birth by cesarean; and (b) to examine the relationship between birth mode preference and other factors and subsequent labor after cesarean (LAC). METHODS: Data are from the First Baby Study, a prospective cohort of 3006 primiparous individuals. The analytic sample includes individuals with a first cesarean birth and a second birth during the 5-year follow-up period (n = 394). We used multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between experiences in the first perinatal period and subsequent preference for vaginal birth, and between preference for vaginal birth and LAC in the second birth. RESULTS: About a third of the sample preferred vaginal birth in a future birth, and 20% had LAC. Factors associated with higher odds of future vaginal birth preference were favorable prenatal attitude toward vaginal birth, lower perceived maternal-infant bonding at 1 month after the first birth, post-traumatic stress symptoms after the first birth, and desiring more than 1 additional child after the first birth. Odds of LAC were nearly 8 times higher among those who preferred vaginal birth (AOR = 7.69, P < .001). Fatigue after the first birth, post-traumatic stress symptoms after the first birth, and having higher predicted chances of vaginal birth after cesarean were also associated with higher odds of LAC. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the formation of preferences around vaginal birth may present a modifiable target for future counseling and shared decision-making interventions.


Assuntos
Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea , Gravidez , Feminino , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Cesárea/psicologia , Parto , Estudos de Coortes , Prova de Trabalho de Parto
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 26(12): 2526-2535, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36348212

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The rising cesarean birth rate globally has led to increasing concern about long-term unintended consequences, with particular focus on child neurodevelopmental outcomes. This study investigated the association between cesarean birth and early child neurodevelopment, measured at 3 years of age. METHODS: This was a large multicenter longitudinal prospective cohort study of first-time mothers and their offspring in Pennsylvania. Mothers completed adapted versions of two measures of child development at 36- months postpartum: the modified Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status (M-PEDS) and a shortened Ages and Stages Questionnaire (S-ASQ). Logistic regression models were used to assess the association between mode of delivery and delayed child development, controlling for confounding variables. RESULTS: There were 695 (29.3%) children born by cesarean delivery and 1676 (70.7) born vaginally. Children born by cesarean had increased odds of scoring as developmentally delayed on both measures of child development: the M-PEDS (8.9% cesarean and 5.1% vaginal, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11-2.24)) and the S-ASQ (6.3% cesarean and 3.3% vaginal, aOR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.09-2.54). Additional factors associated with developmental delay were male sex, and the maternal factors of high pre-pregnancy body mass index, thyroid disorder, and diabetes. CONCLUSION: In this large prospective cohort study of first-time mothers and their offspring, cesarean delivery was found to be associated with an elevated risk of delayed child development at age 3 years. This analysis highlights the importance of continued research to understand the impact of cesarean delivery on child development.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Desenvolvimento Infantil , Criança , Masculino , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Ordem de Nascimento , Estudos Prospectivos , Pennsylvania/epidemiologia , Parto
4.
Am J Perinatol ; 2022 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35253111

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) for primiparous women who gave birth vaginally and to compare recovery by OASIS status in three domains as follows: (1) physical health and functioning, (2) mental health, and (3) healthcare utilization. STUDY DESIGN: This secondary analysis used data from 2,013 vaginal births in the First Baby Study, a prospective cohort study of women with first births between 2009 and 2011. Interview data at multiple time points were linked to birth certificate and hospital discharge data. The key exposure of interest was OASIS (3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration, identified in the hospital discharge data; n = 174) versus no OASIS (n = 1,839). We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between OASIS and a range of outcomes including physical health and functioning, depression, and health care utilization, assessed at 1 month and 6 months postpartum. RESULTS: Eight percent of women had OASIS. In adjusted models, there were no differences in general physical health and functioning measures by OASIS (such as fatigue and overall self-rated health), but women with OASIS had higher rates of reporting perineal pain (p < 0.001), accidental stool loss (p = 0.001), and bowel problems (p < 0.001) at 1-month postpartum. By 6-month postpartum, there were no differences in reported physical health and functioning. There were no differences in probable depression at 1- or 6-month postpartum. Women with OASIS were more likely to attend a comprehensive postpartum visit, but there were no other differences in health care utilization by OASIS. CONCLUSION: Women with OASIS were at increased risk of accidental stool loss, bowel problems, and perineal pain in the immediate postpartum period. Women who had OASIS had similar physical functioning across a range of general health outcomes to women who gave birth vaginally without OASIS. KEY POINTS: · Higher risk of bowel problems and accidental stool loss 1-month postpartum with OASIS.. · Higher risk of perineal pain 1-month postpartum with OASIS.. · No differences in health outcomes at 6-months postpartum by OASIS..

5.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 304(3): 713-724, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175975

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to determine the incidence of UI in a large cohort of primiparous women before and during pregnancy and over the course of 30-months postpartum, and to identify risk factors for UI during and after pregnancy. METHODS: Nulliparous women aged 18-35 years with singleton pregnancies were interviewed in their third trimester and asked about urinary incontinence before and during pregnancy (n = 3001). After delivery these women were interviewed at 1, 6, 12, 18, 24 and 30-months postpartum and asked about urinary incontinence occurring in the month prior to each interview. Multivariable logistic regression models identified risk factors for UI during pregnancy and during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Overall, 4% reported having urinary incontinence before pregnancy and 36.8% during pregnancy. The strongest predictor of urinary incontinence during pregnancy was urinary incontinence before pregnancy (adjusted OR 13.11, 95% CI 7.43-23.13). Among the women with no subsequent pregnancies, the rate of urinary incontinence increased from 12.5% at 6-months postpartum to 27.4% at 30-months postpartum, 52.1% reported UI at one or more postpartum data collection stages, and the strongest predictors of postpartum UI were UI before pregnancy (adjusted OR 3.95 (95% CI 1.60-9.75) and during pregnancy (adjusted OR 4.36, 95% CI 3.24-5.87). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that primiparous women who report UI before and during pregnancy should be monitored for the continuation or worsening of UI over the course of the first 2-3 years postpartum, and treatment options discussed.


Assuntos
Período Pós-Parto , Incontinência Urinária/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Paridade , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia
6.
Public Health Nutr ; 23(15): 2759-2769, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915084

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To identify countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) that have not yet achieved at least 90 % universal salt iodization and factors associated with the consumption of non-iodized salt among women of reproductive age. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study using data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS). The presence of iodine in household salt (iodized or non-iodized), which was tested during the survey process, was the study outcome. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine independent factors associated with the consumption of non-iodized salt among women of reproductive age. SETTING: There were eleven countries in SSA that participated in the DHS since 2015 and measured the presence of iodine in household salt. PARTICIPANTS: Women (n 108 318) aged 15-49 years. RESULTS: Countries with the highest rate of non-iodized salt were Senegal (29·5 %) followed by Tanzania (21·3 %), Ethiopia (14·0 %), Malawi (11·6 %) and Angola (10·8 %). The rate of non-iodized salt was less than 1 % in Rwanda (0·3 %), Uganda (0·5 %) and Burundi (0·8 %). Stepwise multivariable logistic regression showed that women were more likely to be using non-iodized salt (adjusted OR; 95 % CI) if they were poor (1·62; 1·48, 1·78), pregnant (1·16; 1·04, 1·29), aged 15-24 years (v. older: 1·14; 1·04, 1·24) and were not literate (1·14; 1·06, 1·23). CONCLUSIONS: The use of non-iodized salt varies among SSA countries. The higher level of use of non-iodized salt among poor, young women and pregnant women is particularly concerning.


Assuntos
Iodo , Cloreto de Sódio na Dieta , Angola , Burundi , Estudos Transversais , Etiópia , Feminino , Humanos , Malaui , Gravidez , Ruanda , Senegal , Cloreto de Sódio na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Tanzânia , Uganda
7.
Prev Med ; 118: 1-6, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30287329

RESUMO

Despite the known benefits of breastmilk, associations between breastfeeding and child overall health outcomes remain unclear. We aimed to understand associations between breastfeeding and health outcomes, including child weight, through age 3. Analysis included women (N = 3006) in the longitudinal, prospective First Baby Study from 2009 to 2014. For this analysis, breastfeeding initiation and duration were measured using self-reported data from the 1-, 6- and 12-month surveys; child illnesses were analyzed from the 6-, 12-, and 24-month interviews; height and weight at age 3 were used to determine overweight/obese (≥85th percentile) and obese (≥95th percentile). Adjusted logistic regressions were utilized to determine significance. Greater duration of breastfeeding was associated with fewer reported acute illnesses at 6 months (p < 0.001) and fewer diarrheal illness/constipation episodes at 6, 12, and 24 months (p = 0.05) in adjusted analyses. Fewer breastfed children, compared to non-breastfed children, were overweight/obese (23.5% vs. 37.8%; p = 0.032) or obese (9.1% vs. 21.6%; p = 0.012) at age 3. Breastfeeding duration was negatively associated with overweight/obese (never breastfed: 37.8%, 0-6 months: 26.9%, >6 months: 20.2%; p = 0.020) and obesity (never breastfed: 21.6%, 0-6 months: 11.0%, >6 months: 7.3%; p = 0.012). Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that duration of breastfeeding is associated with fewer reported acute illnesses at 6 months of age and diarrheal illness and/or constipation episodes at 6, 12, and 24 months. Additionally, results from our study suggest a protective effect of breastfeeding from childhood overweight/obesity, as children who received breastmilk for 6 months or longer had lower odds of overweight/obesity at age 3 years.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Peso Corporal , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde da Criança , Adulto , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Longitudinais , Mães/estatística & dados numéricos , Obesidade Infantil/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
8.
Birth ; 46(1): 51-60, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30051510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nearly 90% of United States pregnant women with a prior cesarean give birth by repeat cesarean. Public health goals encourage greater use of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), but there is little prospective data on predictors of women's preference for VBAC. We characterized predictors of women's preferred mode of delivery after a first cesarean and thematically categorized reasons for their preference. METHODS: Data were from a cohort of 3006 women whose first childbirth was in Pennsylvania in 2009-2011. The analytic sample included women who had their first birth by cesarean and reported mode of delivery preference for their next delivery at 12 months postpartum (n = 616). Associations with future birth mode preference were assessed using multivariate logistic regression, and reasons for preference were categorized using content analysis. RESULTS: At 12 months postpartum, 45% of women who delivered by cesarean in their first birth wanted to have their next delivery vaginally. Independent predictors of VBAC preference were Black race/ethnicity, nonrecurrent indication for the first cesarean, planning three or more additional children, and difficulty recovering from the first cesarean. The most common reason for preferring a vaginal birth was wanting the experience of vaginal birth; the most common reason for preferring cesarean birth was that the first birth was by cesarean. CONCLUSION: Nearly half of respondents preferred VBAC in future births, but national estimates indicate that only about 12% of women with prior cesareans have a VBAC. This suggests a need to ensure greater access to VBAC for women who want it.


Assuntos
Cesárea/psicologia , Preferência do Paciente , Gestantes/psicologia , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/psicologia , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento de Escolha , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Análise Multivariada , Parto , Pennsylvania , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Prova de Trabalho de Parto , Adulto Jovem
9.
Birth ; 46(1): 42-50, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30144141

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the importance of early maternal-newborn contact for the health and well-being of the newborn and promotion of breastfeeding. However, little research has investigated the association between early maternal-newborn contact and the mother's birth experience. METHODS: As part of a large-scale prospective, cohort study (the First Baby Study [FBS]), nearly 3000 women who delivered in Pennsylvania (2009-2011) reported how soon after delivery they first saw, held, and fed their newborns. Birth experience was measured via telephone interview 1 month postpartum, using the FBS Birth Experience Scale, a 16-item scale which addresses women's feelings about the delivery. General linear models were used to measure associations between time to first maternal-newborn contact and birth experience, controlling for relevant confounders, including maternal age, race/ethnicity, insurance coverage, delivery mode, gestational age, and pregnancy and delivery complications. RESULTS: The sooner that new mothers first saw, held, and fed their newborns after delivery the more positive their childbirth experiences (all P-values < 0.001). Women who delivered by cesarean were less likely to see, hold and feed their newborns shortly after delivery than those who delivered vaginally (all P-values < 0.001), and reported less positive birth experiences (P < 0.001). However, if they first saw, held, and fed their newborns shortly after delivery, they reported more positive birth experiences than those who delivered vaginally (P = 0.010). DISCUSSION: Early maternal-newborn contact after delivery was associated with positive birth experiences for new mothers, particularly those who delivered by cesarean.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno/psicologia , Cesárea/psicologia , Trabalho de Parto/psicologia , Relações Mãe-Filho/psicologia , Parto/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Aleitamento Materno/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Lineares , Análise Multivariada , Pennsylvania , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
10.
Birth ; 45(1): 19-27, 2018 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29052265

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Childbirth is an important life event and how women feel in retrospect about their first childbirth may have long-term effects on the mother, child, and family. In this study, we investigated the association between mode of delivery at first childbirth and birth experience, using a new scale developed specifically to measure women's affective response. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 3006 women who were interviewed during pregnancy and 1-month postpartum. The First Baby Study Birth Experience Scale was used to measure the association between mode of delivery and women's postpartum feelings about their childbirth, taking into account relevant confounders, including maternal age, race, education, pregnancy intendedness, depression, social support, and maternal and newborn complications by way of linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Women who had unplanned cesarean delivery had the least positive feelings overall about their first childbirth, in comparison to those whose deliveries were spontaneous vaginal (P < .001), instrumental vaginal (P = .001), and planned cesarean (P < .001). In addition, those who delivered by unplanned cesarean were more likely to feel disappointed (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 6.21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.62-8.35]) and like a failure (adjusted OR 5.09 [95% CI 3.65-7.09]) in comparison to women who had spontaneous vaginal delivery; and less likely to feel extremely or quite a bit proud of themselves (adjusted OR 2.70 [95% CI 2.20-3.30]). CONCLUSIONS: Delivering by unplanned cesarean delivery adversely affects how women feel about their first childbirth in retrospect, and their self-esteem.


Assuntos
Cesárea/psicologia , Emoções , Mães/psicologia , Parto Normal/psicologia , Período Pós-Parto/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Autoimagem , Adulto Jovem
11.
Birth ; 44(4): 306-314, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28887835

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Researchers documenting persistent racial/ethnic and socioeconomic status disparities in chances of cesarean delivery have speculated that women's birth attitudes and preferences may partially explain these differences, but no studies have directly tested this hypothesis. We examined whether women's prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery differed by race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status, and whether attitudes were differently related to delivery mode depending on race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. METHODS: Data were from the First Baby Study, a cohort of 3006 women who gave birth to a first baby in Pennsylvania between 2009 and 2011. We used regression models to examine (1) predictors of prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery, and (2) the association between prenatal attitudes and actual delivery mode. To assess moderation, we estimated models adding interaction terms. RESULTS: Prenatal attitudes toward vaginal delivery were not associated with race/ethnicity or socioeconomic status. Positive attitudes toward vaginal delivery were associated with lower odds of cesarean delivery (AOR=0.60, P < .001). However, vaginal delivery attitudes were only related to delivery mode among women who were white, highly educated, and privately insured. CONCLUSIONS: There are racial/ethnic differences in chances of cesarean delivery, and these differences are not explained by birth attitudes. Furthermore, our findings suggest that white and high-socioeconomic status women may be more able to realize their preferences in childbirth.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Preferência do Paciente , Classe Social , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Análise Multivariada , Pennsylvania , Gravidez , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
12.
Birth ; 44(3): 252-261, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28321899

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mode of delivery at first childbirth largely determines mode of delivery at subsequent births, so it is particularly important to understand risk factors for cesarean delivery at first childbirth. In this study, we investigated risk factors for cesarean delivery among nulliparous women, with focus on the association between labor induction and cesarean delivery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 2851 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies who attempted vaginal delivery at hospitals in Pennsylvania, 2009-2011, was conducted. We used nested logistic regression models and multiple mediational analyses to investigate the role of three groups of variables in explaining the association between labor induction and unplanned cesarean delivery-the confounders of maternal characteristics and indications for induction, and the mediating (intrapartum) factors-including cervical dilatation, labor augmentation, epidural analgesia, dysfunctional labor, dystocia, fetal intolerance of labor, and maternal request of cesarean during labor. RESULTS: More than a third of the women were induced (34.3%) and 24.8% underwent cesarean delivery. Induced women were more likely to deliver by cesarean (35.9%) than women in spontaneous labor (18.9%), unadjusted OR 2.35 (95% CI 1.97-2.79). The intrapartum factors significantly mediated the association between labor induction and cesarean delivery (explaining 76.7% of this association), particularly cervical dilatation <3 cm at hospital admission, fetal intolerance of labor, and dystocia. The indications for labor induction only explained 6.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Increased risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction among nulliparous women is attributable mainly to lower cervical dilatation at hospital admission and higher rates of labor complications.


Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido , Paridade , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgesia Epidural/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Parto Obstétrico , Distocia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Primeira Fase do Trabalho de Parto , Modelos Logísticos , Ocitócicos/uso terapêutico , Pennsylvania , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
13.
Matern Child Health J ; 19(2): 391-400, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24894728

RESUMO

Our objective was to test the hypothesis that nulliparous women with a history of miscarriage have an increased risk of depression during late pregnancy, and at 1, 6, and 12 months postpartum compared to women without a history of miscarriage. We conducted secondary analysis of a longitudinal cohort study, the First Baby Study, and compared 448 pregnant women with a history of miscarriage to 2,343 pregnant women without a history of miscarriage on risk of probable depression (score >12 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale). Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios at each time point and generalized estimating equations were used to obtain estimates in longitudinal analysis. Women with a history of miscarriage were not more likely than woman without a history of miscarriage to score in the probable depression range during the third trimester or at 6 or 12 months postpartum but were more likely at 1 month postpartum, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.03-2.69). Women with a history of miscarriage may be more vulnerable to depression during the first month postpartum than women without prior miscarriage, but this effect does not appear to persist beyond this time period. We support the promotion of awareness surrounding this issue and recommend that research is planned to identify risk factors that may position a woman with a history of miscarriage to be at higher risk for depression.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/psicologia , Depressão Pós-Parto/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Número de Gestações , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Logísticos , Estudos Longitudinais , Idade Materna , Razão de Chances , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Medição de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estresse Psicológico , Adulto Jovem
14.
BMC Womens Health ; 14: 83, 2014 Jul 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25028056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Miscarriage, the unexpected loss of pregnancy before 20 weeks gestation, may have a negative effect on a mother's perception of herself as a capable woman and on her emotional health when she is pregnant again subsequent to the miscarriage. As such, a mother with a history of miscarriage may be at greater risk for difficulties navigating the process of becoming a mother and achieving positive maternal-infant bonding with an infant born subsequent to the loss. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of miscarriage history on maternal-infant bonding after the birth of a healthy infant to test the hypothesis that women with a history of miscarriage have decreased maternal-infant bonding compared to women without a history of miscarriage. METHODS: We completed secondary analysis of the First Baby Study, a longitudinal cohort study, to examine the effect of a history of miscarriage on maternal-infant bonding at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months after women experienced the birth of their first live-born baby. In a sample of 2798 women living in Pennsylvania, USA, we tested our hypothesis using linear regression analysis of Shortened Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (S-PBQ) scores, followed by longitudinal analysis using a generalized estimating equations model with repeated measures. RESULTS: We found that women with a history of miscarriage had similar S-PBQ scores as women without a history of miscarriage at each of the three postpartum time points. Likewise, longitudinal analysis revealed no difference in the pattern of maternal-infant bonding scores between women with and without a history of miscarriage. CONCLUSIONS: Women in the First Baby Study with a history of miscarriage did not differ from women without a history of miscarriage in their reported level of bonding with their subsequently born infants. It is important for clinicians to recognize that even though some women may experience impaired bonding related to a history of miscarriage, the majority of women form a healthy bond with their infant despite this history.


Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/psicologia , Relações Mãe-Filho/psicologia , Mães/psicologia , Apego ao Objeto , Poder Familiar/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Modelos Lineares , Estudos Longitudinais , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
15.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol ; 27(1): 62-71, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23215713

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: More than a dozen studies have reported a reduced rate of childbearing after caesarean delivery (CD). It has been hypothesised that this is because women who deliver by CD are less likely to intend to have subsequent children than women who deliver vaginally - either before childbirth or as a consequence of CD. Little research has addressed either of these hypotheses. METHODS: As part of an ongoing prospective study, we interviewed 3006 women in their third trimester and 1 month after first childbirth to assess subsequent childbearing intentions. RESULTS: Women who delivered by CD were similar to those who delivered vaginally in intent to have at least one additional child, both before childbirth (90.1% vaginal, 89.9% CD; P = 0.97) and after (87.8% vaginal, 87.1% CD; P = 0.87); however, women who had CD were less likely to intend two or more additional children, both before childbirth (34.7% vaginal, 29.2% CD; P = 0.03) and after (32.2% vaginal, 26.1% CD; P = 0.01). Among women who intended to have at least one additional child before childbirth, 5.0% reported intending to have no additional children 1 month after delivery (5.1% vaginal, 4.6% CD; P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Women whose first delivery is by CD are less likely to intend a relatively large family of three or more children than those who deliver vaginally, but delivery by CD does not decrease women's intentions to have at least one more child any more than does vaginal delivery, at least in the short term.


Assuntos
Cesárea/psicologia , Parto/psicologia , Gestantes/psicologia , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento de Escolha , Estudos de Coortes , Características da Família , Feminino , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Pennsylvania , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Nascimento Vaginal Após Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
16.
Birth ; 40(4): 289-96, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24344710

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fear of childbirth and mode of delivery are two known factors that affect birth experience. The interactions between these two factors are unknown. The aim of this study was to estimate the effects of different levels of fear of birth and mode of delivery on birth experience 1 month after birth. METHODS: As part of an ongoing prospective study, we interviewed 3,006 women in their third trimester and 1 month after first childbirth to assess fear of birth and birth experience. Logistic regression was performed to examine the interactions and associations between fear of birth, mode of delivery and birth experience. RESULTS: Compared with women with low levels of fear of birth, women with intermediate levels of fear, and women with high levels of fear had a more negative birth experience and were more affected by an unplanned cesarean section or instrumental vaginal delivery. Compared with women with low levels of fears with a noninstrumental vaginal delivery, women with high levels of fear who were delivered by unplanned cesarean section had a 12-fold increased risk of reporting a negative birth experience (OR 12.25; 95% CI 7.19-20.86). A noninstrumental vaginal delivery was associated with the most positive birth experience among the women in this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that both levels of prenatal fear of childbirth and mode of delivery are important for birth experience. Women with low fear of childbirth who had a noninstrumental vaginal delivery reported the most positive birth experience.


Assuntos
Parto Obstétrico/psicologia , Medo , Parto/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Parto Obstétrico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Modelos Logísticos , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto Jovem
17.
PLoS One ; 18(2): e0281707, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795737

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is difficult for women in labor to determine when best to present for hospital admission, particularly at first childbirth. While it is often recommended that women labor at home until their contractions have become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart, little research has investigated the utility of this recommendation. This study investigated the relationship between timing of hospital admission, in terms of whether women's labor contractions had become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart before admission, and labor progress. METHODS: This was a cohort study of 1,656 primiparous women aged 18-35 years with singleton pregnancies who began labor spontaneously at home and delivered at 52 hospitals in Pennsylvania, USA. Women who were admitted before their contractions had become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart (early admits) were compared to those who were admitted after (later admits). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess associations between timing of hospital admission and active labor status on admission (cervical dilation 6-10 cm), oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia and cesarean birth. RESULTS: Nearly two-thirds of the participants (65.3%) were later admits. These women had labored for a longer time period before admission (median, interquartile range [IQR] 5 hours (3-12 hours)) than the early admits (median, (IQR) 2 hours (1-8 hours), p < 0.001); were more likely to be in active labor on admission (adjusted OR [aOR] 3.78, 95% CI 2.47-5.81); and were less likely to experience labor augmentation with oxytocin (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.35-0.55); epidural analgesia (aOR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38-0.72); and cesarean birth (aOR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.88). CONCLUSIONS: Among primiparous women, those who labor at home until their contractions have become regular and ≤ 5-minutes apart are more likely to be in active labor on hospital admission and less likely to experience oxytocin augmentation, epidural analgesia and cesarean birth.


Assuntos
Trabalho de Parto , Ocitocina , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Hospitais
18.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0287023, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37379273

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: First-time mothers often need help with breastfeeding and may feel isolated and uncertain about whom they can turn to for help with breastfeeding challenges. Exploration of whether access to breastfeeding advice helps new mothers initiate and continue breastfeeding is necessary. This study investigated the associations between ease of access to breastfeeding advice for first-time mothers and breastfeeding initiation and duration. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal cohort study of 3,006 women who delivered their first child in Pennsylvania, USA; with prenatal and postpartum interviews. At 1-month postpartum participants reported the extent to which they had access to "Someone to give you advice about breastfeeding if you needed it", via a 5-point scale ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time". RESULTS: There were 132 women (4.4%) who reported that they had access to someone to give them advice about breastfeeding "none of the time"; 697 (23.3%) reported access "a little of the time" or "some of the time"; and 2,167 (72.3%) reported access "most of the time" or "all of the time". While the majority of the new mothers were breastfeeding at 1-month postpartum (72.5%), less than half were still breastfeeding at 6-months postpartum (44.5%). The higher the level of access to advice about breastfeeding the more likely women were to establish breastfeeding by 1-month postpartum and to still be breastfeeding at 6-months. CONCLUSIONS: For first-time mothers, ease of access to someone who can give them advice about breastfeeding facilitates breastfeeding establishment and continuation.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Mães , Gravidez , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Longitudinais , Período Pós-Parto
19.
Breastfeed Med ; 17(5): 429-436, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180349

RESUMO

Objective: The primary objective was to determine the role that paternal education level plays in the initiation and duration of breastfeeding for their infants. Materials and Methods: As part of a prospective cohort study, primiparous women, aged 18-35 years, living in Pennsylvania, were enrolled and interviewed during pregnancy (N = 3,006) and at 1 and 6 months postpartum. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between paternal education level and breastfeeding initiation and duration, controlling for maternal education level and other covariates-including marital/relationship status, household poverty level, maternal age, race/ethnicity, smoking, attending breastfeeding class during pregnancy, mode of delivery, gestational age, and plans to return to work ≤2 months after delivery. Results: Information on both paternal and maternal education levels and breastfeeding outcomes was available for 2,839 couples. Most of the women reported that they planned to breastfeed (92.5%); 92.0% initiated breastfeeding; and 49.5% of those who initiated breastfeeding were still breastfeeding by 6 months postpartum. Paternal education level was independently associated with breastfeeding initiation and duration in both regression models-the higher the level of education of the father, the more likely breastfeeding was initiated and the mother was still breastfeeding at 6 months postpartum, even after controlling for maternal education level and other relevant covariates. Conclusions: In this large prospective cohort study of first-time mothers and their newborns, paternal education level was independently associated with breastfeeding initiation and duration. These findings highlight the importance of including the father in prenatal breastfeeding education initiatives.


Assuntos
Aleitamento Materno , Pai , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Mães , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos
20.
PLoS One ; 17(9): e0272593, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36170224

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acetaminophen is one of the most commonly used drugs during pregnancy globally. Recent studies have reported associations between prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and neurobehavioral problems in children, including attention-deficit hyperactivity disorders. Little research has investigated these associations in preschool-age children or the potential confounding effects of prenatal stress. The purpose of this study was to examine associations between prenatal acetaminophen exposure and offspring neurobehavioral problems at the age of 3 years, with a focus on the potentially confounding effects of prenatal stress. METHODS: We used data from the First Baby Study, a prospective cohort study conducted in Pennsylvania, USA, with 2,423 mother-child pairs. Women reported medication use and completed a prenatal stress inventory during their third trimester. Child behavioral problems were measured at the age of 3 years, using the 7 syndrome scale scores from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) for ages 1 ½ to 5. RESULTS: There were 1,011 women (41.7%) who reported using acetaminophen during pregnancy. Children who were exposed to acetaminophen during pregnancy scored significantly higher on 3 of the 7 CBCL syndrome scales: withdrawn, sleep problems and attention problems. Scores on all 7 of the CBCL syndrome scales were significantly associated with prenatal stress. After adjustment for prenatal stress and other confounders, 2 syndrome scales remained significantly higher in children exposed to acetaminophen: sleep problems (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.01-1.51) and attention problems (aOR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.01-1.45). CONCLUSIONS: These findings corroborate previous studies reporting associations between prenatal exposure to acetaminophen and attention problems in offspring and also show an association with sleep problems at age 3 years. Because use of acetaminophen during pregnancy is common, these results are of public health concern and suggest caution in the use of medications containing acetaminophen during pregnancy.


Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília , Acetaminofen/efeitos adversos , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/induzido quimicamente , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/complicações , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/complicações
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA