Seizures after open heart surgery: comparison of ε-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid.

OBJECTIVE: Although the lysine analogs tranexamic acid (TXA) and aminocaproic acid (EACA) are used widely for antifibrinolytic therapy in cardiac surgery, relatively little research has been performed on their safety profiles, especially in the setting of cardiac surgery. Two antifibrinolytic protocols using either TXA or aminocaproic acid were compared according to postoperative outcome. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis. SETTING: A university-affiliated hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred four patients undergoing cardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: One cohort of 275 consecutive patients received TXA; a second cohort of 329 consecutive patients was treated with EACA. Except for antifibrinolytic therapy, the anesthetic and surgical teams and their protocols remained unchanged. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Besides major outcome criteria, namely postoperative bleeding, the need for allogeneic transfusions, operative revision because of bleeding, postoperative renal dysfunction, neurologic events, heart failure, and in-hospital mortality, the authors specifically sought differences between the groups concerning seizures. The 2 cohorts were comparable over a range of perioperative factors. Postoperative seizures occurred significantly more frequently in TXA patients (7.6% v 3.3%, p = 0.019), whereas EACA patients had a higher incidence of postoperative renal dysfunction (20.0% v 30.1%, p = 0.005). There were no differences in all other measured major outcome factors. CONCLUSION: Both lysine analogs are associated with significant side effects, which must be taken into account when performing risk-benefit analyses of their use. Their use should be restricted to patients at high risk for bleeding; routine use on low-risk patients undergoing standard surgeries should face renewed critical reappraisal.

Critical adverse events during transfemoral TAVR in conscious sedation. Is an anesthesiologic support mandatory?

BACKGROUND: Transfemoral TAVR (tf-TAVR) under conscious sedation (CS) has become popular. The need of anesthesiologic support during tf-TAVR has been questioned. Critical events during the procedure might require immediate action. We analyzed the frequency of periprocedural critical adverse events (CAE) during tf-TAVR with CS in our institution. METHODS: Tf-TAVR has been performed at our institution since 2007. We excluded patients from the first four years to minimize the influence of any learning curve. CAE were defined as occurrence of 1.) "CPR", 2.) "defibrillation", 3.) "emergency extracorporeal circulation (ECC)" and 4.) "conversion to general anesthesia (GA) not related to 1.)-3.)". Data was prospectively collected in our AVIATOR TAVR registry. RESULTS: 601 patients were analyzed retrospectively. Overall, CAE were recorded in 54 patients (9%). CPR was necessary in 12 patients (2%) and defibrillation in 10 patients (1.6%). ECC was rarely needed (n = 2, 0.3%). Conversion to GA was necessary in 34 patients (5.65%). Procedure-related conversion was necessary in 10 patients. With 24 patients, sedation-related conversion occurred more frequently. Unrest and pain were the most common reasons for conversion (n = 13, 2%) and respiratory distress in 11 patients (2%). Catecholaminergic support was needed in 269 (45%) patients. Vasopressors were more often applied (n = 249, 41%) than inotropes (n = 59, 10%). CONCLUSION: Even in a high-volume center, CAE may occur in nearly every tenth patient. Conversion to GA was the most common CAE. Catecholaminergic support (primary vasopressor support) was needed in nearly every second patient. These points underline the necessity of a cardiac anaesthesiologist to be in the room during the procedure. SUMMARY: Despite experience, critical adverse events (CAE) still occur in TAVR patients. We analyzed the occurrence of CAE and the need for catecholaminergic support in sedated TAVR patients.

Basic requirements and parameter optimization for boron neutron capture therapy of extracorporeal irradiated and auto-transplanted organs.

BACKGROUND: In 2001 and 2003, at the University of Pavia, Italy, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) has been successfully used in the treatment of hepatic colorectal metastases (Pinelli et al., 2002; Zonta et al., 2006). The treatment procedure (TAOrMINA protocol) is characterised by the auto-transplantation and extracorporeal irradiation of the liver using a thermal neutron beam. METHODS: The clinical use of this approach requires well founded data and an optimized irradiation facility. In order to start with this work and to decide upon its feasibility at the research reactor TRIGA Mainz, basic data and requirements have been considered (Wortmann, 2008). Computer calculations using the ATTILA (Transpire Inc. 2006) and MCNP (LANL, 2005) codes have been performed, including data from conventional radiation therapy, from the TAOrMINA approach, resulting in reasonable estimations. RESULTS: Basic data and requirements and optimal parameters have been worked out, especially for use at an optimized TRIGA irradiation facility (Wortmann, 2008). Advantages of the extracorporeal irradiation with auto-transplantation and the potential of an optimized irradiation facility could be identified. Within the requirements, turning the explanted organ over by 180° appears preferable to a whole side source, similar to a permanent rotation of the organ. CONCLUSIONS: The design study and the parameter optimization confirm the potential of this approach to treat metastases in explanted organs. The results do not represent actual treatment data but a first estimation. Although all specific values refer to the TRIGA Mainz, they may act as a useful guide for other types of neutron sources. The recommended modifications (Wortmann, 2008) show the suitability of TRIGA reactors as a radiation source for BNCT of extracorporeal irradiated and auto-transplanted organs.