Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
J Cancer Educ ; 33(6): 1213-1221, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573517

RESUMO

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines are the gold standard in hereditary cancer risk assessment, screening, and treatment. A minority of physicians follow NCCN guidelines for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. This study assesses the impact of an interventional educational program on HBOC in terms of knowledge. Physicians were sent an invite to join either an intervention survey (web-training offered prior to the knowledge survey) or control survey (web-training offered after the knowledge survey). Sixty-nine physicians in the intervention arm and 67 physicians in the control arm completed the survey. The interventional group regularly answered items correctly at a higher frequency than the control group. For example, 64.71% (n = 44) of physicians in the intervention group knew that multi-gene testing does not have to include only highly penetrant genes compared to 32.84% (n = 22) of the control group (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen with other specific survey items. The current study is important in that it shows web-based education to be a feasible and effective modality for training on hereditary breast cancer. This type of education may be incorporated into CME programs and can be used as a foundation for further studies as well.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Competência Clínica , Educação Médica Continuada , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Internet , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Distribuição Aleatória
2.
J Cancer Educ ; 30(3): 573-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25234477

RESUMO

The study aim was to evaluate the association between genetics referrals, training in medical school, residency, or continuing medical education and physician knowledge of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). A survey of 55 questions was administered to 140 physicians evaluating knowledge and practice patterns regarding HBOC. Physicians with genetics training during residency were more likely to recognize that most instances of ovarian cancer are not hereditary (odds ratio (OR) = 3.16; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.32, 7.58). Physicians with continuing medical education (CME) training on genetics were more likely to identify that screening can be improved for those with a hereditary mutation (OR = 4.28; 95 % CI 1.32, 13.90). Primary care physicians who frequently referred for genetics were more likely to recognize that maternal history is not more important than paternal history (OR = 2.51; 95 % CI 1.11, 5.66), that screening can be improved for those with hereditary risk (OR = 4.06; 95 % CI 1.08, 15.22), and that females with a hereditary breast cancer risk would have different recommendations for screening than someone without this risk (OR = 4.91; 95 % CI 1.04, 23.25). Our data suggest that training and frequency of genetics referrals may be associated with knowledge of general risk assessment for HBOC.


Assuntos
Educação Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Testes Genéticos , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Médicos , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/genética , Educação Médica Continuada , Feminino , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Humanos , Internato e Residência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Faculdades de Medicina
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA