Rewarding properties of the stereoisomers of 4-methylaminorex: involvement of the dopamine system.

4-Methylaminorex is a potential psychostimulant drug of abuse that exists as four stereoisomers: cis-4R,5S, cis-4S,5R, trans-4S,5S, and trans-4R,5R. The racemic mixture of the cis-isomers has been encountered in illicit samples, but previous animal studies suggest that also the trans-isomers could have similar stimulant-like properties. We tested whether the stereoisomers possess rewarding properties and compared their potency using the conditioned place preference method in rats. Furthermore, the involvement of the brain dopaminergic system in the 4-methylaminorex reward was tested with the dopamine D1- and D2-receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and raclopride administered systemically, or with the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine injected into the nucleus accumbens. All the four isomers induced place preference, with no apparent differences in their potency. SCH 23990 and raclopride attenuated 4-methylaminorex-induced increase in place preference, and 6-hydroxydopamine also tended to be efficacious. These findings indicate that all the four stereoisomers of 4-methylaminorex possess rewarding properties and thus abuse potential; the trans-isomers are at least as potent as the cis-isomers. Furthermore, the brain dopaminergic system appears to be involved in the 4-methylaminorex-reward.

Differential behavioural sensitization to intermittent morphine treatment in alcohol-preferring AA and alcohol-avoiding ANA rats: role of mesolimbic dopamine.

Alcohol-preferring AA (Alko Alcohol) and alcohol-avoiding ANA (Alko Non-Alcohol) rats have well-documented differences in their voluntary ethanol consumption and brain opioidergic systems. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether these rat lines differ in their susceptibility to morphine-induced behavioural and neurochemical sensitization. The rats were given 15 injections of morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) or saline every other day. Locomotor activity and release of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens were monitored after a challenge with additional morphine injections (10 mg/kg) 1 and 5 weeks after withdrawal from the repeated treatment. Morphine increased locomotion more in the previously morphine-treated rats than in the saline-treated controls. Furthermore, AA rats were more sensitive to this effect of morphine than ANA rats. Accumbal morphine-induced dopamine release was significantly higher in the morphine-treated AA than ANA rats after the first challenge injection 1 week from withdrawal, but no differences were observed after the second challenge. The brain and plasma concentrations of morphine were similar among the lines suggesting that the differences in the effects of morphine cannot be explained in terms of differential pharmacokinetics of morphine in these lines. These data show that AA rats are more susceptible to morphine-induced behavioural sensitization than ANA rats. Furthermore, it suggests that mesolimbic dopamine has at best only a transient role in the expression of opioid-induced behavioural sensitization. The relationship between the mechanisms underlying the differential sensitivity of these rat lines to the effects of repeated morphine and voluntary ethanol drinking remains to be determined.