A Phase I, Multiple-Dose, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Etelcalcetide Administered Intravenously to Chinese Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis.

PURPOSE: This study reports data from the first evaluation of etelcalcetide treatment in Chinese adults with chronic kidney disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: This phase I, randomized study compared thrice-weekly etelcalcetide (5 mg per dose intravenously) and placebo in 33 Chinese adults (aged 18-70 years) receiving hemodialysis. Patients in both treatment groups received standard-of-care treatment with a total of 12 doses of the investigational product during a 4-week treatment period, followed by 4 weeks of washout and follow-up. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (primary endpoint), tolerability (secondary endpoint), and changes in intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and corrected calcium (cCa) concentrations (exploratory endpoints) were assessed. PK parameters, ie, the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-last), assessed over the interdialytic interval following the first and last doses were evaluated. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) and anti-etelcalcetide antibodies was assessed. FINDINGS: Etelcalcetide administered to 25 patients was compared with placebo administered to 8 patients. Etelcalcetide exposure, assessed by Cmax and AUC0-last, increased after multiple-dose administration of etelcalcetide through day 27, with a mean (SD) accumulation ratio of 3.02 (0.61) based on AUC. At least one AE was reported for all patients in the etelcalcetide group and for 87.5% of patients in the placebo group. Serious AEs were reported in 12% of patients in the etelcalcetide group only. No deaths occurred, and a single discontinuation because of patient withdrawal of consent was reported in the etelcalcetide group. Preexisting anti-etelcalcetide antibodies were detected in one patient. The mean serum cCa level for all patients was maintained at >1.75 mmol/L. The iPTH and cCa concentrations decreased as expected, and a maximum mean decrease from baseline of 35.13% in iPTH levels was detected on day 27. IMPLICATIONS: Multiple doses of 5 mg etelcalcetide were well tolerated, and observed etelcalcetide PK and safety profiles were similar to those in reports in adults of ethnicities other than Chinese. Changes in serum iPTH and serum calcium levels were consistent with expected responses to etelcalcetide. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03283098.

Comparison of Neisseria gonorrhoeae MICs obtained by Etest and agar dilution for ceftriaxone, cefpodoxime, cefixime and azithromycin.

We evaluated Neisseria gonorrhoeae Etest minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) relative to agar dilution MICs for 664 urethral isolates for ceftriaxone (CRO) and azithromycin (AZM), 351 isolates for cefpodoxime (CPD) and 315 isolates for cefixime (CFM). Etest accurately determined CPD, CFM and AZM MICs, but resulted in higher CRO MICs.

Translating HIV interventions into practice: community-based organizations' experiences with the diffusion of effective behavioral interventions (DEBIs).

Efficacious behavioral interventions developed to address the spread of HIV/STIs are currently being disseminated in the USA through a national diffusion program (DEBI) spearheaded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Understanding how interventions are translated to real world settings is necessary to further scientific knowledge of this process and to facilitate future translation efforts in public health. Prior studies have begun to elucidate how agencies translate behavioral interventions into practice, but further work is needed. Guided by the ADAPT framework, we examined agencies' assessment, preparation, and implementation of interventions. Our qualitative interview-based study focused on six community-based agencies in California (United States) funded to implement three group-level HIV interventions. Findings showed considerable variation in the extent to which agencies engaged in assessment and broad-based preparation and in the ease with which agencies implemented the interventions. The findings provide insight into the process that agencies undergo in the translation of effective behavioral interventions and illustrate how agencies can inform logic models that guide translation. We also identify relevant dimensions of existing models, including the ADAPT framework and Rogers's (1995, 2005) diffusion of innovations in organizations, that have value for agencies that are translating research to practice.