Knotless Suture Anchor With Suture Tape Quadriceps Tendon Repair Is Biomechanically Superior to Transosseous and Traditional Suture Anchor-Based Repairs in a Cadaveric Model.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of a knotless suture anchor with suture tape quadriceps tendon repair technique with transosseous and suture anchor repair techniques. METHODS: Twenty matched pairs of cadaveric knees underwent a quadriceps tendon avulsion followed by repair via the use of transosseous tunnels with #2 high-strength sutures, 5.5-mm biocomposite fully threaded suture anchors with #2 high-strength sutures, or 4.75-mm biocomposite knotless suture anchors with suture tape. Ten knees were repaired via transosseous repair and 10 via fully threaded suture anchor repair, and their matched specimens were repaired with suture tape and knotless anchors. Biomechanical analysis included displacement during cyclic loading over 250 cycles, construct stiffness, ultimate load to failure, and failure mode analysis. RESULTS: Compared with transosseous repairs, quadriceps tendons repaired with knotless suture tape demonstrated significantly less displacement during cyclic loading (cycles 1-20 3.6 ± 1.3 vs 6.3 ± 1.9 mm, P = .003; cycles 20-250 2.0 ± 0.4 vs 3.1 ± 0.9 mm, P = .011), improved construct stiffness (67 ± 25 vs 26 ± 12 N/mm, P = .001), and greater ultimate load to failure (616 ± 149 vs 413 ± 107 N, P = .004). Our repair technique also demonstrated improved biomechanical parameters compared with fully threaded suture anchor repair in initial displacement during cyclic loading (cycles 1-20 3.0 ± 0.8 vs 5.1 ± 0.9 mm, P < .001), construct stiffness (62 ± 20 vs 28 ± 10 N/mm, P = .001) and ultimate load to failure (579 ± 129 vs 399 ± 87 N, P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: Repair of quadriceps tendon ruptures with this knotless suture anchor with suture tape repair technique is biomechanically superior in cyclic displacement, construct stiffness, and ultimate load to failure compared with transosseous and fully threaded suture anchor techniques in cadaveric specimens. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The demonstration that our repair technique is biomechanically superior to previously described techniques in a cadaveric setting suggests that consideration should be given to this technique.

Technique for creating the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: optimizing femoral footprint anatomic restoration using outside-in drilling.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate and optimize anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral outside-in drilling technique with a goal of anatomic restoration of the footprint morphologic length, width, area, and angular orientation. METHODS: Ex vivo, computer navigation was used to create virtual 3-dimensional maps of femoral bone tunnels for ACL drill guide pin insertion paths on small, medium, and large models of averaged femora considering various pin insertion angles to the femur. We then determined which pin insertion angle resulted in an ACL femoral footprint optimally matching normal human anatomic length, width, area, and angular orientation of the footprint long axis. RESULTS: During outside-in drilling of the ACL femoral socket, a guide pin entrance angle of 60° to a line perpendicular to the femoral anatomic axis, combined with a guide pin entrance angle of 20° to the transepicondylar axis, results in the closest approximation of the gold standard of normal anatomic morphology of the human knee ACL femoral footprint length, width, area, and angular orientation. CONCLUSIONS: During outside-in drilling of the ACL femoral socket, a guide pin entrance angle of 60° to a line perpendicular to the femoral anatomic axis, combined with a guide pin entrance angle of 20° to the transepicondylar axis, results in optimal reconstruction of the normal human anatomic ACL femoral footprint length, width, area, and angular orientation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We describe arthroscopic landmarks for anatomic ACL femoral socket creation that may be considered by practicing arthroscopic surgeons in the operating room, without open dissection or fluoroscopy and unaffected by type of drill guide or variations in the thickness of the femoral soft-tissue envelope.

A 3.5-mm-diameter anterior cruciate ligament tibial retrograde socket drilling pin is more accurate than a 2.4-mm-diameter pin.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a 3.5-mm-diameter anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tibial retrograde socket drilling pin versus a standard, 2.4-mm drill-tipped guide pin. A secondary purpose was to evaluate surgeon precision in identifying the true (anatomic) center of the ACL tibial footprint using arthroscopic visualization. METHODS: Six matched pairs of cadaveric knees were disarticulated, leaving a well-defined footprint of the ACL on the tibial plateau. The tibial footprint was digitally recorded by a bioengineer, and the true center of the footprint was calculated. Next, using arthroscopic visualization, a surgeon identified and marked his estimation of the true center of the ACL tibial footprint. This mark was then digitally recorded by the bioengineer and compared with the calculated center, allowing quantification of surgeon anatomic precision. Finally, under arthroscopic visualization, the surgeon was given 1 attempt to aim and drill the guide pin to his mark. Pin position was digitally recorded; the distance of the drill pin from the mark quantified drill pin placement accuracy. RESULTS: Mean accuracy for the 3.5-mm retrograde socket drilling pin was 1.06 ± 0.75 mm versus 3.03 ± 1.00 mm for the 2.4-mm pin. The difference was significant (P < .005). Surgeon anatomic precision was 2.7 ± 1.4 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a 3.5-mm-diameter ACL tibial retrograde socket drilling pin is significantly more accurate than a 2.4-mm-diameter pin. The 3.5-mm pin accuracy is within the range of surgeon precision; the 2.4-mm pin accuracy is not. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pin accuracy and surgeon precision are clinically relevant measures because anatomic tunnel placement is a determinant of ACL reconstruction outcome.

Suture Tape-Augmented Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Should Be Tensioned and Fixed at Approximately 100° Knee Flexion to Prevent Loss of Full Flexion.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanics of simulated posterior cruciate ligament injuries (SimPCL) with and without internal brace suture tape augmentation (IBSTA) in cadaver knees. METHODS: A total of 20 cadaveric knees were used, all male, with an average age of 65 ± 18 years. Femoral tunnel isometry was evaluated at the 1/11 o'clock and 2/10 o'clock femoral positions. SimPCL were created in 6 knees. IBSTA was performed, and load data were collected through knee range of motion. An additional 6 specimens were evaluated at the 1/11 femoral tunnel position, and load cell recordings were obtained at 10 different knee flexion angles. Cyclic displacement in 8 cadaver knees was assessed using an Instron machine. Load and displacement data were recorded. Testing was performed under 3 conditions for each specimen: intact PCL, SimPCL, and SimPCL/IBSTA using the 1/11 femoral tunnel position. RESULTS: There was no difference in isometry when comparing the 1/11 o'clock (7.1 ± 4.0 ft∗lb) femoral position and the 2/10 o'clock (7.6 ± 4.2 ft∗lb) position (P = .467). SimPCL/IBSTA suture tape tension gradually increased with progressive flexion to a peak at approximately 120° of knee flexion. For cycle 100 tibial displacement, there was no difference between intact (4.41 mm) and SimPCL/IBSTA (5.59 mm, P = .391). There was a difference between intact (4.41 mm) and SimPCL (7.19 mm, P = .006) , but there was no significant difference between SimPCL/IBSTA (5.59 mm) and SimPCL (7.19 mm, P = .140). There was a difference in cycle 1 stiffness between intact (62.3 N/mm) and Sim2PCL (37 N/mm, P = .005). There was no difference between other groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaver study, there was a 1.18-mm average difference in posterior tibial displacement when comparing intact and SimPCL/IBSTA. The internal brace construct should be tensioned and fixed at approximately 100° of knee flexion to prevent loss of full flexion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The presented biomechanical data for internal bracing of PCL injuries may lead to improved surgical techniques.

The Use of Suture Augmentation for Graft Protection in ACL Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study in Porcine Knees.

PURPOSE: To biomechanically evaluate the use of the suture augmentation construct at time 0 of ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Eighty porcine knees underwent ACL reconstruction using 2 techniques for graft fixation: a single suspensory construct (SSC), performed with a femoral button and tibial interference screw; and a double suspensory construct (DSC), with a femoral and tibial button. Each fixation technique was performed on 40 porcine knees divided into 4 subgroups. The first group had a nonaugmented ACL reconstruction, the second group had an ACL reconstruction with suture augmentation, and the third and fourth groups were the same as the first and second groups, with the graft resected 80% to simulate graft weakening. Ultimate load, yield load, stiffness, cyclic displacement values, and mode of failure were recorded for each graft. RESULTS: In a weakened graft model with 80% graft resection, there was a significant increase in ultimate strength (P < .001), yield strength (P < .001), and cyclic displacement (P < .001) with suture augmentation. There was no significant increase in stiffness with suture augmentation with either construct (P = .278). In the setting of an intact graft, there were no differences in either SSC or DCS groups with or without suture augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a suture to ACL reconstruction techniques resulted in minimal changes in baseline biomechanical characteristics while improving ultimate load, yield load, and cyclic displacement in a weakened graft model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Suture augmentation of ACL reconstruction may confer improved integrity of the graft and is worth consideration and future clinical study.

Biomechanical Analysis of Single Interference Screw vs Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Flexor Hallucis Longus Transfer.

BACKGROUND: Flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer (FHL) with a cortical button tension slide is an innovative addition that has not been measured against traditional methods. METHODS: 12 pairs (n=24) of fresh-frozen cadaveric tibia-to-toe samples were used and randomized to receive one of the operative FHL techniques. Specimens underwent bone density analysis. Biomechanical loading was applied between 20 and 60 N at 1 Hz for 100 cycles. Post-cyclic load to failure occurred at 1.25 mm/s. Cyclic displacement, structural stiffness, and ultimate load were derived from load-displacement curves. Student t tests evaluated significant effects between both FHL techniques. Linear regression analysis assessed interactions between bone density and strength of FHL technique. RESULTS: Average tendon diameter was 5.44±0.46 mm. Average bone density was 1.06±0.08 g/cm2. Addition of a cortical button to FHL transfer did not significantly affect cyclic displacement (0.78±0.52 mm vs 0.87±0.80 mm) or structural stiffness (162.11±43.34 N/mm vs 167.57±49.19 N/mm). Cortical button addition to FHL transfer resulted in significantly increased ultimate load (343.72±68.93 N) compared with interference screw alone (255.62±77.17 N) (P = .0002). Linear regression analyses did not reveal any significant interactions between bone density and FHL tendon transfer technique. CONCLUSION: Enhanced strength can be achieved with FHL tendon transfer to calcaneus using an interference screw and cortical button tension slide technique as compared to an interference screw alone. Cortical buttons in the setting of FHL tendon transfer to the calcaneus offers an additional level of support. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Operative cases presenting with poor bone quality due to osteoporosis or osteopenia could benefit from cortical button fixation during FHL transfer. Clinical studies are needed to determine if the increased construct stability conferred from the additional use of a flip button results in fewer FHL transfer failures or better clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, Controlled Laboratory Study.

Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to measure anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral tunnel lengths comparing anteromedial (AM) portal and outside-in techniques. METHODS: ACL femoral guide pins were drilled into 12 cadaveric knees through the AM portal technique and then the outside-in technique in each specimen. Pin intraosseous distance was measured in millimeters by a MicroScribe 3-dimensional digitizer (Immersion, San Jose, CA). RESULTS: With the AM portal technique, the mean ACL femoral tunnel distance was 30.5 mm. With the outside-in technique, the mean ACL femoral tunnel distance was 34.1 mm. The difference was statistically significant (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the outside-in technique for creating the ACL femoral tunnel results in a longer mean tunnel length than the AM portal technique for creating the ACL femoral tunnel. The outside-in technique best prevents excessively short tunnels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results have clinical relevance for surgeons who desire to perform independent, rather than transtibial, drilling of the ACL femoral tunnel and desire adequate length of tendon graft within the femoral bone tunnel.

Independent Suture Tape Internal Brace Reinforcement of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Allografts: Biomechanical Assessment in a Full-ACL Reconstruction Laboratory Model.

Internal bracing for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery is a relatively new concept. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an "independent" button-fixed internal brace on the biomechanical properties of ACL reconstruction in a full-construct experimental model. Three groups (n = 10 each) were tested in a full-construct porcine-bone model with human bone-patellar tendon-bone allografts using different reconstruction techniques: interference screw fixation on femur and tibia (S-S group), adjustable-loop device (ALD) fixation on the femur with tibial interference screw without suture tape (ALD-S group), and with internal brace (ALD-S-IB group). Measured outcomes included cyclic displacement, stiffness, and ultimate load to failure. The ALD-S-IB group (2.9 ± 0.8 mm) displaced significantly less than the ALD-S (4.2 ± 0.9 mm; p = 0.015) and S-S group (4.3 ± 1.1 mm; p = 0.017). No significant difference was found between the ALD-S and the S-S group. Construct stiffness was significantly higher for the ALD-S-IB group (156 ± 23 N/mm) and the ALD-S group (122 ± 28 N/mm) than for the S-S group (104 ± 40 N/mm; p = 0.003 and p = 0.0042), but there was no significant difference between both ALD groups. Similarly, ultimate loads in the ALD-S-IB (758 ± 128 N) and the ALD-S groups (628 ± 223 N) were significantly greater than in the S-S group (416 ± 167 N; p < 0.001 and p = 0.025), but there was no significant difference between ALD groups. Adding an internal brace reinforcement to an ALD in a full-construct experimental model significantly decreased cyclic displacement by 31% without increasing construct stiffness or ultimate load significantly. These results indicate that suture tape internal bracing of bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft ACL reconstruction decreases cyclic displacement during experimental testing, which has clinical implications regarding initial construct stability.

Surgical Treatment of Meniscal Extrusion: A Biomechanical Study on the Role of the Medial Meniscotibial Ligaments With Early Clinical Validation.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal extrusion refers to meniscal displacement out of the joint space and over the tibial margin, altering knee mechanics and increasing the risk of osteoarthritis. The meniscotibial ligaments have been shown to have an important role in meniscal stability. However, it remains unclear whether an isolated lesion of the medial meniscotibial ligaments will result in meniscal extrusion and whether repairing the detached ligament will reduce extrusion. HYPOTHESIS: A lesion of the medial meniscotibial ligament will result in meniscal extrusion, and repairing the joint capsule will eliminate the extrusion by returning the meniscus back to its original position. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (N = 6) were used for biomechanical testing. The test protocol involved 100 flexion-extension cycles. In full extension, meniscal extrusion was measured using ultrasound, in both an otherwise unloaded state and while subjected to a 10-N·m varus load. Each knee was tested in its native condition (baseline), after creating a detachment of the medial meniscotibial ligament, and finally with the joint capsule repaired using 3 knotless SutureTak anchors. We also performed a retrospective review of 15 patients who underwent meniscotibial ligament repair with a minimal follow-up of 5 weeks (mean, 14 weeks; range, 5-35 weeks). RESULTS: During biomechanical testing, the mean absolute meniscal extrusion at baseline was 1.5 ± 0.6 mm. After creation of the meniscotibial ligament lesion, the mean absolute meniscal extrusion was significantly increased (3.4 ± 0.7 mm) (P < .001). After repair, the extrusion was reduced to 2.1 ± 0.4 mm (P < .001). Clinically, a reduction in absolute meniscal extrusion of approximately 48% was reached (1.2 ± 0.6 vs 2.4 ± 0.5 mm preoperatively; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the medial meniscotibial ligaments contribute to meniscal stability as lesions cause the meniscus to extrude and that repair of those ligaments can significantly reduce extrusion. Early clinical results using this meniscotibial ligament repair technique support our biomechanical findings, as a significant reduction in meniscal extrusion was achieved. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our biomechanical findings suggest that repair of medial meniscotibial ligaments reduces meniscal extrusion and clinically may improve meniscal function, with the possible long-term benefit of reducing the risk for osteoarthritis.

Biomechanical assessment of lateral ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction with or without internal brace augmentation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) using primary repair or reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex have proven inconsistent. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that augmentation of LUCL repair or palmaris longus tendon reconstruction using a suture tape augmentation would be associated with less rotational displacement and greater torque load to failure (LTF) compared with nonaugmented constructs. METHODS: Cadaveric elbows (n = 12 matched pairs) were used. Baseline stiffness and displacement values were obtained. The LUCL was transected followed by repair alone, repair with augmentation, reconstruction with palmaris longus graft, or reconstruction with augmentation. Specimens were retested including torque LTF. Paired t tests were performed to assess the biomechanical effects of augmentation. RESULTS: Augmentation was associated with higher LTF than repair and reconstruction alone (P = .008 and .047, respectively). Displacement was less with augmentation in reconstruction groups (P = .048) but not in repair groups. Suture tape augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than repair alone (P = .01). Although reconstruction with augmentation maintained rotational stiffness better than nonaugmented reconstruction, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .057). Mode of failure for repair alone was predominantly suture pulling through repaired ligament. Augmented repairs primarily failed at the anchor-bone interface. Modes of failure for both reconstruction groups were similar, including graft tearing and/or slipping at the anchor. CONCLUSION: When positioned in neutral forearm rotation and 90o of flexion to simulate postoperative conditions, augmentation of LUCL repair or tendon reconstruction using suture tape is associated with better resistance to rotational loads compared with nonaugmented repair or reconstruction, while maintaining near-native rotational stiffness.

Reconstruction of the Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament of the Elbow: Biomechanical Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique to the Docking Technique.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, understanding of the anatomy of the ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) has evolved, demonstrating that the insertional footprint of the UCL on the ulna is more elongated and distally tapered than previously described. Current UCL reconstruction configurations do not typically re-create this native anatomy, which may represent a potential area for improvement. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purposes of this study were (1) to describe a novel anatomic UCL reconstruction technique designed to better replicate the native UCL anatomy and (2) to biomechanically compare this with the docking technique. The hypothesis was that the ultimate load to failure for the anatomic technique would not be inferior to the docking technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (8 matched pairs) were utilized. One elbow in each pair was randomized to receive UCL reconstruction via the docking technique or the novel anatomic UCL reconstruction technique with palmaris tendon autograft. Following reconstruction, biomechanical testing was performed by applying valgus rotational torque at a constant rate of 5 deg/s until ultimate mechanical failure of the construct occurred. Maximal torque (N·m), rotation stiffness (N·m/deg), and mode/location of failure were recorded for each specimen. RESULTS: The mean ultimate load to failure for elbows in the docking technique group was 23.8 ± 6.1 N·m, as compared with 31.9 ± 8.4 N·m in the anatomic technique group (P = .045). Mean rotational stiffness was 1.9 ± 0.7 versus 2.3 ± 0.9 N·m/deg for the docking and anatomic groups, respectively (P = .338). The most common mode of failure was suture pullout from the graft, which occurred in all 8 (100%) docking technique specimens and 7 of 8 (88%) specimens that underwent the anatomic UCL reconstruction technique. CONCLUSION: Ultimately, the anatomic UCL reconstruction technique demonstrated superior strength and resistance to valgus torque when compared with the docking technique, and this was comparable with that of the native UCL from prior studies. Increased initial strength may allow for earlier initiation of throwing postoperatively and potentially shorten return-to-play times. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Current UCL reconstruction techniques do not accurately reproduce the UCL insertional anatomy on the ulna. The novel anatomic technique described may result in more natural joint kinematics. This study demonstrated load-to-failure rates that are significantly higher than with the docking technique and consistent with the native ligament, as reported from previous studies. These findings may serve as a foundation for future clinical study and optimization of this technique.

Biomechanical validation of load-sharing rip-stop fixation for the repair of tissue-deficient rotator cuff tears.

BACKGROUND: Poor-quality tendon is one of the most difficult problems the surgeon must overcome in achieving secure fixation during rotator cuff repair. A load-sharing rip-stop construct (LSRS) has recently been proposed as a method for improving fixation strength, but the biomechanical properties of this construct have not yet been examined. PURPOSE: To compare the strength of the LSRS construct to that of single-row fixation for rotator cuff repair. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Rotator cuff tears were created in 6 cadaveric matched-pair specimens and repaired with a single row or an LSRS. In the LSRS repair, a 2-mm suture tape was placed as an inverted mattress stitch in the rotator cuff, and sutures from 2 anchors were placed as simple stitches that passed medial to the suture tape. The suture tape limbs were secured with knotless anchors laterally before sutures were tied from the medial anchors. Displacement was observed with video tracking after cyclic loading, and specimens were loaded to failure. RESULTS: The mean load to failure was 371 ± 102 N in single-row repairs compared with 616 ± 185 N in LSRS repairs (P = .031). There was no difference in displacement with cyclic loading between the groups (3.3 ± 0.8 mm vs. 3.5 ± 1.1 mm; P = .561). In the single-row group, 4 of 6 failures occurred at the suture-tendon interface. In the LSRS group, only 1 failure occurred at the suture-tendon interface. CONCLUSION: The ultimate failure load of the LSRS construct for rotator cuff repair was 1.7 times that of a single-row construct in a cadaveric model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The LSRS rotator cuff repair construct may be useful in the repair of difficult tears such as massive tears, medial tears, and tears with tendon loss.