Japanese single-center experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over 20 years: should open or endovascular aneurysm repair be performed first?

PURPOSE: The present study analyzed the outcomes of our experience with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair over 20 years using endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) with commercially available devices or open aortic repair (OAR) and reviewed our surgical strategy for AAA. METHODS: From 1999 to 2019, 1077 patients (659 OAR, 418 EVAR) underwent AAA repair. The OAR and EVAR groups were compared retrospectively, and a propensity matching analysis was performed. RESULTS: EVAR was first introduced in 2008. Our strategy was changed to an EVAR-first strategy in 2010. Beginning in 2018, this EVAR-first strategy was changed to an OAR-first strategy. After propensity matching, the overall survival in the OAR group was significantly better than that in the EVAR group at 10 years (p = 0.006). Two late deaths due to AAA rupture were identified in the EVAR group, although there were no significant differences between the OAR and EVAR groups with regard to the freedom from AAA-related death at 10 years. The rate of freedom from aortic events at 10 years was significantly higher in the OAR group than in the EVAR group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The rates of freedom from AAA-related death in both the OAR and EVAR groups were favorable, and the rate of freedom from aortic events was significantly lower in the EVAR group than in the OAR group. Close long-term follow-up after EVAR is mandatory.

[Does Surgeons' Experience Affect the Surgical Outcomes of Total Arch Replacement?]

OBJECTIVES: Total arch replacement( TAR) is used to be a complicated and quite invasive aortic procedure. To perform TAR safely and effectively under all circumstances, we have constructed standardization of the procedures of TAR. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of surgeons' experience on surgical outcome of TAR to evaluate our standardization. METHODS: From January 2008 to December 2020, 346 consecutive patients (mean age 73.6±10.2) underwent elective TAR through a median sternotomy at our institute. TAR was performed by three types of surgeon classified by their experience( A:over 20 years, B:15~20 years, C:under 15 years). The surgical outcomes were examined. Our standard approach include( 1) meticulous selection of arterial cannulation site and type of arterial cannula;(2) antegrade selective cerebral perfusion;(3) maintenance of minimal tympanic temperature between 20 ℃ and 23 ℃;(4) early rewarming just after distal anastomosis;(5) maintaining fluid balance below 1,000 ml during cardiopulmonary bypass. RESULTS: The operative cases were 227 in A, 86 in B and 33 in C. Surgeon A operated more complicated TAR with higher operative risk compared with B and C. The hospital mortality and major complication rate was not significant difference among surgeons( hospital mortality A:3.5%, B:2.3%, C:3.0%). Multivariate analysis showed the surgeons' experience was not associated with hospital mortality and major complications. Long-term outcomes were also compatible among three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our standardization for TAR seemed to be an useful approach to eliminate the impact of surgeon experience on surgical outcomes if the type of surgeon was appropriately selected according to the level of operative difficulty.