Doxycycline Sclerodesis-"Rhinodesis"-for Enhanced Soft Tissue Adhesion in Rhinoplasty: A Preliminary Study.

The use of doxycycline as a sclerosing agent is well-established. Given the clinical efficacy of doxycycline sclerosant therapy, we embarked upon a study to evaluate the efficacy of small-volume liquified doxycycline particularly in thick skinned rhinoplasty patients to promote re-adhesion of the nasal skin-soft tissue envelope (SSTE) thereby minimizing surgical dead space and enhancing surface contour, to improve the eventual outcome of surgery.We present two clinical case series using rhinodesis. All patients were treated with the same rhinodesis protocol that included conventional splinting and taping. The first series consisted of 102 consecutive primary rhinoplasties with medium to thick nasal skin treated via open rhinoplasty. Doxycycline solution at a concentration of 20 mg/mL was applied beneath the skin flap using a 14-gauge angiocath inserted through small gaps in the marginal suture line following closure, retained for 2 to 3 minutes, and then expressed from the dead space. Firm manual compression of the SSTE was maintained for at least 1 additional minute, and the splint was then applied. The second series consisted of 25 thick-skinned primary rhinoplasties that were also treated with open rhinoplasty using the same rhinodesis protocol. However, the second group was evaluated with serial postoperative ultrasonography to characterize the soft-tissue response to rhinodesis, particularly within the tip and supra-tip regions.Results revealed enhanced skin adherence in nearly all patients when compared to traditional taping and splinting alone. Ultrasonic examination demonstrated enhanced adherence of the subcutaneous tissue to the nasal framework and suggests that rhinodesis is effective at minimizing dead space in majority of thick-skinned rhinoplasty patients. No complications were observed. Doxycycline can be used easily and safely to seal the surgical dead space post-rhinoplasty and minimize degradation of nasal contour with excellent outcome.

Characterization of Fat Used for the Optimization of the Soft Tissue Envelope of the Nose in Rhinoplasty.

Septorhinoplasty (SRP) is one of the most common aesthetic procedures worldwide. A thin or scarred soft tissue envelope, especially in the context of secondary SRP, can lead to unpredictable scarring, shrinkage, and discoloration of the skin. Other than the careful preparation of the soft tissue mantle, no gold standard exists to minimize the above-mentioned risks. Our aim was to create a thin "separation layer" between the nasal bridge (osseous and cartilaginous) and the skin envelope by autologous fat transfer with the addition of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) to conceal small irregularities, to improve the quality of the skin soft tissue mantle, and to optimize the mobility of the skin. We report 21 patients who underwent SRP on a voluntary basis. All patients had either thin skin and/or revision SRP with scarring. Macroscopic fat harvested from the periumbilical or rib region was minced and purified. PRF was obtained by centrifugation of autologous whole blood samples and mixed with the fat to form a graft, which was then transferred to the nasal dorsum. Postoperative monitoring of graft survival included sonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the nose. The harvested adipose tissue was also analyzed in vitro. In the postoperative follow-up after 1 year, survival of the adipose tissue was demonstrated in all patients by both sonography and MRI. The in vitro analysis showed interindividual differences in the quantity, size, and quality of the transplanted adipocytes. Camouflage of the nasal bridge by using adipose tissue was beneficial for the quality of the skin soft tissue mantle and hence represents a good alternative to known methods. Future aims include the ability to assess the quality of adipose tissue to be transplanted based on clinical parameters. Level of evidence: N/A.

Correction of the Saddle Nose Deformity Using the "Push Up" Technique.

The saddle nose deformity typically occurs after the loss of underlying septal support with loss of projection of the middle nasal vault. This creates a saddling effect as the upper lateral cartilages contract and forms a dip in the profile. The saddle nose deformity can occur from many different etiologies, including septal hematoma, fracture of the septum after trauma, disruption of the dorsal L-strut support after septoplasty, and metabolic disorders resulting in the loss of septal support. In most cases, the nasal bones remain in their native position creating a discrepancy in dorsal height and deformity. Correction of the saddle nose deformity can be performed using one of the two primary approaches. The most basic option is to simply fill the defect with a cartilage onlay graft (solid graft, diced cartilage and fascia, and so on) to create a normal dorsal line. This approach can be effective in many cases. Over time, the onlay graft may descend and create deformity or become visible. The other approach involves opening the middle nasal vault, placing spreader grafts, and reconstituting the dorsal L-strut, performing septal reconstruction or extracorporeal septoplasty. In this paper, we present our technique of repairing the saddle nose deformity using a "push up" method that preserves the middle vault anatomy and reconstitutes the proper projection of the middle-third of the nose.

Correction of the Saddle Nose Deformity Using the "Push Up" Technique.

The saddle nose deformity typically occurs after the loss of underlying septal support with loss of projection of the middle nasal vault. This creates a saddling effect as the upper lateral cartilages contract and forms a dip in the profile. The saddle nose deformity can occur from many different etiologies, including septal hematoma, fracture of the septum after trauma, disruption of the dorsal L-strut support after septoplasty, and metabolic disorders resulting in the loss of septal support. In most cases, the nasal bones remain in their native position creating a discrepancy in dorsal height and deformity. Correction of the saddle nose deformity can be performed using one of the two primary approaches. The most basic option is to simply fill the defect with a cartilage onlay graft (solid graft, diced cartilage and fascia, and so on) to create a normal dorsal line. This approach can be effective in many cases. Over time, the onlay graft may descend and create deformity or become visible. The other approach involves opening the middle nasal vault, placing spreader grafts, and reconstituting the dorsal L-strut, performing septal reconstruction or extracorporeal septoplasty. In this paper, we present our technique of repairing the saddle nose deformity using a "push up" method that preserves the middle vault anatomy and reconstitutes the proper projection of the middle-third of the nose.

Optimization of the Soft Tissue Envelope of the Nose in Rhinoplasty Utilizing Fat Transfer Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin.

A thin or damaged skin soft tissue envelope may cause concerns in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. During postoperative healing, unpredictable scarring and contraction may occur and lead to significant aesthetic and trophic sequelae. Besides a meticulous surgical technique, there are no reliable techniques to prevent long-term skin damage and shrinkage. Fat transfer with addition of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) harbors the possibility of local soft tissue regeneration and skin rejuvenation through growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells. It may also facilitate the creation of a thin fat layer on the dorsum to prevent shrink-wrap forces and conceal small irregularities. The goal is to provide evidence for the feasibility, durability, and beneficial effect of diced macrofat transfer bonded with PRF on the nasal dorsum. We present the technique of fat transfer conjugated with PRF as a nasal dorsal graft. Clinical endpoints were the prevention of trophic disturbances and atrophy at a 1-year postoperative follow-up. We present the skin mobility test as a clinical indicator of a healthy soft tissue envelope. The presented case series consists of 107 rhinoplasties. Fat was harvested in the umbilical or costal region. PRF was created by centrifugation of autologous whole blood samples. Macrofat was diced, cleaned, and bonded with PRF. The compound transplants were transferred to the nasal dorsum. There were no perioperative complications or wound-healing issues. Mean follow-up was 14 months. Clinical inspection showed good skin quality and no signs of shrinkage, marked scarring, or color changes with positive skin mobility test in all patients. Survival of fat was confirmed by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Diced macrofat transfer in conjunction with PRF to the nasal dorsum is a feasible and safe method. A beneficial effect on the soft tissue envelope is demonstrated as well as the prevention of shrink-wrap forces.

Cartilage Scales Embedded in Fibrin Gel.

Multiple techniques have been described for dorsal nasal augmentation in rhinoplasty. In this article, we review common surgical techniques for raising the dorsum or eliminating dorsal irregularities, by highlighting inherent advantages and disadvantages of each method. Within the past few years, the use of diced cartilage grafts has become the workhorse in this field of interest. To overcome drawbacks of methods based on diced cartilage, we present a new concept for autologous augmentation, using regenerative medicine protocols. A mix of cartilage scales with cartilage pâté was embedded in platelet-rich fibrin (PRF). Since December 2015, a total of 48 patients were treated with this technique. Based on our preliminary results, cartilage scales in PRF appear to be a promising and reliable alternative to existing procedures for dorsal nasal augmentation.

Options for Middle Vault and Dorsum Restoration after Hump Removal in Primary Rhinoplasty.

Prevention of unfavorable sequelae following humpectomy in reduction rhinoplasty by restoration of the middle nasal vault complex today has become imperative in the majority of patients with perhaps the exception of small humps. In general, the techniques used for preservation and reconstruction of these important anatomical structures can be divided into two main categories: spreader graft and spreader flap techniques. Oversimplified spreader graft techniques require donor cartilage, whereas spreader flap techniques use the excess height of the medial portion of the upper lateral cartilages in patients with a cartilaginous hump. In principle, both donor cartilage and preserved upper lateral cartilages usually are positioned along both sides of the dorsal septum to provide natural and harmonious contours as well as to avoid functional impairment (valve collapse). However, the considerable number of publications on this topic attests to existing downsides of both surgical principles. To overcome these shortcomings, we illustrate additional modifications in the application of spreader grafts as well as spreader flaps. However, the main goal of this article is to provide an algorithm helping to decide which technique is best suited to meet the requirements of each individual patient.

Cranial tip suture in nasal tip contouring.

The creation of both a functionally and aesthetically pleasing nasal tip contour is demanding and depends on various different parameters. Typically, procedures are performed with emphasis on narrowing the nasal tip structure. Excisional techniques alone inevitably lead to a reduction in skeletal support and are often prone to unpredictable deformities. But also long-term results of classical suture techniques have shown unfavorable outcomes. Particularly, pinching of the ala and a displacement of the caudal margin of the lateral crus below the cephalic margin belong to this category. A characteristic loss of structural continuity between the domes and the alar lobule and an undesirable shadowing occur. These effects lead to an unnatural appearance of the nasal tip and frequently to impaired nasal breathing. Stability and configuration of the alar cartilages alone do not allow for an adequate evaluation of the nasal tip contour. Rather a three-dimensional approach is required to describe all nasal tip structures. Especially, the rotational angle of the alar surface as well as the longitudinal axis of the lateral crus in relation to cranial septum should be considered in the three-dimensional analysis. Taking the various parameters into account, the authors present new aspects in nasal tip surgery which contribute to the creation of a functionally and aesthetically pleasing as well as durable nasal tip contour.

A new classification of spreader flap techniques.

The objective of this study was to introduce various spreader flap technique modifications to adjust the width of the middle nasal vault in patients who underwent rhinoplasties with humpectomy. Decisive modifications of current spreader flap techniques were performed to allow a more natural restoration of the middle nasal vault and the internal nasal valve after humpectomy. Additional steps provide tools to adjust the width and shape of the middle nasal vault according to patients' requirements. The techniques were categorized into "basic spreader flaps," "flaring spreader flaps," "support spreader flaps," and "interrupted spreader flaps." The various spreader flap techniques were used during 576 primary septorhinoplasties in patients with hump noses, hump/crooked noses, or hump/tension noses. The average follow-up was 19 months. Patients who received basic spreader flaps or a flaring spreader flaps tended to show a slightly too wide middle nasal vault, revision surgery was necessary in four of these cases. All other patients showed an appropriate width in the middle nasal vault and an aesthetically pleasing course of the dorsal aesthetic lines. No signs of inverted v deformities or collapse of the internal nasal valve were observed in any of the patients. Patients who had reported impaired nasal breathing preoperatively described clearly improved subjective symptoms. The described techniques appear to be appropriate and highly promising as a supplement to existing procedures for reconstructing the middle nasal vault and internal nasal valves. No additional cartilage grafts are needed.

Subdorsal Cantilever Graft: Indications and Technique.

The subdorsal cantilever graft (SDCG) is a costal cartilage graft that is positioned below the nasal dorsum to control the position of the nasal bones and middle nasal vault. SDCG type A is used to raise the middle nasal vault and caudal nasal bones to correct the saddle nose deformity. SDCG type B can be used to raise the entire dorsum of the nose (radix, bony vault, and middle vault) in the ethnic augmentation rhinoplasty patient. This article will discuss the indications and technique of the SDCG in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty.

Structural Preservation Rhinoplasty: A Hybrid Approach.

SUMMARY: Structural preservation rhinoplasty merges two popular philosophies of rhinoplasty-structure rhinoplasty and preservation rhinoplasty-in an effort to maximize patient outcomes, aesthetics, and function. This allows the surgeon to both preserve the favorable attributes of the nose, and also to structure the nasal tip and dorsum with grafts to maximize contour and support. The concept of dorsal preservation is to preserve favorable dorsal aesthetic lines without the creation of an "open roof." However, the addition of some structure concepts can expand the utility of dorsal preservation in primary rhinoplasty patients. The authors discuss these structure concepts and their applicability to dorsal preservation.

Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty: Measures to Prevent Suboptimal Outcomes.

Preservation rhinoplasty is making a resurgence as a reliable method of performing primary rhinoplasty. Dorsal preservation is an important part of the approach to preserve favorable nasal contours when performing rhinoplasty. Keys to success require proper patient selection and careful execution. There are potential sequelae, such saddle nose deformity, recurrence of the dorsal convexity, cerebrospinal fluid leak, and radix step-off. This article discusses methods and adjustments in technique to help minimize these potential problems when performing dorsal preservation.

Subdorsal Z-flap: a modification of the Cottle technique in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the novel technique of subdorsal Z-flap in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and give an overview on current available dorsal preservation techniques in the literature. RECENT FINDINGS: The subdorsal Z-flap combines the advantages of the high and low septal strip techniques in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty and ensures well tolerated treatment of the dorsal hump and structural stability. SUMMARY: The technique and concept of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty (DPR) has been used for more than a century but only recently gained significant popularity along with specific technical refinements. The advantage of DPR lies in the preservation of the delicate triangular cartilaginous unity of the septal and upper lateral cartilages with its functional and esthetic implications in contrast to all resecting techniques. A variety of modifications of DPR have been published in recent years, each with advantages and disadvantages. The issue of hump recurrence remains a major concern in DPR. We describe the 'subdorsal Z-flap' and related techniques of DPR in detail, present two clinical case studies and discuss alternative technical modifications. The 'subdorsal Z -flap' combines the advantages of the high septal strip procedure with the advantages of the traditional 'low septal strip' or Cottle technique. By starting the incision at a high level, final septal height can be adjusted precisely. By creating a triangular shape with a vertical cut below the K-Area, which is usually the highest point of the hump, significant leverage can be applied from below the hump and the septal overlap may be sutured securely for a stable correction. In combination with Piezo osteotomy and full open approach, great precision and predictability can be achieved. In a recent publication, we presented more than 100 consecutive cases of subdorsal Z-flap DPR with good functional and esthetic outcomes. The subdorsal Z-flap modification is a combination of two popular DPR techniques, fusing their advantages while minimizing risk profile. A slightly higher degree of technical difficulty and necessary tissue dissection provides the benefits of better predictability and reduction of adverse outcomes.

Characterization of Injury Induced by Routine Surgical Manipulations of Nasal Septal Cartilage.

IMPORTANCE: This study characterizes and compares common surgical manipulations' effects on septal cartilage to understand their implications for rhinoplasty outcomes based on cell viability and cartilage health. OBJECTIVE: To illustrate distinct differences in the impact of various surgical manipulations on septal cartilage in an in vitro septal cartilage model. A secondary objective is to better understand the chondrocyte's response to injury as well as how alterations in the extracellular matrix correspond to chondrocyte viability. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this bench-top in vitro porcine model using juvenile bovine septal cartilage from bovine snouts, easily obtainable septal cartilage was used to generate large numbers of homogenous cartilage specimens. Quantitative outcomes at early and late time points were cell viability, cell stress, matrix loss, and qualitative assessment through histologic examination. The study was performed at a single academic tertiary care research hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Four common surgical manipulations were contrasted with a control group: crushed cartilage, scored cartilage, diced cartilage, and shaved cartilage. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Following the manipulation of the cartilage, the quantitative outcomes were glycosaminoglycan release to the media, lactate dehydrogenase release to the media, and cell death analysis through apoptosis staining. The qualitative outcomes were histologic staining of the manipulated cartilage with safranin-O/fast green stain to identify proteoglycan loss. RESULTS: The crushing followed by shaving manipulations were the most damaging as indicated by increased levels of lactate dehydrogenase release, glycosaminoglycans loss, and cell death. Matrix loss did not increase until after 48 hours postinjury. Furthermore, chondrocyte death was seen early after injury and accelerated to the late time point, day 9, in all manipulations. Conversely, cell stress was found to be greater at 48 hours postinjury, which then declined to the late time point, day 9. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The crushing manipulation followed by shaving and then dicing were the most destructive methods of cartilage manipulation relative to control specimens. Collectively, these outcomes demonstrate the range of injury which occurs with all septal cartilage manipulations and can inform rhinoplasty practice to use the least damaging effective surgical manipulation to obtain the desired outcome. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Spreader flaps for middle vault contour and stabilization.

Nasal hump excision is common during septorhinoplasty. Without appropriate restoration of the middle nasal vault, cosmetic and functional problems may ensue. Recently, spreader flaps have become an established alternative to traditional spreader grafts. Typical indications include primary rhinoplasty patients with hump noses, hump/tension noses, and moderately hooked or crooked noses. When suitable patients are selected, spreader flaps and their modifications represent a reliable alternative to the standard spreader graft, and when all of the necessary prerequisites are met, this technique obviates the need for additional cartilage grafting in most cases.