Waking Up in Pain: a prospective unselected cohort study of pain in 3702 patients immediately after surgery in the Danish Realm.

BACKGROUND: Acute and persistent pain after surgery is well described. However, no large-scale studies on immediate postoperative pain in the operating room (OR) exist, hindering potential areas of research to improve clinical outcomes. Thus, we aimed to describe the occurrence and severity of immediate postoperative pain in a large, unselected cohort. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study, encompassing all procedures in 31 public hospitals in the Danish Realm, during a 5-day period including the weekend. Data on procedures and anesthesia were collected and the main outcome was occurrence of moderate or severe pain in the OR. Secondary outcomes included pain, sedation and nausea in the OR or during the first 15 min in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) including relevant risk factors. Descriptive and logistic regression statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 3675 procedures were included for analysis (87% inclusion rate). Moderate or severe pain occurred in 7.4% (95% CI 6.5% to 8.3%) of cases in the OR immediately after awakening, rising to 20.2% in the OR and/or PACU. Large intraprocedure and interprocedure variations occurred (0.0%-37.5%), and in 20% of cases with epidural-general anesthesia patients experienced moderate or severe pain. Independent risk factors were female sex, younger age, preoperative pain, daily opioid use and major surgical procedures. CONCLUSION: Moderate or severe pain in the immediate postoperative phase occurred in 20% of all cases with procedure and anesthesiological technique variations, suggesting a need for identification of relevant procedure-specific risk factors and development of preventive treatments. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RoPR ID 43191.

Microdialysis: characterisation of haematomas in myocutaneous flaps by use of biochemical agents.

Metabolic markers are measured by microdialysis to detect postoperative ischaemia after reconstructive surgery with myocutaneous flaps. If a haematoma develops around the microdialysis catheter, it can result in misinterpretation of the measurements. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a haematoma in a flap can be identified and dissociated from ischaemia, or a well-perfused flap, by a characteristic chemical profile. In 7 pigs, the pedicled rectus abdominal muscle flap was mobilised on both sides. A haematoma was made in each flap and two microdialysis catheters were placed, one in the haematoma, and the other in normal tissue. One flap was made ischaemic by ligation of the pedicle. For 6 hours, the metabolism was monitored by measurement every half-an-hour of the concentrations of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and glycerol from all 4 catheters. After 3 hours of monitoring, intravenous glucose was given as a challenge test to identify ischaemia. The non-ischaemic flap could be differentiated from the ischaemic flap by low glucose, and high lactate, concentrations. It was possible to identify a catheter surrounded by a haematoma in ischaemic as well as non-ischaemic muscle from a low or decreasing concentration of glucose together with a low concentration of lactate. All four sites could be completely dissociated when the concentrations of glucose and lactate were evaluated and combined with the lactate:glucose ratio and a flow chart. The challenge test was useful for differentiating between haematomas in ischaemic and non-ischaemic tissue.