Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Idioma
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 165(24): 2473-7, 2003 Jun 09.
Artigo em Da | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12872466

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: No randomised trials have estimated the value of using fluoroscopy for colonoscopy. The aim of our study was to estimate the rate of success using this method. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective trial 264 patients were included, 139 were examined without fluoroscopy-equipment (Group A), and 125 with fluoroscopy-equipment (Group B). We registered: Indication for colonoscopy, duration of the colonoscopy, medication, time in which X-ray was being used, whether coecum was reached or not, clinical results of the examinations and complications. In cases where coecum was not intubated the cause was registered. RESULTS: We found a significantly higher rate of success of the colonoscopy in Group B (84%) than in group A (74%) (p = 0.045). Pain and looping of the scope were the main reasons for insufficient examination. DISCUSSION: In a modern endoscopic ward fluoroscopy must be available, but it seems reasonable to start uncomplicated colonoscopies without the use of fluoroscopy. In cases where coecal intubation is not obtained, conversion to examination with fluoroscopy should be possible.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia/métodos , Fluoroscopia , Adulto , Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico , Doenças do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Colonoscopia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico , Doenças Retais/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA