Short- and long-term predictive power of the preoperative Geriatric Assessment components in older patients undergoing cholecystectomy.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Increasing numbers of older patients will require laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Physicians may have doubts when qualifying these patients for elective surgeries since older age is considered a risk factor for complications. Determining biological age, using a Geriatric Assessment (GA), should be the key factor in the preoperative assessment.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to determine which GA components and frailty alone are most useful for predicting postoperative outcomes in both short- and long-term follow-up.</br> <b><br>Materials and methods:</b> 219 consecutive patients aged ≥70 years underwent surgery and were followed up prospectively for 12 months. The preoperative GA consisted of functionality, physical activity, comorbidity, polypharmacotherapy, nutrition, cognition, mood, and social support domains. Logistic regression analyses were used to analyze the predictive ability of GA.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> GA, frailty, and chronological age were not predictive of major 30-day morbidity. There were significantly more overall postoperative complications in the frail group than in the fit group (21% vs 4%), with mainly minor (Clavien-Dindo I, II) and medical (16 patients; 72.7%) complications. There were no significant differences in the rate of major and surgical complications (8 patients; 36.4%) between frail and fit patients. Only frailty was a predictor of 1-year mortality odd ratio 12.17 (2.47-59.94) P = 0.002.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Performing GA before elective laparoscopic cholecystectomies seems unnecessary for the evaluation of short-term outcomes but helpful for the assessment of long-term outcomes. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed also in older frail patients.</br>.

Comorbidity assessment methods and their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer - A scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: The scoping review was performed to identify methods of comorbidity assessment and to evaluate their significance in predicting the results of treatment of older patients undergoing elective abdominal surgeries for cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and European Trials Register were searched for eligible studies investigating the impact of comorbidity on various postoperative outcomes of patients aged ≥65. Findings were narratively reported. RESULTS: The review identified 40 studies with a total population of 59,612 patients, using eight different methods of comorbidity assessment. The most used was Charlson Comorbidity Index (60 % of studies) and presence of specific comorbid conditions (38 %). No study provided rationale for the choice of specific comorbidity measure. Most of the included studies reported short-term results (75 %), such as postoperative complications (43 %) and mortality (18 %) as main clinical endpoint. The results were inconsistent across the studies. DISCUSSION: There is still no consensus regarding the choice of comorbidity measures and their role in postoperative outcome prediction. Further efforts are needed to develop new, well-designed, more effective comorbidity assessments tools.