Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 313
Filtrar
1.
Psychol Med ; : 1-11, 2024 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38775165

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic research suggests that youth cannabis use is associated with psychotic disorders. However, current evidence is based heavily on 20th-century data when cannabis was substantially less potent than today. METHODS: We linked population-based survey data from 2009 to 2012 with records of health services covered under universal healthcare in Ontario, Canada, up to 2018. The cohort included respondents aged 12-24 years at baseline with no prior psychotic disorder (N = 11 363). The primary outcome was days to first hospitalization, ED visit, or outpatient visit related to a psychotic disorder according to validated diagnostic codes. Due to non-proportional hazards, we estimated age-specific hazard ratios during adolescence (12-19 years) and young adulthood (20-33 years). Sensitivity analyses explored alternative model conditions including restricting the outcome to hospitalizations and ED visits to increase specificity. RESULTS: Compared to no cannabis use, cannabis use was significantly associated with psychotic disorders during adolescence (aHR = 11.2; 95% CI 4.6-27.3), but not during young adulthood (aHR = 1.3; 95% CI 0.6-2.6). When we restricted the outcome to hospitalizations and ED visits only, the strength of association increased markedly during adolescence (aHR = 26.7; 95% CI 7.7-92.8) but did not change meaningfully during young adulthood (aHR = 1.8; 95% CI 0.6-5.4). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence of a strong but age-dependent association between cannabis use and risk of psychotic disorder, consistent with the neurodevelopmental theory that adolescence is a vulnerable time to use cannabis. The strength of association during adolescence was notably greater than in previous studies, possibly reflecting the recent rise in cannabis potency.

2.
Ann Emerg Med ; 83(4): 360-372, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38069965

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Approximately 1 in 100 postpartum individuals visit an emergency department (ED) for a psychiatric reason. Repeat visits can signify problems with the quality of care received during or after the initial visit; this study aimed to understand risk for repeat postpartum psychiatric ED visits. METHODS: This population-based cohort study used Ontario, Canada health administrative data available through ICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences) to identify all individuals discharged from postpartum psychiatric ED visits (2008 to 2021) and measured the proportion with one or more repeat psychiatric ED visit within 30 days. Using modified Poisson regression, we calculated the association between one or more repeat visits and sociodemographic, medical, obstetric, infant, continuity of care, past service use, and index ED visit characteristics both overall and stratified by psychiatric diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 14,100 individuals, 11.7% had one or more repeat psychiatric ED visits within 30 days. Repeat visit risk was highest for those with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (28.2%, adjusted risk ratio 2.41; 95% confidence interval 1.88 to 3.08, versus 9.5% anxiety referent). Low (versus no) psychiatric care continuity, prior psychiatric ED visits and admissions, and initial visits within 90 days postpartum were also associated with increased risk, whereas intentional self-injury was associated with reduced risk. In diagnosis-stratified analyses, the factors most consistently associated with repeat ED visits were past psychiatric ED visits and admissions, and initial visits within 90 days postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: Over 1 in 10 postpartum psychiatric ED visits are followed by a repeat visit within 30 days. Targeted approaches are needed across clinical populations to reduce repeat ED visits in this population with young infants.


Assuntos
Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Coortes , Ontário/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
3.
BMC Psychiatry ; 24(1): 28, 2024 01 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38191370

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a novel form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), can be administered in 1/10th of the time of standard rTMS (~ 3 min vs. 37.5 min) yet achieves similar outcomes in depression. The brief nature of the iTBS protocol allows for the administration of multiple iTBS sessions per day, thus reducing the overall course length to days rather than weeks. This study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of active versus sham iTBS using an accelerated regimen in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). As a secondary objective, we aim to assess the safety, tolerability, and treatment response to open-label low-frequency right-sided (1 Hz) stimulation using an accelerated regimen in those who do not respond to the initial week of treatment. METHODS: Over three years, approximately 230 outpatients at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and University of British Columbia Hospital, meeting diagnostic criteria for unipolar MDD, will be recruited and randomized to a triple blind sham-controlled trial. Patients will receive five consecutive days of active or sham iTBS, administered eight times daily at 1-hour intervals, with each session delivering 600 pulses of iTBS. Those who have not achieved response by the week four follow-up visit will be offered a second course of treatment, regardless of whether they initially received active or sham stimulation. DISCUSSION: Broader implementation of conventional iTBS is limited by the logistical demands of the current standard course consisting of 4-6 weeks of daily treatment. If our proposed accelerated iTBS protocol enables patients to achieve remission more rapidly, this would offer major benefits in terms of cost and capacity as well as the time required to achieve clinical response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04255784.


Assuntos
Comportamento Aditivo , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/terapia , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana , Depressão , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
Can J Psychiatry ; 69(1): 21-32, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36518095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is mixed evidence on the link between mental health and addiction (MHA) history and recidivism. Few studies have examined post-release MHA care. Our objective was to examine the association between prior (pre-incarceration) MHA service use and post-release recidivism and service use. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study linking individuals held in provincial correctional institutions in 2010 to health administrative databases. Prior MHA service use was assigned hierarchically in order of hospitalization, emergency department visit and outpatient visit. We followed up individuals post-release for up to 5 years for the first occurrence of recidivism and MHA hospitalization, emergency department visit and outpatient visit. We use Cox-proportional hazards models to examine the association between prior MHA service use and each outcome adjusting for prior correctional involvement and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Among a sample consisting of 45,890 individuals, we found that prior MHA service use was moderately associated with recidivism (hazard ratio (HR): 1.20-1.50, all P < 0.001), with secondary analyses finding larger associations for addiction service use (HR range: 1.34-1.54, all P < 0.001) than for mental health service use (HR range: 1.09-1.18, all P < 0.001). We found high levels of post-release MHA hospitalization and low levels of outpatient MHA care relative to need even among individuals with prior MHA hospitalization. DISCUSSION: Despite a high risk of recidivism and acute MHA utilization post-release, we found low access to MHA outpatient care, highlighting the necessity for greater efforts to facilitate access to care and care integration for individuals with mental health needs in correctional facilities.


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Prisioneiros , Reincidência , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Estabelecimentos Correcionais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
5.
Can J Psychiatry ; 69(5): 347-357, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38179680

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Emergency departments (EDs) are a vital part of healthcare systems, at times acting as a gateway to community-based mental health (MH) services. This may be particularly true for veterans of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police who were released prior to 2013 and the Canadian Armed Forces, as these individuals transition from federal to provincial healthcare coverage on release and may use EDs because of delays in obtaining a primary care provider. We aimed to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of MH-related ED visits between veterans and non-veterans residing in Ontario, Canada: (1) overall; and by (2) sex; and (3) length of service. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative healthcare data from 18,837 veterans and 75,348 age-, sex-, geography-, and income-matched non-veterans residing in Ontario, Canada between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2020. Anderson-Gill regression models were used to estimate the HR of recurrent MH-related ED visits during the period of follow-up. Sex and length of service were used as stratification variables in the models. RESULTS: Veterans had a higher adjusted HR (aHR) of MH-related ED visits than non-veterans (aHR, 1.97, 95% CI, 1.70 to 2.29). A stronger effect was observed among females (aHR, 3.29; 95% CI, 1.96 to 5.53) than males (aHR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.57 to 2.01). Veterans who served for 5-9 years had a higher rate of use than non-veterans (aHR, 3.76; 95% CI, 2.34 to 6.02) while veterans who served for 30+ years had a lower rate compared to non-veterans (aHR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 à 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MH-related ED visits are higher among veterans overall compared to members of the Ontario general population, but usage is influenced by sex and length of service. These findings indicate that certain subpopulations of veterans, including females and those with fewer years of service, may have greater acute mental healthcare needs and/or reduced access to primary mental healthcare.


Assuntos
Veteranos , Feminino , Masculino , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Veteranos/psicologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Saúde Mental , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro , Estudos de Coortes , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
6.
Can J Psychiatry ; 69(3): 196-206, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37501606

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with chronic psychotic disorders are overrepresented in correctional facilities, but little is known about factors that increase the risk of correctional involvement. The objective of this study was to compare individuals with chronic psychotic disorders who were released from correctional facilities in Ontario to individuals with chronic psychotic disorders but no correctional involvement on sociodemographic, clinical, and prior mental health-related health service utilization characteristics. METHOD: All individuals with chronic psychotic disorders who were released from a provincial correctional facility in Ontario in 2010 were matched (1:2) by age and sex to Ontario residents with chronic psychotic disorders and no correctional involvement. Covariates included sociodemographic (rural residence, marginalization such as residential instability quintile, material deprivation quintile, dependency quintile, and ethnic concentration quintile) and clinical (duration of chronic psychotic disorder and comorbidities) characteristics, and mental health-related health service utilization characteristics (primary care physician, psychiatrist and emergency department visits, and hospitalizations) 1 and 3 years prior to correctional involvement. The association between correctional involvement and prior health service utilization was measured by estimating incidence rate ratios using Poisson and negative-binomial regressions. RESULTS: Individuals with correctional involvement (N = 3,197) lived in neighbourhoods with higher material deprivation and residential instability, and had a shorter duration of illness, and more psychosocial comorbidities (e.g., behavioural issues and depression) than individuals without correctional involvement (N = 6,393). Adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical variables, individuals with correctional involvement had a higher rate of mental health-related primary care physician visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations but a lower rate of psychiatrist visits prior to correctional involvement, compared to individuals without correctional involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher mental health-related comorbidities and higher rates of accessing acute mental health services among individuals with chronic psychotic disorders and correctional involvement, visits to psychiatrists prior to involvement were low.


Assuntos
Transtornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/terapia , Saúde Mental , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Doença Crônica , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência
7.
Can J Psychiatry ; 69(2): 89-99, 2024 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37448375

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Although the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had widespread negative impacts on the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), there has been little research on psychological interventions during the pandemic for this population. The current study examines whether a brief coping-focused treatment intervention delivered in a virtual individual format would be associated with positive changes in Canadian HCWs' mental health during the pandemic. METHOD: Three hundred and thirty-three HCWs receiving the intervention at 3 large specialty tertiary care hospitals in Ontario, Canada, completed measures of anxiety, depression, perceived stress, work/social impairment, insomnia and fear of COVID-19. After completing treatment, HCWs rated their satisfaction with the treatment. RESULTS: The intervention was associated with large effect size improvements in anxiety, depression, perceived stress, insomnia and fear of COVID-19, and moderate effect size improvements in work/social impairment. At treatment session 1, prior mental health diagnosis and treatment were both significantly correlated with depression, anxiety, and work/social impairment scores. Secondary analyses of data from one of the sites revealed that treatment-related changes in anxiety, depression, perceived stress and work/social impairment were independent of age, gender, occupational setting, profession and the presence of a previous mental health diagnosis or treatment, with the exception that nurses improved at a slightly greater rate than other professions in terms of work/social impairment. HCWs were highly satisfied with the treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A large number of HCWs experiencing significant distress at baseline self-referred for assistance. Timely and flexible access to a brief virtual coping-focused intervention was associated with improvements in symptoms and impairment, and treatment response was largely unrelated to demographic or professional characteristics. Short-term psychological interventions for HCWs during a pandemic may have a highly positive impact given their association with improvement in various aspects of HCWs' mental health improvement.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Psicoterapia Breve , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono , Humanos , Pandemias , Ontário/epidemiologia , Saúde Mental , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Ansiedade/terapia , Pessoal de Saúde , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/terapia
8.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38017620

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mental health problems, particularly anxiety and depression, are common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), and negatively impact quality of life, treatment adherence, and mortality. However, the degree to which mental health and addictions services are utilized by those with CKD is unknown. We examined the history of mental health and addictions service use of individuals across levels of kidney function. METHODS: We performed a population-based cross-sectional study using linked healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada from 2009 to 2017. We abstracted the prevalence of individuals with mental health and addictions service use within the previous 3 years across levels of kidney function (eGFR$\ \ge $60, 45 to < 60, 30 to < 45, 15 to < 30, <15 mL/min per 1.73m2 and maintenance dialysis). We calculated prevalence ratios (PR) to compare prevalence across kidney function strata, while adjusting for age, sex, year of cohort entry, urban versus rural location, area-level marginalization, and Charlson comorbidity scores. RESULTS: Of 5 956 589 adults, 9% (n = 534 605) had an eGFR<60 mL/min per 1.73m2 or were receiving maintenance dialysis. Fewer individuals with eGFR < 60 had a history of any mental health and addictions service utilization (crude prevalence range 28% to 31%), compared to individuals with eGFR ≥ 60 (35%). Compared to eGFR ≥ 60, the lowest prevalence of individuals with any mental health and addictions service utilization was among those with eGFR 15 to < 30 (adjusted PR 0.86, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.88), eGFR < 15 (adjusted PR 0.81, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.86) and those receiving maintenance dialysis (adjusted PR 0.83, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.84). Less use of outpatient services accounted for differences in service utilization. CONCLUSIONS: Mental health and addictions service utilization is common but less so in individuals with advanced CKD in Ontario, Canada.

9.
CMAJ ; 195(38): E1291-E1299, 2023 10 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788846

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Increased rates of pediatric eating disorders have been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but little is known about trends among adults. We aimed to evaluate rates of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for eating disorders among adolescents and adults during the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study using linked health administrative data for Ontario residents aged 10-105 years during the prepandemic (Jan. 1, 2017, to Feb. 29, 2020) and pandemic (Mar. 1, 2020, to Aug. 31, 2022) periods. We evaluated monthly rates of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for eating disorders, stratified by age. RESULTS: Compared with expected rates derived from the prepandemic period, emergency department visits for eating disorders increased during the pandemic among adolescents aged 10-17 years (7.38 v. 3.33 per 100 000; incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-2.26), young adults aged 18-26 years (2.79 v. 2.46 per 100 000; IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10-1.16) and older adults aged 41-105 years (0.14 v. 0.11 per 100 000; IRR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.24). Hospital admissions for eating disorders increased during the pandemic for adolescents (8.82 v. 5.74 per 100 000; IRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.54-1.54) but decreased for all adult age groups, especially older adults aged 41-105 years (0.21 v. 0.30 per 100 000; IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80). INTERPRETATION: Emergency department visits for eating disorders increased among adolescents, young adults and older adults during the pandemic, but hospital admissions increased only for adolescents and decreased for all adult groups. Differential rates of acute care use for eating disorders by age have important implications for allocation of inpatient mental health resources.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Idoso , Ontário/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/epidemiologia
10.
CMAJ ; 195(36): E1210-E1220, 2023 09 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37722745

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Youth have reported worsening mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. We sought to evaluate rates of pediatric acute care visits for self-harm during the pandemic according to age, sex and mental health service use. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study using linked health administrative data sets to measure monthly rates of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for self-harm among youth aged 10-17 years between Jan. 1, 2017, and June 30, 2022, in Ontario, Canada. We modelled expected rates of acute care visits for self-harm after the pandemic onset based on prepandemic rates. We reported relative differences between observed and expected monthly rates overall and by age group (10-13 yr and 14-17 yr), sex and mental health service use (new and continuing). RESULTS: In this population of about 1.3 million children and adolescents, rates of acute care visits for self-harm during the pandemic were higher than expected for emergency department visits (0.27/1000 population v. 0.21/1000 population; adjusted rate ratio [RR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.39) and hospital admissions (0.74/10 000 population v. 0.43/10 000 population, adjusted RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.46-2.03). This increase was primarily observed among females. Rates of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for self-harm were higher than expected for both those aged 10-13 years and those aged 14-17 years, as well as for both those new to the mental health system and those already engaged in care. INTERPRETATION: Rates of acute care visits for self-harm among children and adolescents were higher than expected during the first 2 and a half years of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly among females. These findings support the need for accessible and intensive prevention efforts and mental health supports in this population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Comportamento Autodestrutivo , Feminino , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Ontário/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Estudos Transversais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/epidemiologia , Comportamento Autodestrutivo/terapia
11.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 148(2): 179-189, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37221899

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Alcohol-related hospitalizations are common and associated with high rates of short-term readmission and mortality. Providing rapid access to physician-based mental health and addiction (MHA) services post-discharge may help to reduce the risk of adverse outcomes in this population. This study used population-based data to evaluate the prevalence of outpatient MHA service use following alcohol-related hospitalizations and its association with downstream harms. METHODS: This was a population-based historical cohort study of individuals who experienced an alcohol-related hospitalization between 2016 and 2018 in Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was whether an individual received follow-up outpatient MHA services from either a psychiatrist or primary care physician within 30 days of discharge from the index hospitalization. The outcomes of interest were alcohol-related hospital readmission and all-cause mortality in the year following discharge from the index alcohol-related hospitalization. Information on health service use and mortality was captured using comprehensive health administrative databases. The associations between receiving outpatient MHA services and the time to each outcome were assessed using multivariable time-to-event regression. RESULTS: A total of 43,343 individuals were included. 19.8% of the cohort received outpatient MHA services within 30 days of discharge. Overall, 19.1% of the cohort was readmitted to hospital and 11.5% of the cohort died in the year following discharge. Receiving outpatient MHA services was associated with a reduced hazard of alcohol-related hospital readmission (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.88-0.99) and all-cause mortality (aHR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.66-0.83) after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term outcomes following alcohol-related hospitalizations are poor. Facilitating rapid access to follow-up MHA services may help to reduce the risk of recurrent harm and death in this population.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Mental , Readmissão do Paciente , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Alta do Paciente , Assistência ao Convalescente , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Hospitalização , Ontário/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos
12.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 25(1): 86-93, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35792868

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There has been little investigation of whether the clinical effectiveness of smoking cessation treatments translates into differences in healthcare costs, using real-world cost data, to determine whether anticipated benefits of smoking cessation treatment are being realized. AIMS AND METHODS: We sought to determine the association between smoking cessation treatment and healthcare costs using linked administrative healthcare data. In total, 4752 patients who accessed a smoking cessation program in Ontario, Canada between July 2011 and December 2012 (treatment cohort) were each matched to a smoker who did not access these services (control cohort). The primary outcome was total healthcare costs in Canadian dollars, and secondary outcomes were sector-specific costs, from one year prior to the index date until December 31, 2017, or death. Costs were partitioned into four phases: pretreatment, treatment, posttreatment, and end-of-life for those who died. RESULTS: Among females, total healthcare costs were similar between cohorts in pretreatment and posttreatment phases, but higher for the treatment cohort during the treatment phase ($4,554 vs. $3,237, p < .001). Among males, total healthcare costs were higher in the treatment cohort during pretreatment ($3,911 vs. $2,784, p < .001), treatment ($4,533 vs. $3,105, p < .001) and posttreatment ($5,065 vs. $3,922, p = .001) phases. End-of-life costs did not differ. Healthcare sector-specific costs followed a similar pattern. CONCLUSIONS: Five-year healthcare costs were similar between females who participated in a treatment program versus those that did not, with a transient increase during the treatment phase only. Among males, treatment was associated with persistently higher healthcare costs. Further study is needed to address the implications with respect to long-term costs. IMPLICATIONS: The clinical effectiveness of pharmacological and behavioral smoking cessation treatments is well established, but whether such treatments are associated with healthcare costs, using real-world data, has received limited attention. Our findings suggest that the use of a smoking cessation treatment offered by their health system is associated with persistent higher healthcare costs among males but a transient increase among females. Given increasing access to evidence-based smoking cessation treatments is an important component in national tobacco control strategies, these data highlight the need for further exploration of the relations between smoking cessation treatment engagement and healthcare costs.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Sistema de Fonte Pagadora Única , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Tabagismo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Análise Custo-Benefício , Morte , Ontário , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Tabagismo/tratamento farmacológico
13.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(8): 462-468, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37230751

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Previous research comparing veteran and civilian mental health (MH) outcomes often assumes stable rates of MH service use over time and relies on standardisation or restriction to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. We aimed to explore the stability of MH service use in the first 5 years following release from the Canadian Armed Forces and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, and to demonstrate the impact of using increasingly stringent matching criteria on effect estimates when comparing veterans with civilians, using incident outpatient MH encounters as an example. METHODS: We used administrative healthcare data from veterans and civilians residing in Ontario, Canada to create three hard-matched civilian cohorts: (1) age and sex; (2) age, sex and region of residence; and (3) age, sex, region of residence and median neighbourhood income quintile, while excluding civilians with a history of long-term care or rehabilitation stay or receipt of disability/income support payments. Extended Cox models were used to estimate time-dependent HRs. RESULTS: Across all cohorts, time-dependent analyses suggested that veterans had a significantly higher hazard of an outpatient MH encounter within the first 3 years of follow-up than civilians, but differences were attenuated in years 4-5. More stringent matching decreased baseline differences in unmatched variables and shifted the effect estimates, while sex-stratified analyses revealed stronger effects among women compared with men. CONCLUSIONS: This methods-focused study demonstrates the implications of several study design decisions that should be considered when conducting comparative veteran and civilian health research.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Mental , Militares , Veteranos , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Ontário/epidemiologia , Instalações de Saúde
14.
Int J Eat Disord ; 56(6): 1156-1187, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36757092

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The economic burden of eating disorders is substantial. One potential way to reduce costs, without sacrificing care, may be to target preventable (i.e., potentially unnecessary) acute care. This study sought to determine the amount and proportion of preventable and non-preventable acute care spending among individuals with eating disorders. METHOD: We undertook a population-based, cross-sectional study of all individuals over the age of 17 with eating disorders (diagnosed through hospitalization) in Ontario, Canada, to determine potentially preventable and non-preventable acute care spending. Preventable acute care (i.e., preventable emergency department visits and hospitalizations) was defined using previously validated algorithms. We undertook analyses for the full sample, by sex and by eating disorder diagnosis (anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, eating disorder not otherwise specified, multiple). RESULTS: Among 7547 individuals with eating disorders, 15% of all acute care spending (i.e., $1.33 million) was considered preventable; this figure was higher for females (14%) and those with bulimia nervosa (21%). Among emergency department visits, 25% of visits were considered preventable; the largest proportions were for non-emergent (11%) and primary care treatable (10%) conditions. Among hospitalizations, 9% were considered preventable; the highest proportions of preventable care spending were for short-term diabetes complications (1.8%) and urinary tract infections (1.8%). DISCUSSION: Although the economic burden of eating disorders is substantial, there is some scope to decrease acute care spending among this patient population. Care coordination and improved access to primary care and disease prevention, particularly related to diabetes, may help prevent the occurrence of some acute care episodes. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Many jurisdictions have implemented strategies to reduce costs and improve the quality of care among patients with high health care needs, such as those with eating disorders; however, it is unclear whether any costs can be reduced and, if so, which costs. Cost-savings resulting from the reduction of unnecessary care could provide further economic justification for increased investment in outpatient care for individuals with eating disorders.


Assuntos
Anorexia Nervosa , Bulimia Nervosa , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Hospitalização , Bulimia Nervosa/diagnóstico , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnóstico , Assistência Ambulatorial
15.
Int J Eat Disord ; 56(10): 1919-1930, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37449455

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study examined a 2-year period after diagnosis of an eating disorder to compare health care utilization in diagnostic subgroups including: anorexia nervosa (AN), bulimia nervosa (BN), binge-eating disorder (BED), avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), and other specified eating disorders (Other). METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study of children diagnosed with AN (n = 674), BN (n = 230), BED (n = 59), ARFID (n = 171), and Other (n = 315). We used a general population cohort for comparison, matched 5:1 to the diagnostic subgroups on sex and birth date. We then conducted a separate analysis using the ARFID subgroup as a reference group compared to the other subgroups. Outcomes were determined using data linkage with health administrative databases and included hospitalizations, emergency department, general practitioner, psychiatry, and pediatrician visits. Odds ratios (dichotomous outcomes) and rate ratios (continuous outcome) were calculated. RESULTS: Mental health care utilization was higher for all subgroups compared to the general population. When the subgroups were compared to the ARFID subgroup, those with ARFID appeared to have similar health care utilization to the other subgroups, except when compared to those with AN. The AN subgroup had higher odds of a mental health related hospitalization (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.5) higher rates of mental health related pediatrician visits (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.26-2.46) and psychiatry visits (RR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.68). CONCLUSIONS: Those with ARFID have similar utilization as other subtypes of eating disorders, except when compared to those with AN who have higher health care utilization. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Our study found that the health service needs of young people with all types of eating disorders are substantially higher than the general population, and it appears that Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder (ARFID) has similar health care utilization to other eating disorders.

16.
Tob Control ; 32(1): 72-79, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34083493

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No research has assessed the individual-level impact of smoking cessation treatment delivered within a general primary care patient population on multiple forms of subsequent healthcare service use. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the rate of outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalisations during a 5-year follow-up period among smokers who had and had not accessed a smoking cessation treatment programme. METHODS: The study was a retrospective matched cohort study using linked demographic and administrative healthcare databases in Ontario, Canada. 9951 patients who accessed smoking cessation services between July 2011 and December 2012 were matched to a smoker who did not access services, obtained from the Canadian Community Health Survey, using a combination of hard matching and propensity score matching. Outcomes were rates of healthcare service use from index date (programme enrolment or survey response) to March 2017. RESULTS: After controlling for potential confounders, patients in the overall treatment cohort had modestly greater rates of the outcomes: outpatient visits (rate ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.14), ED visits (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.13) and hospitalisations (RR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.18). Effect modification of the association between smoking cessation treatment and healthcare service use by prevalent comorbidity was found for outpatient visits (p=0.006), and hospitalisations (p=0.050), but not ED visits. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who enrolled in smoking cessation treatment offered through primary care clinics in Ontario displayed a modest but significantly greater rate of outpatient visits, ED visits and hospitalisations over a 5-year follow-up period.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Humanos , Estudos de Coortes , Fumantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Ontário/epidemiologia
17.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 345, 2023 05 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198612

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We previously found an association between rurality and death by suicide, where those living in rural areas were more likely to die by suicide. One potential reason why this relationship exists might be travel time to care. This paper examines the relationship between travel time to both psychiatric and general hospitals and suicide, and then determine whether travel time to care mediates the relationship between rurality and suicide. METHODS: This is a population-based nested case-control study. Data from 2007 to 2017 were obtained from administrative databases held at ICES, which capture all hospital and emergency department visits across Ontario. Suicides were captured using vital statistics. Travel time to care was calculated from the resident's home to the nearest hospital based on the postal codes of both locations. Rurality was measured using Metropolitan Influence Zones. RESULTS: For every hour in travel time a male resides from a general hospital, their risk of death by suicide doubles (AOR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.61-2.69). Longer travel times to psychiatric hospitals also increases risk of suicide among males (AOR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.02-1.05). Travel time to general hospitals is a significant mediator of the relationship between rurality and suicide among males, accounting for 6.52% of the relationship between rurality and increased risk of suicide. However, we also found that there is effect modification, where the relationship between travel time and suicide is only significant among males living in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these findings suggest that males who must travel longer to hospitals are at a greater risk of suicide compared to those who travel a shorter time. Furthermore, travel time to care is a mediator of the association between rurality and suicide among males.


Assuntos
Suicídio , Humanos , Masculino , Suicídio/psicologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , População Rural , Hospitais Gerais , Ontário/epidemiologia
18.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 817, 2023 11 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37940930

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Perinatal depression affects an estimated 1 in 5 women in North America during the perinatal period, with annualized lifetime costs estimated at $20.6 billion CAD in Canada and over $45.9 billion USD in the US. Access to psychological treatments remains limited for most perinatal women suffering from depression and anxiety. Some barriers to effective care can be addressed through task-sharing to non-specialist providers and through telemedicine platforms. The cost-effectiveness of these strategies compared to traditional specialist and in-person models remains unknown. This protocol describes an economic evaluation of non-specialist providers and telemedicine, in comparison to specialist providers and in-person sessions within the ongoing Scaling Up Maternal Mental healthcare by Increasing access to Treatment (SUMMIT) trial. METHODS: The economic evaluation will be undertaken alongside the SUMMIT trial. SUMMIT is a pragmatic, randomized, non-inferiority trial across five North American study sites (N = 1,226) of the comparable effectiveness of two types of providers (specialist vs. non-specialist) and delivery modes (telemedicine vs. in-person) of a behavioural activation treatment for perinatal depressive and anxiety symptoms. The primary economic evaluation will be a cost-utility analysis. The outcome will be the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which will be expressed as the additional cost required to achieve an additional quality-adjusted life-year, as assessed by the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level instrument. A secondary cost-effectiveness analysis will use participants' depressive symptom scores. A micro-costing analysis will be conducted to estimate the resources/costs required to implement and sustain the interventions; healthcare resource utilization will be captured via self-report. Data will be pooled and analysed using uniform price and utility weights to determine cost-utility across all trial sites. Secondary country-specific cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analyses will also be completed. Sensitivity analyses will be conducted, and cost-effectiveness acceptability-curves will be generated, in all instances. DISCUSSION: Results of this study are expected to inform key decisions related to dissemination and scale up of evidence-based psychological interventions in Canada, the US, and possibly worldwide. There is potential impact on real-world practice by informing decision makers of the long-term savings to the larger healthcare setting in services to support perinatal women with common mental health conditions.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo , Telemedicina , Humanos , Feminino , Saúde Mental , Análise Custo-Benefício , Ansiedade/terapia , Telemedicina/métodos
19.
Can J Psychiatry ; 68(12): 925-932, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37006178

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on psychiatric hospitalizations in Ontario are unknown. The purpose of this study was to identify changes to volumes and characteristics of psychiatric hospitalizations in Ontario during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A time series analysis was done using psychiatric hospitalizations with admissions dates from July 2017 to September 2021 identified from provincial health administrative data. Variables included monthly volumes of hospitalizations as well as proportions of stays <3 days and involuntary admissions, overall and by diagnosis (mood, psychotic, addiction, and other disorders). Changes to trends during the pandemic were tested using linear regression. RESULTS: A total of 236,634 psychiatric hospitalizations were identified. Volumes decreased in the first few months of the pandemic before returning to prepandemic volumes by May 2020. However, monthly hospitalizations for psychotic disorders increased by ∼9% compared to the prepandemic period and remained elevated thereafter. Short stays and involuntary admissions increased by approximately 2% and 7%, respectively, before trending downwards. CONCLUSION: Psychiatric hospitalizations quickly stabilized in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, evidence suggested a shift towards a more severe presentation during this period.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adulto , Humanos , Ontário/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Afeto , Hospitalização
20.
Can J Psychiatry ; 68(3): 187-199, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36124379

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: A patient's death by suicide is a common experience for psychiatrists, ranging from 33% to 80%, however, research about the impact of patient suicide on psychiatrists is limited to a few survey studies. This study had three main objectives: (1) understanding the emotional and behavioural impact of a patient's suicide on psychiatrists, (2) exploring if and how the experience of a patient's suicide results in changes in psychiatrist practice patterns, and (3) understanding the tangible steps that psychiatrists and institutions take to manage the emotional and behavioural impact of patient suicide on psychiatrists. METHODS: Eighteen psychiatrists were recruited using snowball sampling and interviewed to collect demographic data, followed by an in-depth exploration of their experiences of patient suicide. Interviews were then transcribed verbatim and analysed using constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS: Study participants described strong emotional reactions in response to patient suicide. Emotional reactions were mediated by a physician, patient, relationship and institutional factors. While psychiatrists did not change the acuity or setting of their practice in response to patient suicide, they made several changes in their practice, including increased caution regarding discharges and passes from inpatient units, more thorough documentation and continuing education about suicide. CONCLUSIONS: Patient suicide has a profound impact on psychiatrists and based on the findings of this study, we propose steps that psychiatrists and institutions can take to manage the emotional, psychological and behavioural burden of this event.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Médicos , Psiquiatria , Prevenção do Suicídio , Suicídio , Humanos , Masculino , Emoções , Médicos/psicologia , Psiquiatria/educação , Psiquiatria/normas , Suicídio/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Relações Médico-Paciente , Competência Clínica , Atenção à Saúde/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA