RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Triplet pregnancies are high risk for both the mother and the infants. The risks for infants include premature birth, low birthweight, and neonatal complications. Therefore, the management of triplet pregnancies involves close monitoring and may include interventions, such as fetal reduction, to prolong the pregnancy and improve outcomes. However, the evidence of benefits and risks associated with fetal reduction is inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of trichorionic triplet pregnancies with and without fetal reduction and with nonreduced dichorionic twin pregnancies and primary singleton pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: All trichorionic triplet pregnancies in Denmark, including those with fetal reduction, were identified between 2008 and 2018. In Denmark, all couples expecting triplets are informed about and offered fetal reduction. Pregnancies with viable fetuses at the first-trimester ultrasound scan and pregnancies not terminated were included. Adverse pregnancy outcome was defined as a composite of miscarriage before 24 weeks of gestation, stillbirth at 24 weeks of gestation, or intrauterine fetal death of 1 or 2 fetuses. RESULTS: The study cohort was composed of 317 trichorionic triplet pregnancies, of which 70.0% of pregnancies underwent fetal reduction to a twin pregnancy, 2.2% of pregnancies were reduced to singleton pregnancies, and 27.8% of pregnancies were not reduced. Nonreduced triplet pregnancies had high risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes (28.4%), which was significantly lower in triplets reduced to twins (9.0%; difference, 19.4%, 95% confidence interval, 8.5%-30.3%). Severe preterm deliveries were significantly higher in nonreduced triplet pregnancies (27.9%) than triplet pregnancies reduced to twin pregnancies (13.1%; difference, 14.9%, 95% confidence interval, 7.9%-21.9%). However, triplet pregnancies reduced to twin pregnancies had an insignificantly higher risk of miscarriage (6.8%) than nonreduced twin pregnancies (1.1%; difference, 5.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.9%-10.4%). CONCLUSION: Triplet pregnancies reduced to twin pregnancies had significantly lower risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes, severe preterm deliveries, and low birthweight than nonreduced triplet pregnancies. However, triplet pregnancies reduced to twin pregnancies were potentially associated with a 5.6% increased risk of miscarriage.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo , Redução de Gravidez Multifetal , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Gravidez , Humanos , Redução de Gravidez Multifetal/efeitos adversos , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Aborto Espontâneo/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Peso ao Nascer , Resultado da Gravidez , Gravidez de Gêmeos , Natimorto/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idade Gestacional , TrigêmeosRESUMO
RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the risk of miscarriage after a viable fetus verified on ultrasound at 6-8 weeks' gestation among women who conceive with medically assisted reproduction (MAR), stratified by type of fertility treatment? DESIGN: A nationwide register-based cohort study of women identified in the Danish ART-Registry with a viable singleton pregnancy at 6-8 weeks' gestation between 2007 and 2010 (nâ¯=â¯10,011). Women were identified from The Danish Fetal Medicine Database (DFMD), which holds information on early (between 6-8 and 11-14 weeks) and late (between 11-14 and 22 weeks) miscarriages. The late miscarriage rate was compared with a control group of naturally conceived pregnancies with a viable fetus at 11-14 weeks' gestation from 2008 to 2010, identified in the DFMD (nâ¯=â¯146,932). RESULTS: In the MAR1 cohort, the overall miscarriage rate was 11.8% (1091/9261) after an ultrasound verified viable pregnancy at 6-8 weeks' gestation. Most miscarriages occurred before the 11-14-week scan (1035/1091 [94.9%]). The early miscarriage rate was slightly higher in women who conceived with frozen embryo transfer compared with intrauterine insemination (IUI), corresponding to an adjusted OR of 1.31 (1.02 to 1.68). We found no significant risk associated with IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with IUI pregnancies. The late miscarriage rate was 0.8% in women conceiving with MAR and 0.6% among controls (P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for maternal characteristics, none of the fertility treatment types were associated with an increased risk of miscarriage compared with naturally conceiving women.
Assuntos
Aborto Espontâneo/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida/efeitos adversos , Ultrassonografia Pré-Natal , Adulto , Dinamarca , Transferência Embrionária , Feminino , Fertilização in vitro , Humanos , Inseminação Artificial , Idade Materna , Doação de Oócitos , Gravidez , Primeiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Sistema de Registros , Injeções de Esperma Intracitoplásmicas , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common type of congenital birth defect, but little is known about possible modifiable behavioral risk factors. The study aimed to assess whether intake of periconceptional or postconceptional multivitamin was associated with a decreased risk of CHD in the offspring. STUDY DESIGN: The study population comprised 15,567 women from the Copenhagen Pregnancy Cohort with complete data on multivitamin intake before and during pregnancy, who gave birth to live-born singletons from October 2012 to October 2016. Main outcome measure was CHD defined according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10th revision. Cases of CHD were classified into five subgroups based on the clinical phenotype: 1) Conotruncal defects, 2) Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction, 3) Right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, 4) Septal defects, and 5) Other CHD. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed with adjustment for maternal age, chronic disease, assisted reproductive technology, smoking status, and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: Of the 15,567 included women, 31.9 % reported a daily multivitamin intake in the periconceptional period, 53.7 % in the postconceptional period, and 14.4 % women did not report a daily multivitamin intake. The prevalence of CHD in the population was 0.7 % (n = 112). Periconceptional and postconceptional multivitamin intake was not associated with risk of overall CHD in offspring: Adjusted OR was 0.64 (95 % CI 0.36-1.13) and 0.77 (95 % CI 0.47-1.30), respectively. CONCLUSION: The current large cohort study did not show a preventive effect of multivitamin intake in the periconceptional or postconceptional period on the risk of CHD in the offspring.