Intermittent Convective Therapies in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In critically ill patients requiring intermittent renal replacement therapy (RRT), the benefits of convective versus diffusive clearance remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the safety, clinical efficacy, and clearance efficiency of hemofiltration (HF) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) compared to hemodialysis (HD) in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving intermittent RRT. METHOD: We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO. We included clinical trials and observational studies that reported the use of intermittent HF or HDF in adult patients with AKI. The following outcomes were included: mortality, renal recovery, clearance efficacy, intradialytic hemodynamic stability, circuit loss, and inflammation modulation. RESULTS: A total of 3,169 studies were retrieved and screened. Four randomized controlled trials and 4 observational studies were included (n: 615 patients). Compared with conventional HD, intermittent convective therapies had no effect on in-hospital mortality (relative risk, 1.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.76-1.99), renal recovery at 30 days (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.16), time-to-renal recovery (mean difference [MD], 0.77; 95% CI, -6.56 to 8.10), and number of dialysis sessions until renal recovery (MD, -1.34; 95% CI, -3.39 to 0.72). The overall quality of included studies was low, and dialysis parameters were suboptimal for all included studies. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests that there is no significant difference in short-term mortality and renal recovery in patients with severe AKI when treated with intermittent HF or HDF compared to conventional HD. This systematic review emphasizes the need for further trials evaluating optimal convective parameters in AKI patients treated with intermittent dialysis.

Restaging Patients with Rectal Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: In the USA, most patients with clinical stage II/III rectal cancer receive neoadjuvant chemoradiation (chemo/XRT) over 5-6 weeks followed by a 6-10-week break before proctectomy. As chemotherapy is delivered at radio-sensitizing doses, there is essentially a 3-month window during which potential systemic disease is untreated. Evidence regarding the utility of restaging patients prior to proctectomy is limited. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies evaluating the utility of restaging patients with rectal cancer after completion of long-course chemo/XRT, and reporting associated changes in management. Studies that were non-English, included <50 patients, or examining the diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities were excluded. Study quality was evaluated using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified including a total of 1251 patients restaged between completion of chemo/XRT and proctectomy. All studies were retrospective. Restaging identified new metastatic disease in 72 (6.0%) patients, with 4 studies reporting specific sites: liver (n = 28), lung (n = 8), adrenal (n = 1), bone (n = 1), and multiple sites (n = 7). Overall progression (distant or local) was detected in 88 (7.0%) patients and resulted in a change in management in 77 (87.5%) of these patients. Tumor-related prognostic characteristics were inconsistently reported among studies, precluding meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although restaging between completion of neoadjuvant chemo/XRT and proctectomy detects disease progression in only a small percentage of patients, findings alter the treatment plan in the vast majority of these patients. Multi-institutional collaboration with analysis of well-defined prognostic variables may better identify patients most likely to benefit from restaging.

Stabilization of renal function after the first year of follow-up in kidney transplant recipients treated for significant BK polyomavirus infection or BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: BK polyomavirus virus (BKPyV) screening and immunosuppression reduction effectively prevent graft loss due to BKPyV-associated nephropathy (BKPVAN) during the first year after transplantation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of this infection during longer follow-up periods. METHODS: We reviewed the outcome of our screening and immunosuppression reduction protocol in 305 patients who received a kidney transplant between March 2008 and January 2013. Quantitative BKPyV DNA surveillance in plasma was performed at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplantation. Patients with significant viremia and/or biopsy-proven BKPVAN were treated with immunosuppression reduction and leflunomide. RESULTS: During the first post-transplant year, 24 patients (7.9%) developed significant viremia at a median time of 95 days, and 18 patients had BKPVAN; 23 of the 24 (7.5%) were treated according to our protocol (group BKV+); 225 patients (73.8%) did not develop any BK viremia (group BKV-). Allograft function was similar in both groups at 1 month post transplantation (P=.87), but significantly worse at 1 year in the BKV+ group (P=.002). Thereafter, kidney function stabilized in the BKV+ group and no differences in patient and graft survival were seen between the groups after a median follow-up of 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the early occurrence of BKPyV replication after transplantation and the short-term decline in renal function. However, early detection of BKPyV replication, prompt diagnosis, and reduction in immunosuppression may offer long-term benefits for graft function.

Treatment Time or Convection Volume in HDF: What Drives the Reduced Mortality Risk?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Treatment time is associated with survival in hemodialysis (HD) patients and with convection volume in hemodiafiltration (HDF) patients. High-volume HDF is associated with improved survival. Therefore, we investigated whether this survival benefit is explained by treatment time. METHODS: Participants were subdivided into four groups: HD and tertiles of convection volume in HDF. Three Cox regression models were fitted to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality of HDF subgroups versus HD: (1) crude, (2) adjusted for confounders, (3) model 2 plus mean treatment time. As the only difference between the latter models is treatment time, any change in HRs is due to this variable. RESULTS: 114/700 analyzed individuals were treated with high-volume HDF. HRs of high-volume HDF are 0.61, 0.62 and 0.64 in the three models, respectively (p values <0.05). Confidence intervals of models 2 and 3 overlap. CONCLUSION: The survival benefit of high-volume HDF over HD is independent of treatment time.

Online hemodiafiltration reduces systemic inflammation compared to low-flux hemodialysis.

Online hemodiafiltration may diminish inflammatory activity through amelioration of the uremic milieu. However, impurities in water quality might provoke inflammatory responses. We therefore compared the long-term effect of low-flux hemodialysis to hemodiafiltration on the systemic inflammatory activity in a randomized controlled trial. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 were measured for up to 3 years in 405 patients of the CONvective TRAnsport STudy, and albumin was measured at baseline and every 3 months in 714 patients during the entire follow-up. Differences in the rate of change over time of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and albumin were compared between the two treatment arms. C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 concentrations increased in patients treated with hemodialysis, and remained stable in patients treated with hemodiafiltration. There was a statistically significant difference in rate of change between the groups after adjustments for baseline variables (C-reactive protein difference 20%/year and interleukin-6 difference 16%/year). The difference was more pronounced in anuric patients. Serum albumin decreased significantly in both treatment arms, with no difference between the groups. Thus, long-term hemodiafiltration with ultrapure dialysate seems to reduce inflammatory activity over time compared to hemodialysis, but does not affect the rate of change in albumin.

Treatment policy rather than patient characteristics determines convection volume in online post-dilution hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Sub-analyses of three large trials showed that hemodiafiltration (HDF) patients who achieved the highest convection volumes had the lowest mortality risk. The aims of this study were (1) to identify determinants of convection volume and (2) to assess whether differences exist between patients achieving high and low volumes. METHODS: HDF patients from the CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST) with a complete dataset at 6 months (314 out of a total of 358) were included in this post hoc analysis. Determinants of convection volume were identified by regression analysis. RESULTS: Treatment time, blood flow rate, dialysis vintage, serum albumin and hematocrit were independently related. Neither vascular access nor dialyzer characteristics showed any relation with convection volume. Except for some variation in body size, patient characteristics did not differ across tertiles of convection volume. CONCLUSION: Treatment time and blood flow rate are major determinants of convection volume. Hence, its magnitude depends on center policy rather than individualized patient prescription.

Effect of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

In patients with ESRD, the effects of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events are unclear. In this prospective study, we randomly assigned 714 chronic hemodialysis patients to online postdilution hemodiafiltration (n=358) or to continue low-flux hemodialysis (n=356). The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality. The main secondary endpoint was a composite of major cardiovascular events, including death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, therapeutic coronary intervention, therapeutic carotid intervention, vascular intervention, or amputation. After a mean 3.0 years of follow-up (range, 0.4-6.6 years), we did not detect a significant difference between treatment groups with regard to all-cause mortality (121 versus 127 deaths per 1000 person-years in the online hemodiafiltration and low-flux hemodialysis groups, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-1.20). The incidences of cardiovascular events were 127 and 116 per 1000 person-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.39). Receiving high-volume hemodiafiltration during the trial associated with lower all-cause mortality, a finding that persisted after adjusting for potential confounders and dialysis facility. In conclusion, this trial did not detect a beneficial effect of hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events compared with low-flux hemodialysis. On-treatment analysis suggests the possibility of a survival benefit among patients who receive high-volume hemodiafiltration, although this subgroup finding requires confirmation.

Pseudo-outbreak of haemodiafiltration dialysis fluid contamination: results of a detailed epidemiologic investigation.

Background: Compliance with dialysis fluid ultrapurity standards is a paramount for online modalities. More than 200 dialysis fluid samples have been analyzed monthly for years in our two dialysis units, with compliant microbiological results until mid-2020. Aim: In mid-2020, an unusual occurrence (30%) of contaminated dialysis fluids in dialysis units led us to investigate to determine the source. Methods: Microbiological methods for aquaphilic bacteria culturing and endotoxin detection in dialysis fluids were routinely performed on a monthly basis for all dialysis machines. As the contamination appeared randomly and almost simultaneously in our two units without any routine change or febrile syndrome, we searched for a common cause. Supplier's sampling kits as well as microbiological laboratory procedures were scrupulously investigated. Findings: 21 out of 30 sampling bags filled with sterile water brought back numerous fungi and bacteria. Laboratory's investigation, through the negative control tests performed routinely, exonerated the lab. All batches of bags analyzed later showed variable levels of contamination according to their transport/storage mode or date of manufacturing. Analyses performed by the supplier - methods complying with the medical device's standards but different from those recommended for dialysis fluids purity - remained negative. Conclusion: Our investigation revealed that the contamination of our sampling kits came presumably from the manufacturer's supplying chain. Such false-positive results findings, created serious safety issues and disturbed clinical activities since positive machines were quarantined. Furthermore, it raised a serious concern about manufacturing, microbiological checking and shipping methods for the medical device industry that deserve further attention.

Clinical performance targets and quality of life in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Patients value health-related quality of life (HRQOL) over survival. It was our aim to study the relation between attainment of widely accepted performance targets and HRQOL in hemodialysis patients. METHODS: This study included baseline data from 715 hemodialysis patients from 29 dialysis centers. Six clinical performance targets, as recommended by the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI), were evaluated: single-pool Kt/V (≥1.2), hemoglobin (11-13 g/dl), vascular access (fistula), phosphorus (2.3-4.5 mg/dl), parathyroid hormone (150-300 pg/ml), and blood pressure (predialysis <140/90 and postdialysis <130/ 80 mm Hg). RESULTS: After correction for case-mix and multiple comparisons, no association was found between the 6 KDOQI clinical performance targets and the 14 HRQOL domains, or between the number of performance targets reached and HRQOL. CONCLUSION: Attainment with widely accepted clinical performance targets was not related to the HRQOL of hemodialysis patients. Hence, in clinical guidelines, HRQOL should be adopted as an explicit treatment goal for these individuals.

Online Hemodiafiltration Compared to Conventional Hemodialysis in Critically Ill Patients.

Introduction: Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been increasingly used for improved clearance of middle molecular weight toxins. The impact of this mode of clearance is unknown in critically ill patients. We aimed to determine whether the use of HDF in acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with lower mortality and improved kidney recovery up to 90 days after initiation of therapy. Methods: Single-center retrospective cohort study using data from 2017 to 2020 of adults with AKI who initiated intermittent renal replacement therapy (IRRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU), using either hemodialysis (HD) or HDF depending on the maintenance status of the water system without regards for patient characteristics. We assessed association with patient-events and session-events using time-dependent Cox models and general estimating equations models, respectively. Results: We included 182 adults with AKI for whom 848 IRRT sessions were performed in the ICU. The 90-day mortality rate was 43 of 182 (24.6%). There was no significant association with the use of HDF and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.85 (0.43; 1.67) P = 0.64), kidney recovery (aHR: 1.18 (0.76; 1.84) P = 0.47), or intradialytic hypotension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.91 confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-1.28 P = 0.58). HDF treatment was associated with a lower rate of subsequent vasopressor use (aOR: 0.60 CI: 0.36-0.99 P = 0.047) and a greater reduction of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) following the first session (-15.0% vs. +5.1%, P = 0.047) but was also associated with increased risk of filter thrombosis during treatment (aOR: 2.42 CI: 1.67-3.50 P < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of HDF in the setting of AKI was not associated with a differential risk of mortality or kidney recovery.

State of the Art in Lung Nodule Localization.

Lung nodule and ground-glass opacity localization for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes is often a challenge for thoracic surgeons. While there are several adjuncts and techniques in the surgeon's armamentarium that can be helpful, accurate localization persists as a problem without a perfect solution. The last several decades have seen tremendous improvement in our ability to perform major operations with minimally invasive procedures and resulting lower morbidity. However, technological advances have not been as widely realized for lung nodule localization to complement minimally invasive surgery. This review describes the latest advances in lung nodule localization technology while also demonstrating that more efforts in this area are needed.

A composite score of protein-energy nutritional status predicts mortality in haemodialysis patients no better than its individual components.

BACKGROUND: Protein-energy wasting is tightly associated with mortality in haemodialysis patients. An expert panel of the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM) has published a consensus on the parameters that define protein-energy nutritional status and posed the question, 'which scoring system most effectively predicts outcome?' The aim of our study was therefore to develop a composite score of protein-energy nutritional status (cPENS) and to assess its prediction of all-cause mortality. METHODS: We used the data of 560 haemodialysis patients participating in the CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST). All participants were followed for occurrence of death. Internationally recommended nutritional targets were used as components of the cPENS, including the subjective global assessment (target score ≥ 6), albumin (≥ 4.0 g/dL), normalized protein nitrogen appearance (≥ 0.8 g/kg/day), cholesterol (≥ 100 mg/dL), creatinine (≥ 10 mg/dL) and BMI (> 23 kg/m(2)). A Cox regression model was used to analyse the relation between different cPENS variants and mortality. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 1.4 years (max 4.2). One hundred and five patients (19%) died. A cPENS variant based on albumin, BMI, creatinine and the nPNA yielded the strongest relation with mortality (hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.54-0.74, P < 0.001), after adjustments for confounders. Some of the individual parameters of the cPENS, notably albumin and creatinine, were related to mortality with similar strength and magnitude. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, albumin reflects mortality risk similarly to multiple nutritional parameters combined. This questions the clinical value of the proposed diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting.

Protein-energy nutritional status and kidney disease-specific quality of life in hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important outcome in dialysis care. Previous research has related protein-energy nutritional status to generic HRQOL domains, but it is still not clear as to how it relates to HRQOL domains that are unique to hemodialysis patients. Therefore, our aim was to study the relation between protein-energy nutritional status and kidney disease-specific HRQOL domains in hemodialysis patients. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study was performed at multiple centers. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: We evaluated the first 590 hemodialysis patients who had enrolled in the Convective Transport Study. DETERMINANTS: We measured protein-energy nutritional status by using the Subjective Global Assessment, albumin, normalized nitrogen appearance, creatinine, body mass index, and cholesterol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: HRQOL was assessed by using the Kidney Disease Quality Of Life-Short Form. RESULTS: In all, 83% of the cohort was found to be well-nourished on the basis of the Subjective Global Assessment. Multiple nutritional parameters were positively related to the physical summary of generic HRQOL and to the following kidney disease-specific HRQOL scales: the effects of the kidney disease on daily life, the burden of the kidney disease, and overall health. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, even in predominantly well-nourished hemodialysis patients, protein-energy nutritional status was significantly related to kidney disease-specific HRQOL.

Short-term effects of online hemodiafiltration on phosphate control: a result from the randomized controlled Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST).

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphatemia is an independent risk factor for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Phosphate control often is unsuccessful using conventional dialysis therapies. STUDY DESIGN: Short-term analysis of a secondary outcome of an ongoing randomized controlled trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 493 (84%) consecutive patients from 589 patients included in the Convective Transport Study (CONTRAST) by January 2009 from 26 centers in 3 countries. INTERVENTION: Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) versus continuation of low-flux HD. OUTCOMES: Differences in change from baseline to 6 months in phosphate levels and proportion of patients reaching phosphate treatment targets (phosphate < or = 5.5 mg/dL). MEASUREMENTS: Phosphate, use of phosphate-binding agents, and proportion of patients achieving treatment targets at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. RESULTS: Phosphate levels decreased from 5.18 +/- 0.10 (SE) mg/dL at baseline to 4.87 +/- 0.10 mg/dL at 6 months in HDF patients (P < 0.001) and were stable in HD patients (5.10 +/- 0.10 mg/dL at baseline and 5.03 +/- 0.10 mg/dL after 6 months; P = 0.5). The difference in change in phosphate levels between HD and HDF patients (B = -0.24; 95% CI, -0.52 to 0.03; P = 0.08) increased after adjustment for phosphate-binder use (B = -0.36; 95% CI, -0.65 to -0.06; P = 0.02). The proportion of patients reaching phosphate treatment targets increased from 64% to 74% in HDF patients and was stable in HD patients (66% and 66%); the difference between groups reached statistical significance (P = 0.04). Nutritional parameters and residual renal function were similar in both treatment groups. LIMITATIONS: Only predialysis serum phosphate levels were measured; phosphate clearance could therefore not be calculated. CONCLUSION: HDF may help improve phosphate control. Whether this contributes to improved clinical outcome remains to be established.

Patient- and treatment-related determinants of convective volume in post-dilution haemodiafiltration in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Large convective volumes are recommended for online haemodiafiltration (HDF) to maximize solute removal. There has been little systematic evaluation of factors that determine convective volumes in routine clinical practice. METHODS: In the present study, potential patient- and treatment-related determinants of convective volume were analysed in 235 consecutive patients on post-dilution HDF using multivariable linear regression models. All patients (age 64 +/- 14 years; 61% male) participated in the ongoing CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST). Additionally, differences in convective volumes between dialysers were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean convective volume was 19.4 +/- 4.0 L (+/-SD) per treatment, with a large variation between the participating centres (centre means ranging from 13.4 +/- 0.9 L to 24.5 +/- 0.12 L, +/- SE). The mean filtration fraction of the blood flow was 25.9 +/- 3.6. In the multivariable analysis, factors that were significantly related to convective volume were haematocrit [inversely, regression coefficient (B) = -1.4 +/- 0.4 L per 10%], serum albumin (positively, B = 1.0 +/- 0.4 L per 10 g/L), blood flow rate (positively, B = 0.4 +/- 0.04 L per 10 mL/min) and treatment time (positively, B = 5.1 +/- 0.4 L/h). In addition, significant differences between dialysers were observed, likely explained by different operational conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Apart from increasing the treatment time and blood flow rate, convective volumes could be optimized by increasing the filtration fraction in each individual, provided that transmembrane pressures are well within safe limits. The precise role of dialyser characteristics on maximal achievable convective volumes in clinical practice is a topic for further research.

Evolution of high-sensitivity troponin-T and echocardiography parameters in patients undergoing high efficiency on-line hemodiafiltration versus conventional low-flux hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: On-line hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been associated with better inflammatory markers profile and survival than low-flux hemodialysis (HD). This study aimed at determining the effect of HDF vs HD on hs-TnT and echocardiography parameters evolution at one year follow-up. METHOD: Patients were randomized from 2007 to 2013 to HD or HDF in accordance with the CONvective TRAnsport STudy protocol initially as part of the Montreal cohort and subsequently as part of a local cohort. Pre-dialysis hs-TnT were analyzed at baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 54 HDF patients and 59 HD patients were included. At baseline, median hs-TnT value was 49 ng/L (IQR 31-89) in the HDF group vs. 60 ng/L (36-96) in the HD group (p = 0.370). At one year follow-up, median hs-TnT remained stable in the HDF group (p = 0.707 vs. baseline), but significantly increased to 62 ng/L (40-104) in the HD group (p = 0.021 vs. baseline). The median variation (delta) in hs-TnT values was -3 ng/L (IQR -7-+8) in the HDF group vs. +8 ng/L (-5 -+25) in the HD group (p = 0.042). In the HDF group, LVEF increased from 60.0% (IQR 55.0-65.0) at baseline to 65.0% (60.0-65.5) at 1-year follow-up (p = 0.040) whereas it remained stable in the HD group (LVEF of 60.0% [IQR 55.0-65.0] at baseline and 65.0% [55.0-65.0] at 1-year follow-up [p = 0.312]). CONCLUSIONS: High-efficiency HDF is associated with stability in hs-TnT values, whereas low-flux HD is associated with significant increase in hs-TnT levels.

Increased glucose excursion in cystic fibrosis and its association with a worse clinical status.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal glucose tolerance is a frequent co-morbidity in cystic fibrosis patients (CF), and is associated with a worse prognosis. The objectives are to investigate (a) the relative contribution of insulinopenia and insulin resistance (IR) for glucose tolerance and (b) the association between various glucose parameters and CF clinical status. METHODS: Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed in 114 consecutive CF patients not known to be diabetic as well as 14 controls similar for age and BMI. RESULTS: Abnormal glucose tolerance was found in 40% of patients with CF: 28% had impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and 12% had new cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD). Compared to control subjects, all CF patients were characterized by an increased glucose excursion (AUC). While reduced early insulin release characterised CF, IGT and CFRD patients also present IR thus both mechanisms significantly contribute to glucose tolerance abnormalities. Increased glucose AUC and reduced early insulin release but not glucose tolerance categories were associated with a reduced pulmonary function (FEV(1)). CONCLUSION: In CF, early insulin secretion defect but also IR contribute to glucose intolerance. Early in the course of the disease, increased glucose AUC and reduced early insulin secretion are more closely associated with a worse clinical status than conventional glucose tolerance categories.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of High-Efficiency Hemodiafiltration Versus Low-Flux Hemodialysis Based on the Canadian Arm of the CONTRAST Study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of high-efficiency on-line hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with low-flux hemodialysis (LF-HD) for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) based on the Canadian (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal) arm of a parallel-group randomized controlled trial (RCT), the CONvective TRAnsport STudy. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted for the period of the RCT (74 months). In addition, a Markov state transition model was constructed to simulate costs and health benefits over lifetime. The primary outcome was costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. The analysis had the perspective of the Quebec public healthcare system. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomly allocated to OL-HDF (n = 67) and LF-HD (n = 63). The cost-utility ratio of OL-HDF versus LF-HD was Can$53,270 per QALY gained over lifetime. This ratio was fairly robust in the sensitivity analysis. The cost-utility ratio was lower than that of LF-HD compared with no treatment (immediate death), which was Can$93,008 per QALY gained. CONCLUSIONS: High-efficiency OL-HDF can be considered a cost-effective treatment for ESRD in a Canadian setting. Further research is needed to assess cost effectiveness in other settings and healthcare systems.

The Effect of Online Hemodiafiltration on Infections: Results from the CONvective TRAnsport STudy.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis (HD) patients have a high risk of infections. The uremic milieu has a negative impact on several immune responses. Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) may reduce the risk of infections by ameliorating the uremic milieu through enhanced clearance of middle molecules. Since there are few data on infectious outcomes in HDF, we compared the effects of HDF with low-flux HD on the incidence and type of infections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data of the 714 HD patients (age 64 ±14, 62% men, 25% Diabetes Mellitus, 7% catheters) participating in the CONvective TRAnsport STudy (CONTRAST), a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of HDF as compared to low-flux HD. The events were adjudicated by an independent event committee. The risk of infectious events was compared with Cox regression for repeated events and Cox proportional hazard models. The distributions of types of infection were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty one percent of the patients suffered from one or more infections leading to hospitalization during the study (median follow-up 1.96 years). The risk for infections during the entire follow-up did not differ significantly between treatment arms (HDF 198 and HD 169 infections in 800 and 798 person-years respectively, hazard ratio HDF vs. HD 1.09 (0.88-1.34), P = 0.42. No difference was found in the occurrence of the first infectious event (either fatal, non-fatal or type specific). Of all infections, respiratory infections (25% in HDF, 28% in HD) were most common, followed by skin/musculoskeletal infections (21% in HDF, 13% in HD). CONCLUSIONS: HDF as compared to HD did not result in a reduced risk of infections, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00205556.