Prevalence of severe hypoglycemia in a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes. / Prevalencia de hipoglucemia grave en una cohorte de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1.

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglycemia is the major limiting factor in the glycemic management of type 1 diabetes. Severe hypoglycemia puts patients at risk of injury and death. Recurrent hypoglycemia leads to impaired awareness of hypoglycemia and this increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia. Recent studies have reported rates for severe hypoglycemia of 35% in type 1 diabetic patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients and to evaluate the relationship between this and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia according to the Clarke test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following data were collected from a cohort of type 1 diabetic patients: age, gender, duration of type 1 diabetes, treatment (multiple daily insulin injection or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion), glycemia self-control, HbA1c, episodes of severe hypoglycemia and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Of the participants, 39.8% had had at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia (in the previous 6 months), 11.4% with loss of consciousness (in the previous 12 months). According to the Clark test, 40.9% had impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Older age and longer duration of diabetes were associated with a higher prevalence of severe hypoglycemia with unconsciousness; older age and a lower level of HbA1c were associated with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study allows us to confirm the high rate of severe hypoglycemia and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Clinical differences between patients with MODY-3, MODY-2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus with I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alpha gene.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to describe and evaluate the clinical and metabolic characteristics of patients with MODY-3, MODY-2 or type 2 diabetes who presented I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alpha gene. METHODS: The study included 31 previously diagnosed subjects under follow-up for MODY-3 (10 subjects from 5 families), MODY-2 (15 subjects from 9 families), or type 2 diabetes (6 subjects) with I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alpha gene. The demographic, clinical, metabolic, and genetic characteristics of all patients were analyzed. RESULTS: No differences were observed in distribution according to sex, age of onset, or form of diagnosis. All patients with MODY-2 or MODY-3 had a family history of diabetes. In contrast, 33.3% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alpha gene had no family history of diabetes (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in body mass index, prevalence of hypertension, or microvascular or macrovascular complications. Drug therapy was required by 100% of MODY-3 patients, but not required by 100% of MODY-2 patients or 16.7% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alpha gene (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Occasional difficulties may be encountered when classifying patients with MODY-2, MODY-3 or type 2 diabetes of atypical characteristics, in this case patients who present I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alpha gene.

Prevalencia de hipoglucemia grave en una cohorte de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 / Prevalence of severe hypoglycemia in a cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes

INTRODUCCIÓN: La hipoglucemia es el principal factor limitante para alcanzar los objetivos de control glucémico en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1. La hipoglucemia grave conlleva riesgo de daño, e incluso de muerte. Tener hipoglucemias repetidas se relaciona con la aparición de hipoglucemias inadvertidas, las cuales incrementan el riesgo de hipoglucemias graves. Algunos metaanálisis recientes estiman una prevalencia del 35% de hipoglucemia grave en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1. OBJETIVO: Conocer la prevalencia de hipoglucemia grave en una cohorte de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y evaluar la dependencia entre las variables hipoglucemia grave e inadvertida evaluada mediante el test de Clarke. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se ha estudiado una cohorte de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 para analizar la edad, sexo, tiempo de evolución de diabetes, tratamiento (múltiples dosis o infusión subcutánea continua de insulina), autocontrol glucémico, HbA1c, episodios de hipoglucemia grave sin pérdida de conciencia, episodios de hipoglucemia grave con pérdida de conciencia e hipoglucemias inadvertidas. RESULTADOS: El 39,8% de los pacientes presentaron hipoglucemias graves sin pérdida de conciencia (últimos 6 meses) y el 11,4%, con pérdida de conciencia (últimos 12 meses). El 40,9% presentaban hipoglucemias inadvertidas y se descartó la independencia entre estas y las hipoglucemias graves. La presencia de hipoglucemias graves con pérdida de conciencia se asoció a mayor edad y mayor tiempo de evolución; las hipoglucemias inadvertidas, con una mayor edad y una menor HbA1c. CONCLUSIÓN: Se confirma el elevado porcentaje de pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 afectos de hipoglucemia grave e inadvertida

INTRODUCTION: Hypoglycemia is the major limiting factor in the glycemic management of type 1 diabetes. Severe hypoglycemia puts patients at risk of injury and death. Recurrent hypoglycemia leads to impaired awareness of hypoglycemia and this increases the risk of severe hypoglycemia. Recent studies have reported rates for severe hypoglycemia of 35% in type 1 diabetic patients. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients and to evaluate the relationship between this and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia according to the Clarke test. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The following data were collected from a cohort of type 1 diabetic patients: age, gender, duration of type 1 diabetes, treatment (multiple daily insulin injection or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion), glycemia self-control, HbA1c, episodes of severe hypoglycemia and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: Of the participants, 39.8% had had at least one episode of severe hypoglycemia (in the previous 6 months), 11.4% with loss of consciousness (in the previous 12 months). According to the Clark test, 40.9% had impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. Older age and longer duration of diabetes were associated with a higher prevalence of severe hypoglycemia with unconsciousness; older age and a lower level of HbA1c were associated with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study allows us to confirm the high rate of severe hypoglycemia and impaired awareness of hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes

Importance of clinical variables in the diagnosis of MODY2 and MODY3.

AIMS: MODY (maturity onset diabetes of the young) is a group of well-defined diseases clinically characterised by onset before age 25 years that does not require insulin treatment (at least initially) to prevent the formation of ketone bodies and autosomal dominant inheritance. Despite the importance of accurate classification, it is not always simple to catalogue the diagnosis of a young patient with diabetes, and genetic studies are often improperly used. METHODS: We describe the clinical features of patients negative for MODY2 and MODY3 and compared them to patients positive for these subtypes. RESULTS: All patients with MODY3 had been diagnosed before age 25 years and required drug therapy for blood glucose control. MODY2 patients were diagnosed at the first laboratory workup either incidentally or as part of gestational diabetes screening. The clinical description of the 19 patients negative for MODY2 and MODY3 showed that only two patients presented a clinical picture consistent with MODY3 and one patient with MODY2. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical features can be used for early exclusion of a MODY2 or MODY3 diagnosis and may reduce the need for genetic testing.

Importance of clinical variables in the diagnosis of MODY2 and MODY3

La diabetes tipo MODY (del inglés maturity onset diabetes of the young) constituye un grupo de patologías bien definidas y caracterizadas por su aparición antes de los 25 años, herencia autosómica dominante y por el hecho de que no precisan un tratamiento con insulina (al menos, inicialmente) para evitar la formación de cuerpos cetónicos. A pesar de la importancia de una clasificación precisa del paciente diabético, no siempre resulta sencillo clasificar el diagnóstico de un paciente joven con diabetes, y los estudios genéticos, a menudo, se usan de forma inadecuada. Métodos Se describen las características clínicas de pacientes cuyo estudio para MODY2 y MODY3 resultó negativo, y se comparan con las características de pacientes con resultado de estudio positivo. Resultados Todos los pacientes con MODY3 habían sido diagnosticados antes de los 25 años de edad y requerían algún tratamiento farmacológico para controlar la glucemia. Los pacientes con MODY2 fueron diagnosticados a partir de la primera analítica realizada, bien de forma accidental o dentro de un contexto de cribado de diabetes gestacional. La descripción clínica de los 19 pacientes cuyo estudio para MODY2 y MODY3 resultó negativo, mostró que sólo dos pacientes presentaban un cuadro clínico compatible con MODY3 y solo un paciente con MODY2.ConclusionesLas características clínicas pueden ser utilizadas para excluir el diagnóstico de MODY2 y MODY3, y ello puede reducir la necesidad de estudios genéticos (AU)

MODY (maturity onset diabetes of the young) is a group of well-defined diseases clinically characterised by onset before age 25 years that does not require insulin treatment (at least initially)to prevent the formation of ketone bodies and autosomal dominant inheritance. Despite the importance of accurate classification, it is not always simple to catalogue the diagnosis of a young patient with diabetes, and genetic studies are often improperly used. Methods: We describe the clinical features of patients negative for MODY2 and MODY3 and compared them to patients positive for these subtypes. Results: All patients with MODY3 had been diagnosed before age 25 years and required drug therapy for blood glucose control. MODY2 patients were diagnosed at the first laboratory workup either incidentally or as part of gestational diabetes screening. The clinical description of the19 patients negative for MODY2 and MODY3 showed that only two patients presented a clinical picture consistent with MODY3 and one patient with MODY2.Conclusions: Clinical features can be used for early exclusion of a MODY2 or MODY3 diagnosis and may reduce the need for genetic testing (AU)

Clinical differences between patients with MODY-3, MODY-2 and type 2 diabetes mellitus with I27L polymorphism in the HNF1alfa gene

Objective: The aim of our study was to describe and evaluate the clinical and metabolic characteristics of patients with MODY-3, MODY-2 or type 2 diabetes who presented I27L polymorphism in the HNF1α gene. Methods: The study included 31 previously diagnosed subjects under follow-up for MODY-3 (10 subjects from 5 families), MODY-2 (15 subjects from 9 families), or type 2 diabetes (6 subjects) with I27L polymorphism in the HNF1α gene. The demographic, clinical, metabolic, and genetic characteristics of all patients were analyzed. Results: No differences were observed in distribution according to sex, age of onset, or form of diagnosis. All patients with MODY-2 or MODY-3 had a family history of diabetes. In contrast, 33.3% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and I27L polymorphism in the HNF1α gene had no family history of diabetes (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in body mass index, prevalence of hypertension, or microvascular or macrovascular complications. Drug therapy was required by 100% of MODY-3 patients, but not required by 100% of MODY-2 patients or 16.7% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and I27L polymorphism in the HNF1α gene (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Occasional difficulties may be encountered when classifying patients with MODY-2, MODY-3 or type 2 diabetes of atypical characteristics, in this case patients who present I27L polymorphism in the HNF1α gene

Objetivos: El objetivo de este estudio es describir y evaluar las características clínicas y metabólicas de pacientes diabéticos MODY 3, MODY 2 y con diabetes tipo 2 portadores del polimorfismo I27L en el gen HNF1α. Métodos: Se incluyó a 31 pacientes diagnosticados previamente y en seguimiento en consultas externas por diabetes tipo MODY 3, MODY 2 y diabetes tipo 2 portadores del polimorfismo I27L en el gen HNF1α: 10 pacientes diagnosticados de diabetes MODY 3 (pertenecientes a 5 familias); 15 pacientes con diabetes MODY 2 (pertenecientes a 9 familias) y 6 pacientes diagnosticados de diabetes tipo 2 portadores del polimorfismo I27L en el gen HNF1α. Se analizan las características clínicas, antropométricas y metabólicas de los pacientes. Resultados: No se objetivaron diferencias en la distribución por sexos y edad o forma de diagnóstico de la diabetes. Todos los pacientes con diabetes MODY 2 y MODY 3 tenían antecedentes familiares de diabetes. El 33,3% de los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 portadores del polimorfismo I27L en el gen HNF1α no tenían antecedentes familiares de diabetes (p > 0,05). No se encontraron diferencias en el IMC, la prevalencia de hipertensión arterial o la incidencia de complicaciones microvasculares o macrovasculares. En cuanto al tratamiento, el 100% de los pacientes con diabetes MODY 3 necesitaban tratamiento farmacológico. El 100% de los pacientes con diabetes MODY 2 y el 16,7% de los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2 y el polimorfismo I27L en el gen HNF1α no necesitaban tratamiento farmacológico (p > 0,05). Conclusiones: Este artículo realza la dificultad en la correcta clasificación clínica de los pacientes con diabetes MODY 2, MODY 3 y diabéticos tipo 2 con características clínicas atípicas, en este caso portadores del polimorfismo I27L en el gen HNF1α