Ingrown Toenails: A Survey Among Dermatologists on Current Treatments.

BACKGROUND: To date, there is no formal consensus on how to treat ingrown toenails. Despite the risk of causing irreparable damage to the nail, highly invasive procedures are still common. Less-invasive, matrix-directed techniques with shorter downtime and high cure rates exist, but, perhaps because of a lack of awareness, appear not to have been universally adopted. OBJECTIVE: The authors' study sought to generate data on common practices in the treatment of ingrown toenails. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors developed and conducted an online survey to ask dermatologists/dermatosurgeons how they would proceed in 9 different cases of ingrown toenails based on photographs. RESULTS: The authors received 154 replies. Nonsurgical interventions, including advice on nail care/foot baths/ointments/wraps/padding, were always the most frequently chosen option. Removal of the lateral nail plate followed by chemical partial matricectomy (phenolization) was the most or second-most frequently chosen surgical intervention. The answers were highly heterogeneous, and there was no unanimity based on morphology alone. CONCLUSION: Except for a preference for nonsurgical interventions, the authors could not identify any clear treatment standards. The heterogeneity of treatment approaches suggests the need for a guideline.

Telephone follow-up after outpatient nail surgery - a retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: One of the areas of care in dermatosurgery is the surgical treatment of diseases of the nail organ. Side effects and complications after nail surgery were investigated by telephone follow-up (TFU), and its suitability for postoperative monitoring and consultation was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent nail surgery at the Department of Dermatology at the Ludwigshafen City Hospital from October 2019 to December 2021 in outpatient setting were contacted by telephone on the second to third postoperative day and questioned in a standardized manner about postoperative complaints and counselled if necessary. RESULTS: A total of 100 cases were followed up. The most common procedures performed were phenol matricectomy (41%), nail avulsion (16%), and nail matrix biopsies (9%). 50% and 21% of patients reported pain on the day of the procedure and the day after surgery, respectively. After nail avulsion, pain was statistically significantly more frequently reported on the day following the procedure and pain medication was statistically significantly more frequently required (p  =  0.002). Serious adverse events did not occur after nail surgery. 10% of the respondents raised specific questions and needed counseling by TFU. CONCLUSIONS: All nail surgeries were well tolerated in the outpatient setting. Pain was the most common side effect, although only half of all patients reported pain on the day of surgery and only 21% on the day after the procedure. The TFU proved to be an effective and practical as well as easy to establish method for postoperative follow-up and consultation after outpatient nail surgery.