Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuromodulation ; 23(1): 102-108, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31265205

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The WHISPER randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates safety and clinical effectiveness of subperception spinal cord stimulation (SCS) at ≤1.2 kHz in subjects previously implanted with an SCS system for treatment of chronic, neuropathic pain. METHODS: WHISPER is a prospective, multicenter RCT with a crossover design sponsored by Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02314000). Eligible subjects were randomized (N = 140) to receive subperception or supraperception for three months and then crossed over to receive the alternative. Upon completion of crossover period, subjects who preferred subperception were followed up to one year. Overall pain, quality-of-life, and other outcomes were collected in the study. The primary endpoint was the overall pain responder rate (≥50% improvement from baseline) with no increase in medications. Secondary endpoints consisted of pain scores, physical disability, quality of life, and treatment preference. RESULTS: The study met its primary endpoint and demonstrated noninferiority between supraperception and subperception in a prespecified cohort of 70 randomized subjects (Interim Analysis). Thirty-nine percent of subjects with subperception settings and 29% with supraperception settings had a greater than or equal to 50% reduction in their overall pain scores with no increase in average daily medication at three-months post-activation as compared with baseline. Further assessment of all participating study subjects (N = 140) revealed similar results. Subjects were previously implanted 3.8 ± 2 years and had a disability score (Oswestry Disability Index) of 70.2 ± 11.4 at study start. Of the randomized subjects that completed the End of Period 2 Visit, 93 (66%) preferred subperception SCS and their mean overall pain reduced from 7.3 ± 1.1 (N = 89) at baseline to 4.0 ± 2.1 (N = 80) at 12-months post-activation. Post hoc analysis also demonstrated that multiple options provide superior outcomes, as supported by a 74% increase in the responder rate when subjects could choose their most effective option (47%) compared with supraperception alone (27%). DISCUSSION: Subperception SCS at ≤1.2 kHz is safe and effective in subjects with extreme physical disability and previously implanted for chronic pain. Further, by providing study participants with different waveform options, increased pain relief was achieved.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/terapia , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis , Percepção da Dor/fisiologia , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Cross-Over , Feminino , Humanos , Neuroestimuladores Implantáveis/tendências , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Mo Med ; 104(6): 496-500; quiz 500-1, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18210912

RESUMO

Low back pain has become endemic in our society. It is one of the leading causes of disability. It is the most common cause for limitation of activity of people under 45 years of age and is one of the most frequent reasons for a visit to a physician. It is estimated that the cost of back pain in our society in terms of lost productivity and actual cost of treatment exceeds one billion dollars annually. According to the World Health Organization, more than 17 percent of U.S. patients seen by primary care physicians have persistent pain. In visits to physicians, pain medications are the second most commonly prescribed drugs (after cardiovascular medications).


Assuntos
Dor Lombar/terapia , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Injeções Epidurais , Dor Lombar/diagnóstico , Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA