RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Propose areas of future space human factors research. BACKGROUND: Deep space, long-duration human spaceflight missions to the Moon and Mars still require advances in space human factors research. Key drivers relate to astronauts living and working in isolation, new novel technologies required to accomplish exploration missions, and the longer durations of these. RESULTS: Three areas of research are proposed for methods and techniques: (1) to enable more autonomous astronauts; (2) to monitor crew and improve ground team situation awareness; and (3) to detect and support changes in long-duration team coordination. CONCLUSIONS: Future human exploration missions will benefit from advances in space human factors research. APPLICATION: Human factors researchers can contribute to human spaceflight by prioritizing these research topics.
Assuntos
Voo Espacial , Humanos , Astronautas , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Introduction: Group living skills (GLS), that is, being tidy and considerate of others, are an important skillset for teams who live and work together. However, this construct does not have a validated measure to enable an understanding of how group living skills influence team dynamics over time. We developed and validated a short measure of group living skills for teams living in extreme work environments. Methods: We collected data from 83 individuals in 24 teams living and working in space and spaceflight analog environments on missions of 45-240 days. Results: We provide evidence of reliability and validity for the GLS Survey over time and identify a two-factor structure. We also demonstrate its use as a measure of team-level dynamics and its utility as a sociometric measure to identify a person's degree of group living skills. Discussion: We outline recommendations for using this new measure in future research and applied settings to understand this unique aspect of teams living and working together.
RESUMO
Long-duration space exploration missions will pose significant risks to the physical and behavioral health and performance of the crew. We documented the presence and frequency of (1) behavioral health and performance (BHP)-relevant symptoms for each condition in NASA's Exploration Medical Conditions List (EMCL), (2) the BHP-relevant effects of applicable medical treatments in the current International Space Station (ISS) On-Orbit Medication List, (3) the breadth of potential BHP impacts of spaceflight medical treatments, and (4) the likelihood of adverse BHP effects of treating spaceflight medical conditions. BHP symptoms and effects were categorized by the six neurobehavioral domains of the National Institute of Mental Health's Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework. Including the cognitive effects of acute and chronic pain (e.g., attention, memory), 94% of spaceflight medical conditions include symptoms relevant to Cognitive Systems (e.g., attention deficits, confusion, psychosis), 36% include symptoms relevant to Negative Valence Systems (e.g., anxiety), 32% include symptoms relevant to Arousal and Regulatory Systems (e.g., sleep disturbances), 22% include symptoms relevant to Sensorimotor Systems (e.g., dizziness), 19% include symptoms relevant to Positive Valence Systems (e.g., mania), and 11% include symptoms relevant to Social Processes (e.g., social withdrawal). Only 2% of spaceflight medical conditions have no documented BHP symptoms. Of the spaceflight medical treatments, 63% affect Arousal and Regulatory Systems, 60% affect Sensorimotor Systems, 59% affect Cognitive Systems, 53% affect Negative Valence Systems, 38% affect Positive Valence Systems, and 31% affect Social Processes. The breadth of potential BHP impacts was bimodal, in that 27% of spaceflight medical treatments had no documented BHP effects; however, 27% of treatments may produce adverse effects across all six neurobehavioral domains. Historical prevalence data on medical conditions, symptoms, and complaints from 14 years of International Space Station operations coupled with documented BHP effects of recommended treatments indicates the potential for up to 481 adverse BHP effects of spaceflight medical treatments per person-year. Assessing the potential BHP impacts of spaceflight medical conditions and their treatments highlights the interactive nature of operational risks, and can provide an enhanced evidence base to support integrated research and countermeasure development strategies for long-duration exploration missions.
Assuntos
Astronautas , Voo Espacial , Humanos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Teams in isolated, confined, and extreme (ICE) environments face many risks to behavioral health, social dynamics, and team performance. Complex long-duration ICE operational settings such as spaceflight and military deployments are largely closed systems with tightly coupled components, often operating as autonomous microsocieties within isolated ecosystems. As such, all components of the system are presumed to interact and can positively or negatively influence team dynamics through direct or indirect pathways. However, modern team science frameworks rarely consider inputs to the team system from outside the social and behavioral sciences and rarely incorporate biological factors despite the brain and associated neurobiological systems as the nexus of input from the environment and necessary substrate for emergent team dynamics and performance. Here, we provide a high-level overview of several key neurobiological systems relevant to social dynamics. We then describe several key components of ICE systems that can interact with and on neurobiological systems as individual-level inputs influencing social dynamics over the team life cycle-specifically food and nutrition, exercise and physical activity, sleep/wake/work rhythms, and habitat design and layout. Finally, we identify opportunities and strategic considerations for multidisciplinary research and development. Our overarching goal is to encourage multidisciplinary expansion of team science through (1) prospective horizontal integration of variables outside the current bounds of team science as significant inputs to closed ICE team systems and (2) bidirectional vertical integration of biology as the necessary inputs and mediators of individual and team behavioral health and performance. Prospective efforts to account for the behavioral biology of teams in ICE settings through an integrated organizational neuroscience approach will enable the field of team science to better understand and support teams who work, live, serve, and explore in extreme environments.
RESUMO
In 24/7 operations, fatigue from extended work hours and shift work is ubiquitous. Fatigue is a significant threat to performance, productivity, safety, and well-being, and strategies for managing fatigue are an important area of research. At the level of individuals, the effects of fatigue on performance are relatively well understood, and countermeasures are widely available. At the level of organizations, the effects of fatigue are also relatively well understood, and organizational approaches to fatigue risk management are increasingly well documented. However, in most organizational settings, individuals work in teams, and teams are the building blocks of the organizational enterprise. Yet, little is known about the effects of fatigue on team functioning. Here we discuss the effects of fatigue at the levels of individuals, teams, and organizations, and how the consequences of fatigue cross these levels to impact overall productivity and safety. Furthermore, we describe the pivotal role of teams in understanding the adverse organizational effects of fatigue in 24/7 operations and argue that teams may be leveraged to mitigate these effects. Systematic investigation of the effects of fatigue on teams is a promising avenue toward advances in fatigue risk management and provide some ideas for how this may be approached.
Assuntos
Cognição/fisiologia , Comportamento Cooperativo , Fadiga/psicologia , Cultura Organizacional , Humanos , Gestão de RiscosRESUMO
The scientific study of teamwork in the context of spaceflight has uncovered a considerable amount of knowledge over the past 20 years. Although much is known about the underlying factors and processes of teamwork, much is left to be discovered for teams who will be operating in extreme isolation and confinement during a future Mars mission. Special considerations must be made to enhance teamwork and team well-being for multi-year missions during which the small team will live and work together. We discuss the unique challenges of effective teamwork in a Mars mission scenario, and the difficulties of studying teamwork using analogs of the space environment. We then describe the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's current practices and research on teamwork, which includes team selection and composition, teamwork training, countermeasures to mitigate risks to effective team performance, and the measurement and monitoring of team functioning. We end with a discussion of the teamwork research areas that are most critical for a successful journey to Mars. (PsycINFO Database Record