Cardiac MR imaging to measure myocardial blood flow response to the cold pressor test in healthy smokers and nonsmokers.

PURPOSE: To determine if myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can show changes in myocardial blood flow (MBF) during the cold pressor test (CPT) and can allow identification of the differing endothelial function of smokers and nonsmokers when compared during adenosine stress. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional ethics review board and all participants gave informed written consent. Twenty-nine healthy volunteers (19 nonsmokers, 10 smokers; mean age ± standard deviation, 22 years ± 4) underwent 1.5-T MR imaging and analysis. Myocardial perfusion was assessed during rest, peak CPT, and adenosine hyperemia with a saturation-recovery gradient-echo pulse sequence (spatial resolution, 2.4 × 2.4 × 10 mm). Global, endocardial, and epicardial MBF were calculated by using Fermi-constrained deconvolution. Paired and independent t test statistical analyses were used to compare the responses between tests and groups. Regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of MBF change. RESULTS: MBF at rest was similar between the nonsmoking and smoking groups (0.97 mL/g/min ± 0.4 vs 0.96 mL/g/min ± 0.3, respectively; P = .96). Nonsmokers responded to CPT with a 47% increase in MBF (1.43 mL/g/min ± 0.5) and smokers responded with a 27% increase (1.22 mL/g/min ± 0.4; P < .001). An endocardial-to-epicardial gradient existed at rest (nonsmokers, 1.10 [P = .002]; smokers, 1.30 [P = .01]) and CPT (nonsmokers, 1.19 [P < .001] smokers, 1.28 [P = .04]) but reversed during adenosine stress (nonsmokers, 0.89 [P = .03]; smokers, 0.92 [P = .42]). CONCLUSION: Myocardial perfusion cardiac MR imaging during CPT can allow assessment of changes in MBF globally and in the separate myocardial layers in healthy smokers and nonsmokers. This allows the combined assessment of endothelium-dependent (CPT) and endothelium-independent (adenosine stress test) MBF reserve in a single study.

Reproducibility of first-pass cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion.

PURPOSE: To assess the reproducibility of semiquantitative and quantitative analysis of first-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven volunteers underwent myocardial perfusion CMR during adenosine stress and rest on 2 separate days. Perfusion data were acquired in a single mid-ventricular section in two cardiac phases to permit cardiac phase reproducibility comparisons. Semiquantitative analysis was performed to derive normalized upslopes of myocardial signal intensity profiles (myocardial perfusion index, MPI). The quantitative analysis estimated absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF) using Fermi-constrained deconvolution. The perfusion reserve index was calculated by dividing stress by rest data. Two observers performed all the measurements independently. One observer repeated all first scan measurements 4 weeks later. RESULTS: The reproducibility of perfusion CMR was highest for semiquantitative analysis with an intraobserver coefficient of variability (CoV) of 3%-7% and interobserver CoV of 4%-10%. Semiquantitative interstudy comparison was less reproducible (CoV of 13%-27%). Quantitative intraobserver CoV of 10%-18%, interobserver CoV of 8%-15% and interstudy CoV of 20%-41%. Reproducibility of systolic and diastolic phases and the endocardial and epicardial myocardial layer showed similar reproducibility on both semiquantitative and quantitative analysis. CONCLUSION: The reproducibility of CMR myocardial perfusion estimates is good, but varies between intraobserver, interobserver, and interstudy comparisons. In this study semiquantitative analysis was more reproducible than quantitative analysis.

The microvascular effects of insulin resistance and diabetes on cardiac structure, function, and perfusion: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study.

AIMS: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for the development of heart failure. To better understand the mechanism by which this occurs, we investigated cardiac structure, function, and perfusion in patients with and without diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five patients with no stenosis >30% on invasive coronary angiography were categorized into diabetes (19) and non-diabetes (46) which was further categorized into prediabetes (30) and controls (16) according to the American Diabetes Association guidelines. Each patient underwent comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment. Left-ventricular (LV) mass, relative wall mass (RWM), Lagrangian circumferential strain, LV torsion, and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) were calculated. LV mass was higher in diabetics than non-diabetics (112.8 ± 39.7 vs. 91.5 ± 21.3 g, P = 0.01) and in diabetics than prediabetics (112.8 ± 39.7 vs. 90.3 ± 18.7 g, P = 0.02). LV torsion angle was higher in diabetics than non-diabetics (9.65 ± 1.90 vs. 8.59 ± 1.91°, P = 0.047), and MPR was lower in diabetics than non-diabetics (2.10 ± 0.76 vs. 2.84 ± 1.25 mL/g/min, P = 0.01). There was significant correlation between MPR and early diastolic strain rate (r = -0.310, P = 0.01) and LV torsion (r = -0.306, P = 0.01). In multivariable linear regression analysis, non-diabetics waist-hip ratio, but not body mass index, had a significant association with RWM (Beta = 0.34, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetes have increased LV mass, LV torsion, and decreased MPR. There is a significant association between decreased MPR and increased LV torsion suggesting a possible mechanistic link between microvascular disease and cardiac dysfunction in diabetes.