Feasibility and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiation for elderly patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Although concurrent chemoradiation is increasingly used for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, many elderly patients receive radiation alone due to toxicity concerns. We evaluate acute and late toxicity among patients age ≥ 65 who received concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Between 6/2003 and 8/2011, 40 consecutive patients age ≥ 65 underwent combined chemoradiation for head and neck cancer. Ten patients were treated in the postoperative setting and 30 underwent definitive chemoradiation. Twenty-eight patients received concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and 12 received concurrent weekly paclitaxel. Treatment plans were designed to provide a dose of 66-72 Gy at 2-2.12 Gy/fraction to >95% of the gross tumor volume in the definitive setting or for positive margins and 60-66 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction post-operatively. Median follow-up was 23.2 months (range: 0-94.4 months). MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Acute skin and mucosal toxicity, unplanned treatment interruptions, and chronic treatment related toxicity including gastrostomy tube dependence as graded by the CTCAE v3.0. RESULTS: Eight patients (20%) required a radiation treatment break of ≥ 3 days. Thirteen (33%) required unplanned hospitalization during or immediately following treatment. No grade 4+ skin or mucosal toxicity was noted. Five patients remained PEG tube dependent at >1 year. One patient developed non-healing mandibular osteoradionecrosis >3 years following chemoradiation. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 55%. CONCLUSION: Higher-than-expected rates of in-patient hospitalization with significant acute toxicity were noted in this cohort with a correspondingly high rate of radiation treatment breaks. Late toxicity rates were similar to those observed in historical controls with younger patients. Careful patient selection criteria should be employed for elderly patients considering concurrent chemoradiation for head and neck cancer.

Feasibility study of intra-patient sorafenib dose-escalation or re-escalation in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine if intra-patient dose escalation of the multi-targeted kinase inhibitor sorafenib is feasible in patients with advanced pretreated solid malignancies. METHODS: An intra-patient dose escalation scheme starting at 400 mg BID was employed in this prospective trial. Doses were escalated to 600 mg BID for the second cycle and to 800 mg BID for the third cycle in the absence of grade 3+ adverse events. In the event of grade 3+ adverse events during cycle 1, doses were reduced to 400 mg daily through cycle 2. Dose re-escalation for cycle 3 was allowed in the absence of grade 3+ adverse events during cycle 2. Further dose escalation was prohibited. The primary endpoint was the overall percentage of patients tolerating dose escalation to 600 mg BID through cycle 2 or tolerating re-escalation to 400 mg BID through cycle 3. RESULTS: Fifty eligible patients with various solid tumors and a median of 3 prior therapies were enrolled. Eleven patients (22%) tolerated primary dose escalation or re-escalation. Only 14 patients (28%) completed cycle 1 without dose modification or discontinuing treatment. Seven of 13 patients tolerated primary dose escalation through cycle 2. Four of 5 patients tolerated dose re-escalation through cycle 3. Reasons for escalation failure included tumor progression (42%) and adverse events (26%). Common grade 3+ adverse events included hand-foot skin reaction, hypertension, and hypophosphatemia. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-patient dose escalation and/or re-escalation of sorafenib were not feasible in pretreated solid tumor patients. Sorafenib dose escalation remains an investigational approach.

Escalating weekly doses of cetuximab and correlation with skin toxicity: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The recommended dosage is an initial load of 400 mg/m² intravenously (IV) followed by a weekly maintenance dose of 250 mg/m². It has been reported retrospectively that cetuximab efficacy was correlated with dose-related severity of skin rash. This study was prospectively designed to examine the safety and feasibility of escalating weekly doses of cetuximab, testing the hypothesis of the relationship of dose-dependent skin toxicity and efficacy. Methods Four dose levels were tested: Cetuximab 400 mg/m² IV loading dose and 250, 300, 350, 400 mg/m² weekly IV maintenance. There was no intra-patient dose escalation. Standard dose limiting toxicity criteria were used. Rash was evaluated using two additional validated dermatology methods: global acne grading scale (GAGS) and acne lesion counting (ALC). Tumor specimens and blood samples were obtained for correlative analyses. RESULTS: Twenty seven patients with solid tumors were enrolled: five head and neck, three pancreas, four gall bladder, two each of prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, and esophagus, and five others. Planned dose escalation was completed without reaching dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) or the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). The highest dose level was expanded to a total of 17 patients. Gr 3/4 toxicities included: lymphopenia (2), fatigue (2), and hypomagnesemia (2). One patient experienced a grade 3 rash (350 mg/m²). Sixty five percent of pts had a ≥ Gr 2 rash that was not dose dependent. In 22 evaluable patients, there was one partial response (PR) in a patient with cholangiocarcinoma (400 mg/m²) and seven patients had stable disease (SD). ALC and GAGS demonstrated no correlation with dose or response. Correlative studies evaluating k-ras, EGFR FISH status and immunologic correlatives were conducted on available tumor samples. CONCLUSIONS: Cetuximab administered at 400 mg/m² IV as a loading dose with weekly maintenance dose of 400 mg/m² is feasible and well tolerated. There was no direct correlation of the grade of rash with dose in this group of patients with heterogenous solid tumors.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: biologic rationale for combination strategies.

Chemotherapy continues to play an essential role in the treatment of most stages of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In fact, within the past 5 years, this role has greatly expanded into adjuvant therapy for early-stage resected disease. Likewise, agents targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), particularly the tyrosine kinase inhibitors gefitinib and erlotinib, have proven to be clinically active in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC. Because of these findings, it is logical to expect that combinations of these 2 classes of antineoplastic agents would prove more efficacious than either one alone. Yet 4 large randomized phase III trials of chemotherapy with or without an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor in unselected patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, altogether totaling > 4000 patients, did not demonstrate improvement in clinical outcomes with the combination. Whether these negative results will be reproduced in ongoing combination studies of chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibodies directed against EGFR remain to be determined. Herein, we review recent preclinical and clinical data addressing this topic and explore the biologic rationale for developing new combination strategies based on patient selection by molecular and clinical factors, or by pharmacodynamic parameters.

Phase III trial of paclitaxel plus carboplatin with or without tirapazamine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Southwest Oncology Group Trial S0003.

PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia confers chemotherapy resistance. Tirapazamine is a cytotoxin that selectively targets hypoxic cells. We conducted a phase III clinical trial to determine whether the addition of tirapazamine to paclitaxel and carboplatin offered a survival advantage when used in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of 396 patients registered, 367 eligible patients were randomly assigned to either arm 1 (n = 181), which consisted of treatment every 21 days with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2/3 h, carboplatin (area under the curve = 6), and tirapazamine 260 mg/m2 in cycle 1 (which was escalated, if tolerable, to 330 mg/m(2) in cycle 2), or arm 2 (n = 186), which consisted of paclitaxel and carboplatin as in arm 1 with no tirapazamine. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar between the two arms. There were no statistically significant differences in response rates, progression-free survival, or overall survival. Patients on arm 1 had significantly (P < .05) more abdominal cramps, fatigue, transient hearing loss, febrile neutropenia, hypotension, myalgias, and skin rash and were removed from treatment more often as a result of toxicity than patients in arm 2 (26% v 13%, respectively; P = .003). More than 40% of patients did not have the tirapazamine dose escalated, primarily because of toxicity. The trial was closed early after an interim analysis demonstrated that the projected 37.5% improvement in survival (8 v 11 months median survival) in arm 1 was unachievable (P = .003). CONCLUSION: The addition of tirapazamine to paclitaxel and carboplatin does not result in improved survival in advanced NSCLC compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone but substantially increases toxicity.

Identification of novel targeting peptides for human ovarian cancer cells using "one-bead one-compound" combinatorial libraries.

Using "one-bead one-compound" combinatorial chemistry technology, we generated random peptide libraries containing millions of 90 mum TentaGel beads, each with its own unique amino acid sequence. A cyclic random 8-mer library was screened with CAOV-3 (a human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line) and beads with a unique ligand that bind to the cell surface receptors were coated by one or more layers of cells. These positive beads were isolated, stripped, and microsequenced. Several peptide motifs were identified from these screenings, some of which were novel and unique, e.g., cDGX(4)GX(6)X(7)c. Structure-activity relationship studies of this peptide revealed that the l-aspartate residue at position 2, the two glycines at positions 3 and 5, and the two d-cysteines at the amino and COOH terminus are critical for activity. In addition, a hydrophobic residue was preferred at position X(4), whereas amino acids at positions X(6) and X(7) were more variable. Binding of this peptide to a number of different cancer cell lines and normal cells was also determined and we observed that peptides with this motif bound preferentially to three other human ovarian cancer cell lines (ES-2, SKOV-3, and OVCAR-3) as well as a human glioblastoma cancer cell line (A172). Structural analysis of the peptides using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy revealed strong conformational similarity among all peptides with cX(1)GX(4)GX(6)X(7)c motif. Blocking study with a panel of anti-integrin antibodies strongly suggests alpha3 integrin present on these ovarian adenocarcinoma cells is the target receptor for this peptide.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a model for investigating the biology of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition.

Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is a previously uncommon subset of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with unique epidemiology, pathology, clinical features, radiographic presentation, and natural history compared with other NSCLC subtypes. Recent data suggest that the incidence of BAC is increasing, notably in younger nonsmoking women. Despite reports of prolonged survival after repeated surgical resection of multifocal lesions and slow growth kinetics, advanced bilateral or recurrent diffuse BAC remains incurable, with the vast majority of patients dying of respiratory failure or intercurrent pneumonia within 5 years. Limited data suggest that chemotherapy may yield poor results in BAC. However, anecdotal reports of prolonged complete response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a member of the human epidermal growth factor receptor (erbB) family, have raised considerable interest in studying this NSCLC subset. Here we present clinical data and preliminary results of correlative science studies analyzing human epidermal growth factor receptor pathways from the following two prospective Southwest Oncology Group clinical trials performed in advanced stage BAC: S9714 testing a 96-h continuous infusion of paclitaxel (Taxol) and S0126 evaluating the small molecule EGFR inhibitor gefitinib (ZD1839 or Iressa). These studies provide a biological rationale for investigating BAC as a model of predictive markers of EGFR inhibition.

Tirapazamine plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in advanced malignant solid tumors: a california cancer consortium phase I and molecular correlative study.

PURPOSE: Tumor hypoxia confers chemotherapy resistance. Tirapazamine is a cytotoxin that selectively targets hypoxic cells and has supra-additive toxicity with platinums and taxanes in preclinical studies. We conducted a Phase I study of tirapazamine, carboplatin, and paclitaxel and assessed potential plasma markers of hypoxia as surrogates for response. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-two patients with advanced solid tumors were treated at four dose levels; parallel dose escalations were carried out in chemotherapy-naive and previously treated subjects. Pre and post-therapy plasma levels of the hypoxia-induced proteins plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor were measured. RESULTS: Three of four chemotherapy-naïve patients developed dose-limiting toxicities at dose level 4 (grade 3 stomatitis/infection, grade 3 emesis, and grade 4 febrile neutropenia). Four of seven previously treated patients developed dose-limiting toxicities at dose level 3, including one death [grade 3 myalgia, grade 3 infection/grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 infection/grade 4 neutropenia, and grade 5 infection (death)/grade 4 neutropenia]. Of 38 patients assessable for response, 3 had a complete response, 1 a partial response, 1 an unconfirmed partial response, and 23 had stable disease in at least one evaluation; 10 quickly progressed. One complete responder had normalization of vascular endothelial growth factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels. CONCLUSION: Dose levels 3 (carboplatin AUC of 6, 225 mg/m(2) paclitaxel, and 330 mg/m(2) tirapazamine) and 2 (carboplatin AUC 6, 225 mg/m(2) paclitaxel, and 260 mg/m(2) tirapazamine) are the maximum tolerated doses for chemotherapy naive and patients treated previously, respectively. Dose level 3 is the experimental arm of a Phase III Southwest Oncology Group trial (S0003) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Potential markers of tumor hypoxia may be useful correlates in studies of hypoxic cytotoxins and are being prospectively investigated in S0003.

Tirapazamine: prototype for a novel class of therapeutic agents targeting tumor hypoxia.

Preclinical models in vitro and in vivo have shown that tumor hypoxia alters the malignant cell phenotype, selecting for p53 mutations, stimulating angiogenesis and metastasis, and markedly reducing the efficacy of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Similarly, clinical studies measuring pretreatment tumor oxygen status confirm that the presence of hypoxia confers a negative impact on local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Despite these data and extensive past research efforts, the promise of developing selective hypoxic-cell sensitizers has been largely unfulfilled. In contrast, tirapazamine is the rationally designed prototype for a new class of therapeutic agents targeting tumor hypoxia: hypoxic cytotoxins. Tirapazamine is bioreductively activated in hypoxic cells and has been shown to potentiate the cytotoxicity of radiation and a number of chemotherapeutic drug classes, in particular platinum compounds and taxanes. This article reviews the preclinical and clinical development of tirapazamine, as well as current trials in non-small cell lung cancer designed to provide proof of principle for this new category of cancer therapeutics.

Concurrent chemoradiation strategies in the management of unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Locally advanced or unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with combined-modality therapy with chemotherapy plus thoracic radiation have improved survival compared to those treated with radiotherapy alone. Furthermore, recent studies in good performance status, stage III patients have shown that concurrent chemoradiotherapy improves survival compared to sequential chemoradiotherapy. However, the optimal chemoradiation approach continues to evolve and is the subject of this review. Since the majority of patients completing chemoradiotherapy will succumb to distant metastatic disease, active systemic agents targeting this tumor compartment are required. Recent data suggest that full-dose chemotherapy designed to eradicate distant micrometastases given either as induction or consolidation has the potential to yield improved patient outcomes. Many of these chemotherapeutic agents are also potent radiosensitizers, hence providing enhanced local control. The integration of these chemotherapeutic agents into chemoradiotherapy programs in stage III NSCLC is the focus of current trials. Ongoing research with novel therapeutic agents with activity against distant micrometastases, refined radiation techniques, and enhanced imaging methodologies to aid in accurate staging are being pursued and should lead to improved survival and toxicity outcomes in this disease.

Antisense oligonucleotides in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Antisense oligonucleotides (ASONs) are one of the new classes of molecularly targeted agents that have transitioned from the laboratory into clinical trials. Rational drug design has resulted in agents directed against a number of important cellular targets, including the mRNA of bcl-2, protein kinase (PK) C-alpha, PKA-I, H-ras, c-raf, R1 and R2 subunit of ribonucleotide reductase, and transforming growth factor beta2. These drugs are well tolerated with favorable toxicity profiles, and preliminary studies have demonstrated that they can be feasibly combined with chemotherapy. Plasma half-life is short, generally necessitating continuous prolonged intravenous infusion. Shorter administration schedules are being investigated. Efficacy has been demonstrated in early-phase studies in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, ovarian cancer, melanoma, and prostate cancer. Molecular correlative studies with peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumor tissue have demonstrated suppression of target proteins, suggesting that these drugs are indeed reaching the target. Here we discuss the current status of development of ASONs, focusing on LY900003 (formerly ISIS 3521), an agent directed against PKC-alpha currently under study in NSCLC. Phase III studies will determine the ultimate role these agents will play in the treatment of cancer. Future areas of study include combination with radiation and other molecularly targeted agents, alternative dosing schedules, liposomal administration, and the development of new antisense agents directed against additional molecular targets.

Trastuzumab plus docetaxel in HER2/neu-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a California Cancer Consortium screening and phase II trial.

HER2 is reported to be overexpressed in 20% of cases of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), principally adenocarcinoma. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody against HER2 that, when combined with a taxane, improves survival compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced breast cancer. In view of these observations, we conducted a phase II HER2 screening and efficacy trial of trastuzumab plus weekly docetaxel in cases of advanced NSCLC in which primary platinum-based therapy had failed. Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC were screened for HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Patients with HER2-positive tumors (2+ or 3+) were initially randomized to either single-agent trastuzumab or docetaxel. After completing 2 treatment cycles, all patients went on to receive the trastuzumab/docetaxel combination regardless of response to the single agents. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week break and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg intravenously on week 1 followed by 2 mg/kg per week thereafter. Cycle length was 8 weeks. Sixty-nine patients with NSCLC (33 men, 36 women) were screened between August 1999 and March 2001. Only 13 patients (19%) had HER2-positive disease; all 13 enrolled in the efficacy trial. Of 9 patients receiving docetaxel alone, 1 partial response (PR) was seen. None responded to trastuzumab alone. The overall outcomes to the sequence of single-agent therapy followed by combination therapy included a PR rate in 8% of cases, stable disease in 23%, progression in 46%, and nonassessable disease in 23%. Estimated event-free and overall survival times were 4.3 and 5.7 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated. The screening component of this trial demonstrated that the target population for trastuzumab therapy in NSCLC is relatively small. Because of the limited clinical activity of trastuzumab-based therapy in this cohort and the similar disappointing reports from other studies of trastuzumab in NSCLC, this trial was closed to further accrual. In view of the limited target population for HER2 inhibition, future efforts and resources should be directed toward molecular targets other than HER2 in NSCLC.

Unfavorable therapeutic index of cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

In view of favorable reports with the 3-drug combination of PGV (cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine), this multicenter phase II study evaluated the therapeutic index of PGV in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-two patients with stage IV NSCLC and 1 with stage IIIB were studied. There were 23 men and 10 women, with a median age of 63 years (range, 38-80 years). Twelve patients had a performance status (PS) of 0, and 21 patients had a PS of 1. Treatment consisted of cisplatin 50 mg/m2, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 all given intravenously on days 1 and 8, in 21-day cycles. Fifteen patients (45%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 28%-64%) achieved a partial response. Median response duration was 3 months (range, 1-9 months). The median and 1-year survival rates were 9.4 months and 39% (95% CI, 23%-58%), respectively. The median number of cycles was 4. Only 3 patients (9%) completed treatment without regimen modifications. Median dose intensity (% planned) was cisplatin 24 mg/m2/week (72%), gemcitabine 483 mg/m2/week (72%), and vinorelbine 12 mg/m2/week (72%). Toxicities were predominantly hematologic, with grade 3/4 neutropenia (67%), febrile neutropenia (21%), and thrombocytopenia (67%). There were 3 (9%) treatment-related deaths due to neutropenic complications. This study confirms the substantial antineoplastic activity of PGV. We observed a high rate of severe hematologic toxicity, especially febrile neutropenia, despite a lower delivered dose intensity of PGV. Given these results, PGV appears to offer no therapeutic advantage to current doublet regimens.

Gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: a phase II California cancer consortium trial.

A phase II trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-containing regimens and prospectively categorized for platinum response status. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The status of p53 in pretreatment tumor tissue was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Sixty-one patients who progressed or recurred following platinum-based therapy were enrolled, 26 platinum-sensitive and 35 platinum-refractory. A median of 4 treatment courses (range, 2-7 courses) was delivered. Of the 55 patients assessable for response, there was 1 confirmed complete response and 3 with a confirmed partial response for an overall response proportion of 7%. Twenty-one patients had stable disease while 28 progressed and 2 patients had an unconfirmed partial response. Three of the responders (2 confirmed, 1 unconfirmed) were platinum-refractory. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival for all patients were 4.1 months and 8.6 months, respectively. Median PFS and overall survival for the platinum-sensitive and platinum-refractory cohorts were 5.4 months versus 3.1 months, and 11.9 months versus 7.1 months, respectively. Toxicity was principally hematologic with grade 3/4 neutropenia in 21% and grade 4 platelets in 8%. There were no treatment-related deaths. Twenty-four of 33 patients (73%) had p53-positive tumors. Although no significant association between platinum sensitivity and p53 status was seen, patients with platinum-sensitive disease and negative p53 by IHC had a trend toward longer survival compared to those with platinum-refractory disease and/or p53 positivity (P = 0.06). We concluded that salvage gemcitabine in this dose and schedule is safe and tolerable in previously platinum-treated patients with NSCLC.

Population-based maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan and carboplatin.

A novel schema of intrapatient dose escalation was applied to determine a population-based maximum tolerated dose (pMTD) for irinotecan (CPT-11, Camptosar) and carboplatin (Paraplatin) in a phase I trial. A total of 74 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled with the following characteristics: men/women, 46/28; median age, 61 years; 51 patients with and 23 patients without prior chemotherapy; performance status of 0-1 (93%) and 2 (7%). Patients were started at dose level 1 with irinotecan at 200 mg/m2, and carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5 mg/mL x min, administered every 21 days. Depending on degree of toxicity observed, the dose for each patient in each subsequent cycle was determined according to a predetermined schema of dose levels. Individual maximum tolerated dose (iMTD) was determined for each patient. The pMTD was defined as the highest dose level for which the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity occurred in less than 33% of the patient population. The most common dose-limiting toxicity included neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (15%), diarrhea (8%), and nausea/emesis (7%). The iMTD ranged from dose level-3 (irinotecan at 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an AUC of 4) to dose level 5 (irinotecan at 350 mg/m2 and carboplatin at AUC 6). The pMTD was determined to be dose level-1 and 1 for previously chemotherapy-treated and--untreated patients, respectively. Fifty-nine patients were assessable for response. Of note, a response rate of 40% was observed in 15 patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based therapy. We recommend dose level 1 of irinotecan (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) for chemotherapynaive patients, and dose level-1 of irinotecan (150 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 5) for chemotherapy-treated patients in phase II trials.

Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

IMPORTANCE: Radiation therapy to the head and neck has traditionally been associated with adverse effects that can affect oral health and physical functioning. Although intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been widely adopted as a means of decreasing toxic effects, limited clinical data exist on its potential effect on long-term quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To analyze quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated with IMRT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis studied 50 consecutive long-term survivors of head and neck cancer from a comprehensive cancer center who had previously undergone IMRT that required bilateral neck irradiation for locally advanced disease. All patients were clinically without evidence of recurrent disease and had at least 5 years of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL) scores were reviewed for all study participants. The UW-QOL questionnaire consists of 12 domains that pertain to the degree of quality of life in the categories of pain, appearance, activity, recreation, swallowing, chewing, speech, shoulder function, taste, saliva, mood, and anxiety. RESULTS: Five years after completion of IMRT, 42 patients (84%) reported that their health-related quality of life was "much better" or "somewhat better" than at the time of cancer diagnosis. With respect to recent health-related quality of life during the preceding 7 days at the time of completing the UW-QOL questionnaire, 40 patients (80%) treated with IMRT reported "outstanding" or "very good" levels of functioning. Five years after completion of treatment, 41 (82%) rated their overall quality of life as "outstanding" or "very good." The lowest domain score on the UW-QOL questionnaire at 5 years pertained to salivary dysfunction. However, 42 patients (84%) reported saliva "of normal consistency" or "less saliva than normal but enough" compared with 8 (16%) reporting "too little saliva." No patient reported having "no saliva." CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings add to the body of literature that supports the acceptance of IMRT as standard treatment for head and neck cancer. The fact that most 5-year survivors were satisfied with their quality of lives points to the ability of IMRT to preserve long-term functioning.

A Pilot Study (SWOG S0429) of Weekly Cetuximab and Chest Radiotherapy for Poor-Risk Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor performance status (PS) or co-morbidities are often not candidates for standard chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) due to poor tolerance to treatments. A pilot study for poor-risk stage III NSCLC patients was conducted combining cetuximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with chest radiation (RT). METHODS: Stage III NSCLC patients with Zubrod PS 2, or Zubrod PS 0-1 with poor pulmonary function and co-morbidities prohibiting chemoRT were eligible. A loading dose of cetuximab (400 mg/m(2)) was delivered week 1, followed by weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m(2))/RT to 64.8 Gy in 1.8 Gy daily fractions, and maintenance weekly cetuximab (250 mg/m(2)) for 2 years or until disease progression. H-score for EGFR protein expression was conducted in available tumors. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Twenty-two were assessed for outcome and toxicity. Median survival was 14 months and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The response rate was 47% and disease control rate was 74%. Toxicity assessment revealed 22.7% overall ≥Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities. Grade 3 esophagitis was observed in one patient (5%). The skin reactions were mostly Grade 1 or 2 except two of 22 (9%) had Grade 3 acne and one of 22 (5%) had Grade 3 radiation skin burn. Grade 3-4 hypomagnesemia was seen in four (18%) patients. One patient (5%) had elevated cardiac troponin and pulmonary emboli. H-score did not reveal prognostic significance. An initially planned second cohort of the study did not commence due to slow accrual, which would have added weekly docetaxel to cetuximab/RT after completion of the first cohort of patients. CONCLUSION: Concurrent weekly cetuximab/chest RT followed by maintenance cetuximab for poor-risk stage III NSCLC was well tolerated. Further studies with larger sample sizes will be useful to establish the optimal therapeutic ratio of this regimen.

Differential response rates to irradiation among patients with human papillomavirus positive and negative oropharyngeal cancer.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the responsiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) -positive and HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), using axial imaging obtained daily during the course of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study with matched-pair analysis of patients irradiated for HPV-positive and HPV-negative oropharygeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients treated by IMRT to 70 Gy for locally advanced, HPV-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx were matched to one HPV-negative control subject by age, gender, performance status, T-category, tumor location, and the use of concurrent chemotherapy. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on daily IGRT scans obtained via kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Mathematical modeling using fitted mixed-effects repeated measure analysis was performed to quantitatively and descriptively assess the trajectory of tumor regression. RESULTS: Patients with HPV-positive tumors experienced a more rapid rate of tumor regression between day 1 of IMRT and the beginning of week 2 (-33% Δ GTV) compared to their counterparts with HPV-negative tumors (-10% Δ GTV), which was statistically significant (p<0.001). During this initial period, the average absolute change in GTV was -22.9 cc/week for HPV-positive tumors and -5.9 cc/week for HPV-negative tumors (p<0.001). After week 2 of IMRT, the rates of GTV regression were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancers exhibited an enhanced response to radiation, characterized by a dramatically more rapid initial regression than those with HPV-negative tumors. Implications for treatment de-intensification in the context of future clinical trials and the possible mechanisms underlying this increased radiosensitivity will be discussed.

Southwestern oncology group phase II trial (S0526) of pemetrexed in bronchioloalveolar carcinoma subtypes of advanced adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed, a multitargeted antifolate drug, is an active agent in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially adenocarcinomas. Based on preclinical data supporting the relevance of alpha-folate receptors in adenocarcinoma of the bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) subtype, this trial was designed to assess pemetrexed in patients with this pathologic subtype of lung adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) or stage IV adenocarcinoma with BAC features or pure BAC were eligible. Treatment consisted of pemetrexed, 500 mg/m(2), administered intravenously every 21 days. RESULTS: Of 27 patients enrolled, 24 were eligible and assessable for adverse events: Toxicity was primarily hematologic, consisting of leukopenia/neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. The median follow-up among patients still alive (n = 8) was 35 months (range, 26-47 months). Among 17 patients with measurable disease, the response rate was 23% (all partial responses; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-56%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6 and 25 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Pemetrexed is active and well tolerated and, in patients with adenocarcinoma BAC subtypes, likely related to its underlying mechanism of action as a multitargeted antifolate drug.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy is associated with improved global quality of life among long-term survivors of head-and-neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term quality of life among patients treated with and without intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head-and-neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The University of Washington Quality of Life instrument scores were reviewed for 155 patients previously treated with radiation therapy for locally advanced head-and-neck cancer. All patients were disease free and had at least 2 years of follow-up. Eighty-four patients (54%) were treated with IMRT. The remaining 71 patients (46%) were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) by use of initial opposed lateral fields matched to a low anterior neck field. RESULTS: The mean global quality of life scores were 67.5 and 80.1 for the IMRT patients at 1 and 2 years, respectively, compared with 55.4 and 57.0 for the 3D CRT patients, respectively (p < 0.001). At 1 year after the completion of radiation therapy, the proportion of patients who rated their global quality of life as "very good" or "outstanding" was 51% and 41% among patients treated by IMRT and 3DCRT, respectively (p = 0.11). At 2 years, the corresponding percentages increased to 73% and 49%, respectively (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis accounting for sex, age, radiation intent (definitive vs. postoperative), radiation dose, T stage, primary site, use of concurrent chemotherapy, and neck dissection, the use of IMRT was the only variable independently associated with improved quality of life (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: The early quality of life improvements associated with IMRT not only are maintained but apparently become more magnified over time. These data provide powerful evidence attesting to the long-term benefits of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer.