Image quality of ultra-low radiation exposure coronary CT angiography with an effective dose <0.1 mSv using high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the potential of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition with low tube voltage and current in combination with iterative reconstruction to achieve coronary CT angiography with sufficient image quality at an effective dose below 0.1 mSv. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced coronary dual source CT angiography (2 × 128 × 0.6 mm, 80 kV, 50 mAs) in prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition mode was performed in 21 consecutive individuals (body weight <100 kg, heart rate ≤60/min). Images were reconstructed with raw data-based filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction (IR). Image quality was assessed on a 4-point scale (1 = no artefacts, 4 = unevaluable). RESULTS: Mean effective dose was 0.06 ± 0.01 mSv. Image noise was significantly reduced in IR (128.9 ± 46.6 vs. 158.2 ± 44.7 HU). The mean image quality score was lower for IR (1.9 ± 1.1 vs. 2.2 ± 1.0, P < 0.0001). Of 292 coronary segments, 55 in FBP and 40 in IR (P = 0.12) were graded "unevaluable". In patients with a body weight ≤75 kg, both in FBP and in IR, the rates of fully evaluable segments were significantly higher in comparison to patients >75 kg. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary CT angiography with an estimated effective dose <0.1 mSv may provide sufficient image quality in selected patients through the combination of high-pitch spiral acquisition and raw data-based iterative reconstruction.

Influence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors on the Prevalence of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Angiographically Normal Coronary Arteries.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is predominately influenced by CV risk factors and coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) is capable of detecting early-stage coronary artery disease. We sought to determine the influence of CV risk factors on the prevalence of nonobstructive atherosclerosis in patients with normal-appearing coronary arteries in invasive coronary angiography (ICA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, we included 60 consecutive symptomatic patients, having undergone ICA and coronary CTA. Coronary dual source CTA was performed using electrocardiogram-triggered retrospective gated image acquisition at 40%-70% of RR interval (tube voltage 100-120 kV, tube current time product 320-440 mAs, 60 mL contrast, and flow rate 6 mL/s). RESULTS: Out of 60 patients (32 men, mean age 61 ± 11 years) with a normal coronary artery appearance in ICA, 45 (75%) patients showed atherosclerotic plaque in CTA. Plaque was present in 14 of 60 (23%) left main, 41 of 60 (68%) left anterior descending, 21 of 60 (35%) circumflex coronary arteries, and 24 of 60 (40%) right coronary arteries. More than 15% of all coronary artery segments showed detectable plaques. Interobserver agreement ranged from good to very good on a per-patient, per-vessel, and per-segment level. Patients with presence of plaque were significantly older (P = 0.005) and showed higher incidence of arterial hypertension (P = 0.019) as compared to individuals without coronary plaque in dual source computed tomography. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis by CTA is substantial in symptomatic patients with normal invasive coronary angiogram. Hypertension and older age significantly influence the prevalence of atherosclerotic plaque and highlight the importance of risk-modifying therapy.

Accuracy of prospectively ECG-triggered very low-dose coronary dual-source CT angiography using iterative reconstruction for the detection of coronary artery stenosis: comparison with invasive catheterization.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of very low-dose computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) for the evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. BACKGROUND: Iterative reconstruction (IR) has shown to substantially reduce image noise and hence permit the use of very low-dose data acquisition protocols in coronary CTA. METHODS: Fifty symptomatic patients with an intermediate likelihood for coronary artery disease underwent coronary CTA (heart rate: 59 ± 5 bpm, prospectively ECG-triggered axial acquisition, 100 kV, 160 mAs, 2 × 128 × 0.6 mm collimation, 60 mL contrast, 6 mL/s) prior to invasive coronary angiography. CTA images were reconstructed using both standard filtered back projection (FBP) and a raw data-based IR algorithm [Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE), Siemens Healthcare]. Subjective image quality (four-point Likert scale from 0 = non-diagnostic to 3 = excellent image quality), image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), as well as the presence of coronary stenosis >50% were independently determined by two observers. RESULTS: The mean dose-length product was 46.8 ± 3.5 mGy cm (estimated effective dose 0.66 ± 0.05 mSv). IR led to significantly improved objective image quality compared with FBP (image noise: 41 ± 12 vs. 49 ± 11 HU, P < 0.0001; CNR: 16 ± 8 vs. 12 ± 4, P < 0.0001; SNR: 13 ± 7 vs. 10 ± 3, P < 0.0001). Four coronary segments were not evaluable on FBP data, whereas all segments showed diagnostic image quality with IR. To detect significant coronary stenosis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 69% (11/16), 97% (175/180), 69% (11/16), and 97% (175/180) per vessel with FBP data sets, respectively. With IR data sets, the corresponding values were 81% (13/16), 97% (178/184), 68% (13/19), and 98% (178/181). These differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.617). CONCLUSIONS: Raw data-based IR significantly improves image quality in very low-dose prospectively ECG-triggered coronary dual-source CTA when compared with standard reconstruction using FBP.

Low-dose dual-source CT angiography with iterative reconstruction for coronary artery stent evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic accuracy of very low-dose, dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) angiography for the evaluation of coronary stents. BACKGROUND: Iterative reconstruction (IR) leads to substantial reduction of image noise and hence permits the use of very low-dose data acquisition protocols in coronary computed tomography angiography. METHODS: Fifty symptomatic patients with 87 coronary stents (diameter 3.0 ± 0.4 mm) underwent coronary DSCT angiography (heart rate, 60 ± 6 beats/min; prospectively electrocardiography-triggered axial acquisition; 80 kV, 165 mA, 2 × 128 × 0.6-mm collimation; 60 ml of contrast at 6 ml/s) before invasive coronary angiography. DSCT images were reconstructed using both standard filtered back projection and a raw data-based IR algorithm (SAFIRE, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). Subjective image quality (4-point scale from 0 [nondiagnostic] to 3 [excellent image quality]), image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio as well as the presence of in-stent stenosis >50% were independently determined by 2 observers. RESULTS: The median dose-length product was 23.0 (22.0; 23.0) mGy · cm (median estimated effective dose of 0.32 [0.31; 0.32] mSv). IR led to significantly improved image quality compared with filtered back projection (image quality score, 1.8 ± 0.6 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5, p < 0.05; image noise, 70 Hounsfield units [62; 80 Hounsfield units] vs. 96 Hounsfield units [82; 113 Hounsfield units], p < 0.001; contrast-to-noise ratio, 11.0 [9.6; 12.4] vs. 8.0 [6.2; 9.3], p < 0.001). To detect significant coronary stenosis in filtered back projection reconstructions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 97% (32 of 33), 53% (9 of 17), 80% (32 of 40), and 90% (9 of 10) per patient, respectively; 89% (43 of 48), 79% (120 of 152), 57% (42 of 74), and 96% (121 of 126) per vessel, respectively; and 85% (12 of 14), 69% (51 of 73), 32% (11 of 34), and 96% (51 of 53) per stent, respectively. In reconstructions obtained by IR, the corresponding values were 100% (33 of 33), 65% (11 of 17), 85% (33 of 39), and 100% (11 of 11) per patient, respectively; 96% (46 of 48), 84% (129 of 152), 66% (47 of 71), and 98% (127 of 129) per vessel, respectively; and 100% (14 of 14), 75% (55 of 73), 44% (14 of 32), and 100% (55 of 55) per stent, respectively. These differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients, prospectively electrocardiography-triggered image acquisition with 80-kV tube voltage and low current in combination with IR permits the evaluation of patients with implanted coronary artery stents with reasonable diagnostic accuracy at very low radiation exposure.

Automated attenuation-based selection of tube voltage and tube current for coronary CT angiography: reduction of radiation exposure versus a BMI-based strategy with an expert investigator.

BACKGROUND: Recently developed automated algorithms use the topogram and the corresponding attenuation information before coronary CT angiography (CTA) to allow for an individualized anatomic-based selection of tube current (mAs) and voltage (kV). OBJECTIVES: The value of these algorithms in reducing the associated radiation exposure was evaluated. METHODS: One hundred patients underwent coronary CTA with dual-source CT with prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered axial data acquisition. In all patients, tube parameters (current and voltage) were suggested by both an experienced investigator according to the patient's body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight divided by height squared; kg/m(2)) and by an automated software according to attenuation values of the initial topogram. The first 50 consecutive patients (group 1) underwent coronary CTA with dual-source CT with tube parameters suggested by the experienced investigator (BMI-based tube parameters), whereas in another 50 consecutive patients (group 2) CT data acquisition was performed with tube settings of the automated software. Subsequently, subjective image quality (4-point rating score from 0 = nondiagnostic to 3 = excellent image quality), image noise (SD of CT number within the aortic root), as well as signal- and contrast-to-noise ratios and mean effective radiation doses, were compared between both groups. RESULTS: Both groups showed comparable image quality parameters (group 1 vs 2: noise, 28.1 ± 6.0 HU vs 29.9 ± 5.4 HU, P = .12; signal-to-noise ratio, 16.4 ± 3.9 vs 16.8 ± 4.1, P = .54; contrast-to-noise ratio, 18.6 ± 4.1 vs 19.2 ± 4.3, P = .49; 4-point rating score, 2.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.9 ± 0.3, P = .81). Tube voltage, current, and mean effective radiation dose for groups 1 and 2 were 111 ± 12 kV and 108 ± 12 kV (P = .18), 361 ± 32 mAs and 320 ± 48 mAs (P < .001), and 2.3 mSv (25th; 75th percentile, 1.5; 2.8 mSv) and 1.4 mSv (25th; 75th percentile, 1.1; 1.9 mSv) (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Automated attenuation-based selections of individualized tube parameters are superior to BMI-based selections with expert oversight and show a potential for reduction of radiation exposure in coronary CTA, and image quality is maintained.

Stent evaluation in low-dose coronary CT angiography: effect of different iterative reconstruction settings.

BACKGROUND: Different iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques compensate increased noise from lower tube current-time product settings, yet the differences between IR settings remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: Aim of this study was to test whether different IR settings have a clinically relevant influence on image quality and on the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT angiography in patients with a stent. METHODS: Forty-two patients with 73 coronary stents were prospectively enrolled. Data were acquired with dual-source CT, and images were reconstructed with standard filtered back projection (FBP) and raw data-based IR with different settings (I3, I4, I5). Quantitative parameters, including CT-attenuation, noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, as well as the presence of in-stent stenosis > 50% were determined. All patients had invasive angiography as reference standard. RESULTS: Mean effective dose was 0.32 ± 0.02 mSv. Image noise decreased significantly compared with FBP (I3 = 29%; I4 = 38% and I5 = 45%), whereas signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios increased significantly (all IR settings P < .01). Subjective image quality was superior with all IR settings (P < .01). FBP sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 83%, 71%, 36%, and 96% per stent compared with 100%, 76%, 44%, and 100%, respectively, in IR reconstructions independent of the IR setting applied. CONCLUSION: In low-dose coronary CT angiography, higher IR settings significantly improved subjective and objective image quality but had no effect on accuracy.

Intravenous infusion of ascorbic acid decreases serum histamine concentrations in patients with allergic and non-allergic diseases.

Histamine plays an important role in the development of symptoms in allergic, infectious, neoplastic and other diseases. Empirical findings have suggested beneficial effects of ascorbic acid supplementation in those diseases, and these effects are assumed to be related to a possible decrease in systemic histamine concentration. In the present study, we systematically investigated for the first time the effect of 7.5 g of intravenously administered ascorbic acid on serum histamine levels (as detected by ELISA) in 89 patients (19 with allergic and 70 with infectious diseases). When all patients were grouped together, there was a significant decline in histamine concentration from 0.83 to 0.57 ng/ml×m2 body surface area (BSA, p<0.0001). The decrease in serum histamine concentration in patients with allergic diseases (1.36 to 0.69 ng/ml×m2 BSA, p=0.0007) was greater than that in patients with infectious diseases (0.73 to 0.56 ng/ml×m2 BSA, p=0.01). Furthermore, the decline in histamine concentration after ascorbic acid administration was positively correlated with the basal, i.e. pre-therapeutic, histamine concentration. Intravenous infusion of ascorbic acid clearly reduced histamine concentrations in serum, and may represent a therapeutic option in patients presenting with symptoms and diseases associated with pathologically increased histamine concentration.